Comparison of Orion Flywheel to Commercially Available Flywheel Device
INTRODUCTION: The chosen exercise device for the Orion Multi-purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) for Artemis missions is the Orion Flywheel (OFW), which was selected in 2017 from a pool of exercise devices. The Orion Flywheel is to be installed in the MPCV for its first use during the Artemis II mission and will be utilized for subsequent Artemis missions. The OFW provides the capability to perform both resistive and aerobic exercises while taking up a small volume and not requiring power. Aerobic exercise consists of rowing while resistive exercise includes the deadlift, harness squat, and deadlift high pull among others. The efficacy of the OFW as an exercise countermeasure to spaceflight deconditioning has not yet been fully evaluated. A future HRP-funded study using head-down tilt bed rest is planned to evaluate the efficacy of the OFW to mitigate aerobic and muscular deconditioning. The OFW, made by KBR, is a specialized device that poses high costs for purchase and maintenance. The aim of the study is to determine if a commercially available alternative could be used as a backup for the OFW during the bed rest study or as an alternative in other studies. This study seeks to compare the loading profile and mechanics of a commercial flywheel device (kBox Pro) with the three resistance settings of the OFW using a controlled, instrumented setup to validate its acceptability as a backup. METHODS: An experimental setup was designed to simulate human use of the OFW. Flywheel devices can have varied actuated inertial mass and strap length. The inertial mass refers to the flywheel itself or the object that spins as the result of the movement of the strap. The OFW has three gears actuated with a lever, with the low gear used for aerobic rowing and the medium and high gears used for resistance exercises. These gears correspond to increasing flywheel inertia, which corresponds to a certain number and sizes of inertial plates on a commercial flywheel. The kBox Pro has varied sizes of inertial discs that are installed to the external shaft of the device and can be configured to roughly match the inertia seen in the OFW per gear setting. The strap length can be adjusted to allow for different ranges of motion. The experimental setup allows for the simulation of rowing, harness squats, and deadlift high pulls with corresponding exercise strap lengths. All three OFW gears are to be tested, as well as multiple combinations of kBox discs. The setup was created using a system of pulleys and cables to minimize friction loss. The system is actuated through the dropping of a connected mass which, through the pulley system, pulls the strap of the exercise device upwards as if a human was exercising. A string potentiometer and tensile force transducer are used to measure strap displacement and strap force, respectively. The masses dropped are exercise chains that simulate the decrease in force observed throughout a typical exercise. As the chains are lowered to the ground, they begin to spool and therefore are no longer subjecting the exercise device’s strap to their load. This setup was designed to provide realistic loads and protect the OFW from damage, an important precaution because it’s the only available unit for research and ground operations. Data is to be collected across simulated exercises and with different strap lengths, with the same conditions collected on both the OFW and the kBox Pro. RESULTS: Data collection is ongoing for the kBox and the Orion Flywheel. CONCLUSIONS: Study results will inform if the OFW and a kBox Pro device can be deemed mechanically similar. Depending on the results, additional data collection may be required to assess the user experience between the devices. A key result of this study is a mechanical characterization of the OFW device, demonstrating the load and force profile using a repeatable test method. This data will guide next steps on potential kBox Pro modifications needed to produce a comparable exercise experience to the OFW.