Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34

Lessons Learned From the Cesium Pond Soil Shipping Campaign at Whiteshell Laboratories - 18206

Whiteshell Laboratories (WL), located in Manitoba, Canada is the first major decommissioning project of a nuclear research establishment in Canada. With the focus now active remediation to return the site to green state, the majority of legacy radioactive waste and waste generated from decommissioning and demolition of nuclear facilities must be transported off site to Chalk River Laboratories (CRL), located in Ontario, Canada. No large radioactive waste shipment campaigns have been undertaken by WL until now. A newly established Waste Management Program specifically designed to support the WL Closure Project has executed its first major shipping campaign of radioactive material, making approximately one hundred shipments and reducing WL's total volume of low-level radioactive waste to transport by seven percent. The shipped waste was approximately 1800 m{sup 3} (2600 metric tons) of known Cs-137 contaminated soil material generated from the excavation of an Experimental Cesium Pond Project designed to study the distribution of dose received by organisms living at the mud-water interface from Cs-137 contamination. This paper outlines the cost benefit analysis undertaken to determine the most cost effective method for transporting the radioactively contaminated soil to CRL, storage challenges experienced by both WL and CRL, the selection of the most appropriate waste package, training of shippers, and the continual optimization of increasing the number of generated waste packages and the number of waste packages shipped and accepted at CRL. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Decision and Modeling Strategy for a Radiological Risk Assessment at Area G, Los Alamos, New Mexico - 17258

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owns a low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal site at Material Disposal Area G, in Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA. Area G has been the primary LLW disposal site for Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) since the 1960's, and is now approaching the end of its service life. In addition to LLW, Area G is host to a variety of other wastes, the disposition of which must be determined before closure of the site. A probabilistic Radiological Risk Assessment (RRA) for Area G is used in order to support decision making regarding some wastes that are not addressed in the extant Area G Performance Assessment (PA) and Composite Analysis (CA). Between 1979 and 1987, 33 special shafts were augered into the Bandelier Tuff at Area G. This tuff is present across Pajarito Plateau on the eastern slopes of the Jemez Mountains, and varies widely in its consistency, from weakly indurated non-welded layers to welded layers that uphold the mesa cliffs of the Plateau. These mesas are home to LANL, Area G, and the town of Los Alamos. The 33 Shafts were lined with steel casing, and contain remote-handled (RH) transuranic wastes (TRU) resulting from experiments and analysis performed in special glove boxes at the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) facility at LANL. Some of these wastes originated as used ('spent') nuclear fuel. The purpose of the Area G RRA is to evaluate the potential future risk to humans and the environment from the RH TRU in the 33 Shafts in the context of the risk associated with the surrounding wastes at Area G. The analysis is responsive to expectations outlined in DOE Order 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, and is informed by the Manual and Guidance accompanying DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. Because the waste meets the definition of TRU, the regulatory context also takes into consideration the regulation governing the disposal of TRU from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 40 CFR 191, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Given the broader regulatory context for the RRA, the analysis is subject to different assumptions from those made in the existing DOE O 435.1 PA and CA, such as allowing for future occupation of the site. The analysis begins with a comprehensive evaluation of features, events, processes, and exposure scenarios (FEPS) for Area G and the wastes it contains. These FEPS are screened to eliminate from further consideration those of extremely low probability and/or consequence, and a conceptual site model (CSM) is subsequently developed. The scope and structure of the Area G RRA Model is informed by this CSM, and the Area G RRA Model is developed using the GoldSim systems analysis modeling platform. This paper outlines the development of a defensible, transparent, and reasonably realistic model, which is based on the state of knowledge of the wastes, the site, and the FEPS that govern contaminant transport and human exposures. Probabilistic model input distributions represent uncertainties inherent in the real and modeled systems. The results of the Area G RRA Model will inform decision analysis regarding the disposition of the RH TRU in the 33 Shafts. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

An Overview of R and D on Retrievability and Retrieval Technology in Germany - 20462

Retrievability is a term that is included in most radioactive waste management programs around the world. Although national definitions vary, the overall understanding of retrievability concerns the ability to recover waste packages from the repository mine after their emplacement. Different countries may implement retrievability in very different ways, ranging from a built-in reversibility into the emplacement process to the stipulation that retrievability may in no way impede passive safety in the post-closure phase. Germany takes a middle course such that retrievability in a HLW repository (repository for high level radioactive waste) may have no significant detrimental effect on passive safety. In Germany, the current siting process considers rock salt, clay rock, and crystalline rock as potential host rocks. Therefore, Research and Development (R and D) has been investigating repository concepts and retrievability in all host rocks. After introduction of retrievability in 2010, existing repository concepts were modified to facilitate retrieval. The changes made comprised, for example, equipping boreholes with steel liners, developing new technologies, and modifying existing emplacement devices. Apart from retrieval of HLW, retrieval of other wastes from underground repositories that were designed and operated without retrievability in mind, poses major technical and scientific challenges. Currently, studies are under way to investigate the feasibility and costs of partial retrieval of waste from an underground repository for hazardous and highly toxic waste in France, Stocamine. With regard to retrieval, the rock-mechanical conditions are deteriorating rapidly, so time is of the essence. In the Asse II mine in Germany, about 126,500 waste casks with low and intermediate level waste await retrieval. The repository mine suffers from difficult rock-mechanical conditions and inflow of brine, locally into emplacement areas. The Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal (BGE) is legally required to retrieve all wastes from the Asse. Due to the specific challenges, R and D is needed to develop technical solutions for the safe retrieval from each of the emplacement chambers. R and D on retrievability and retrieval technology does not only address challenges in radioactive or toxic waste retrieval but may also help to germinate innovation to better master complex underground situations in general, e.g. in deep mining, tunneling, or repository construction. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low- and Intermediate-Active Waste Management in the Federal Republic of Germany - 16567

Waste with negligible heat generation (low- and intermediate-active waste) generated in Germany is to be emplaced in the Konrad repository. As the start of operation of the Konrad repository is expected in 2022, regulations have been developed that allow a longer storage period while keeping the same high level of safety. The guidelines for the storage of radioactive waste with negligible heat-generation have become part of the regulatory framework and its enforcement is thoroughly guided by the responsible Federal Ministry. Radioactive waste generated during the operation or the decommissioning of nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel cycle facilities has to be stored by the operator until the Konrad repository is available. In contrast, radioactive waste generated from other industrial, medical and research applications including spent nuclear sources, initially has to be delivered to a Land collecting facility and has to be registered, treated and stored there. The Land collecting facilities will deliver the resulting waste packages to the disposal facility as of 2022. While the operation of the Land Collecting Facilities is a task of the responsible Laender authorities, the operation of the repository Konrad is a federal task. The interaction of the involved different parties will be described. This paper will focus on the management of low- and intermediate-active waste. It will give an insight to the expected amounts and different kinds of waste streams. The different concepts for collecting and qualification procedures for waste packages depending on the origin of the waste will be presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Establishment of Master Plans on Spent Nuclear Fuel in Korea - 17097

This study pertains to the Master Plans for High-Level Radioactive Waste Management prepared by the Korean Government on the basis of the predicted amount of spent nuclear fuel in Korea and the results of public discussion of the issue. The Korean Government has established the Master Plans for High-Level Radioactive Waste Management on the basis of the results of public discussion of the issue to secure the safety of the nationals and resolve the policy uncertainty that has been accumulated for more than 30 years. To provide a legal basis for the implementation of the Master Plans, legislation of the Act on High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Procedures (tentative) will be promoted, and an independent implementation institute, (tentatively named as) the Management Facility Strategy Committee, and an administrative supporting organization, the Planning and Promotion Group, will be organized and operated. This study is expected to transfer experience of and lessons from determining national policy to countries that have not established their final management policy for spent fuel, based on the formation of national consensus. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Verification and Analysis of Spent Fuel Safety Information Database in Korea - 18252

The Public Engagement Commission on SNF management (PECOS) published the recommendation report on the spent fuel management of Korea in June, 2015. Based on this report, the national basic policy for high level radioactive waste management of Korea was established and promulgated, taking into consideration the national/international trends on policy and technology development. According to the national plan, the siting for deep geological disposal facility of high level radioactive waste will be proceeded by 2028. Once the site is selected at somewhere, centralized spent fuel storage facility will be constructed by 2035 at the same site while research program is ongoing to determine the compatibility of the site for disposal facility. According to the enforcement decree of the nuclear safety act, the definition of 'interim storage' is that a safe storage of spent fuel which is received from NPP operator for a specified period, until it is processed or permanently disposed of. It means that spent fuels should be taken over with integrated information of spent fuel from NPP operator to the KORAD (Korea Radioactive waste agency). The aim of this study is to confirm and analyze present and future spent fuel data in order to provide the basic information to the safety research on the transport and storage of spent fuel in Korea. AMORES (Automatic Multi-batch ORIGEN Runner for Evaluation of Spent fuel) was used for the aim of this study. All 16,160 bundles of PWR spent fuel database as of the end of 2015 and the expected spent fuel which will be generated from 2016 to 2053 are evaluated and verified based on national basic plan. Through scenario analysis, it was estimated that approximately 15,000 MTU of spent fuel will be transported to intermediate storage facilities by 2052. Therefore, 44%, 6%, and 33% of spent fuel will be left in Kori, Hanbit and Hanul sites, respectively. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Systematic Evidence Based Performance Approach to Regulation of Nuclear Sites in England and Wales - 20058

The Environment Agency for England has developed a systematic evidence-based approach to pursue our strategic environmental objectives for the regulation of nuclear sites. We use an annual evidence review process to ensure effective and efficient targeting of limited resources to achieve those objectives. Over the last 8 years, we have been developing and refining this approach to ensure risk-based and value driven regulation. The approach comprises nuclear site and nuclear sector review processes known as Site Environment Review (SER) and Nuclear Environment Review (NER). This approach complements our regulation of nuclear site permit holders under the Environmental Permitting Regulations (EPR). We deliver our regulation of nuclear sites in England and Wales alongside the Office for Nuclear Regulation. The SER process involves the lead regulator for each nuclear site assessing the permit holder's environmental performance across 14 themes, set within the context of the site's main activities and associated waste disposals. Our themes include environmental leadership, resources and climate change, radioactive waste management, facility management and decommissioning, groundwater, and environmental radiological protection. We use evidence from site inspections and working within our subject matter groups to grade current and predicted future environmental performance. We are particularly interested in sustainability and the application of Best Available Techniques (BAT) to prevent the creation, and minimise the disposal, of radioactive wastes. We use risk analysis (strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities) to examine performance against our strategic environmental objectives, which are set out, in our 5-year Nuclear Delivery Plan (NDP). The output supports the targeting of our resources at each nuclear site. We consult the relevant permit holders on the SER priorities and use their feedback to refine our plans. We expect all permit holders to take account of our priorities when considering their own programmes of work, objectives and plans. The NER process brings together what we learn and achieve through regulation across the sector. It provides input to planning priorities, supported by qualitative and semi-quantitative evidence. It covers the 28 nuclear sites in England and Wales and spans the same 14 environmental themes. During the process we collate, compile and summarise evidence from the SERs and other sources such as inspection reports and evidence from our other nuclear work programmes. The output is the NER annual report. This provides a snapshot of the status of the nuclear sector and gives insights to enable us to regulate more efficiently and effectively. It also takes account of cross-cutting issues and risks such as changes in international standards, domestic policy, regulatory framework, domestic standards and guidance, learning from experience such as incidents, events and good practice, and innovation, research and development. It provides graphics that illustrate the grading of environmental performance for the nuclear sector across the fourteen environmental themes. This analysis allows benchmarking of nuclear site's environmental performance and the visualisation provides a convenient comparison of performance across themes, sites, and over time. We use this intelligence to inform our investment in training and development of our staff, and our cross-cutting engagement on strategic issues with government, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and other corporate organisations. Adopting this approach can provide benefits with organisational reputation, stakeholder participation and ensuring value from the public investment. This paper describes the history of the SER/NER process, a selection of outputs from the process and ideas for improvement. The paper will be of interest to other regulators and organisations across the world that are interested in supporting continuous improvement. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sampling Low-Level Waste - Building a Program - 16101

Low level radioactive waste is routinely sampled and analyzed to demonstrate compliance with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 61. The sample results are frequently used to create scaling factors to relate the activity of hard to detect (HDT) radionuclides to gamma emitting activity if there is a correlation between the key and scaled radionuclide pair. The activity of gamma emitters can be used with these scaling factors to calculate activity of the low level waste generated in the plant. Another method is to use the sample results directly and scale the total activity to the volume or weight of the waste in the container. Either method assumes that the sample results are representative of the total waste in the container. This requires that the waste streams be accurately defined and that the samples contain radionuclides at ratios that are representative of the bulk waste. This is not always the case and deviations between the sample results and the actual radionuclide concentrations in the waste can lead to miss-classification of the waste resulting in regulatory non-compliance, increased waste disposal costs or both. A deliberate sampling methodology that considers the context of the waste generation and the inherent limitations in practical sampling methodologies will enhance the licensee's ability to demonstrate the analytical results from the sample are representative and defendable. A good sampling program starts with the establishment of waste streams that are consistent with both production mechanisms and plant systems. Once waste streams have been established, data quality objectives can be determined and then the methods for obtaining an appropriate sample can be developed along with the identification of sample points and sample schedules. Sometimes it may not be practical or even possible to obtain a truly representative sample in which case the results from the measurement of the sample must be evaluated within the context of the expected values and the factors inhibiting the collection of a truly representative sample. This paper will explore objectives of a sampling program in relation to the regulations and identify methods that can be used to obtain and evaluate sample data that can be defended as 'representative'. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Update on implementing geological disposal in the UK - 16266

For more than 60 years, Britain has been accumulating radioactive waste which is currently stored safely at over 20 sites around the country. Radioactive Waste Management (RWM) is responsible for making this waste even safer by disposing of it securely for the long term in a GDF. This paper provides an update on the implementation of the process for siting a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) in the United Kingdom (UK) and the role of RWM as the developer in its implementation. The UK Government favours an approach for selecting a GDF site that is based on working in partnership with communities. In early 2013 when there were no longer any communities participating in the site selection process, the UK Government embarked upon a review to consider what lessons could be learned. Informed by this review the UK Government published in July 2014 a renewed approach to implementing geological disposal based on working with interested communities. The first two years of the programme comprises of initial actions overseen by Government recognising the need to provide additional information before the siting process is formally launched in 2017. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Controversial Projects and Potential Implications for the Consent-Based Siting of Nuclear Waste Management Facilities - 17345

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) goal is to develop solutions for the long-term, sustainable management of the nation's spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The DOE is planning for an integrated waste management system to transport, store, and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from commercial electricity generation, as well national defense activities. To achieve this goal, the DOE is developing a process to site facilities collaboratively with the public, communities, stakeholders, and governments at the state, tribal, and local levels. The DOE is seeking the help of all Americans in developing a consent-based approach to siting that is fair and reflective of public input. To inform DOE's efforts to develop a consent-based process for siting facilities an effort was undertaken to review other contentious projects including contaminated site remediation and facilities and infrastructure deployment to understand the role of different parties involved and of public involvement for both successful and unsuccessful projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Conceptual Design of the Package Handling System for the Deep Borehole Engineering Demonstration - 17064

Deep borehole disposal involves drilling one or more boreholes into crystalline basement rock to a depth of about 5 km, emplacing waste packages in the lower 2 km of the borehole, and sealing and plugging the upper 3 km. These depths are several times deeper than for typical mined repositories. A deep borehole field test (DBFT) is proposed to confirm the safety and feasibility of the deep borehole concept. The primary goals are to demonstrate the construction and characterization of deep boreholes, demonstrate the equipment and operations used for safe waste handling and emplacement downhole, study geologic controls on waste form stability and isolation, and evaluate the overall safety and practicality of the concept. The test will be conducted using simulated waste packages; no radioactive wastes will be handled at the deep borehole field test site. A key component of the DBFT is an engineering demonstration of the equipment and operations needed to transport waste packages to the site, move packages between the transportation and emplacement systems, and lower or retrieve packages into or out of the borehole. This paper describes the conceptualization of test package handling, from transportation and receipt through the interface with the borehole. It also describes the use of an integrated test facility to check out equipment prior to deployment at the DBFT site, and performance of the engineering demonstration at the DBFT site. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Planning: Three Relevant Case Studies - 16056

Executive Order 13653, Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change, was issued in 2013. The President emphasized the importance for federal agencies to take action to enhance climate preparedness and resilience. The U.S. Department of Energy released the DOE Climate Change Adaptation Plan in 2014 to build resilience and mitigation across the Department, and to assure inclusion of climate change adaptation as part of its planning and operations. DOE's Office of Environmental Management has an important mission to manage safe cleanup of environmental legacy contamination brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development and government sponsored nuclear energy research. Specifically, Environmental Management is responsible for remediation of soil and groundwater, deactivation and decommissioning of facilities, and disposal of hazardous and radioactive waste. Three case studies are discussed in this paper that demonstrate the cost benefit and importance for Environmental Management to assess climate change vulnerability and implement planning procedures: 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico has experienced $0.5 billion in unanticipated costs as a result of climate-related events including: extreme drought, wildfires, deluge rains, and historic flooding over the past 15 years. 2. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency American Cyanamid Superfund Site, situated on the New Jersey coast was hit by Hurricane Irene in 2011. Three major contaminated, solvent impoundment berms were breached within the 100-year flood plain, causing major damage to the facility. 3. For radioactive waste disposal facilities in low-lying areas in proximity to groundwater, climate change vulnerability and assessment is prudent for operational management. One such Superfund hazardous and radioactive waste disposal facility, the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility located at the DOE Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee, has documented surface and ground water management challenges since construction began in 2001, driven by changing regional weather patterns. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Vadose and Saturated Zone Flow and Transport Calculations for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington

The purpose of the fate and transport modeling described in this environmental calculation file (ECF) is to evaluate the impacts to groundwater associated with waste disposal operations at Mixed Waste Low-Level Burial Ground (LLBG) Trenches 31 and 34 to satisfy requirements in DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. The model integrates the flow and transport in the vadose zone beneath the active trenches with the saturated zone downgradient of the trenches to predict the radionuclide concentration at the point of assessment (POA). DOE M 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual, defines the POA as the point of highest projected dose or concentration beyond a 100 m (328 ft) buffer zone surrounding the disposed waste. The modeling is conducted in accordance with the DOE G 435.1, Implementation Guide for Use with DOE M 435.1-1, performance assessment (PA) guidelines. The modeling involves evaluation of the groundwater concentrations and radionuclide arrival times during the 1,000-year compliance and 10,000-year sensitivity-uncertainty periods per DOE O 435.1 and DOE M 435.1. This analysis does not consider radionuclide release during facility operations, only the post-closure impacts of the radionuclides to the environment. The evaluation of potential radiological dose to groundwater receptors caused by releases from a closed facility containing radioactive waste typically includes the following: (1) Release of radionuclides from that facility (2) Transport of those radionuclides through the environment, and (3) Exposure to humans to environmental concentration levels of those radionuclides The fate and transport three-dimensional (3D) model analysis involves the post-closure impacts to the environment of the technetium-99, iodone-129, and uranium (all isotopes in the waste). The residual inventory estimates include several radionuclides, but technetium-99 is typically responsible for almost all of the beta-gamma dose equivalent associated with groundwater (water resources) protection per 40 CFR 141, “National Primary Drinking Water Regulations” (e.g., see the results in WCH-520, Performance Assessment of Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, Hanford Site, Washington; hereinafter referred to as the ERDF PA), and iodone-129 can also be a significant dose contributor for some waste (e.g., RPP-RPT-59958, Performance Assessment for the Integrated Disposal Facility, Hanford Site, Washington; hereinafter referred to as the IDF PA). Uranium does not typically factor significantly into the impacts to groundwater, even during the 10,000-year sensitivity-uncertainty period, but always remains of interest as a contaminant. This ECF does not address vadose and saturated zone modeling for Trench 94 of the 200 East Area LLBG. Current information confirms the validity of the low corrosion rate of the naval reactor plant carbon steel (HY-80), and the even lower corrosion rate of the nickel-iron-chromium alloy reactor vessel (Inconel Alloy 600) presented in DOE/EIS-0259, Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, and Los Angeles Class Naval Reactor Plants. Based on these low corrosion rates, the time to breach the reactor vessel to allow release of radionuclides from the activated metal of the reactor vessel internal structure is at least 10,000 years. This time to breach precludes the need to evaluate the vadose and saturated zone transport of contaminants released from the reactor compartment disposal packages in the 200 East Area LLBGs PA (CP-63826, Waste Release Model Package Report for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Perspectives on Previous DOE Transportation Acquisition Efforts - 19049

The Department of Energy (DOE) is planning for future large-scale transport of commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) to eventual disposal and/or storage facilities. Various options for procuring transportation services are being evaluated. To inform this work, a review of past comments received on DOE transportation acquisition activities in the early 1990's through 2016 was conducted. Through the course of data collection, staff analyzed comments submitted from ten DOE initiatives from DoE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and DoE's Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE). This paper summarizes and outlines key themes arising from these comments. Past issues identified by a wide variety of commenters (nuclear industry and cask vendors, nuclear utilities and purchasers, states, Tribes, local governments, rail carriers, nongovernmental organizations, trade organizations, engineering firms, and members of the public) were examined. These issues concerned DoE's activities to make maximum use of the private sector to transport and store SNF and HLW. The key themes analyzed include: Uniqueness of the Shipping Campaign, Views on Privatization, Industry Risk and Privatization, Unclear Roles and Responsibilities, and Responsibilities Recommended for DOE to Maintain. This paper concludes by discussing lessons that can be learned from analyzing these public comments and what that may mean moving forward in the U.S. radioactive waste management program. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Global Survey of Deep Underground Facilities; Examples of Geotechnical and Engineering Capabilities, Achievements, Challenges (Mines, Shafts, Tunnels, Boreholes, Sites and Underground Facilities for Nuclear Waste and Physics R&D): A Guide to Interactive Global Map Layers, Table Database, References and Notes

These associated tables, references, notes, and report present a synthesis of some notable geotechnical and engineering information used to create four interactive layer maps for selected: 1) deep mines and shafts; 2) existing, considered or planned radioactive waste management deep underground studies or disposal facilities 3) deep large diameter boreholes, and 4) physics underground laboratories and facilities from around the world. These data are intended to facilitate user access to basic information and references regarding “deep underground” facilities, history, activities, and plans. In general, the interactive maps and database provide each facility’s approximate site location, geology, and engineered features (e.g.: access, geometry, depth, diameter, year of operations, groundwater, lithology, host unit name and age, basin; operator, management organization, geographic data, nearby cultural features, other). Although the survey is not comprehensive, it is representative of many of the significant existing and historical underground facilities discussed in the literature addressing radioactive waste management and deep mined geologic disposal safety systems. The global survey is intended to support and to inform: 1) interested parties and decision makers; 2) radioactive waste disposal and siting option evaluations, and 3) safety case development applicable to any mined geologic disposal facility as a demonstration of historical and current engineering and geotechnical capabilities available for use in deep underground facility siting, planning, construction, operations and monitoring.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

DOE Progress on Implementing Recommendations of National Academy of Sciences for SNF Transportation - 17087

In 2006, the National Research Council of the United States' National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued the report Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States. The report's foremost finding was that there were 'no fundamental technical barriers to the safe transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the United States.' However, it made a number of recommendations to improve safety, communicate risk, and conduct planning and other activities in anticipation of a large-scale transport campaign for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC), formed by the Secretary of Energy at the request of the President to conduct a comprehensive review of the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle and recommend a new plan, concluded that with respect to transportation issues, the NAS recommendations that had not yet been implemented should be revisited and addressed as appropriate. This paper discusses the NAS recommendations and the current status regarding their implementation, with a focus on actions being taken by DOE. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

In Backyards and Bedrooms: Challenges and Successes in Gaining Access to Homes for Radiological Testing - 18204

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is a federal environmental clean-up program. Its mandate is the remediation and local, long-term, safe management of approximately 1.7 million cubic metres of historic low-level radioactive waste in the adjacent communities of Port Hope and Port Granby in Southern Ontario, Canada. The PHAI is being undertaken by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), on behalf of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, a federal Crown corporation. It is currently one of the largest environmental remediation projects in Canada The safety of workers, the public and the environment while delivering the PHAI on time and within budget is CNL's number one priority. The PHAI is being carried out as two projects - the Port Hope Project and the Port Granby Project. The Port Hope Project is the larger of the two and includes the cleanup of approximately 1.2 million cubic metres of historic waste from various locations within the community. The Port Hope Project includes a unique and important component - the Property Radiological Survey. This survey involves the interior and exterior investigation of approximately 4,800 small-scale properties - primarily residential - in the Municipality of Port Hope for the presence or absence of historic low-level radioactive waste. The Property Radiological Survey began in 2012 and is being conducted in five campaigns with between 450 and 1,250 properties in each campaign. The survey begins with radon monitoring, followed by interior and exterior gamma radiation tests, and concludes with exterior borehole drilling/soil sampling. The full suite of tests take approximately 18 - 24 months to complete at each property. This paper will describe the communications strategy implemented to obtain consent from thousands of property owners for CNL's contractor to conduct radiological testing in private living spaces such as bathrooms, bedrooms and closets, as well as front yards, backyards and outbuildings. This strategy incorporates tactics used to secure consent from residents who are reluctant to participate in the survey for reasons including privacy issues, family situations, life events and misapprehensions about the survey and/or the PHAI in general. The paper will include information about how residents' concerns are addressed, the stepped approach to securing access from owners who do not respond to repeated attempts at contact, and the importance of close coordination with the contractor to ensure that all components of the investigations are aligned so that work is conducted in a safe, timely and systematic manner. The authors will also describe the process for keeping the regulator and the municipality informed of survey outreach efforts, challenges and successes, and will outline the process for notifying the approximately 800 owners of properties on which historic low-level radioactive waste is expected to be identified and transitioning those owners from the survey to the remediation phase. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Advances in Thermal-Hydrologic Modeling of Nuclear Waste Disposal in Deep Boreholes - 16303

Deep borehole disposal is one of the potential options for safely isolating high-level radioactive waste. It is expected that existing drilling technology can provide reliable and cost-effective construction of suitable deep boreholes. In addition, favorable disposal conditions such as low permeability host rock, high salinity, and geochemically reducing conditions, exist at depth in many locations. Coupled thermal-hydrologic processes induced by heat from the radioactive waste may impact fluid flow and the associated migration of radionuclides. This work looks at those processes as was also done with recent studies. Simulations of thermal-hydrology for the emplacement of cesium and strontium capsules in a deep borehole are presented. The simulations looked at disposal options such as different disposal configurations and aging of waste to reduce thermal effects. The simulations studied temperature and fluid flux in the vicinity of the borehole. Simulation results include temperature and vertical flux profiles around the borehole at selected depths. Of particular importance are peak temperatures, and fluxes above the disposal zone. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗