SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Test protocol”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

670 records · Page 38

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2020

Anthropogenic Markers in Alta Irrigation District Water Supply Wells

In July 2016, LLNL produced a report for the Kings River Watershed Coalition Authority (KRWCA) entitled “Groundwater Age and Nitrate Isotopic Composition in Alta Irrigation District Water Supply Wells” (Esser et al., 2016). That report summarized groundwater age and nitrate isotopic composition data produced by LLNL for Alta Irrigation District (AID) groundwater wells sampled by KRWCA in a pilot project to test the utility of advanced isotopic methods for constraining the timing and source of nitrate in groundwater at selected sites in the Kings River service area. One section of that report made recommendations for follow-on study. The first and strongest recommendation was to measure a wider suite of source tracers including co-contaminants such as herbicides, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and food constituents and additives. KRWCA followed up on this recommendation in Phase II of the pilot study by re-sampling the original set of wells and submitting the samples to a commercial laboratory for analysis of a limited range of co-contaminants (including pharmaceuticals, personal care products , and food constituents and additives, but not including herbicides or pesticides). They have asked that LLNL review and interpret these data in the context of previous LLNL analyses and to evaluate the utility of such co-contaminant analyses in providing additional constraints on the source of groundwater nitrate contamination in Alta Irrigation District water supply wells. The goal of the second phase of this pilot project is to evaluate the utility of co-contaminant occurrence for constraining nitrate source in groundwater at selected sites in the Kings River service area, with special reference to the use of such data in conjunction with advanced isotopic methods such as nitrate isotopic composition and groundwater age. Nitrate isotopic composition alone cannot distinguish nitrate derived from animal manure from nitrate derived from human septic waste. The presence or absence of agricultural chemicals (herbicides, pesticides, veterinary pharmaceuticals) or chemicals associated with people (human pharmaceuticals, artificial sweeteners) can help make this distinction. Co-contaminant analyses using multi-analyte LC-MS-MS protocols are now commercially available and reasonably priced. The feasibility and utility of the using co-contaminants for nitrate source attribution can be evaluated by 1) determining the degree to which co-contaminants occur in distinct and easily attributable groupings (e.g. agricultural chemicals vs personal care products and food additives); 2) determining the degree to which co-contaminant occurrence is consistent with nitrate isotopic composition and groundwater age (e.g. no co-contaminant occurrence in very old groundwater; co-contaminants consistent with animal manure or human septic waste occurring in groundwaters having nitrate isotopic composition also consistent with animal manure or human septic waste); and 3) determining the degree to which co-contaminants provide additional constraint on nitrate source over and beyond nitrate isotopic composition and groundwater age (e.g. distinguishing between animal manure and human septic waste).

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2021

Materials Challenges and Opportunities for Energy Generation, Conversion, Delivery, and Storage (Applied Energy Tri-Laboratory Consortium Workshop Report)

This report documents the outcomes of the Tri-Laboratory Materials Workshop that was held July 31 and August 1, 2019 to begin addressing the needs, opportunities, and challenges associated with the development, fabrication, and testing of the needed materials and components for integrated hybrid energy systems (i.e., incorporating nuclear, fossil, and renewables for electric and thermal applications). This was accomplished by assembling the research program leads and principal investigators at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), who support the research and development of new technology and system integration. The team then identified and prioritized key materials development needs. This effort was intended to enhance communications and synergy among the Tri-Lab partners. Advanced functional and structural materials are central to transformative energy technologies for energy generation, conversion, delivery, and storage. With that in mind, the workshop focused on identifying and assessing the foundational materials research needs at both the basic and applied levels. Materials challenges include the ability to withstand harsh environments, such as high temperatures and pressures, corrosion, oxidation, or irradiation while maintaining flexible mission profiles and long service lifespans. Advanced energy system material challenges and needs range from materials for the capture, upgrading/concentration, storage, and delivery of low-grade heat to materials for high temperature environments that involve liquid metals, molten salt, and very high temperature gas heat delivery and storage systems. Material improvements are needed for hybrid energy systems due to accelerated corrosion and stress-fatigue failure of materials and equipment, which results from increased frequency and amplitude of thermal, mechanical, and electrical cycling of systems components. Multifunctional materials are needed for high temperature solid-oxide fuel cells, advanced electrochemical reactors, and in-process separation. Relative to materials manufacturing, application of advanced additive and subtractive methods need to be understood to develop both thin-layer homogenous materials and materials of graded composition. Materials modeling and machine learning will be critical to accelerate the design and production of power electronics, and nuclear reactor materials and fuel, as well as to gain an understanding of beneficial materials phenomena or deleterious microstructure evolution. There is also a need for standardized models, computational structures, data reporting protocols and modeling tools across the three laboratories. This would allow consistent results, analysis, and data sharing. Combining computational capabilities between the three laboratories (e.g., hardware, software) would greatly increase computational capabilities and throughput. The workshop identified the need for laboratories to anticipate and address problems that will occur during scale-up. Laboratory work must connect with industry to ensure that research focuses on processes that are scalable and marketable. Industry input and perspective are essential to guide laboratory research to meet these requirements and deploy new technology in industrial demonstrations. Another aspect of scale-up is the integration of multiple systems since new challenges often arise at the subsystem interfaces. Establishing a scale-up manufacturing demonstration/pilot plant, potentially as an industrial user facility, would be beneficial to the laboratories and industry. That modular scale-up manufacturing demonstration/pilot plant would allow researchers to find and resolve interface problems that cannot be identified by focusing only on individual parts. Communication exchanges among the organizers, attendees, and workshop survey responses indicate that the workshop was successful in achieving its goal to identify key technology gaps and research needs. Strong positive feedback was received on the sharing of ideas, capabilities, talent, and passion to move forward on the materials-related action items.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Biological toxicity and environmental hazards associated with PLGA nanoparticles

There have been tremendous advances in nanotechnology. More recently, the use of nanoparticles has expanded to applications including materials, packaging, energy, and medical uses such as drug delivery, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) define nanoparticles as particles with at least one dimension measuring between 1 and 100 nm (2), but this view is generally too limited, and recommendations have been made to consider all materials with a dimension measuring under 1,000 nm as nanoparticles. The biomedical uses of nanoparticles are particularly promising because of their ability to reach and target various sites and organs. However, some nanoparticles can be composed of toxic materials or are limited by issues of biodistribution and bioaccumulation, which have hampered their use in biomedicine. The copolymer poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) has gained use in biomedical applications as a delivery system because it is considered biocompatible and can be formulated with controlled degradation in physiological environments. PLGA has a history in biomedicine that dates to the 1970s when biodegradable sutures were developed using PLGA. In addition, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) have approved various PLGA particle formulations as therapeutic delivery vehicles. Interest in biocompatible materials to deliver a range of therapeutic drugs, proteins, nucleic acids, and other molecules has risen recently. In addition to drug delivery, sustained drug release can be achieved by tuning the physical properties of PLGA, such as the molecular weight, ratio of lactic to glycolic acid, drug concentration, stabilizing molecules, and particle size. Given the rise of nanoparticles, human and environmental exposure to them is inevitable as more applications use free, unbound, and highly mobile particles. Although PLGA is generally considered safe, a detailed understanding of how PLGA and the other components used to help formulate this copolymer into a nanoparticle delivery vehicle is useful for assessing potential harmful effects. Despite recent advances in PLGA nanoparticle formulations, residual stabilizing molecules, inconsistent preparations, and batch-to-batch variations can lead to toxicity. Poor preparations of PLGA can lead to common mechanisms of toxicity observed with nanoparticles, such as inflammation and oxidative stress. Consistency in PLGA formulations and accurate methods to evaluate nanoparticle toxicity are needed to ensure safety. In order to better assess PLGA nanoparticles as non-toxic delivery systems, it is critical to understand their physical and chemical properties and the formulation protocols that may introduce toxic components into particles.

Biology, nanoparticle, toxicity↗

DOE OSTI2025

Nanoscale structural evolution and phase transformation of geopolymers: In situ SAXS/WAXS investigation under uniaxial tension at elevated temperatures

This investigation delves into the degradation mechanisms of high-density polyethylene geomembranes (PE GMXs) under a spectrum of conditions, replicating real-world scenarios within a rigorously controlled laboratory setting. The treatment protocols applied induced a notable increase in the crystallinity of the treated specimens relative to the untreated controls. Small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis identified an initial long period (interlamellar distance) of 16.9 nm for the untreated polymer, which expanded by 19.5% at a strain of 16.7 percent. Conversely, the treated PE GMXs exhibited a more gradual elongation of the long period, with an increase of merely 10.6% at a strain of 23.3 percent. At an elevated temperature of 65°C, both samples exhibited pronounced strain hardening, with the treated PE GMXs demonstrating superior stability even at a strain of 150 percent. Wide-angle x-ray scattering (WAXS) experiments corroborated these observations, revealing that the diffraction patterns of the untreated PE remained stable up to a strain of 16.7%, whereas those of the treated PE remained distinct up to a strain of 46.1 percent. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images substantiated the formation of a shish–kebab structure in the treated samples. The study concludes that the geopolymer underwent oxidation and material degradation as a result of the chemical and mechanical treatments, transitioning to a more crystalline state and concomitantly losing its initial elasticity.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗