Longitudinal and lateral stability and control characteristics of a large-scale model with a swept wing and augmented jet flap
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The integrated space shuttle vehicle was tested to determine proximity force and moment data for the orbiter/external tank and solid rocket booster (SRB) with and without separation rockets firing for both single and dual booster runs. Data were obtained at points t = 0 sec, t = 1.25 sec, and t = 2 sec on the nominal SRB separation trajectory.
Data were obtained in a series of wind tunnel tests on the space shuttle external tank over an angle of attack range from 0 deg to 180 deg at Mach numbers of 5.3 and 10.4. Body roll angles varied from 0 deg to 315 deg for the Mach number 10.4 tests. A constant roll angle of 180 deg was used for all Mach number 5.3 tests. The effects of protuberances and Reynolds number on the force and moment coefficients were investigated.
A low speed wind tunnel was used to evaluate the inflight aeroacoustic performance of several single- and multiple-passage sonic inlets. Takeoff and approach geometries were tested, and the effects of inlet lip and diffuser design were determined. Results indicate that the single passage geometries, in particular a cylindrical centerbody takeoff geometry and a bulb shaped centerbody approach geometry, provide the highest level of aeroacoustic performance. Increasing inlet lip contraction ratio extends the maximum incidence angle for attached lip flow, while increasing inlet diffuser length results in higher total pressure recovery for a given amount of noise suppression.
A wind tunnel force and moment test of the space shuttle launch vehicle was conducted. The wind tunnel model utilized a triple balance such that component aerodynamics of the orbiter, external tank, and solid rocket booster was obtained. The test was conducted at an angle of attack range from -10 deg to 10 deg, and angle of sideslip range from -10 deg to 10 deg, and a Mach number range from 0.6 to 4.96. Simulation parameters to be used in future launch vehicle wind tunnel tests were investigated. The following were included: (1) effect of orbiter -ET attach hardware; (2) model attachment (spacer) effects; (3) effects of grit on model leading surfaces; and (4) model misalignment effects. The effects of external tank nose shape was studied by investigating five different nose configurations. Plotted and tabulated data is reported.
The Rockwell Space Shuttle Launch Vehicle components were tested in a Trisonic Wind Tunnel. Pressure measurements were made on the aft portion, in the base regions, and on the wing surfaces. Axial force determination were made from the pressure data. Data were recorded with the model at zero degrees angle of attack and sideslip through a Mach number from 0.9 to 3.0. The only configuration changes investigated were strut mounting techniques and gas line fairing location between the external tank and the orbiter.
The results of the tests are presented along with aerodynamic loads data obtained at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 1.4. Surface pressure distributions were obtained simultaneously with six-component stability and control force data on the complete launch configuration. The configuration consisted of the orbiter, an external tank, two solid rocket boosters, and associated intercomponent attach hardware. Angles of attack and sideslip from -10 deg to +10 deg were investigated. The tests were conducted from 4 September 1973 through 13 September 1973.
A wind tunnel simulation of the diffusion patterns in a sea breeze was attempted. The results indicate that the low level onshore flow was well simulated for neutral, stable, unstable, and elevated inversion conditions. Velocity, turbulence, shear stress, and temperature data were taken, and the spread of emissions from ground level sources was investigated. Comparison is made with theoretical predictions by E. Inoue and with the open, homogeneous plane field results of Pasquill. Agreement with the predictions by Inoue is good, and the comparison with Pasquill's results shows that the wind tunnel flows are shifted two categories towards more stable. The discrepancy may be explained as a matter of averaging time.
The primary test objectives were to define ferry configuration afterbody fairing effects on orbiter stability and control characteristics and to substantiate wind tunnel results. Parametric variations consisted entirely of testing different afterbody fairing contours in an effort to improve both the orbiter drag levels and lateral-directional control characteristics. The three afterbody contours that were tested consisted of the Boeing TC3 beavertail, the new Rockwell-Boeing TC4 fairing, and a modification of an existing short bumblebee fairing redesignated TC6.
Tests were conducted in September, 1973 on a launch vehicle configuration consisting of a space shuttle orbiter, an external tank, two solid rocket boosters, and associated intercomponent attach hardware. Model variables included elevon, rudder, and speed brake deflections. Aerodynamic loads were measured and surface pressure distributions were obtained simultaneously with six-component stability and control force data on the complete configuration. Angles of attack and sideslip were also investigated.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the lower wing surface of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the upper wing surface of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the left and right vertical tail surface of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.