Decontamination Experiments and Simulations Supporting Recovery After Widespread Contamination - 18685
Clean-up after an uncontrolled nuclear material release differs from common decontamination practices in the nuclear industry and military combat scenarios. Uncontrolled releases, particularly acts of terror, require specific protective actions guides (PAGs) to optimize short and long-term repercussions. Ideally, non-destructive decontamination methods would be employed. To help fulfill this need, the IWATERS (Integrated Wash Aid Treatment Emergency Reuse System) was proposed in 2014 for remediation outside the immediate blast area. 'Wash-Aid' is hosed onto affected areas, and the used wash solution is collected and recycled through sand/clay beds. To help characterize the IWATERS technology, the below was completed: - Decontamination experiments with a pressurized wash solution using Cs-137, Sr- 85, and Eu-152 contaminants on porous urban materials. - Sensitivity analyses on recycling bed variables using GoldSim{sup TM} CT. - A proposed framework that expands the recycling bed model to include probabilistic simulation of immediate recovery efforts. Removal efficacy of tap water and 0.5 M KCl were compared for Cs, Sr, and Eu across asphalt, brick, and concrete. The 0.5 M KCl solution significantly outperformed tap water in every case except for Eu on concrete and Cs on brick. Trends in the high-pressure decontamination with salt additive compared to low pressure decontamination show evidence of physical and chemical removal. Variations in cleaning rate yielded no significant trend. Pressure changes (by adjusting nozzle-to-coupon distance) were only significant for the highest pressure. Hypothetical Contamination Scenario: To tie the decontamination experiments and recycling bed model together, a small contamination scenario was created. Imagine the sides of a small concrete building uniformly contaminated with Cs-137. Power washing the building with 0.5 M KCl solution would result in 857 L of contaminated solution generated in 185 minutes. Two sand clay beds were designed to clean the used solution. With a sand mass fraction of 0.9, a 10 ft{sup 2} bed 4 ft tall could recycle the solution in 1.05 hrs. Changing the sand mass fraction to 0.5 yielded a 2.5 ft{sup 2} bed 4 ft tall (∼55-gallon drum) that recycled the solution in 7.43 hrs. This exercise showed how the sand/clay bed design can easily change to match the primary remediation goals. The second sand/clay bed would reduce the waste generation while the first bed reduces the remediation time. Conclusions: Variations on speed and nozzle distance (pressure) yielded insignificant differences in efficacy except for the closest distance. High-pressure washing showed increased decontamination efficacy with KCl additive in the majority of cases. Except for bed composition, key recycling bed parameters can be varied on-the-fly. This allows for optimization of, for example, time and waste generation. The hypothetical contamination scenario showed pairing decontamination experiment results with modeling tools can lead to increased preparedness for a large-scale contamination event. With collaboration and time, an expanded recovery/remediation model could aid in development of effective protective action guides.