SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This paper presents the initial results of an exploratory effort undertaken at JPL to establish the baseline electrical performance and cycle life envelope for commercially available lithium-ion cells.
In some implementations, a cathode is formed by (1) providing a cathode additive including (a) a matrix including a lithium compound, and (b) metal nanostructures embedded in the matrix; and (2) combining the cathode additive with a cathode active material to form a mixture. In other implementations, a cathode is formed by (1) providing a cathode additive including a compound of lithium and at least one non-metal or metalloid; and (2) combining the cathode additive with a cathode active material to form a mixture.
Abstract LiNiO 2 ‐based high‐nickel layered oxide cathodes are regarded as promising cathode materials for high‐energy‐density automotive lithium batteries. Most of the attention thus far has been paid towards addressing their surface and structural instability issues brought by the increase of Ni content (>90 %) with an aim to enhance the cycle stability. However, the poor safety performance remains an intractable problem for their commercialization in the market, yet it has not received appropriate attention. In this review, we focus on the gas generation and thermal degradation behaviors of high‐Ni cathodes, which are critical factors in determining their overall safety performance. A comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of outgassing and thermal runaway reactions is presented and analyzed from a chemistry perspective. Finally, we discuss the challenges and the insights into developing robust, safe high‐Ni cathodes.
This invention relates to a method for preparing an electrochemical cell comprising the sequential steps of preparing a solution of a lithium salt in an non-aqueous solvent containing an additive compound, and maintaining the solution at a temperature in the range of about 20 to about 30° C. for about 5 to 10 days to form an aged electrolyte; assembling an electrochemical cell from an anode, a cathode, and the aged electrolyte; and electrochemically subjecting the electrochemical cell to formation cycling. The additive compound comprises one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of: (R3SiO)3B, (R3SiO)3XY, (R3SiO)3P, (R′O)3PO, (R3Si)3X′, R3SiOS(O)2R′; (R3Si)OC(═O)R′; wherein each R and R′ independently is a hydrocarbyl group; X is P or B; Y is O or S; X is Ti or Al. Electrochemical cells and batteries also are described.
Molecular engineering of electrolyte structures has led to the successful application of trifluoropropylene carbonate (TFPC), a fluorinated derivative of propylene carbonate (PC), in next-generation high-voltage high-energy lithium-ion cell. Additionally, in contrast to a PC-based electrolyte which cointercalates in the form of Li + -solvated species into the graphene layer and exfoliates a graphite anode, a TFPC-based electrolyte is highly compatible with a graphite anode at low potential. Additionally, it shows exceptional oxidation stability on the charged cathode surface owing to the presence of the -CF 3 group. An all-fluorinated electrolyte, that is, 1.0 M LiPF 6 TFPC/2,2,2-trifluoroethyl carbonate (FEMC) (1/1 volume ratio) + FEC additive, was formulated and demonstrated excellent cycling stability in a high-voltage LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 /graphite cell cycled between 3.0 and 4.6 V.
Abstract Commercial LiPF 6 ‐based electrolytes face limitations in oxidation stability (4.2 V) and water tolerance (10 ppm). While replacing LiPF 6 with lithium bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) improves water tolerance, it induces Al current collector corrosion above 3.7 V vs. Li/Li + . To address this, lithium cyano(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiCTFSI) is proposed here as a non‐corrosive, moisture‐tolerant alternative. The 2.0 M LiCTFSI/propylene carbonate (PC)‐fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) (7:3 by volume) electrolyte enables LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NCM811) cathodes to reach 210 mAh g −1 (2.8‐4.6 V) with a cycle life of 500. Full cells with NCM811||graphite (2.0 mAh cm −2 ) show 77.8% capacity retention after 500 cycles. Even with 2000 ppm moisture in the electrolyte, full cells maintain high cycling stability, reducing the need for costly dry rooms. The electrolyte’s low freezing point and high thermal stability enable the operation from ‐20 °C to 60 °C, delivering 168 mAh g −1 at ‐20 °C and retaining 94% capacity after 100 cycles at 60 °C. In contrast, cells with commercial LiPF 6 electrolyte deliver 71 mAh g −1 at ‐20°C and retain 52.7% after 100 cycles at 60 °C. This novel salt offers a cost‐effective solution for developing robust, high‐performance batteries suitable for extreme conditions.
Not Available
When originally launched, the International Space Station (ISS) primary Electric Power System (EPS) used Nickel-Hydrogen (Ni-H2) batteries to store electrical energy. The electricity for the space station is generated by its solar arrays, which charge batteries during insolation for subsequent discharge during eclipse. The Ni-H2 batteries were designed to operate for ten years at a 35% depth of discharge (DOD) maximum during normal operation in a Low Earth Orbit. For service beyond that period, upgraded Li-Ion Orbital Replacement Units (ORUs) were designed. These are the largest Li-Ion batteries ever utilized for a human rated spacecraft. The first set of six Ni-H2 batteries was replaced by Li-Ion batteries in December 2016; the second set of six was launched in September 2018 and installed in March 2019. The third set of six were launched in September 2019. Three batteries were installed in September 2019, with the remaining three to be installed in January 2020. This paper will include a brief overview of the ISS Li-Ion battery system architecture, start up of the second and third set of 6 batteries and the on-orbit status of all 18 batteries, plus the status of the Li-Ion cell life testing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Enabling high‑voltage batteries depends critically on rational electrolyte design. Conventional carbonate electrolytes with LiPF 6 suffer from insufficient oxidative stability, motivating the use of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) for its superior high‑temperature and high‑voltage performance. However, LiFSI is relatively costly, and its electrolytes often require high concentrations to suppress aluminum current collector corrosion in cathode architectures and to adequately passivate electrode interfaces. Here, a low‑concentration LiFSI electrolyte is realized by combining a high‑voltage organosulfur solvent, ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS), with a non‑solvating fluorinated diluent, fluorobenzene (FB). Extended cycling of LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) full cells to 4.5 V reveals substantial long‑term performance advantages over conventional carbonate electrolytes. Comparison with a popular cyclic sulfone, tetramethylene sulfone (TMS), shows that ring‑containing structures such as TMS strongly influence passivation behavior, ultimately limiting performance and narrowing the viable operating window. Overall, EMS is identified as a uniquely stable solvent for LiFSI‑based electrolytes operating at moderately high voltages.
Not Available
Not Available
The development of general strategies for the electronic tuning of a catalyst’s active site is an ongoing challenge in heterogeneous catalysis. To this end, herein, we describe the application of Li-ion battery cathode and anode materials as redox non-innocent catalyst supports that can be continuously modulated as a function of lithium intercalation. A zero-valent nickel complex was oxidatively grafted onto the surface of lithium manganese oxide (Li x Mn 2 O 4 ) to yield isolated Ni2+ occupying the vacant interstitial octahedral site in the Li diffusion channel on the surface and subsurface of the spinel structure (Ni/Li x Mn 2 O 4 ). Additionally, the activity of Ni/Li x Mn 2 O 4 for olefin hydrogenation, as a representative probe reaction, was found to increase monotonically as a function of support reductive lithiation. Simulation of Ni/Li x Mn 2 O 4 reveals the dramatic impact of surface redox states on the viability of the homolytic oxidative addition mechanism for H 2 activation. Catalyst control through support lithiation was extended to an organotantalum complex on Li x TiO 2 , demonstrating the generality of this phenomenon.
Carbonate-based electrolytes are widely used in Li-ion batteries but are limited by a small operating temperature window and poor cycling with silicon-containing graphitic anodes. The lack of non-carbonate electrolyte alternatives such as ether-based electrolytes is due to undesired solvent co-intercalation that occurs with graphitic anodes. Here, we show that fluoroethers are the first class of ether solvents to intrinsically support reversible lithium-ion intercalation into graphite without solvent co-intercalation at conventional salt concentrations. In full cells using a graphite anode, they enable 10-fold higher energy densities compared to conventional ethers, and better thermal stability over carbonate electrolytes (operation up to 60 °C) by producing a robust solvent-derived solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). As single-solvent–single-salt electrolytes, they remarkably outperform carbonate electrolytes with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and vinylene carbonate (VC) additives when cycled with graphite–silicon composite anodes. In conclusion, our molecular design strategy opens a new class of electrolytes that can enable next generation Li-ion batteries with higher energy density and a wider working temperature window.
The objective of this project is to develop machine learning-assisted electron microscopy, together with three-dimensional, cryogenic, and in-situ imaging techniques, for resolving chemical inhomogeneity and materials dynamics in lithium battery electrodes and interfaces. The project aims to expand the spatial, temporal, and dimensional resolution of transmission electron microscopy and to enable quantitative analysis of beam-sensitive battery materials.
The ever-increasing demand for high-performance batteries have been driving the fundamental understanding of the crystal/surface structural and electrochemical properties of intercalation cathode materials, among which the olivine-type, spinel and layered lithium transition metal oxide materials have received particular attention in the past decade due to their successful commercialization. While the most current studies focus on the macroscopic and bulk crystal structure of these materials, our previous work suggests that, as a confined region where charge transfer takes place, the interfacial structures of cathode materials largely dictate their electrochemical performances due to the structural symmetry breaking from 3D (bulk) to 2D (surface), which leads to reconstructions under the different chemical/electrochemical conditions. By summarizing works in this subject and offering our perspectives, this tutorial review will reveal for the first time the correlation between surface structure and interface reconstruction at atomic/molecular scales and their direct impact on corresponding electrochemical performances. More importantly, by extending the knowledge obtained from these three well-studied system, we believe that the same principles established could universally apply to other cathode materials that have been the frontiers of new battery chemistries.
Artificial barriers, usually with either electrochemically active or inactive coating materials, are deployed on cathode material surfaces to mitigate detrimental side reactions by suppressing direct contact of cathode and electrolyte called surface coatings. These surface coatings are commonly known to increase the wettability of liquid electrolyte and reduce the interfacial charge transfer resistance. An important caveat is the selection of appropriate coating material with appropriate thickness for achieving enhanced electrochemical performance. As modern battery materials are increasingly developed with some type of surface coating, a careful and thorough examination of their role in mitigating the cycle life issues of cathode materials is paramount. Here, this comprehensive review article extensively covers the selection criteria of coating materials based on their chemical and physical properties and electrochemical functionalities. Additionally, the article discusses the concept of critical coating thickness and methods of achieving homogeneous coating architectures that deliver desired performance benefits. Furthermore, this comprehensive article summarizes the recent advancements, effectiveness, necessity of cathode surface coatings and identifies the key aspect of structure-property correlation between coating type/thickness and lithium-ion diffusion through coating layers as the linchpin that validates surface coating approaches especially for high capacity nickel-rich cathodes.
This work uses accelerating rate calorimetry to evaluate the impact of cell chemistry, state of charge, cell capacity, and ultimately cell energy density on the total energy release and peak heating rates observed during thermal runaway of Li-ion batteries. While the traditional focus has been using calorimetry to compare different chemistries in cells of similar sizes, this work seeks to better understand how applicable small cell data is to understand the thermal runaway behavior of large cells as well as determine if thermal runaway behaviors can be more generally tied to aspects of lithium-ion cells such as total stored energy and specific energy. We have found a strong linear correlation between the total enthalpy of the thermal runaway process and the stored energy of the cell, apparently independent of cell size and state of charge. We have also shown that peak heating rates and peak temperatures reached during thermal runaway events are more closely tied to specific energy, increasing exponentially in the case of peak heating rates.