Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LUNAR PHASE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35

Reactor safety for the Space Exploration Initiative

A task force was created by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to conduct a 90-day study to support efforts to determine requirements to meet the goals of the Space Exploration Initiative. The task force identified the need for a nuclear reactor to provide the electrical power required as the outpost power demands on the moon and Mars evolve into hundreds of kilowatts. A preliminary hazards analysis has been performed to examine safety aspects of nuclear reactor power systems for representative missions to the moon and Mars. Mission profiles were defined for reference lunar and Martian flights. Potential alternatives to each mission phase were also defined. Accident scenarios were qualitatively defined for the mission phases. The safety issues decay heat removal, reactor control, disposal, criticality, end-of-mission shutdown, radiation exposure, the Martian environment, high speed impact on the surfaces of the moon or Mars, and return flyby trajectories were identified.

Dix, Terry E.↗

Real-Time Lunar Prospector Data Visualization Using Web-Based Java

The Lunar Prospector was co-developed by NASA Ames Research Center and Lockheed Martin, and was launched on January 6th, 1998. Its mission is to search for water ice and various elements in the Moon's surface, map its magnetic and gravity fields, and detect volcanic activity. For the first time, the World Wide Web is being used to graphically display near-real-time data from a planetary exploration mission to the global public. Science data from the craft's instruments, as well as engineering data for the spacecraft subsystems, are continuously displayed in time-varying XY plots. The craft's current location is displayed relative to the whole Moon, and as an off-craft observer would see in the reference frame of the craft, with the lunar terrain scrolling underneath. These features are implemented as Java applets. Analyzed data (element and mass distribution) is presented as 3D lunar maps using VRML and Javascript. During the development phase, implementations of the Java Virtual Machine were just beginning to mature enough to adequately accommodate our target featureset; incomplete and varying implementations were the biggest bottleneck to our ideal of ubiquitous browser access. Bottlenecks notwithstanding, the reaction from the Internet community was overwhelmingly enthusiastic.

Deardorff, D. Glenn↗

Integration and Testing of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Attitude Control System

Throughout the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Integration and Testing (I&T) phase of the project, the Attitude Control System (ACS) team completed numerous tests on each hardware component in ever more flight like environments. The ACS utilizes a select group of attitude sensors and actuators. This paper chronicles the evolutionary steps taken to verify each component was constantly ready for flight as well as providing invaluable trending experience with the actual hardware. The paper includes a discussion of each ACS hardware component, lessons learned of the various stages of I&T, a discussion of the challenges that are unique to the LRO project, as well as a discussion of work for future missions to consider as part of their I&T plan. LRO ACS sensors were carefully installed, tested, and maintained over the 18 month I&T and prelaunch timeline. Care was taken with the optics of the Adcole Coarse Sun Sensors (CSS) to ensure their critical role in the Safe Hold mode was fulfilled. The use of new CSS stimulators provided the means of testing each CSS sensor independently, in ambient and vacuum conditions as well as over a wide range of thermal temperatures. Extreme bright light sources were also used to test the CSS in ambient conditions. The integration of the two SELEX Galileo Star Trackers was carefully planned and executed. Optical ground support equipment was designed and used often to check the performance of the star trackers throughout I&T in ambient and thermal/vacuum conditions. A late discovery of potential contamination of the star tracker light shades is discussed in this paper. This paper reviews how each time the spacecraft was at a new location and orientation, the Honeywell Miniature Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU) was checked for data output validity. This gyro compassing test was performed at several key testing points in the timeline as well as several times while LRO was on the launch pad. Sensor alignment tests were completed several times to ensure that hardware remained on a rigid platform.

Simpson, Jim↗

The Lunar Opposition Surge: Observations by Clementine

The Clementine mission to the Moon in 1994 provided the first multispectral observations of the lunar opposition surge below a few degrees. The brightness of the Moon increases more than 40% between solar phase angles of 4 deg and 0 deg. The opposition effect exhibits a small wavelength dependence: the surge is -3-4% larger at 0.41 microns than at 1.00 microns. This result suggests that the principal cause of the lunar opposition surge is shadow hiding, while coherent backscatter, if present, makes only a minor contribution. The amplitude of the effect depends significantly on terrain: the surge is about 10% greater in the lunar highlands. This difference is attributed to textural variations between the two terrains. The Clementine measurements provide a new basis for deriving spectral geometric albedos, phase integrals, and Bond albedos. A value of 0.11 +/- 0.01 was found for the lunar bolometric Bond albedo. This value is at the low end of the historical published values, but not as low as the recent result of 0.080 +/- 0.002.

Buratti, Bonnie J.↗

Moessbauer Mineralogy on the Moon: The Lunar Regolith

A first-order requirement for spacecraft missions that land on solid planetary objects is instrumentation for mineralogical analyses. For purposes of providing diagnostic information about naturally-occurring materials, the element iron is particularly important because it is abundant and multivalent. Knowledge of the oxidation state of iron and its distribution among iron-bearing mineralogies tightly constrains the types of materials present and provides information about formation and modification (weathering) processes. Because Moessbauer spectroscopy is sensitive to both the valence of iron and its local chemical environment, the technique is unique in providing information about both the relative abundance of iron-bearing phases and oxidation state of the iron. The Moessbauer mineralogy of lunar regolith samples (primarily soils from the Apollo 16 and 17 missions to the Moon) were measured in the laboratory to demonstrate the strength of the technique for in situ mineralogical exploration of the Moon. The regolith samples were modeled as mixtures of five iron-bearing phases: olivine, pyroxene, glass, ilmenite, and metal. Based on differences in relative proportions of iron associated with these phases, volcanic ash regolith can be distinguished from impact-derived regolith, impact-derived soils of different geologic affinity (e.g., highlands, maria) can be distinguished on the basis of their constituent minerals, and soil maturity can be estimated. The total resonant absorption area of the Moessbauer spectrum can be used to estimate total FeO concentrations.

Morris, Richard V.↗

Aerosol Measurements of the Fine and Ultrafine Particle Content of Lunar Regolith

We report the first quantitative measurements of the ultrafine (20 to 100 nm) and fine (100 nm to 20 m) particulate components of Lunar surface regolith. The measurements were performed by gas-phase dispersal of the samples, and analysis using aerosol diagnostic techniques. This approach makes no a priori assumptions about the particle size distribution function as required by ensemble optical scattering methods, and is independent of refractive index and density. The method provides direct evaluation of effective transport diameters, in contrast to indirect scattering techniques or size information derived from two-dimensional projections of high magnification-images. The results demonstrate considerable populations in these size regimes. In light of the numerous difficulties attributed to dust exposure during the Apollo program, this outcome is of significant importance to the design of mitigation technologies for future Lunar exploration.

Greenberg, Paul S.↗

Design and Testing of a Prototype Electrodynamic Regolith Conveyor for Lunar ISRU

NASA’s Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) Swamp Works Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory (ESPL) is developing a 4-phase Electrodynamic Regolith Conveyor (ERC) that could convey regolith without the risk of rotating or vibratory actuation, which could jam or require regular maintenance due to the abrasive nature of lunar regolith. Another goal of electrodynamic conveying is the reduction of conveying power, which is important considering the limited capacity of early-stage lunar power systems. The current state of the art (SOA) for lunar regolith conveying is based on recent NASA system studies for oxygen production plants. These plant designs require conveying rates around 100 kg/hr, to produce 10 mT/yr of oxygen from the regolith. To accomplish this, conventional augers and vibratory spiral conveyors have been identified as the SOA or the leading candidates due to their extensive use in the terrestrial material handling industry. At NASA KSC, the use of dynamic electric fields, generated by alternating high voltage on electrodes, has been developed as a dust mitigation solution known as the Electrodynamic Dust Shield (EDS). The EDS is being developed for lenses, solar panels, radiators, fabric and seals and is scheduled for a technology demonstration mission on the Moon in 2023. ESPL researchers have shown the ability to move thin layers (a few mm) of dust with mW of power. In Academia, researchers have shown the ability to electrodynamically convey regolith up to 1 kg/hr with a 4-phase EDS. This paper will describe the design and testing of a prototype ERC that could scale to support transporting regolith at ISRU relevant flow rates.

Lunar↗

Research on the use of space resources

The second year of a multiyear research program on the processing and use of extraterrestrial resources is covered. The research tasks included: (1) silicate processing, (2) magma electrolysis, (3) vapor phase reduction, and (4) metals separation. Concomitant studies included: (1) energy systems, (2) transportation systems, (3) utilization analysis, and (4) resource exploration missions. Emphasis in fiscal year 1982 was placed on the magma electrolysis and vapor phase reduction processes (both analytical and experimental) for separation of oxygen and metals from lunar regolith. The early experimental work on magma electrolysis resulted in gram quantities of iron (mixed metals) and the identification of significant anode, cathode, and container problems. In the vapor phase reduction tasks a detailed analysis of various process concepts led to the selection of two specific processes designated as ""Vapor Separation'' and ""Selective Ionization.'' Experimental work was deferred to fiscal year 1983. In the Silicate Processing task a thermophysical model of the casting process was developed and used to study the effect of variations in material properties on the cooling behavior of lunar basalt.

Carroll, W. F.↗

Lunar Prospector Orbit Determination Results

The orbit support for Lunar Prospector (LP) consists of three main areas: (1) cislunar orbit determination, (2) rapid maneuver assessment using Doppler residuals, and (3) routine mapping orbit determination. The cislunar phase consisted of two trajectory correction maneuvers during the translunar cruise followed by three lunar orbit insertion burns. This paper will detail the cislunar orbit determination accuracy and the real-time assessment of the cislunar trajectory correction and lunar orbit insertion maneuvers. The non-spherical gravity model of the Moon is the primary influence on the mapping orbit determination accuracy. During the first two months of the mission, the GLGM-2 lunar potential model was used. After one month in the mapping orbit, a new potential model was developed that incorporated LP Doppler data. This paper will compare and contrast the mapping orbit determination accuracy using these two models. LP orbit support also includes a new enhancement - a web page to disseminate all definitive and predictive trajectory and mission planning information. The web site provides definitive mapping orbit ephemerides including moon latitude and longitude, and four week predictive products including: ephemeris, moon latitude/longitude, earth shadow, moon shadow, and ground station view periods. This paper will discuss the specifics of this web site.

Beckman, Mark↗

Design and Testing of a Prototype Electrodynamic Regolith Conveyor For Lunar ISRU

NASA’s Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) Swamp Works Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory (ESPL) is developing a 4-phase Electrodynamic Regolith Conveyor (ERC) that could convey regolith without the risk of rotating or vibratory actuation, which could jam or require regular maintenance due to the abrasive nature of lunar regolith. Another goal of electrodynamic conveying is the reduction of conveying power, which is important considering the limited capacity of early-stage lunar power systems. The current state of the art (SOA) for lunar regolith conveying is based on recent NASA system studies for oxygen production plants. These plant designs require conveying rates around 100 kg/hr, to produce 10 mT/yr of oxygen from the regolith. To accomplish this, conventional augers and vibratory spiral conveyors have been identified as the SOA or the leading candidates due to their extensive use in the terrestrial material handling industry. At NASA KSC, the use of dynamic electric fields, generated by alternating high voltage on electrodes, has been developed as a dust mitigation solution known as the Electrodynamic Dust Shield (EDS). The EDS is being developed for lenses, solar panels, radiators, fabric and seals and is scheduled for a technology demonstration mission on the Moon in 2023. ESPL researchers have shown the ability to move thin layers (a few mm) of dust with mW of power. In Academia, researchers have shown the ability to electrodynamically convey regolith up to 1 kg/hr with a 4-phase EDS. This paper will describe the design and testing of a prototype ERC that could scale to support transporting regolith at ISRU relevant flow rates.

Conveyor↗

Yeast strain development to test in-space bioproduction in the Lunar Explorer Instrument for space biology Applications (LEIA) mission

The Lunar Explorer Instrument for space biology Applications (LEIA) is investigating the effects of lunar radiation and gravity on yeast viability, growth, and metabolism. LEIA is part of the CP-22 Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) surface mission to the south polar region of the Moon. The biological payload will test genetic factors that are likely to influence the tolerance of yeast for deep space and lunar surface radiation. LEIA is also investigating in-space production of β-carotene in bioengineered yeast. This carotenoid is both an antioxidant and pro-vitamin A- an essential human micronutrient. We report progress on engineering carotenoid-expressing strains to test the impacts of strain background and specific genetic variants on growth and production of β-carotene. To test for enhanced sensitivity to the LEIA mission environment, we generated gene knockouts for the RAD51 DNA damage repair locus as well as the SOD1, SOD2, and TSA1 reactive oxygen species (ROS) defense enzymes. We are also generating strains expected to increase tolerance to abiotic stressors and ROS. To be included in the biology payload, each strain needs to satisfy a series of requirements to be compatible with the mission concept of operations. The LEIA mission will conduct experiments using an autonomous light emitting diode optical detection system and microfluidics incubator to quantify growth, metabolism, and carotenoid production. Strains must produce sufficient carotenoids for bioproduction to be detectable with this optical system. Cells will be loaded into microfluidics cards, desiccated, and stored for 8-12 months prior to the initiation of lunar surface operations. The CLPS lander will operate for one lunar day, and strains will need to grow to stationary phase within 96 hours to ensure that telemetry of LEIA data to Earth can be completed. Genetic variants also need to display expected phenotypes within these optical detection, storage, and growth cycle constraints.

Yeast Engineering↗

Development of a Terrain Mapping/Crater Evolution Measurement using Diffractive Optical Elements

When landing on the moon, understanding the interaction of the engine exhaust plume with the lunar surface is critical for the success of the descent and landing flight phases. Two evaluation tools currently used are computational simulations and ground test measurements. Computational simulations require experimental measurements for comparison/validation, but ground test measurements cannot accurately emulate all aspects of an actual lunar landing; flight tests remain the only method of obtaining fully representative data. A terrain mapping/crater evolution measurement system was developed for potential inclusion on a future lander mission. This system uses two stereo cameras viewing a laser dot grid pattern projected on the ground, where the grid is created by shining a laser through one or two diffractive optical elements. CAD simulations of the stereo imaging system are first used to validate the proposed design. Laboratory testing of the system using both a large-scale fixed-geometry crater and a small-scale evolving-geometry crater validate the use of the system for terrain mapping measurements, and for its potential inclusion on a future lander mission.

Joshua M Weisberger↗

Development of a Terrain Mapping/Crater Evolution Measurement using Diffractive Optical Elements

When landing on the moon, understanding the interaction of the engine exhaust plume with the lunar surface is critical for the success of the descent and landing flight phases. Two evaluation tools currently used are computational simulations and ground test measurements. Computational simulations require experimental measurements for comparison/validation, but ground test measurements cannot accurately emulate all aspects of an actual lunar landing; flight tests remain the only method of obtaining fully representative data. A terrain mapping/crater evolution measurement system was developed for potential inclusion on a future lander mission. This system uses two stereo cameras viewing a laser dot grid pattern projected on the ground, where the grid is created by shining a laser through one or two diffractive optical elements. CAD simulations of the stereo imaging system are first used to validate the proposed design. Laboratory testing of the system using both a large-scale fixed-geometry crater and a small-scale evolving-geometry crater validate the use of the system for terrain mapping measurements. High-speed, front-illumination shadow particle tracking of particles ejected from the evolving geometry crater is also performed, demonstrating another diagnostic that can be used to further the understanding of plume-surface interactions.

Joshua M Weisberger↗

Lunar Transient Accelerations White Paper

Recently, the United States announced a plan to return astronauts to the moon by 2024 [8]. Lunar landing (and subsequent Mars landing) architecture was not considered when the current NASA standards and vehicle design requirements for crew injury risk were developed. Therefore a gap exists in protecting the crew in planetary landing scenarios. One of the interesting aspects of this design reference mission (DRM)is the consideration of having the crew stand during dynamic phases of flight. Although this approach was contemplated for the Apollo Lunar Module, current NASA standards do not address design solutions that allow the crew to stand. Currently, NASA uses several tools and associated limits to mitigate crew injury because of dynamic loads. Some of these tools are the Brinkley Dynamic Response Criterion (BDRC) model and Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) [10]; and these have several limitations for assessing spaceflight loading environments, as well as specific underlying assumptions that may not be applicable in planetary landing vehicles. The BDRC is a simple lumped mass parameter model developed by the U.S. military, and has been used primarily to evaluate injury risk associated with aircraft ejection systems. The model evaluates seat accelerations in each axis to determine injury risk. Because the model treats the human-seat-restraint system as a single system, it is contingent on a restraint system and seat with similar characteristics of the original test data underlying the model. In particular, the model requires a rigid seat with a minimum natural frequency of 15Hz, minimal seat pan padding, side supports, and multipoint harness. The BDRC model uses undamped natural frequency and damping coefficients based on these requirements and any deviations may render the model injury predictions void. In lunar landing, one expects that a minimal or even no seat with minimal restraints will be employed. In this case, the original model parameters are likely to not be applicable. For capsule-based spacecraft returning crew to Earth, the Hybrid III ATD in various sizes also is used to supplement the BDRC. This analytical tool was added to address limitations in the BDRC related to spacecraft landings while wearing a pressure garment and helmet. Although the Hybrid III ATD has additional measurement capability; head, neck,and lumbar spine responses were the only metrics included because of the limitations imposed by the model.Lunar landing acceleration limits must assume the crew is standing during landing, an orientation for which we have limited data.Although the Apollo missions did employ a standing orientation for the crew, much of the data is lost. Therefore data from othersources havebeen examined to inform lunar landing acceleration limits.

Jeffrey T Somers↗