Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Nuclear Reactor Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Laboratory Instrument Software Controlled Spread Spectrum Time Domain Reflectometry for Electrical Cable Testing

This research discusses development of a software-controlled laboratory instrument based spread spectrum time domain reflectometry system (SSTDR). This constitutes one task within PNNL’s Light Water Sustainability Program (LWRS) whose mission includes advancing nondestructive examination (NDE) techniques for off-line and on-line in-situ cable condition monitoring. In 2022, PNNL evaluated SSTDR for detection and characterization of a number of cable anomalies (Glass et al. 2022). The review included comparison of SSTDR to Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) techniques which have enjoyed encouraging feedback and are starting to be used in nuclear power plants for periodic cable condition monitoring of cable systems as part of the plant’s overall cable aging management program. The FDR test introduces a broad-band chirp onto the cable at the cable end then listens for any reflection from a change of impedance along the cable caused by a damaged conductor or insulation, splices, contact with moisture, or other cable anomalies. The signal is captured in the frequency domain then transformed back to the time domain using an inverse Fourier transform (IFT). Based on the velocity of propagation, the impedance response signal is plotted against distance along the cable. Peak locations along the X-axis indicate the distance along the cable where a portion of the signal has been reflected back to the instrument as a result of a cable anomaly. The FDR test is considered the gold standard of reflectometry however it does require the cable to be de-energized to perform the test. The LIVEWIRE commercial SSTDR produces a similar plot to the FDR however all processing is in the time domain. A pseudo-random noise code (PN code) is input onto the cable conductor and the instrument listens for any reflected response from cable anomalies. The SSTDR processes the signal as an autocorrelation comparing the input PN code to any reflected signal detected. The autocorrelation analysis for thermal aging, water and water ingress detection, ground fault and phase-to-phase fault detection at various locations along the cable and with the cable attached and detached from a motor load, and on both energized and un-energized conditions were performed. These results were contrasted to Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) measurements of the un-energized cable. Results were encouraging but indicated more work was warranted – particularly with the SSTDR, it seemed that the insulation damage would likely be better evaluated with multiple bandwidth cable tests particularly including larger bandwidths than were possible with the current commercial instrument. The commercial instrument’s bandwidth was set at 6, 12, 24, and 48MHz but note that SSTDR and FDR definitions of bandwidth trend similarly but are not the same. The FDR response could be more broadly adjusted, and the bandwidth of 100 to 500 MHz produced the best responses. FDR responses to anomalies were clearer than SSTDR responses and indications were that a broader bandwidth SSTDR may lead to improved SSTDR detection capability. This project used a laboratory instrument based SSTDR (primarily using an Arbitrary Waveform Generator (AWG) and a digital oscilloscope plus Python in-house software) that allowed software adjustment of the SSTDR bandwidth, window functions applied to the exciting Pseudo-random Noise (PN) code plus and other aspects of the SSTDR signal processing. Hereafter, this will be referred to as the PNNL SSTDR. Evaluating specific performance of the PNNL SSTDR is left to a separate report. This report documents hardware and software development to produce the SSTDR cable test system.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Advancement of Functional Expansion Tallies Capabilities in Serpent 2

The need for accident tolerant fuels (ATFs) became self-evident after the series of unfortunate nuclear events at Fukushima Daiichi in 2011. Restarting the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) at INL is one component in this concerted effort to establish the ATF development and testing program under the United States Department of Energy. Prior to the closure of TREAT in 1994, each experiment required multiple low-power calibration tests before and after each run. Since then, computing advancements have set computer-based modeling and simulation (M and S) as the preferred calibration method. The anticipated savings are both temporal and monetary. MAMMOTH, a collection of M and S tools built from the finite element-based MOOSE Framework, has been established to support the designed experiments intended for TREAT. This collection of tools includes: 1) Rattlesnake, a striking diffusion-based neutronics code, 2) BISON, an advanced materials and fuels performance code, and 3) RELAP-7, a powerful thermal-hydraulics solver. Each is capable of independently performing its function accurately and effectively; unified, they create a powerful multiphysics reactor core M and S application. One unfortunate weakness in this configuration lies in the unique geometry and design of TREAT's core. Although simple to model, this poses a challenge to the diffusion solver in Rattlesnake. One alternative is to replace Rattlesnake with Serpent, a fully-fledged Monte Carlo (MC) neutronics code. Coincidentally, Rattlesnake calculations are frequently validated against Serpent simulations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Notch Effects on the Short Term Rupture Properties of Alloy 617 Base Metal and Weldments

Alloy 617 is currently undergoing approval for inclusion in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code in Section III Division 5 for use in high temperature nuclear reactors. Prior to use in construction of these reactors, however, it must be approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Several concerns relating to the effects of geometric discontinuities, such as notches and multi-axial stress states (as opposed to uniaxial stress states typically present in laboratory run creep tests), must first be addressed. Alloy 617 has been found to be notch-strengthening in short term (1000-2500 hour) creep testing for both base metal and weld metal and will fail preferentially in a straight gauge section rather than at a sharp notch, provided that the applied stresses are similar in both the straight gauge and notch sections. Additionally, specimens designed with semi-circular notches (or U notches, as they are referred to in this report) to impose multi-axial stress states on the specimen during creep-testing were found to either maintain similar creep-rupture-lives as uniaxial stress specimens tested at similar conditions, or have creep-rupture-lives that were significantly longer. This work shows that notches and multi-axial stress states do not appear to raise concerns with relation to the use of design rules created for Alloy 617 using smooth, straight-gauge test specimens and uniaxial creep tests.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

GAIN Technology Workshops Summary Report

National and global demand for nuclear energy is increasing and United States (U.S.) global leadership is eroding. There is a sense of urgency with respect to the deployment of the innovative nuclear energy technologies. The Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) initiative is based on the simultaneous achievement of three strategic goals. The first is maintaining global technology leadership within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The second is enabling global industrial leadership for nuclear vendors and suppliers. The third is focused on utility optimization of nuclear energy within the clean energy portfolio. An effective public-private partnership is required to achieve these goals. DOEs recognizes the recent sense of urgency new developers and investors have in getting their concepts to market. They know that time to market for nuclear technology takes too long and the facilities needed to conduct the necessary research, development and demonstration (RD&D) activities are very expensive to develop and maintain. Early technologies, in the lower technology readiness levels (TRL) need materials testing, analysis, modeling, code development, etc., most of which currently exists in the DOE national laboratory system. However, mature technologies typically need large component testing and demonstration facilities, which are expensive and long-lead efforts. By understanding the needs of advanced nuclear technology developers, GAIN will connect DOE national laboratory capabilities (e.g., facilities, expertise, materials, and data) with industry RD&D needs. In addition, GAIN is working with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to streamline processes and increase understanding of the licensing requirements for advanced reactors.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Status Report on Advanced Reactor Fuels Hot Cell Furnace Testing

The Advanced Fuels Campaign is developing a series of out-of-pile steady state furnace tests on irradiated nuclear fuel pins in order to better characterize and understand isolated fuel performance phenomena. These tests will also provide valuable datasets for validation and improvement of modelling and simulation tools. The Blister Anneal Furnace (BAF) in the INL Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) has been identified as the ideal location for these tests, and, in order to perform them, a new fixture for the BAF has been designed and commissioned. This report summarizes the objectives, design, characteristics and status of this fixture. The design was finalized, materials procured and tested, and the assembly fixture is now fully fabricated in the mock-up shop of the Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF) at MFC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Application of NSUF Capabilities Towards Understanding the Emulation of High Dose Neutron Irradiations with Ion Beams

Development of new materials for current nuclear power plants (NPPs) or materials for new NPPs requires extensive research, development, and deployment programs. Central to these efforts, particularly for core internals, are studies on the microstructural and mechanical changes due to neutron irradiation. These radiation effects studies are typically completed using materials test reactors followed by expensive and time-consuming post-irradiation examinations (PIE). This sluggish approach has severely limited the nuclear materials field to develop new materials or verify materials for new reactor design use. It is also very difficult to achieve the high levels of damage proposed for future reactors. A logical approach to accelerating the field is the application of ion beams to simulate neutron damage, especially for high dose applications. Ion beams have been used for decades to study radiation effects but not to emulate high dose reactor irradiations. In this regard, new (or renewed) methods for ion beam irradiations, new developments in materials characterization, and greater understanding on the governing mechanisms controlling observed radiation effects have led to a need for further studies to refine the technique. A primary challenge is the ability to determine the ion irradiation conditions that produce microstructures and mechanical properties relevant to in-core neutron irradiation conditions. A large, multi-disciplinary, multi-laboratory program deemed the High Fidelity Ion Beam Simulation of High Dose Neutron Irradiation has been formed to assess and overcome the challenges associated with emulating high dose neutron irradiations using ion beams. Central to this program is the use of dual-beam ion irradiations and corresponding neutron irradiations within the BOR-60 fast reactor. These irradiations have produced hundreds of specimens for microstructural and mechanical characterization. A significant issue regarding the samples is the radioactivity of the neutron irradiated specimens as well as the need to characterize both irradiation types using the same equipment to maintain consistency and repeatability. The use of the Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) has been central towards overcoming the mentioned issues and thereby enabling robust PIE in both the ion and neutron irradiated specimens of interest. In particular, the electron microscopes housed within the Low Activation Materials Development and Analysis (LAMDA) facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) - an NSUF partner facility - has been instrumental in gathering high quality data for analysis. This paper will briefly highlight the PIE efforts using the NSUF capabilities within LAMDA.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Fast Flux Test Facility Benchmark Status for FY19

The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Program works on promising Generation-IV R&D. The Program focus is on reactor concepts that could dramatically improve performance in sustainability, safety, economics, security, and proliferation resistance. The near-term ART Program goal is to reduce technical barriers (e.g., by resolving key feasibility and performance challenges) to improve the prospects of advanced technology reactor systems. In the long-term, integrated advanced reactor system designs will be developed that implement the chosen missions and complete the testing and demonstration necessary for licensing. The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is the most recent Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) to operate in the United States, from 1982 to 1992. The plant description and plant data from one specific passive safety test is now an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP). This report is one in a series documenting the PNNL efforts to support this FFTF loss of flow benchmark for the IAEA.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Flux in a 1D-Reactor Cell by Response Matrix

Legacy computational reactor physics software tools and protocols currently used in support of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) core fuel management and safety assurance, and to some extent, experiment management, are inconsistent with the state of modern nuclear engineering practice. Thus, they are difficult, if not impossible, to verify and validate (V and V) according to modern standards. Furthermore, the legacy staff knowledge required for effective application of their application and protocols from the 1960's and 1970's is rapidly being lost due to staff turnover and retirements. In late 2009, the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) initiated a focused effort, the ATR Core Modeling Update Project, to address this situation through the introduction of modern high-fidelity transport theory based computational software and models to replace the legacy methods, with appropriate (V and V) protocols according to applicable national standards. The new computational tools include: - The 2-dimensional HELIOS deterministic transport code for integrated ATR core fuel and experiment management and Core Safety Analysis Package (CSAP) physics data generation. The MCNP5 3-dimensional stochastic simulation (Monte Carlo) code for verification and validation applications and for specialized ATR core analysis along with its longstanding traditional role in experiment support - The 2-dimensional deterministic NEWT transport code and the 3-dimensional KENO6 stochastic simulation code, with their SCALE-based support infrastructure for use in V and V applications and as supporting modules for sensitivity-uncertainty analysis via the TSUNAMI system. The ATTILA 3-dimensional discrete-ordinates transport code for specialized experiment support and possibly additional applications. Regardless of application, every neutron transport code, new or legacy, requires verification. The aim of this presentation is to provide a neutron transport benchmark for a simple 1D-reactor cell in plane geometry. The benchmark finds use as a standard of comparison for the codes listed above intended for the ATR upgrade. The method developed here is in contrast to the finite Fourier transform solution found in Ref. 1, which is limited to isotropic scattering and particularly difficult to numerically implement unless the total cross section is constant over the cell.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Software Quality Assurance and Verification for the MPACT Library Generation Process

This report fulfills the requirements for the Consortium for the Advanced Simulation of Light-Water Reactors (CASL) milestone L2:RTM.P14.02, “SQA and Verification for MPACT Library Generation,” by documenting the current status of the software quality, verification, and acceptance testing of nuclear data libraries for MPACT. It provides a brief overview of the library generation process, from general-purpose evaluated nuclear data files (ENDF/B) to a problem-dependent cross section library for modeling of light-water reactors (LWRs). The software quality assurance (SQA) programs associated with each of the software used to generate the nuclear data libraries are discussed; specific tests within the SCALE/AMPX and VERA/XSTools repositories are described. The methods and associated tests to verify the quality of the library during the generation process are described in detail. The library generation process has been automated to a degree to (1) ensure that it can be run without user intervention and (2) to ensure that the library can be reproduced. Finally, the acceptance testing process that will be performed by representatives from the Radiation Transport Methods (RTM) Focus Area prior to the production library’s release is described in detail.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS1973

Simulator test to study hot-flow problems related to a gas cooled reactor

An advance study of materials, fuel injection, and hot flow problems related to the gas core nuclear rocket is reported. The first task was to test a previously constructed induction heated plasma GCNR simulator above 300 kW. A number of tests are reported operating in the range of 300 kW at 10,000 cps. A second simulator was designed but not constructed for cold-hot visualization studies using louvered walls. A third task was a paper investigation of practical uranium feed systems, including a detailed discussion of related problems. The last assignment resulted in two designs for plasma nozzle test devices that could be operated at 200 atm on hydrogen.

Poole, J. W.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Replacement of Legacy Analytical Codes at the Advanced Test Reactor

For each operating cycle of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory, a Core Safety Assurance Package (CSAP) is necessary to demonstrate compliance with the safety basis approved by the United State Department of Energy (DOE). Certain computer codes are used in CSAP development, most of them developed in-house. This work describes replacement of a large set of these codes and updates previous work. Replacement of legacy codes is necessary due to computer hardware failure but also has generally improved user-friendliness.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Replacement of Legacy Analytical Codes at the Advanced Test Reactor

For each operating cycle of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory, a Core Safety Assurance Package (CSAP) is necessary to demonstrate compliance with the safety basis approved by the United State Department of Energy (DOE). Certain computer codes are used in CSAP development, most of them developed in-house. This work describes replacement of a large set of these codes and updates previous work. Replacement of legacy codes is necessary due to computer hardware failure but also has generally improved user-friendliness.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

The development of a high sensitivity neutron displacement damage sensor

Here, the capability to characterize the neutron energy spectrum and fluence received by a test object is crucial to under-standing the damage effects observed in electronic components. For nuclear research reactors and high energy density physics fa-cilities this can pose exceptional challenges, especially with low level neutron fluences. An ASTM test method for characterizing neutron environments utilizes the 2N2222A transistor as a 1-MeV equivalent neutron fluence sensor and is applicable for environ-ments with 1 x 10 12 - 1 x 10 14 1-MeV(Si)-Eqv.-n/cm 2 . In this work we seek to extend the range of this test method to lower fluence environments utilizing the 2N1486 transistor. Here, the 2N1486 is shown to be an effective neutron displacement damage sensor as low as 1 x 10 10 1-MeV(Si)-Eqv.-n/cm 2 .

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2017

Status of Wrought FeCrAl-UO 2 Capsules Irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor

Candidate cladding materials for accident tolerant fuel applications require extensive testing and validation prior to commercial deployment within the nuclear power industry. One class of cladding materials, FeCrAl alloys, is currently undergoing such effort. Within these activities is a series of irradiation programs within the Advanced Test Reactor. These programs are developed to aid in commercial maturation and understand the fundamental mechanisms controlling the cladding performance during normal operation of a typical light water reactor. Three different irradiation programs are on-going; one designed as a simple proof-of-principle concept, the other to evaluate the susceptibility of FeCrAl to fuel-cladding chemical interaction, and the last to fully simulate the conditions of a pressurized water reactor experimentally. To date, nondestructive post-irradiation examination has been completed on the rodlet deemed FCA-L3 from the simple proof-of-concept irradiation program. Initial results show possible breach of the rodlet under irradiation but further studies are needed to conclusively determine whether breach has occurred and the underlying reasons for such a possible failure. Further work includes characterizing additional rodlets following irradiation.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

A sensitivity analysis to predict the neutronics behavior of samples irradiated in the VTR rabbit system

We report a low-order neutronics model is developed to carry out hundreds of simulations efficiently and investigate the neutronics behavior of samples being irradiated in a test reactor setting under different geometrical constraints. The low-order model allowed for simulations that yield the expected neutronics behavior of any irradiated sample in any environment and allows for the calculation of highly accurate spatially averaged statistics and idealized spatial distributions in the neutron flux. Several benchmarks are performed to evaluate the performance and limitations of the low-order model revealing many important findings. The low-order model predicted the LHGR in the EBR-II driver fuel to within 2.34% by only simulating the fuel rod by itself, which served as a validation for the model. Sensitivity studies investigated 3% enriched UO 2 and U-10Zr being irradiated in the Versatile Test Reactor rabbit system. The analyses investigated a range of combinations of 15 radii and 5 heights for each sample in the rabbit system. Similar data sets are also provided for irradiations in the Advanced Test Reactor’s B-10 irradiation position, which is a thermal neutron spectrum environment. Generalized fits and fit coefficients are obtained for sample heating, reaction rate densities, and local multiplication rate characteristics, allowing the predictions of the neutronics behavior of the samples based on their geometrical constraints. The analyses and fits laid the groundwork for developing a user-end Multiphysics analysis framework to assist and accelerate irradiation experiment design and optimization.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗