Ground shock due to Rayleigh waves from sonic booms.
Steady state vertical displacements at surface of elastic half-space due to Rayleigh waves from sonic boom, obtaining shock amplification factors
STEADY STATE CREEP↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “boom”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Deployment study of a self-rigidizable inflatable boom
Deployment dynamic behavior of an inflatable space structure is analyzed using a combination of gas dynamic analysis and rigid body kinematics simulations. Modeling technique is presented for deployment of a simple cantilever boom that is rolled up on a cylindrical mandrel.
inflatable boom deployment dynamics vibration kina↗
Grid Resolution Study over Operability Space for a Mach 1.7 Low Boom External Compression Inlet
This paper presents a statistical methodology whereby the probability limits associated with CFD grid resolution of inlet flow analysis can be determined which provide quantitative information on the distribution of that error over the specified operability range. The objectives of this investigation is to quantify the effects of both random (accuracy) and systemic (biasing) errors associated with grid resolution in the analysis of the Lockheed Martin Company (LMCO) N+2 Low Boom external compression supersonic inlet. The study covers the entire operability space as defined previously by the High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) High Speed Research (HSR) program goals. The probability limits in terms of a 95.0% confidence interval on the analysis data were evaluated for four ARP1420 inlet metrics, namely (1) total pressure recovery (PFAIP), (2) radial hub distortion (DPH/P), (3) ) radial tip distortion (DPT/P), and (4) ) circumferential distortion (DPC/P). In general, the resulting +/-0.95 delta Y interval was unacceptably large in comparison to the stated goals of the HSCT program. Therefore, the conclusion was reached that the "standard grid" size was insufficient for this type of analysis. However, in examining the statistical data, it was determined that the CFD analysis results at the outer fringes of the operability space were the determining factor in the measure of statistical uncertainty. Adequate grids are grids that are free of biasing (systemic) errors and exhibit low random (precision) errors in comparison to their operability goals. In order to be 100% certain that the operability goals have indeed been achieved for each of the inlet metrics, the Y+/-0.95 delta Y limit must fall inside the stated operability goals. For example, if the operability goal for DPC/P circumferential distortion is ≤0.06, then the forecast Y for DPC/P plus the 95% confidence interval on DPC/P, i.e. +/-0.95 delta Y, must all be less than or equal to 0.06.
Grid↗
The Origin of Inlet Buzz in a Mach 1.7 Low Boom Inlet Design
Supersonic inlets with external compression, having a good level performance at the critical operating point, exhibit a marked instability of the flow in some subcritical operation below a critical value of the capture mass flow ratio. This takes the form of severe oscillations of the shock system, commonly known as "buzz". The underlying purpose of this study is to indicate how Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) analysis of supersonic inlets will alter how we envision unsteady inlet aerodynamics, particularly inlet buzz. Presented in this paper is a discussion regarding the physical explanation underlying inlet buzz as indicated by DES analysis. It is the normal shock wave boundary layer separation along the spike surface which reduces the capture mass flow that is the controlling mechanism which determines the onset of inlet buzz, and it is the aerodynamic characteristics of a choked nozzle that provide the feedback mechanism that sustains the buzz cycle by imposing a fixed mean corrected inlet weight flow. Comparisons between the DES analysis of the Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMCO) N+2 inlet and schlieren photographs taken during the test of the Gulfstream Large Scale Low Boom (LSLB) inlet in the NASA 8x6 ft. Supersonic Wind Tunnel (SWT) show a strong similarity both in turbulent flow field structure and shock wave formation during the buzz cycle. This demonstrates the value of DES analysis for the design and understanding of supersonic inlets.
Mach 1.7↗
Aeroelastic Tailoring Study of N+2 Low-Boom Supersonic Commercial Transport Aircraft
The Lockheed Martins N+2 Low-boom Supersonic Commercial Transport (LSCT) aircraft is optimized in this study through the use of a multidisciplinary design optimization tool developed at the NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. A total of 111 design variables are used in the first optimization run. Total structural weight is the objective function in this optimization run. Design requirements for strength, buckling, and flutter are selected as constraint functions during the first optimization run. The MSC Nastran code is used to obtain the modal, strength, and buckling characteristics. Flutter and trim analyses are based on ZAERO code and landing and ground control loads are computed using an in-house code.
aeroelastic tailoring↗
Aeroelastic Tailoring Study of N+2 Low Boom Supersonic Commerical Transport Aircraft
The Lockheed Martin N+2 Low - boom Supersonic Commercial Transport (LSCT) aircraft was optimized in this study through the use of a multidisciplinary design optimization tool developed at the National Aeronautics and S pace Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center. A total of 111 design variables we re used in the first optimization run. Total structural weight was the objective function in this optimization run. Design requirements for strength, buckling, and flutter we re selected as constraint functions during the first optimization run. The MSC Nastran code was used to obtain the modal, strength, and buckling characteristics. Flutter and trim analyses we re based on ZAERO code, and landing and ground control loads were computed using an in - house code. The w eight penalty to satisfy all the design requirement s during the first optimization run was 31,367 lb, a 9.4% increase from the baseline configuration. The second optimization run was prepared and based on the big-bang big-crunch algorithm. Six composite ply angles for the second and fourth composite layers were selected as discrete design variables for the second optimization run. Composite ply angle changes can't improve the weight configuration of the N+2 LSCT aircraft. However, this second optimization run can create more tolerance for the active and near active strength constraint values for future weight optimization runs.
low boom supersonic civil transport↗
Mach Cutoff Analysis and Results from NASA's Farfield Investigation of No-Boom Thresholds
In support of the ongoing effort by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to bring supersonic commercial travel to the public, the NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center and the NASA Langley Research Center,in partnership with other industry organizations and academia, conducted a flight research experiment to analyze acoustic propagation in the Mach cutoff shadow zone. The effort was conducted in fall of 2012 and named the Farfield Investigation of No-boom Thresholds (FaINT). The test helped to build a data set that will go toward further understanding of the unique acoustic propagation characteristics below Mach cutoff altitude.
sonic boom↗
Computational Studies for Sonic Boom Prediction
Outline: Introduction; Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) Framework; 1st AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop Oblique Shock/Plume Interaction; Summary.
Sonic Boom↗
Development of a Weather-Robust Ground-Based System for Sonic Boom Measurements
This report describes Brigham Young University’s (BYU) development and testing of a weather-robust, ground-based system for sonic boom measurements, carried out in support of NASA’s Quiet Supersonic Flight (QSF) initiative. The microphone configuration system, referred to as the Compact Outdoor Unit for Ground-based Acoustical Recordings (COUGAR, for the BYU mascot), was tested at NASA’s 2018 Quiet Supersonic Flight (QSF18) campaign and at the subsequent 2019 Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements (CarpetDIEM) program.
sonic boom↗
Aeroacoustic Computations of a Generic Low Boom Concept in Landing Configuration: Part 2 - Airframe Noise Simulations
Aeroacoustic simulations of a sub-scale, generic, low-boom supersonic aircraft model at low speeds were carried out using the Lattice-Boltzmann Very Large Eddy Simulation software PowerFLOW® and a Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings approach. The objective was to characterize the airframe noise signature of the configuration and determine the similarities and differences to conventional subsonic aircraft. We quantified the noise produced by the flap and landing gear by simulating the aircraft with and without deployment of these components. Mach number scaling of the far-field noise levels was examined by performing simulations at different flow speeds. We demonstrate that a solid surface formulation does not capture the aircraft acoustic field properly, while a carefully constructed permeable surface formulation yields far-field spectra that compare very favorably to results from direct probing of the simulated flow field.
low boom↗
Aeroacoustic Computations of a Generic Low Boom Concept in Landing Configuration: Part 1 - Aerodynamic Simulations
Computational results are presented for a 15%-scale, full-span, generic low-boom concept aircraft model simulated as installed in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and in free-air conditions. The simulations were conducted with the lattice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture the time-accurate characteristics of the flow. The aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft was investigated with various combinations of flap and landing gear deployments. To replicate the flow speed used during tests of the model, a Mach number of approximately 0.20 was chosen while varying the angle of attack through a limited range. Analyses were performed on local flow quantities, global forces, as well as flow distributions between configurations. Aerodynamic quantities were shown to be sensitive to mesh resolution levels, especially with flap and landing gear systems retracted. When comparing wind tunnel to free-air simulations, the aerodynamic quantities sampled were found to be in good agreement, suggesting that tunnel blockage and model support effects did not adversely impact the aerodynamic behavior of the model during the wind tunnel test. The results of this study improve our understanding of the highly complex, vortical flow generated by configurations with swept, low aspect-ratio wings at speeds encountered during landing operations.
low boom↗
Aeroacoustic Computations of a Generic Low Boom Concept in Landing Configuration: Part 3 - Aerodynamic Validation and Noise Source Identification
Wind tunnel test data were used to validate the predicted aerodynamic behavior of a 15%-scale version of a generic, low-boom aircraft. The test was conducted in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel to determine the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the model. Measured steady surface pressures and global forces were used to validate predicted aerodynamic results obtained from high-fidelity simulations of the model as installed in the tunnel. Very good agreement between predicted and measured aerodynamic trends was demonstrated, providing the impetus to proceed with companion airframe noise simulations that were conducted in a free-air setting. Computed near-field flow variables acquired on a permeable data surface were used to generate synthetic pressure records for two 800-element phased microphone arrays positioned overhead and to the side of the model. The array data were beamformed to generate noise source localization maps for the clean model and several landing configurations. Primary and secondary airframe sources were identified and their relative strengths were determined. Far-field integrated noise spectra for the full aircraft, as well as individual components, were obtained from the source maps via integration of tailored regions. The analysis showed that noise produced by the landing gear was the dominant contributor to the far-field acoustic signature of the model, followed by flap noise. The effects of permeable data surface end caps, spatial resolution, array orientation, angle of attack, component interaction, velocity scaling, and numerical precision on synthetic far-field spectra were also evaluated.
low boom↗
Comparing Two Statistical Models for Low Boom Dose-response Relationships with Correlated Responses
This study compares two statistical modeling approaches to construct summary dose-response curves for low boom community noise surveys. NASA field survey data were used that consist of multiple responses from a survey participant. These data require an approach that accounts for the correlation among repeated annoyance observations from the same participant. A multilevel model accounts for the correlation by allowing estimated parameters to vary with each survey participant. On the other hand, a population average model utilizes generalized estimating equations and accounts for the correlation via a user-specified within-subject correlation structure. A visual comparison of the dose-response curves for these two methods reveals similar results. When comparing specific points along the summary curves, the multilevel model yields more precise confidence bounds than the population average model. The similarity between the summary curves derived from each model lends validity to both approaches for approximating a population representative summary curve.
X-59↗
Comparison of Two Statistical Models for Low Boom Dose-response Relationships with Correlated Responses
This study compares two statistical models to construct summary dose-response curves for low boom community noise surveys. Data from two NASA field surveys are used that consist of multiple responses per survey participant. These data require an approach that accounts for the correlation among repeated annoyance observations from the same participant. A multilevel model accounts for the correlation by allowing estimated parameters to vary with each survey participant. On the other hand, a population average model utilizes generalized estimating equations and accounts for the correlation via a userspecified within-subject correlation structure. A visual comparison of the dose-response curves for these two methods reveals similar results. When comparing specific points along the summary curves, the multilevel model yields more precise confidence bounds than the population average model. The similarity between the summary curves derived from each model lends validity to both approaches for approximating a population representative summary curve, though modeling assumptions may lend favor to the multilevel logistic modeling approach over the population average model.
dose-response↗
High Speed Inlet Distortion Test for the X 59 Low Boom Flight Demonstrator in the NASA Glenn 8-by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel
The Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) High Speed Inlet Distortion Test (HSIDT) was completed in the NASA Glenn Research Center 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (8x6 SWT) using a 9.5 percent-scale propulsion model of the X–59 to evaluate the compatibility and operability of the inlet and engine integration, focusing on the inlet dynamic effects at the engine face. The model was instrumented with steady-state and high-response total pressure probes in the conventional 40-point, equal-area array at the aerodynamic interface plane (AIP). The HSIDT successfully collected high response distortion data points for the X–59 from Mach = 0 to 1.55 for a wide range of angle-of-attack, angle-of-sideslip, and inlet flow. Analyses showed that inlet dynamic distortion and inlet planar wave (or inlet buzz) were within engine limits through most of the flight envelope. The test data showed that inlet planar wave was present at Mach 1.35 and above, at airflows between idle and maximum engine airflow. Engine throttle back will need to be limited when decelerating from supersonic flight Mach to avoid these regions of inlet planar wave. The HSIDT data was also used to compare the metric SUM40, computed from the 40 high-response AIP total pressure probes, with the metric SUM4, computed from four high-response inlet static pressure probes. The data showed that SUM4 can be used as a surrogate for SUM40 during the X–59 flight test to detect inlet planar wave.
X-59↗
Estimating Sonic Boom Metrics Across a Community Using a Kalman Filter
As part of the Quesst mission, NASA will fly the X‑59 aircraft over selected communities to evaluate community responses to low-intensity sonic booms. The purpose of these community tests is to determine the dose-response relationship between the noise exposure metrics and the community response. The independent variables for the dose-response relationship are the noise exposure metrics experienced by survey respondents within the community. Two sources of noise exposure metrics are available in each community: measurements at sparse locations throughout the community, and calculations from propagation models across the community. Both the measurements and calculations are subject to uncertainty. A Kalman filter is proposed to combine the measured and calculated noise exposure metrics to obtain the best estimate of the true noise exposure metrics across the community. The noise exposure metrics estimated by the Kalman filter have lower uncertainty than either the measured or calculated noise exposure metrics alone. Simulations demonstrate that the Kalman filter produces a more accurate estimate of the true noise exposure metrics than other noise estimation methods.
Sonic boom↗
Recent Enhancements to Modeling Sonic Boom Propagation using Augmented Burgers’ Equation
Sonic boom propagation through the atmosphere is modeled with an augmented Burgers’ equation which includes nonlinearity and loss mechanisms. This work details an updated discretization of the governing equations which is fully conservative and duality preserving. Adjoint equations, for all the mechanisms involved, are re-derived and implemented using adjoint consistent discretizations. Computation of loudness metrics is performed using digital filters. The updated implementation is demonstrated and compared against the previous formulation for selected cases, and the differences are documented and discussed. The improved discretization results in faster mesh convergence of the loudness metrics and substantially de-creases runtime. In addition, the adjoint solutions provide mesh-converged gradients which are free from spurious oscillations.
Sonic Boom↗
Apparatus of small size can be extended into long, rigid boom
Three metal sheets, having prenotched edges, are interlocked as they are unrolled from three feed rollers which form a triangle. The apparatus is relatively small, and the sheets can be erected into a rigid triangular boom of considerable length.
Miller, J. V.↗