SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the SRM booster of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the external tank and the SRM nozzle of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the external tank base and SRM booster base of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Pressure data are presented in tabular form on the external tank attach points and the external tank base rake of the space shuttle launch vehicle configuration model. For Vol. 3, see N75-23657.
Results of wind tunnel tests were conducted to determine boundary layer characteristics on the lower surface of a space shuttle orbiter. Total pressure and temperature profile data at various model stations were obtained using a movable, four-degree-of-freedom probe mechanism and static pressure taps on the model surface. During a typical run, the probe was located over a preselected model location, then driven down through the bondary layer until contact was made with the model surface.
Tests were conducted in a hypersonic wind tunnel using various truncated space shuttle orbiter configurations in an attempt to establish the optimum model size for other tests examining body shock-wing leading edge interference effects. The tests were conducted at Mach number 8 using the phase change paint technique. A test description, tabulated data, and tracings of isotherms made from photographs taken during the test are presented.
Data tables, model figures, and tabulated source data are given for aerodynamic investigations of separation effects in the integrated space shuttle vehicle. For Volume 1, see N75-28101.
Various means can be used to vary engine inlet throat areas in order to reduce noise generated at takeoff and approach. Low-speed wind-tunnel tests were performed to evaluate the aeroacoustic performance of two takeoff geometries (cylindrical centerbody and bulb-shaped centerbody) and four approach geometries (bulb-shaped centerbody, annular ring, radial vanes, and step diffuser). The effects of inlet internal lip shape and diffuser length on sonic inlet performance were also investigated. It was found that the single-passage geometries, in particular a cylindrical centerbody takeoff geometry and a bulb-shaped centerbody approach geometry, provide the highest level of aeroacoustic performance. Increasing the inlet lip contraction ratio extends the maximum incidence angle for attached lip flow, while increasing the inlet diffuser length increases total pressure recovery for a given amount of noise suppression.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Wind tunnel tests were conducted to: (1) determine the static stability characteristics of the Shuttle Vehicle 5 configuration; (2) determine the effect on the Vehicle 5 aerodynamic characteristics of External Tank (ET) and Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) nose shape, SRB nozzle shroud flare angle, orbiter to tank fairing, and sting location; (3) provide flow visualization using thin film oil paint; and (4) determine rudder, body flap, and inboard and outboard elevon hinge moments. The mated vehicle model was mounted in three different ways: (1) the orbiter mounted on the balance with the SRB's attached to the tank and the tank in turn attached to the orbiter; (2) the tank mounted on the balance (with the sting protruding through the tank base) with the SRB's and orbiter attached to the tank, and (3) with the tank mounted on the balance and the balance in turn supported by a forked sting entering the nozzle of each SRB, extending forward into the SRB's then crossing over to the tank to provide a balance socket. Data were obtained for Mach numbers from 0.6 through 4.96 at angles-of-attack and -sideslip from -10 to 10 degrees.
The investigations of pressure distributions are presented for aeroloads analysis at Mach numbers from 1.55 through 2.5. Angles of attack and sideslip varied from -6 to +6 degrees. Photographs of wind tunnel models are shown.