SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “decelerators”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2019

Aeroassist Technologies for Small Satellite Missions

Orbit insertion operations that require large V maneuvers using conventional propulsive technologies are mass inefficient and challenging to package within SmallSat form factors such as the popular CubeSat. Aeroassist technologies offer an alternative approach for V maneuvers and could revolutionize the use of SmallSats for exploration missions and increase the science return while reducing costs for orbital or entry missions to Mars, Venus and return to Earth. Aeroassist refers to the use of an atmosphere to accomplish a transportation system function using techniques such as aerobraking, aerocapture, aeroentry, and aerogravity assist. Aeroassist technologies are power efficient and tolerant to the radiation and thermal environment encountered in deep space, and can be integrated around or within SmallSat geometries. This presentation will discuss various Aeroassist technologies including conventional rigid aeroshells, inflatable decelerators, mechanically deployable decelerators and other drag devices and control methods that should be considered by Small Satellite mission design teams.

Cassell, Alan M.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Adaptive Deployable Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) Development for Small Sat Class Venus Missions

The Adaptable, Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) is a novel approach for entry vehicle design. Similar to an umbrella, it is stowed during launch and deployed prior to entry. ADEPT employs a high performance, 3-D woven, carbon fabric to serve as the primary surface of the mechanically deployed system. The successful ADEPT sounding rocket flight test matured the 1-meter Class ADEPT in the areas of deployment and structural integrity, and provided aerodynamic flight characteristics of the ADEPT open-back configuration from Mach 3 to Mach 0.3. Aerocapture uses the aerodynamic drag from a single hyperbolic atmospheric pass to provide the delta-V needed for orbit insertion. Studies suggest that, compared to propulsive orbit insertion, aerocapture could increase delivered payload by 70 percent at Venus. Drag modulation aerocapture, which shows promise of being simpler and more cost-effective than the more-often studied lift modulation methods, uses in-flight transformations of an entry vehicle's drag area to control the amount of deceleration produced during an atmospheric pass. In single-event drag modulation, a drag device is jettisoned after the appropriate deceleration. ADEPT, due to its unique ability to fold and unfold, is being considered for this SmallSat class payload mission applications.

Cassell, Alan M.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Summary of the Second High-Altitude, Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test for the LDSD Project

NASA’s Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator Project is developing and testing the next generation of supersonic aerodynamic decelerators for planetary entry. A key element of that development is the testing of full-scale articles in conditions relevant to their intended use, primarily in the tenuous Mars atmosphere. To achieve this testing, the LDSD project developed a new test architecture for the qualification of their supersonic parachute. A large, helium filled scientific balloon is used to hoist a 4.7 m blunt body test vehicle to an altitude of approximately 32 kilometers. The test vehicle is released from the balloon, spun up for gyroscopic stability, and accelerated to over four times the speed of sound and an altitude of 50 kilometers using a large solid rocket motor. Once at those conditions, the vehicle is despun and the test period begins.

Clark, Ian↗

NASA NTRS2019

Loftid Aeroshell Engineering Development Unit Structural Testing

NASA’s Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) technology was selected for a Technology Demonstration Mission under the Space Technology Mission Directorate in 2017. HIAD is an enabling technology that can facilitate atmospheric entry of heavy payloads to planets such as Earth and Mars using a deployable aeroshell. The deployable nature of the HIAD technology allows it to avoid the size constraints imposed on current rigid aeroshell entry systems. This enables use of larger aeroshells resulting in increased entry system performance (e.g. higher pay-load mass and/or volume, higher landing altitude at Mars). The Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) is currently scheduled for late-2021. LOFTID will be launched out of Vandenberg Air Force Base as a secondary payload on an Atlas V rocket. The flight test features a 6m diameter, 70-deg sphere-cone aeroshell and will provide invaluable high-energy orbital re-entry flight data. This data will be essential in supporting the HIAD team to mature the technology to diameters of 10m and greater. Aeroshells of this scale are applicable to potential near-term commercial applications and future NASA missions. Currently the LOFTID project has completed fabrication of the engineering design unit (EDU) inflatable structure (IS) and the flexible thermal protection system (F-TPS). These two components along with the rigid nose and center body comprise the HIAD aeroshell system. This EDU aeroshell is the precursor to the LOFTID aeroshell that will be used for flight. The EDU was built to verify the design given the subtle differences between the LOFTID aeroshell and past aeroshell designs that have been fabricated under the NASA HIAD project. To characterize the structural performance of the LOFTID aeroshell design, three structural tests will be performed. The first test to be conducted is static load testing, which will induce a uniform load across the forward surface of the aeroshell to simulate the expected pressure forces during atmospheric entry. The IS integrated with the rigid center body will first be tested alone to provide data for analytical model correlation, and then the F-TPS will be integrated for a second series of static load testing of the full aeroshell system. Instrumentation will be employed during the test series to measure component loads during testing, and a laser scanner will be used to generate a 3D map of the aeroshell surface to verify that the shape of the structure is acceptable at the simulated flight loads. After static load testing, pack and deployment testing will be conducted multiple times on the integrated system to demonstrate the aeroshell’s ability to fit within the required packed volume for the LOFTID mission without experiencing significant damage. Finally, the aeroshell will undergo modal testing to characterize its structural response. This presentation will discuss the setup and execution of each of the three tests that the EDU aeroshell will undergo. In addition, initial results of the testing will be presented outlining key findings as LOFTID moves for-ward with fabrication of the flight aeroshell.

Swanson, G. T.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Pterodactyl: An Uncoupled Range Control Approach to Fully Numerical Predictor-Corrector Entry Guidance

Entry, descent, and landing (EDL) has been identified as a core area of investment in NASA's Strategic Technology Investment Plan (NASA STIP). STIP lists the space technologies needed to help achieve NASA's science, technology, and exploration goals across the agency. Within the EDL core area, deployable hypersonic decelerators, also known as deployable entry vehicles (DEVs), have been identified as an area of investment, due to its potential to revolutionize payload delivery methods to Earth and other planets. These vehicles, which can deploy their heat shields or alter their shape before entry, exploit an increased and more effective drag ratio by using less mass than traditional blunt body vehicles with rigid aeroshells. DEVs like Adaptive Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) and Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) have demonstrated the capability of transporting the equivalent science payloads of blunt body rigid aeroshells, while using a significantly smaller diameter when stowed within a launch vehicle. While DEVs' increased energy dissipation for less mass is an attractive feature, their ability to contract and expand would require advancements in the current state-of-the-art guidance and control (G&C) architectures used by traditional rigid vehicles. Pterodactyl, a project funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), aims to provide feasible integrated G&C solutions for DEVs, complete with optimized vehicle designs and packaging analyses. Structural and aerodynamic analyses for the explored control systems suggested a need for a bank angle guidance algorithm, a heritage guidance approach that has been used in many entry precision targeting vehicles, as well as an additional need for the development of a non-bank angle guidance. For this reason, Pterodactyl will consider four different G&C configurations during its design phase: i) a reaction control system for bank (sigma) control, ii) a mass movement system for angle of attack (alpha) sideslip (beta) control, iii) flaps for alpha - beta control, and iv) flaps for sigma control. To increase the applicability of each proposed integrated G&C architecture, an 11 km/s lunar return demonstration mission is selected to stress the developed technology capability. The Lifting Nano-ADEPT (LNA) vehicle is chosen as the DEV to demonstrate the integrated solutions. This paper will detail the trajectory design for a lunar return mission, using the validated bank control guidance algorithm Fully Numerical Predictor-Corrector Entry Guidance (FNPEG) and a newly developed guidance algorithm: FNPEG Uncoupled Range Control (URC). FNPEG-URC diverges from traditional bank angle guidances by producing alpha and beta commands to thereby decouple downrange and crossrange control. This presentation will discuss the development and overall performance of FNPEG and FNPEG-URC for each of the four G&C configurations. Successful G&C configurations are defined as those that can deliver payloads to the intended descent and landing site while abiding by trajectory constraints in the face of dispersions.

Johnson, Breanna↗

NASA NTRS2017

High Ballistic Coefficient Mars EDL with Supersonic Retropropulsion

Future Mars missions will require the ability to land increasingly heavy systems with high precision, possibly at high altitude landing sites. A key obstacle in landing systems with high ballistic coefficient is Mars’ very thin atmosphere, approximately one hundred times less dense than Earth’s atmosphere. As a result, hypersonic deceleration occurs slowly throughout atmospheric entry and additional deceleration methods are required before landing. Previous landers up to and including MSL relied on Viking-heritage technologies including a Disk-Gap-Band (DGB) supersonic parachute and a blunt body aeroshell. Safe and effective deployment of a DGB parachute can be accomplished only within prescribed bounds on dynamic pressure and Mach number.2 In addition to the restrictive constraint this imposes on the entry trajectory, there is a concern that for a parachute to effectively slow an entry vehicle with a high ballistic coefficient, its diameter must be large enough to impose certification costs, modeling uncertainty, or mission risk that could be unacceptable. This has prompted investigation into alternative mission concepts based on use of supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) without a parachute. This work investigates SRP as an enabling technology for Mars EDL of high ballistic coefficient vehicles.

Noyes, Connor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars InSight Entry, Descent, and Landing Trajectory and Atmosphere Reconstruction

The InSight mission landed on the surface of Mars on November 26th, 2018. The InSight system performance met all design requirements, although several performance metrics fell near the boundaries of the predictions. The peak deceleration was high, the overall timeline was short, and the landing site was uprange and crossrange from the target. This paper describes the reconstruction of the entry, descent, and landing trajectory and atmosphere. The approach utilizes a Kalman filter to blend sensor data to obtain the vehicle trajectory. The aerodynamic database is used in combination with the sensed accelerations to obtain estimates of the atmosphere-relative state, which in turn is used to derive the free-stream atmospheric conditions during entry, until the time of parachute deployment. The results indicate that the reconstructed atmosphere was approximately 1σbelow the preflight atmosphere. Analysis of the reconstructed vehicle attitude angles indicate that the aerodynamic lift was oriented downward at entry. The vehicle developed a roll rate during entry, which directed a component of the lift to the north. The low density and aerodynamic lift direction are determined to be the primary causes of the high deceleration, short timeline, and location of the landing site relative to the target.

Christopher D Karlgaard↗

NASA NTRS2020

Mars InSight Entry, Descent, and Landing Trajectory and Atmosphere Reconstruction

Christopher D Karlgaard↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ELECTRICAL SHORTING OF THERMOCOUPLES IN ATMOSPHERIC ENTRY APPLICATIONS

The Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) will test Hyper-sonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) technology. Temperature measurements are taken across the vehicle to address a Level 1 mission requirement regarding performance of the Flexible Thermal Protection System (F-TPS). Temperature measurements are made using dozens of thermocouples (TCs) embedded within the F-TPS at different depths and various locations shown in Figure 1.

Cole D Kazemba↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Developments in Retropropulsion Testing for Mars Entry, Descent and Landing

NASA’s plans for landing human-scale payloads on Mars in the next decade require that retrorockets be used to decelerate the atmospheric entry vehicle continuously from supersonic conditions through soft touchdown. Conventional Mars entry vehicle architectures that include a single parachute for supersonic-to-subsonic descent are not scalable to the sizes needed to land humans on Mars (~20 metric tons). The major aerosciences risks are the uncertainties in predicting aerodynamic stability and performance during powered free-flight and landing. These risks are influenced partially by current limitations in relevant data and testing methods. Consequently, trajectory simulations currently depend on unvalidated powered descent and landing aerodynamics models. NASA engineers have identified gaps in testing methods that, if addressed, would improve the ability to validate these models. There are gaps in capabilities to test multi-engine hot-gas retropropulsion systems in US wind tunnels. This is partially due to the successful use of parachutes as decelerators for human spaceflight at Earth and for the entire Mars lander program to date. Retropulsion test data historically and to this day are limited to using high pressure air jets, at comparatively low temperatures,as engine plume simulants on subscale wind tunnel models. Additionally, the ability to directly measure aerodynamic interference force and moments is limited by existing flow-through balance capabilities. This paper briefly covers historical and recent test data, and identifies new ground test techniques as a means to provide more relevant test data for powered flight and landing aerodynamic model validation.These techniques include using heated inert gases as a substitute for combustion products, additively manufactured 6-component flow-through force and moment balances, and off-body quantitative diagnostic measurements.

Retropropulsion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Vulcan Reuse

This is an exciting time in the space launch market. We have providers developing various reuse concepts to help drive continued cost reductions in access to space. At the same time visions of a future marketplace in space are emerging that have energized the community to move toward economically viable space-based ventures. This paper explores the intersection of these two developments. Specifically, we focus on the underlying technologies developed for ULA’s Sensible, Modular, Autonomous Return Technology (SMART) approach to reuse and the intersection with needs in the cislunar marketplace. ULA has been working with NASA Langley Research Center on maturing their Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) technology into the Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) technology demonstration mission scheduled to fly with the JPSS-2 Launch in 2022, and have honed in on a 6m diameter HIAD for that application. These efforts, under the NASA Space Act Agreements (SAA), have helped identify elements requiring further development for SMART Reuse, which could also benefit other potential mission infusion opportunities. This has proved to be a very fruitful collaboration as these aspects have evolved. The paper further delves into applications across commercial space and NASA’s Space Exploration mandate, in addition to the reusable launch vehicle applications.

John G Reed↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Adaptable, Deployable, Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) Enabling Advanced Entry, Descent, and Landing Capabilities for SmallSat Missions

The Adaptable, Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) is a mechanically deployable low-ballistic coefficient aeroshell entry system which performs entry, descent, and landing (EDL) functions for a broad range of planetary destinations including Mars, Venus, Titan and Earth. The deployable system allows mission planners to develop an aeroshell design that is stowed like a folded umbrella, and yet prior to the EDL mission segment, transforms into a deployed, near-rigid low ballistic coefficient configuration. The ADEPT architecture is scalable from a sub-1m class to 6m diameter entry vehicles for Venus and and it has been studied at up to 15m – 20m scale for human exploration class missions. There has been growing interest in performing interplanetary missions with small spacecraft as secondary payloads and ADEPT offers small satellite mission designers the ability to consider Aeroassist technologies to expand mission applications. The ADEPT architecture introduces a new approach for entry vehicle design. It deploys a flexible 3D woven carbon fabric as the primary drag surface. It is capable of surviving high aerothermal heating during entry, while maintaining a robust impermeable membrane that provides high drag for vehicle deceleration. The ADEPT project team has advanced this decelerator technology via systems-level testing at the one meter diameter (nano-ADEPT) scale. A subsonic aeroloads test (May 2015) and a pathfinder arc-jet aeroheating test (Sept 2015) and a successful sounding rocket flight (SR-1) launch of a 0.7 meter deployed diameter ADEPT (September 2018). The SR-1 flight experiment demonstrated most of the primary end-to-end mission stages including: launch in a stowed configuration, separation and deployment in zero-g, exo-atmospheric conditions, and passive ballistic re-entry of a 70 degree half-angle cone geometry. The ADEPT SR-1 sounding rocket flight experiment had to address challenges such as stowing within the constrained payload envelope, fabric folding, and packaging concerns.

Paul Wercinski↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

X-Ray Imagery as the Record of All Data of Interest in Hypervelocity Impact Fragment Studies

Laboratory study of hypervelocity spacecraft fragmentation has traditionally involved the collection and analysis of fragments that were caught in deceleration material surrounding the impact. This process has typically involved the disintegration of the catchment material either through chemical dissolution, or through physical excavation to recover the fragments. Due to the scale of the three impact tests—the Satellite Orbital Debris Characterization Impact Test (SOCIT), the DebriSat satellite impact test, and the DebrisLV launch vehicle impact test—the latter two using more than 12 cubic meters of polyurethane foam to capture the fragments, hese projects have used x-ray imagery to precisely locate and thus, to more efficiently extract fragments in the soft-catch material. Three years into the DebriSat fragment extraction process, a side study was initiated to explore what additional information could be discerned from the x-rays, with significant results. This study was instrumental to a rapid replacement and retooling as the project was forced to replace the x-ray system around which the extraction process had been based. The revised process continues to map the debris for extraction. The project has, in parallel, systematically addressed the limits/tolerances of what x-rays can reveal about size, shape, density, mass, velocity, energy, and deformation/damage of the fragment during the deceleration in the catchment material while replicating the original extraction mapping function. All of these features have been optimized or have sufficient understanding to characterize the basic factors that will define a complete data set extracted solely from x-ray imagery. It is an ideal time to develop such a process, with extracted fragments providing “ground truth” against image-only data, and abundant available imagery of the same fragments under both the prior and replacement x-ray technologies, which have several fundamentally different characteristics. This paper addresses the types and quality of hypervelocity fragmentation data that can be and has been extracted from x-rays. It further addresses the question of whether and under what circumstances future hypervelocity experiments can use x-ray methods to largely—or to completely—avoid the extraction process in recording all appropriate results. Lastly, this paper addresses lessons learned and how future efforts can be further optimized.

John B. Bacon↗

NASA NTRS2021

High-Fidelity Simulation of Turbulent Flow Past a Gaussian Bump

A spanwise-periodic computation of a turbulent flow past a Gaussian bump is performed in the form of a hybrid direct numerical simulation and wall-resolved large-eddy simulation. A fourth-order spatially-accurate flow solver is employed to perform the simulation, using 10.2 billion grid points for a Reynolds number of 170000 based on the bump height. The key findings from the simulation are reported in the acceleration and deceleration flow regions associated with the bump shape. Significant anisotropy in the normal Reynolds stresses, along both the wall-normal and streamwise directions, is observed within the acceleration region. The ratio between the Reynolds shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy in that region also experiences significant deviations from the norms of a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer. The chosen Reynolds number generates strong flow separation in the adverse pressure gradient region, which is in contrast with a previous simulation at half the Reynolds number that only indicated incipient separation. An internal layer generated in the acceleration region evolves into a free shear layer that develops in the deceleration region and separates. Proper modeling of this inner layer appears crucial to predict the flow separation. Surface curvature effects on the attached flow development are also discussed.

Turbulent Boundary Layer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aerothermal Uncertainty Quantification of Deployable Entry Technologies Using Multi-Fidelity Modeling

The objective of this work was to investigate the use of a co-Kriging based multi-fidelity modeling approach with a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification analyses of surface heating on hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator vehicles and adaptable, deployable entry placement technology vehicles in Mars entry. A previously developed co-Kriging based multi-fidelity modeling approach was used to model the laminar and turbulent convective and radiative heat fluxes along the vehicle. Monte Carlo analyses of surface heat load for nine different vehicle nose radii was performed for both vehicles, assuming the same thermal protection system is used for both vehicles. The maximum heat loads and heat load uncertainties were found to occur at either the stagnation point or the vehicle shoulder. The maximum 95% confidence intervals for the total heat load for the hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator vehicle were found to be [-9.27, 7.81] % of the nominal value and [-6.09, 13.1] % of the nominal value for laminar and turbulent flow, respectively. The maximum 95% confidence intervals for the total heat load for the adaptable, deployable entry placement technology vehicle were found to be [-8.85, 7.22] % of the nominal value and [-9.33, 9.35] % of the nominal value for laminar and turbulent flow, respectively. The difference in heating uncertainties based on vehicle geometry between the two vehicle technologies was found to be minimal.

Mario Santos↗

NASA NTRS2021

Low Cost Access to Mars Surface using a Small Impact Lander

In order to reduce the cost of landing small payloads on Mars, a new technology is being developed: the Small High Impact Energy Landing Device concept (SHIELD). The purpose of SHIELD is to provide a low-cost option to deliver up to 6 kg of science payload to the surface of Mars. SHIELD could be launched as a hosted payload, rideshare on an EELV secondary payload adapter (ESPA), or launching from a dedicated small launch vehicle using a kick stage. The SHIELD concept can achieve low-cost access to Mars by taking advantage of a low ballistic coefficient design to decelerate safely instead of using the typically required parachutes and/or propulsion to decelerate and stabilize itself during entry, decent, and landing (EDL). Current finite element simulations suggest that SHIELD would experience an impact acceleration pulse ranging from 1000 to 2000 g’s with a duration of 8 milliseconds. The SHIELD concept payload subsystem includes a “ruggedized” small warm electronics box (WEB). The WEB houses the telecommunications, command and data handling, thermal control, electrical power, and payload subsystems while maintaining an internal operating temperature ranging between -20° to 20° C. The system is designed to survive the Martian night by utilizing electric heaters powered with solar cells during the day and secondary batteries. The WEB is designed to be impact resistant capable of surviving an impact acceleration pulse equal to or less than 2000 g’s.

Woolley, Ryan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Error Sources and Mitigation Strategies for Thermocouples Integrated in Flexible Thermal Protection System Materials

Brief Presenter Biography:Ruth Miller is an aer-ospace systems engineer in the Entry Systems and Ve-hicle Development Branch at NASA Ames Research Center.Introduction:The flexible thermal protection sys-tem (FTPS) on NASA’s Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) vehicle will be in-strumented with thermocouples (TCs) to measure the in-depth thermal response during entry into Earth’s atmos-phere[1, 2]. Accurate flight temperature measurements are critical for verifying vehicle performance during the flight test and reducing uncertainties in the thermal models.However,the deployable nature of inflatable decelerator technology presents challengesfor integrat-ing TCs, specifically the TCsneed to be compactableand cannot damage the FTPSnor the inflatable structure(IS).Unlike traditional rigid aeroshells, routing TCsthrough the thickness of the FTPS could cause signifi-cant damage during packing of the deployable aeroshellbecause the different layers may shift small amounts in relation to each other imparting strain on the TCsand FTPS materials. The LOFTID TCleads are routed from the measurement location back to the data acquisition system in the vehicle centerbody within the same FTPS layer that they are monitoring the temperature. This ap-proach eliminates the need to put holes in the FTPS lay-ers,butas a consequence,the insulated TCleads travel for an appreciable distance through a region that will expose them to high temperaturesand large thermal gra-dients.LOFTID’s TCswere baselined to be commercially available Type K TCswith a binder impregnated glass braid insulation. These TCswere chosen because they had been used successfully on IRVE-3 and in ground-based arc jet testing. Additionally, these TCsdid notdamage the FTPS nor IS during packing and deploy-ment testing. However, the glass braid insulation is only rated to a maximum continuous use temperature of 482ºC. For reference, the duration of the heat pulse on the LOFTID vehicle is on the order of minutes and themaximum predicted temperaturebeneaththe outermost FTPS layersis 1350ºC.Ground-based testing in a tube furnace at NASA Ames Research Centerwas conducted to determine if the baseline TCsrouted through FTPS samples would survive and provide accurate temperature measure-mentsat LOFTID flight-relevant temperatures[3].The test results showed large measurement errors occurred beginning at approximately 400°C due to conductive deposits on the TCinsulation electrically shorting the TCleads.The conductive deposits and thus electrical shorting weredetermined to be caused by twoerror sources:1.The organic binder on the TCinsulation carbon-izingin a high temperature, low oxygen envi-ronment2.Decomposition products from the FTPSperme-atingthe braided TC insulationFurther testing in the tube furnace demonstrated that heat cleaning the TCinsulation effectivelyremovedthe organic binder andeliminatedthe first error source.The second error sourcewas shown to be mitigated by the addition of amica wraparound each individual TCleadtoact as an impermeable barrier.To understand the applicability of theground-based tube furnace test results to flight,anarc jet testseriesat Boeing’s Large Core Arc Tunnel (LCAT) facilitywas conducted[4].The error sourcesand mitigation strate-giesidentified in the tube furnace testing were substan-tiatedin the arc jet testing.However, the arc jet testing also revealed three new error sources:1.Glass TCinsulation meltingwhich resultsin electrical shorting of the TCeither through di-rect contact between the two leads or through the electrically conductive FTPS materials2.TCwire meltingwhich results in a noisy and/or open-loop TCresponse3.Type K TCwire green-rotwhich results in large calibration errors Scope of the Presentation:This presentation will include a brief discussion onthe effect of electrical shorting on the output of a TC(i.e. how to identify elec-trical shorting in TCdataand what the associated erroris).The tube furnace and arc jet test resultswill be dis-cussedand the solutions LOFTID is implementing to mitigate the error sourcesidentified in the tube furnace and arc jet testingwill be presented.Additionally, futureresearch and development work to eliminateTCerror sourcesfor future missionswill be recommended.

R A Miller↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recent Results from Dragonfly Testing/Analysis as we head to PDR

Dragonfly is a relocatable lander mission to Saturn's moon Titan4, which as well as being a target of out-standing astrobiological interest as an organic-rich Ocean World, has the combination of low gravity (1/7 that of Earth) and a thick atmosphere (4x the density of Earth), making it an environment uniquely suitable for flight. Thus, the Dragonfly lander (similar in size to the Curiosity Mars rover) can take off using lift from a set of eight rotors and fly to a new landing site several kilometers away. The ability to perform such flights, lasting approximately 30 minutes, every month or so on Titan brings unprecedented mobility to planetary exploration, on a world known to have a diverse land-scape of dunes, craters and other features. Dragonfly is planned to launch in 2027, and following a nearly seven year interplanetary cruise would arrive at Titan by 2034. Due to the large scale height of the Titan atmosphere, Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) will be prolonged affair, taking nearly two hours to reach the surface. The ballistic entry environments that Dragonfly will be subjected to are fairly similar to that experienced by recent Mars missions; peak heating on the aeroshell will be about 300 W/sq.cm and peak deceleration is about 10g’s. Following the five minute entry segment, much of the remaining time is spent descending on the drogue and main para-chutes, which carry the dual role of decelerating the spacecraft and stabilizing the system during the long descent. While on one hand, this leisurely EDL sequence affords a relaxed timeline and plenty of time for event staging, it also provides ample opportunity for small disturbances to grow into potential flight safety risks, adding emphasis to the need for careful modeling, simulation and testing of key dynamic events. About two hours after entering the atmosphere, the nearly one metric ton rotocraft will be lowered approximately one meter out of the backshell (the ‘pose’ maneuver) to expose all eight rotors. The rotors will then be used to arrest any residual spin rate and prepare the system for transition to powered flight. Once despin is complete and the lander reaches a target altitude of 1.2 km above the surface (as verified by on-board lidar), the lander will be released and free fall for approximately one second before beginning controlled free flight. This entire “preparation for powered flight” process takes place over several minutes while the system is subject to the dynamic environment produced by so-called “wrist-mode” oscillations as the lander and backshell swing on the main parachute. Once in free flight, the lander will engage on-board terrain relative navigation to locate and navigate to a safe landing zone in the Shangri-La dune field south of Selk crater. Communication during this sequence will be limited to a series of direct-to-Earth X-band tones signalling key events and providing forensic information. Once on the ground, the lander will begin to send additional information, including data collected during this EDL sequence by the on-board Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements (DrEAM) instrumentation suite. This presentation will walk through the entry to first landing timeline in more detail, with a focus on recent analysis and testing results that inform system performance, margins and residual risk estimation.

Dragonfly↗