Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Advanced Reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

MEASUREMENT OF THE NEUTRON FLUENCE-RATES IN THE ADVANCED TEST REACTOR

The axial neutron fluence-rate distribution at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is determined using a combination of pure nickel and cobalt-aluminium alloy dosimeter wires. Most irradiation programs at ATR need to know the fast neutron fluence-rate surrounding their experiment to correlate post-irradiation examination results with neutron dose. The activated dosimeter wires, which extend beyond the full fuelled region of the reactor core, are highly radioactive following the full cycle in ATR and must therefore be measured in the ATR canal. The system that is employed for these measurements is mechanical scanning mechanism is used to scan the activated wires across the face of a columnated shield and a NaI detector. This detector is not sufficiently calibrated to provide absolute activity measurements, therefore, the count-rate is recorded and normalized to the highest activity for that wire. Then, an approximately 3-mm long portion of the wire is removed from the highest activity region in the wire. The wires are then transferred, and an absolute activity measurement is made using a calibrated ionization chamber. These measurements are combined with corrections for decay, neutron energy spectrum, burnup, dosimeter composition, reactor power fluctuations, and reactor outages to determine the average axial neutron fluence-rate at various locations within ATR during the cycle.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Advanced Test Reactor Safety Basis Update for Gas-Cooled Experiments

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) supports neutron irradiation of several types of experiments. One such experiment type is referred to as a gas leadout. Gas leadout experiments actively flow gas through the experiment which allows for active temperature control. It also allows for in-situ data of the experiment. For example, fission gas migration through a fuel sample can be monitored via activity of the sweep gas. Historically, ex-pile equipment and fission product monitors were housed in shielded ATR cubicles. Due to other facility updates, cubicle space is no longer available for gas leadout experiment equipment. To support continued operation of gas leadout experiments, ATR completed a safety basis update that supports a new housing for leadout equipment that may process potentially contaminated gas. In addition to the structure and associated equipment, technical safety requirements regarding handling and storage of experiments needed to be revised to support fueled gas leadout experiments and associated outage configurations. The safety basis update addressed the full lifecycle of these experiments, including experiment movement and interim storage, and credible abnormal events such as failures or leaks in contaminated gas tubing in occupied areas. This paper discusses the completed analyses performed to support the safety basis update associated with gas leadout experiments, including thermal-hydraulic evaluation, probabilistic analysis, and dose consequence analyses.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

In-Canal Assay of High Specific Activity 60 Co at the Advanced Test Reactor

Production of high specific activity (HSA) 60 Co has recently resumed at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The technical steps of performing in-canal assay of HSA 60 Co targets at the ATR are described herein. The HSA targets are assayed on a regular basis, between cycles at the ATR, in order to assess the progress of activation. The targets are also assayed at the conclusion of the irradiation in order to provide activity estimates for the distributor and to be used for safety and shipping evaluations. These target assay activities must take place in the ATR canal to provide sufficient radiological shielding. Furthermore, a specialized assay fixture is used in conjunction with custom 60 Co radiation standards to assess the irradiated target. The specific activity of each irradiated target was determined by first measuring the 60 Co standards to determine a sensitivity factor. Then, each irradiated target was measured, and the integrated measurement was multiplied by the sensitivity factor to determine the total activity of the irradiated target. Finally, a correction factor was determined to adjust the reported activity, accounting for differences in the physical geometries of the standards and targets. These methods were used to accurately assay the gross activity of nine irradiated 60 Co targets, two of which were delivered to the distributor where confirmatory hot-cell assays were performed verifying the accuracy of the in-canal assay method.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Initial Observations from AGR 5/6/7 Capsule 1

The fourth and final irradiation experiment in the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) fuel development and qualification program is designated as AGR-5/6/7. Data collected from the fabrication, irradiation, and post-irradiation examination (PIE) of this tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel are intended to serve as the primary data set for the qualification of this fuel for use in high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (INL 2021, Collin 2018b). However, data collected from the three preceding irradiations (i.e., AGR-1, AGR-2, and AGR-3/4) may also be used to supplement data collected from AGR-5/6/7. All components of the AGR-5/6/7 fuel (i.e., UCO kernels, TRISO coatings, and fuel compacts) were produced on an engineering scale at BWXT (Lynchburg, Virginia USA) according to the fuel specification (Marshall 2017). This fuel was irradiated in the northeast flux trap (NEFT) at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho national Laboratory (INL) from February 16, 2018 to July 22, 2020 (Pham et al. 2021). Measurements in the fission product monitoring system (FPMS) indicated unexpected and significant numbers of failures of TRISO particles in Capsule 1 near the end of the sixth irradiation cycle (ATR Cycle 166A). In the fourth cycle (ATR Cycle 164B) and beyond, the sweep gas flow became very low (presumably from degradation of the capsule gas outlet line via an unidentified mechanism), and the program deliberately isolated Capsule 1 from gas flow periodically. In later cycles, attempts to reestablish any kind of flow in Capsule 1 were unsuccessful. With little or no flow through Capsule 1, FPMS measurements and enumerations of failed particles in Capsule 1 were difficult or impossible as was the ability to control the helium/neon gas mixture used for temperature control. Gas flows and fission gas activity in the effluent gas from the other AGR-5/6/7 capsules were also impacted by the Capsule 1 gas flow issues and the large increase in fission gas released from the Capsule 1.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2010

Fabrication and Comparison of Fuels for Advanced Gas Reactor Irradiation Tests

As part of the program to demonstrate TRISO-coated fuel for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant, a series of irradiation tests of Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) fuel are being performed in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. In the first test, called “AGR-1,” graphite compacts containing approximately 300,000 coated particles were irradiated from December 2006 until November 2009. Development of AGR-1 fuel sought to replicate the properties of German TRISO-coated particles. No particle failures were seen in the nearly 3-year irradiation to a burn up of 19%. The AGR-1 particles were coated in a two-inch diameter coater. Following fabrication of AGR-1 fuel, process improvements and changes were made in each of the fabrication processes. Changes in the kernel fabrication process included replacing the carbon black powder feed with a surface-modified carbon slurry and shortening the sintering schedule. AGR-2 TRISO particles were produced in a six-inch diameter coater using a change size about twenty-one times that of the two-inch diameter coater used to coat AGR-1 particles. Changes were also made in the compacting process, including increasing the temperature and pressure of pressing and using a different type of press. Irradiation of AGR-2 fuel began in late spring 2010. Properties of AGR-2 fuel compare favorably with AGR-1 and historic German fuel. Kernels are more homogeneous in shape, chemistry and density. TRISO-particle sphericity, layer thickness standard deviations, and defect fractions are also comparable. In a sample of 317,000 particles from deconsolidated AGR-2 compacts, 3 exposed kernels were found in a leach test. No SiC defects were found in a sample of 250,000 deconsolidated particles, and no IPyC defects in a sample of 64,000 particles. The primary difference in properties between AGR-1 and AGR-2 compacts is that AGR-2 compacts have a higher matrix density, 1.6 g/cm3 compared to about 1.3 g/cm3 for AGR-1 compacts. Based on fuel properties, excellence performance is expected for the AGR-2 UCO fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Evaluation of Sedimentary Structure Near the Advanced Test Reactor Complex at the Idaho National Laboratory

An analysis of relevant sediment stratigraphy near Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor Complex in support of the proposed remote-handled low-level waste disposal facility is presented. The scope of analysis includes a geostatistical evaluation of sedimentary interbed top elevations and thicknesses compiled for wells near the Advanced Test Reactor Complex from land surface to the elevation of the water table. It also includes an evaluation of expected sediment texture and composition based on information contained in existing reports. Finally, based on this analysis, recommendations for characterization well spacing and appropriate transport model dimensionality are made.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Comparative analysis of compact heat exchangers for application as the intermediate heat exchanger for advanced nuclear reactors

A comparative evaluation of alternative compact heat exchanger designs for use as the intermediate heat exchanger in advanced nuclear reactor systems is presented in this article. Candidate heat exchangers investigated included the Printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) and offset strip-fin heat exchanger (OSFHE). Both these heat exchangers offer high surface area to volume ratio (a measure of compactness [m2/m3]), high thermal effectiveness, and overall low pressure drop. Helium–helium heat exchanger designs for different heat exchanger types were developed for a 600 MW thermal advanced nuclear reactor. The wavy channel PCHE with a 15° pitch angle was found to offer optimum combination of heat transfer coefficient, compactness and pressure drop as compared to other alternatives. The principles of the comparative analysis presented here will be useful for heat exchanger evaluations in other applications as well.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Cross-Code Verification of Neutronics Analysis Tools at INL Applied for 238 Pu Production in the Advanced Test Reactor

Here, analyses are completed for experiments prior to experiment irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Various codes are used to qualify all experiments planned for insertion in the reactor, thereby ensuring that all safety and programmatic requirements are satisfied preirradiation. Among the common experiment analysis tools at INL are MCNP5 coupled to ORIGEN2 (MOPY) and MC21. MOPY uses MCNP5 for transport calculations along with calculations for fluxes and select reaction rates, and then ORIGEN2 handles the step-by-step and postirradiation depletion. MC21 handles all in-reactor transport and step-by-step, during-irradiation, depletion calculations, and then ORIGEN (SCALE 6.2.3) is used for decay and dose calculations postirradiation. The MOPY results, along with those obtained via two variations of the MC21 model, were compared in terms of 238 Pu production in the ATR’s H10 position. For the MOPY model, the MC21 model utilizing the HELIOS-based fission product (FP) library, and the MC21 model utilizing the expanded 1300 FP library, the during-cycle irradiation in-core heating results were sufficiently equivalent; however, the MOPY model and the MC21 model with the HELIOS library showed some differences relating to the respective FP libraries. Ultimately, the MC21 model with a 1300 FP library produced the most consistent results throughout the cycle, whereas the MC21 model that utilized the (smaller) HELIOS library was able to handle during-irradiation analysis but lacked certain short-lived FPs that significantly contributed to the total decay heat at shutdown. MOPY, on the other hand, was found to overpredict fission gas production, as a result of limitations in the ORIGEN2 code.

ATR↗
DOE OSTI2015

2014 Radiological Monitoring Results Associated with the Advanced Test Reactor Complex Cold Waste Pond

This report summarizes radiological monitoring performed of the Idaho National Laboratory Site’s Advanced Test Reactor Complex Cold Waste wastewater prior to discharge into the Cold Waste Pond and of specific groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Industrial Wastewater Reuse Permit (#LA-000161-01, Modification B). All radiological monitoring is performed to fulfill Department of Energy requirements under the Atomic Energy Act.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Application of Fuel Depletion Chain Simplification to Experiment Analysis in the Advanced Test Reactor

An irradiation experiment analysis can be informed by high-fidelity reactor engineering depletion results, but this comes at a computational cost. Applying depletion chain simplification to the advanced test reactor driver fuel before performing experiment depletions permits their programmatic parameters to be calculated faster, with a small penalty to accuracy. Here, this work contrasts the results of two irradiation experiments with different neutronic characteristics. Overall, the simplified nuclide library produced using a simple one-group microscopic cross-section library for a pressurized water reactor in the depletion chain simplification process performed comparably in terms of accuracy and runtime to the simplified nuclide library produced using a three-group microscopic cross-section library generated specifically for the advanced test reactor experiments being modeled. This is attributed to the additional nuclides and transmutation pathways preserved in the one-group cross-section library, which has data for 297 nuclides, compared to the three-group cross-section library, which has data for 217 nuclides. This indicates that a cross-section library with more nuclides is better than a cross-section library with fewer nuclides for the depletion chain simplification process, even if the cross-section library with fewer nuclides better represents the flux spectrum of the system being considered.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Neutrino-detector design for safeguarding small modular reactors

Nuclear reactors have long been a favored source for antineutrino measurements for estimates of power and burnup. With appropriate detector parameters and background rejection, an estimate of the reactor power can be derived from the measured antineutrino event rate. Antineutrino detectors are potentially attractive as a safeguards technology that can monitor reactor operations and thermal power from a distance. Advanced reactors have diverse features that may present challenges for current safeguards methods. By comparison, neutrino detectors offer complementary features, including a remote, continuous, unattended, and near-real-time monitoring capability, that may make them useful for safeguarding certain classes of advanced reactors. This study investigates the minimum depth and size of an antineutrino detector for a small modular reactor to meet safeguards needs for advanced reactors. Furthermore, extrapolating performance from several prior reactor antineutrino experiments, this study uses an analytical approach to develop a possible design for a remote antineutrino-based monitoring device.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2021

Report on Year-3 of Water NSTF Matrix Testing: Two-Phase Parametric Test Series

The Natural convection Shutdown heat removal Test Facility (NSTF) is large scale test facility constructed at Argonne National Laboratory to generate NQA-1 qualified validation data for passive decay heat removal systems in advanced reactor concepts. With support from the Department of Energy (DOE) offices of Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) and Advanced Reactors Regulatory Development (RD), this facility reflects key features of a ½ scale, water-based, Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) and is intended to study the behavior, bound performance, and ultimately guide design decisions for passive decay heat removal systems. Since the facility also retains all aspects common to a fundamental boiling water thermosiphon, the generated experimental data sets are well poised to advance the understanding of fundamental natural circulation boiling and two-phase flow phenomena.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Developing the Irradiation Plan for U-10Mo LEU Fuel Qualification for the Advanced Test Reactor

The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) mission is to convert, remove, and dispose of vulnerable nuclear material located at civilian sites worldwide. As part of its mission, M3’s Office of Convert works around the world to convert research reactors and isotope production facilities to non-weapon-usable nuclear material, both domestically and abroad. In support of this, the Office of Convert is working with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to develop and qualify new fuels and technologies to support conversion efforts domestically and abroad. The INL also supports the Office of Convert by working on converting the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and the Advanced Test Reactor Critical (ATRC) from using High Enriched Uranium (HEU) fuel to Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) fuel. To ensure the viability of ATR LEU fuel, the fuel system should meet a similar functional and operational envelope as the current HEU fuel. A series of irradiation tests of the U-10Mo LEU fuel system is required to support the qualification of the fuel system for use in the ATR and several other U.S. High-Performance Research Reactors (USHPRRs). These irradiation tests include: • Mini-Plate tests (MP-1, MP-2, and MP-ATR), • Full-Size Plate tests (FSP-1, and FSP-ATR), and • Element Tests (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3). The MP tests will use multiple small-scale samples that will provide sufficient data across a wide variety of irradiation conditions to qualify the fuel. The FSP tests will use a small number of full-sized fuel plates to confirm the MP test results are representative of the prototypic plate geometry performance. The MP and FSP irradiation tests occur in ATR test locations. The ETs will use full-sized fuel elements located in ATR core driver positions to explore the full operating ranges of the ATR and other USHPRRs and to confirm that the MP and FSP test results are representative of the prototypic element geometry performance. The established testing functional and operational requirements of MP-1, MP-2, FSP-1, and ET 1 achieve the base fuel qualification needs of the USHPRRs, while the high-level purposes of MP-ATR, FSP ATR, ET 2, and ET-3 are focused on demonstrating U-10Mo fuel for ATR use.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

At-power subcritical multiplication in the advanced test reactor

The degree to which a given physical subdivision of a critical reactor acts as a neutron source for other lobes is not analytically characterized for general application. ATR and ATRC both operate at power, and individual power-producing lobes rely on each other as neutron sources in order to maintain constant power, which in general requires either exactly critical multiplication within a reactor or an external neutron source. Here, this work shows that lobe powers in ATR or ATRC can be related with subcritical multiplication theory, demonstrating that the lobes are not individually critical. This explanation is significant for ATR due to the desire to irradiate a large variety of experiments simultaneously, each having its impact on the core neutron population. This work also establishes the lack of relationship between experiment reactivity worth and cross-sections calculated from fundamental nuclear data. For any physical subdivision of any other critical reactor, it is likewise true that the subdivision undergoes only subcritical multiplication.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Measuring changes in environmental radiological background from construction of an advanced nuclear reactor testing facility

We present a method to survey and track changes in the environmental radiological background during the construction and operation of advanced nuclear reactor facilities. We discuss the results of two surveys of the environmental gamma-radiation background at NEXT Lab, an advanced nuclear reactor research facility on the campus of Abilene Christian University, prior to the introduction of radioactive material. In both surveys, the observed radiation dosage rates are low, with the highest rates at 15% of the average total radiation dosage rate for the United States. We observe ≈20% changes in the radiological background of the property in locations where the environment was changed by construction and ≈20% variations within the facilities correlated with variations in building materials.

Environment↗
DOE OSTI2022

Use Cases and Model Development of Thermal Storage Coupling for Advanced Nuclear Reactors

This report discusses the different options for coupling thermal energy storage (TES) systems to advanced nuclear power plants (A-NPPs) in order to enable flexible and hybrid plant operation. An advanced light-water reactor (ALWR) and a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) were selected as the initial use cases for demonstrating a thermally balanced energy storage coupling design for thermal power extraction. Cost functions for the A-LWR were derived from the fully balanced models that were developed based on three different coupling options with three different thermal energy bypass ratios. For the next steps, cost functions for the HTGR will also be derived, and additional nuclear reactors (e.g., a liquid-cooled fast reactor [LFR] or molten-salt reactor [MSR]) will be evaluated for coupling with TES in similar fashion, including the evaluation of their steady-state condition models and cost functions. The models presented herein showcase several design considerations, focusing on optimal deployment methodologies for achieving steady-state operation with minimum disruption to the nuclear power generation cycle. This report presents the results of steady state models developed using Aspen HYSYS®, wherein the thermal energy bypass for an NPP-TES coupling was varied up to 50%. The various components were sized using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) and Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR), when applicable. Cost functions from these models were developed using the latest publicly available data obtained from APEA V11. The current steady-state models and cost functions provide a baseline for additional work focusing on dynamic operation and process optimization by using Idaho National Laboratory (INL)’s Framework for Optimization of Resources and Economics (FORCE) tools to evaluate the technoeconomic viability and transient operations of TES-coupled A-NPPs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Advanced Test Reactor National Scientific User Facility (ATR NSUF) Monthly Report October 2014

Advanced Test Reactor National Scientific User Facility (ATR NSUF) Monthly Report October 2014 Highlights • Rory Kennedy, Dan Ogden and Brenden Heidrich traveled to Germantown October 6-7, for a review of the Infrastructure Management mission with Shane Johnson, Mike Worley, Bradley Williams and Alison Hahn from NE-4 and Mary McCune from NE-3. Heidrich briefed the group on the project progress from July to October 2014 as well as the planned path forward for FY15. • Jim Cole gave two invited university seminars at Ohio State University and University of Florida, providing an overview of NSUF including available capabilities and the process for accessing facilities through the peer reviewed proposal process. • Jim Cole and Rory Kennedy co-chaired the NuMat meeting with Todd Allen. The meeting, sponsored by Elsevier publishing, was held in Clearwater, Florida, and is considered one of the premier nuclear fuels and materials conferences. Over 340 delegates attended with 160 oral and over 200 posters presented over 4 days. • Thirty-one pre-applications were submitted for NSUF access through the NE-4 Combined Innovative Nuclear Research Funding Opportunity Announcement. • Fourteen proposals were received for the NSUF Rapid Turnaround Experiment Summer 2014 call. Proposal evaluations are underway. • John Jackson and Rory Kennedy attended the Nuclear Fuels Industry Research meeting. Jackson presented an overview of ongoing NSUF industry research.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗