Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Semantics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

BERT-E: An Earth Science Specific Language Model for Domain-Specific Downstream Tasks

Language models are fast approaching human-like understanding of natural language. They have been shown to perform equally, if not better than humans in a myriad of language tasks such as next sentence prediction, question answering, entity extraction etc. Part of the success of the models are owed to the fact that they have been trained on varied natural language text over the internet. By virtue of this, the models do not contain the semantic information present in Earth science literature. Hence, there is a lot of room for improvement when using these models for earth science specific tasks. In this work, we showcase our approach on developing Earth science specific language models. Furthermore, we justify the need for such a model by using the embeddings generated by the model to perform a domain specific downstream task that performs better than a generic model.

Prasanna Koirala↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trend Analysis of AI/ML Tools and Services in NASA

Usage of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms within NASA’s Science Mission Directorates have been increasing over the years. This can be quantitatively observed in the upward trends of ML usage found by analyzing the publications and presentations (in affiliation with NASA) available through NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) and PubMed Central(PMC). Identifying the problem types and class of ML algorithms used to tackle them across the divisions can present opportunities for collaborations, interdisciplinary projects and knowledge transfer for sustainable partnerships. In this presentation, we will present the trend analysis of ML algorithms used in different SMD divisions based on the publications and presentations publicly available. We identify these trends by leveraging ML algorithms which are able to search through the publication texts semantically; which are also highly scalable. We will also present an analysis on the available opensource tools and services in NASA leveraging AI/ML algorithms. This work will provide ample avenues for collaborative efforts across different disciplines based on the surfaced trends.

Slesa Adhikari↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trend Analysis of AI/ML Tools and Services in NASA

Usage of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms within NASA’s Science Mission Directorates have been increasing over theyears. This can be quantitatively observed in the upward trends of ML usage found by analyzing the publications andpresentations (in affiliation with NASA) available through NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) and PubMed Central(PMC). Identifying the problem types and class of ML algorithms used to tackle them across the divisions can presentopportunities for collaborations, interdisciplinary projects and knowledge transfer for sustainable partnerships. In thispresentation, we will present the trend analysis of ML algorithms used in different SMD divisions based on the publicationsand presentations publicly available. We identify these trends by leveraging ML algorithms which are able to search throughthe publication texts semantically; which are also highly scalable. We will also present an analysis on the available opensource tools and services in NASA leveraging AI/ML algorithms. This work will provide ample avenues for collaborativeefforts across different disciplines based on the surfaced trends.

Slesa Adhikari↗
NASA NTRS2022

Integrating FRET with Copilot: Automated Translation of Natural Language Requirements to Runtime Monitors

Runtime verification (RV) enables monitoring systems at runtime, to detect property violations early and limit their potential consequences. To provide the level of assurance required for ultra-critical systems, monitor specifications must faithfully reflect the original mission requirements, which are often written in ambiguous natural language. This paper presents an end-to-end framework to capture requirements in structured natural language and generate monitors that capture their semantics faithfully. We leverage NASA’s Formal Requirement Elicitation Tool (FRET), and the RV system Copilot. We extend FRET with mechanisms to capture additional information needed to generate monitors, and introduce OGMA, a new tool to bridge the gap between FRET and Copilot. With this framework, users can write requirements in an intuitive format and obtain real-time C monitors suitable for use in embedded systems. Our tool chain is available as open source.

FRET↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Application of a Dataset-Publication Knowledge Graph for Improving Earth Science Data Search

Finding a dataset at a NASA data center that is the best fit for the researcher’s application presents a challenge, not only for a novice user but for an experienced one, due to the data complexity and a multitude of choices of the existing data. Users often search for the data based on the application they are interested in, their research domain, phenomena, research topic, etc. As existing dataset metadata may not cover these search terms, the user may not obtain the most relevant results for their purpose. This problem was addressed by leveraging the content of the titles and abstracts of the research papers that utilize NASA datasets. For this, features from the paper titles and abstracts were extracted, and then a knowledge graph (KG) was used to link these features to the datasets used in that paper. The search for the datasets was tested by querying this knowledge graph through various terms extracted from Earth Science ontologies such as Semantic Web for Earth and Environment Technology (SWEET), and it was shown that this KG search outperforms the existing search that exclusively queries the dataset metadata.

Kristina Stoyanova↗
NASA NTRS2022

Towards an Implementation of Differential Dynamic Logic in PVS

This paper describes an ongoing effort to embed and verify differential dynamic logic (dL) in the Prototype Verification System (PVS). dL is a logic for specifying and formally reasoning about hybrid systems, which employ both continuous and discrete dynamics. There are several benefits of this effort. First, the embedding of dL in PVS offers an independent formal verification of the semantics and rules of dL. Second, the embedding is fully operational within PVS, giving PVS practitioners the ability to use dL in the formal specification and verification process. Third, the rich specification language, type system, and powerful interactive prover of PVS can be used on dL objects. In addition to the embedding and verification of dL, a custom extension for Visual Studio Code has been developed, so that a stylized dL syntax can be used to specify hybrid programs and their properties.

Differential Dynamic Logic↗
NASA NTRS2022

Revisiting the Solar Research Cyberinfrastructure Needs: A White Paper of Findings and Recommendations

Solar and Heliosphere physics are areas of remarkable data-driven discoveries. Recent advances in high cadence, high-resolution multiwavelength observations, growing amounts of data from realistic modeling, and operational needs for uninterrupted science-quality data coverage generate the demand for a solar metadata standardization and overall healthy data infrastructure. This white paper is prepared as an effort of the working group “Uniform Semantics and Syntax of Solar Observations and Events” created within the “Towards Integration of Heliophysics Data, Modeling, and Analysis Tools” EarthCube Research Coordination Network (@HDMIEC RCN), with primary objectives to discuss current advances and identify future needs for the solar research cyberinfrastructure. The white paper summarizes presentations and discussions held during the special working group session at the EarthCube Annual Meeting on June 19th, 2020, as well as community contribution gathered during a series of preceding workshops and subsequent RCN working group sessions. The authors provide examples of the current standing of the solar research cyberinfrastructure, and describe the problems related to current data handling approaches. The list of the top-level recommendations agreed by the authors of the current white paper is presented at the beginning of the paper.

SMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA GeneLab: Open Science for Life in Space

The NASA GeneLab project capitalizes on multi-omic technologies to maximize the return on spaceflight experiments. To do this, GeneLab maintains a publicly accessible database (GLDS) that houses spaceflight and spaceflight relevant multi-omics data and collaborates with NASA principal investigators and projects to generate additional omics data. GeneLab houses more than 350 transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and epigenomic datasets from plant, animal and microbial experiments, with a growing number of these having been produced by the GeneLab Sequencing Lab. The GLDS contains rich metadata about each experiment and has integrated radiation dosimetry data from experiments flown on the Space Shuttle, International Space Station, and Free Flying spacecrafts. With the increasing amount and complexity of omics data being generated, GeneLab utilizes community-defined, common models for metadata and terminology so that omics data and results are discoverable and reliably reproducible. GeneLab uses the ISA-Tab specification and semantic model for organizing and representing omics metadata. In addition to metadata standards, data files must be open-source file or common exchange formats to ensure accessibility and usability by all users. To ease data ingestion and transfer, the web-based submission tool allows PIs a user-friendly user interface to curate, organize, and publish their space relevant omics data. In the more recent years, data curation and submission portal has incorporated the FAIR principles making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. To increase reusability of data, GeneLab has implemented an effort to present processed data in the GLDS in addition to the raw omics data. The processed data will enable interpretation of the data by a larger group of students, scientists and the general public. Standard pipelines for the transformation of raw data into visualizations were developed by four GeneLab Analysis Working Groups (animals, plants, microbes, multi-omics) comprised of over 200 scientists from NASA, industry, and academia. To explore the data, the GLDS provides users various tools for data analysis, collaborative workspace for file storage and sharing, and a visualization portal. The analysis platform built using the Galaxy toolshed provides access to a broad variety of users including those with limited bioinformatics experience and students to learn how to analyze spaceflight omics data. The visualization portal takes GeneLab one step closer to data democratization by removing all bioinformatics requisites to interpret transcriptomics data hosted in the repository. To train the next generation of scientists, NASA offers training programs such as GeneLab 4 High School (GL4HS) and GeneLab 4 Universities. NLM Curation at a Scale Workshop 2022 | NASA GeneLab (GL4U) to teach students bioinformatics and computational biology methods to analyze omics data. Discoveries made using GeneLab have begun and will continue to deepen our understanding of biology, advance the field of genomics, and help to discover cures for diseases, create better diagnostic tools, and ultimately allow astronauts to better withstand the rigors of long-duration spaceflight.

GeneLab↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Capturing and Analyzing Requirements with FRET

FRET is an open source tool, developed at NASA Ames, for writing, understanding, formalizing, and analyzing requirements. In practice, requirements are typically written in natural language, which is ambiguous and consequently not amenable to formal analysis. Since formal, mathematical notations are unintuitive, requirements in FRET are entered in a restricted, natural language, called FRETish with precise unambiguous meaning. FRET helps users write FRETish requirements both by providing grammar information and examples during editing, but also through English and diagrammatic explanations to clarify subtle semantic issues. For each requirement, FRET automatically produces formalizations and supports interactive simulation of produced formalizations to ensure that they capture user intentions. Through its analysis portal, FRET connects to analysis tools by exporting verification code. Currently FRET connects to (1) the CoCoSim automated analysis tool for the verification of Simulink and Stateflow models, and (2) the Copilot runtime monitoring tool for the analysis of C programs. FRET also supports the consistency/realizability analysis of requirements for identifying conflicting requirements. In this tutorial, we introduce FRET and learn to speak and analyze FRETish through several examples.

FRET↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

FRET Tutorial

In this tutorial, we present the FRET tool for writing, understanding, formalizing and analyzing requirements. In practice, requirements are typically written in natural language, which is ambiguous and consequently not amenable to formal analysis. Since formal, mathematical notations are unintuitive, requirements in FRET are entered in a restricted, natural language, called FRETish with precise unambiguous meaning. This tutorial explains how requirements can be captured in FRETish and subsequently formalized in temporal logics and in the synchronous data flow language Lustre. We show, through multiple examples, how FRET assists users in understanding FRETish requirements and clarifying subtle semantic issues through English and diagrammatic explanations as well as interactive simulation. FInally, this tutorial describes how FRET can be used to perform realizability checking for identifying conflicting requirements and the connection of FRET with (1) the CoCoSim automated analysis tool for the verification of Simulink and Stateflow models, and (2) the Copilot runtime monitoring tool for the analysis of C programs.

FRET↗
NASA NTRS2022

FPP: A Modeling Language for F Prime

We present F Prime Prime (FPP), a new open-source modeling language for F Prime. F Prime is an open-source flight software framework developed at JPL and deployed, among other places, on the Mars helicopter Ingenuity. FPP provides a convenient way to model the architectural elements of an F Prime application, e.g., components, ports, and their connections. It has a succinct and readable syntax, a well- defined semantics, and robust error checking and reporting. The FPP tool suite, written in Scala, analyzes FPP models, reports errors, and translates correct FPP models to a combination of XML and C++. Existing F Prime tools translate the XML to a partial implementation in C++, to be completed by the developers. The model elements have clean interfaces and are highly reusable. An accompanying visualization tool constructs diagrams of components and connections that FSW developers can use to understand and communicate their designs, for ex- ample at reviews. We discuss the design and implementation of FPP and the integration of FPP into F Prime. We also discuss our experience using FPP to construct F Prime models. Finally, we discuss our plans for future work, including improved code generation, improved visualization, and more advanced analysis capabilities.

Starch, Michael D.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Open Science for Life in Space: Data Sharing and Tools for Knowledge Discovery

Molecular-omics, physiological-phenotypic-behavioral, and environmental-radiation telemetry data from spaceflight biological and health studies are increasingly being made findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable for the scientific public. These data, as well as space science-relevant biospecimens, are available through NASA’s Open Science Data Repository (OSDR), which is the new umbrella grouping of NASA GeneLab, the Ames Life Sciences Data Archive (ALSDA), and the NASA Biological Institutional Scientific Collection (NBISC). The quality of data is underpinned by datasets having rich metadata (determined through Analysis Working Group members), processing pipelines to enable data reuse standards, and ontologies specifying terminology semantics (e.g., the Radiation Biology Ontology).

space biology↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Authoring, Analyzing, and Monitoring Requirements for a Lift-Plus-Cruise Aircraft

Requirements specification and analysis is widely applied to ensure the correctness of industrial systems in safety critical domains. Requirements are often initially written in natural language, which is highly ambiguous, and as a second step transformed into a language with rigorous semantics for formal analysis. [Question/problem] In this paper, we report on our experience in requirements creation and analysis, as well as run-time monitor generation using the Formal Requirement Elicitation Tool (FRET), on an industrial case study for a Lift-Plus-Cruise concept aircraft. [Principal ideas/results] We study the creation of requirements directly in the structured language of FRET without a prior definition of the same requirements in natural language. We focus on requirements describing state machines and discuss the challenges that we faced, in terms of creating requirements and generating monitors. We demonstrate how realizability, i.e., checking whether a requirements specification can be implemented, is crucial for understanding temporal interdependencies among requirements. [Contribution] Our study is the first complete attempt at using FRET to create industrial, realizable requirements and generate run-time monitors. Insight from lessons learned was materialized into new features in the FRET and JKind analysis frameworks.

Requirements engineering↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Embedding Differential Dynamic Logic in PVS

Differential dynamic logic (dL) is a formal framework for specifying and reasoning about hybrid systems, i.e., dynamical systems that exhibit both continuous and discrete behaviors. These kinds of systems arise in many safety- and mission-critical applications. This paper presents a formalization of dL in the Prototype Verification System (PVS) that includes the semantics of hybrid programs and dL’s proof calculus. The formalization embeds dL into the PVS logic, resulting in a version of dL whose proof calculus is not only formally verified, but is also available for the verification of hybrid programs within PVS itself. This embedding, called Plaidypvs (Properly Assured Implementation of dL for Hybrid Program Verification and Specification), supports standard dL style proofs, but further leverages the capabilities of PVS to allow reasoning about entire classes of hybrid programs. The embedding also allows the user to import the well-established definitions and mathematical theories available in PVS.

PVS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Data Sharing in Radiobiology; Towards FAIR

The value of scientific data depends on their findability, accessibility, integrability and reusability according to the FAIR principles. Together with the sustainability of data preservation and access, these principles underpin the long term benefits of scientific research. Within the domain of radiobiology we have a huge array of data types, themes and complexities which make standardisation of metadata, data structure and data integration very challenging. Moreover, it is clear that, for example, in the area of disaster preparedness, the ready discovery and availability of multiple types of data, for example on biological effects of exposure, climatology, ecology, human behavioural and attitudinal studies, is important for an integrated scientific approach. Because these data are spread over many databases, journal supplementary information resources and even the computers of the investigators, their discovery and reuse can be challenging. Despite exhortations from funding agencies and scientific institutions over the past two decades there is still a serious deficit in the willingness and in some cases the ability of investigators to share data, and although much may not be formally „Public domain“, information about the existence of the data, their metadata, and how to obtain them should always be available. We report the progress of work on three databases, the STORE and the NASA GeneLab and LSDA repositories to leverage the Radiation Biology Ontology (RBO), a structured terminology for metadata that can be used by all radiation biology-relevant databases to unite federated and automated data searches across multiple databases, for example using web services, and through semantic web technologies supporting data discovery. The initial primary use-cases for RBO were archiving data in the STORE database (https://www.storedb.org/), the repository used for the RadoNorm and Pianoforte Projects among others, and in the NASA Open Science Data Repository (https://osdr.nasa.gov/bio). The scope of radiobiology research ranges from basic physics to radiation oncology to sociolegal studies; no existing ontology had the necessary breadth or depth to fulfill this need. In addition, a formal ontology has the advantage of being usable for machine learning and, importantly, for tasks like data integration, knowledge extraction from the scientific literature and for query extension and data classification. Standardisation of metadata is one of the primary objectives of the FAIR principles for open data; RBO is an important landmark for FAIR-compliant radiation biology data sharing. The RBO is developed using the open-source tools of GitHub and the OBO Foundry-led Ontology Development Kit, and published through GitHub and the NIH/NCBI BioPortal website. This initial phase of concept modeling has yielded an ontology that has more than 300 declared concepts, with more than 3500 additional concepts imported from other OBO Foundry ontologies with relevance to radiation biology (for example, concepts from the ISO standard Basic Formal Ontology, the Environment Ontology and the Gene Ontology). We welcome input into the development of RBO and encourage its adoption.

ontologies↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Authoring, Analyzing, and Monitoring Requirements for a Lift-Plus-Cruise Aircraft

Requirements specification and analysis is widely applied to ensure the correctness of industrial systems in safety critical domains. Requirements are often initially written in natural language, which is highly ambiguous, and as a second step transformed into a language with rigorous semantics for formal analysis. In this paper, we report on our experience in requirements creation and analysis, as well as run-time monitor generation using the Formal Requirement Elicitation Tool (FRET), on an industrial case study for a Lift-Plus-Cruise concept aircraft. We study the creation of requirements directly in the structured language of FRET without a prior definition of the same requirements in natural language. We focus on requirements describing state machines and discuss the challenges that we faced, in terms of creating requirements and generating monitors. We demonstrate how realizability, i.e., checking whether a requirements specification can be implemented, is crucial for understanding temporal interdependencies among requirements. Our study is the first complete attempt at using FRET to create industrial, realizable requirements and generate run-time monitors. Insight from lessons learned was materialized into new features in the FRET and JKind analysis frameworks.

Requirements engineering↗
NASA NTRS2022

Mars Terrain Segmentation with Less Labels

Planetary rover systems need to perform terrain segmentation to identify drivable areas as well as identify specific types of soil for sample collection. The latest Martian terrain segmentation methods rely on supervised learning which is very data hungry and difficult to train where only a small number of labeled samples are available. Moreover, the semantic classes are defined differently for different applications (e.g., rover traversal vs. geological) and as a result the network has to be trained from scratch each time, which is an inefficient use of resources. This research proposes a semi-supervised learning framework for Mars terrain segmentation where a deep segmentation network trained in an unsupervised manner on unlabeled images is transferred to the task of terrain segmentation trained on few labeled images. The network incorporates a backbone module which is trained using a contrastive loss function and an output atrous convolution module which is trained using a pixel-wise cross-entropy loss function. Evaluation results using the metric of segmentation accuracy show that the proposed method with contrastive pre-training outperforms plain supervised learning by 2%-10%. Moreover, the proposed model is able to achieve a segmentation accuracy of 91.1% using only 161 training images (1% of the original dataset) compared to 81.9% with plain supervised learning.

Wilson, Brian D↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring Digital Transformation for NASA Nuclear Flight Safety

The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA)’s Nuclear Flight Safety discipline is exploring opportunities to combine incremental advancements in many contributing areas in a way that produces a transformative change for how work is performed. More specifically, after providing some general NASA and space nuclear policy background, the authors will describe concepts and efforts that enable: (i) the use of objectives-d riven approaches (in concert with internal and external constraints) to establish a mission risk posture; (ii) the use of that risk posture in the planning process to risk-inform the selection of Safety and Mission Success (S&MS) methods and models; (iii) use of model-based and machine-assisted techniques to manage the complex and ponderous amount of information and interfaces that typify spaceflight efforts; (iv ) the means by which that infrastructure can directly feed an assurance case (including use of systems modelling language, ontological formulation, and semantic web technology) so as to address known weaknesses in our ability to communicate and manage that complexity; and (v) use of that case-assured framework to demonstrate that one did the adequate and sufficient S&MS work and that the S&MS work was done competently.

Donald Helton↗