Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Waste Repository”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

FEHM V3.0 - V3.X

The numerical background of the FEHM computer code can be traced to the early 1970s when it was used to simulate geothermal and hot dry rock reservoirs. The primary use over a number of years was to assist in the understanding of flow fields and mass transport in the saturated and unsaturated zones below the potential Yucca Mountain repository. Today FEHM is used to simulate groundwater and contaminant flow and transport in deep and shallow, fractured and un-fractured porous media throughout the US DOE complex. FEHM has proved to be a valuable asset on a variety of projects of national interest including Environmental Remediation of the Nevada Test Site, the LANL Groundwater Protection Program, geologic CO2 sequestration, Enhanced Geothermal Energy (EGS) programs, Oil and Gas production, Nuclear Waste Isolation, and Arctic Permafrost. Subsurface physics has ranged from single fluid/single phase fluid flow when simulating basin scale groundwater aquifers to complex multifluid/ multi-phase fluid flow that includes phase change with boiling and condensing in applications such as unsaturated zone surrounding nuclear waste storage facility or leakage of CO2/brine through faults or wellbores. The numerical method used in FEHM is the control volume method (CV) for fluid flow and heat transfer equations which allows FEHM to exactly enforce energy/mass conservation; while an option is available to use the finite element (FE) method for displacement equations to obtain more accurate stress calculations. In addition to these standard methods, an option to use FE for flow is available, as well as a simple Finite Difference scheme.

Pawar, Rajesh↗
DOE OSTI2019

Evaluation of Neutron Absorbers in the DOE Standardized SNF Canister

The goal of this evaluation was to evaluate different options for a neutron absorber in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Standardized spent nuclear fuel (SNF) Canister. This was accomplished by taking the two most relevant criticality evaluations and replacing the advanced neutron absorber (ANA) basket material with borated stainless steel. This work was initiated, because alternative storage options for DOE SNF has become a priority for DOE. Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is initiating activities to ensure the continued operation of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) by providing alternative and redundant storage options for spent ATR fuel. In addition, the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) has recently initiated studies to understand and improve the technical basis for long-term dry storage of aluminum clad SNF (e.g., ATR, High Flux Isotope Reactor [HFIR]) (Connolly 2018). While currently in the lab-scale phase, the next step involves validation and verification (V&V) of the lab-scale results. One method to perform V&V is to load aluminum-clad spent fuel in an instrumented DOE Standardized SNF Canister as a demonstration. In order to minimize the need for repackaging before disposal and to provide a representative environment in a demonstration, the fuel is planned to be loaded with an appropriate criticality control mechanism, such as neutron absorbing basket material. While ANA was originally selected as the basket material for ATR fuel in the Yucca Mountain Repository, it has never been produced on a large scale. Therefore, incorporating this material in the DOE Standardized SNF Canister as part of a near-term demonstration could be more challenging than moving forward with a commercially available material, such as borated stainless steel. Past evaluations eliminated borated stainless steel as a long-term neutron absorbing material, because it corroded too quickly and may not always remain in the waste package after degradation. This led to the invention and selection of ANA for use as the basket material in the DOE Standardized SNF Canister. After selecting ANA, new corrosion tests were performed on borated stainless steel using a different method for fabrication. This method of fabrication significantly improved the corrosion resistance properties of borated stainless steel, so much so that it out-performed ANA in corrosion testing. Researchers used the information obtained from these tests to select borated stainless steel as the neutron absorber in the Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister (TAD) designed for commercial SNF. This evaluation compares the criticality control of borated stainless steel to ANA. In every case and scenario, the calculated effective neutron multiplication factor (k eff ) using a borated stainless steel basket was lower than that using an ANA basket, though the borated stainless steel must be thicker due to corrosion effects over the regulatory time period. Although the borated stainless steel performed better than the ANA, it still required additional neutron-absorbing material, gadolinium shot, for the calculated k eff to fall below the upper critical limit of 0.93 in a few cases evaluated. More research using thicker baskets or inserts could be performed in an attempt to lower the k eff without the use of gadolinium shot. In addition, a reevaluation of the degraded ATR material used in the previous evaluations may prove that the original assumptions were over-conservative.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Features Events and Processes Relevant to DPC Disposal Criticality Analysis

The Department of Energy is evaluating the technical feasibility of disposal of spent nuclear fuel in dual-purpose canisters in various geologies. As part of ongoing research and development, the effect of potential post-closure criticality events on repository performance is being studied. Many different features, events, and processes (FEPs) could affect the potential for criticality or the extent of a criticality event. Additionally, a criticality event could affect other FEPs. This report uses existing lists of FEPs as a starting point to evaluate the FEPs that could affect or be affected by an in- package criticality event. The evaluation indicates that most of the FEPs associated with the waste form, the waste, or the EBS have some effect on post-closure criticality and/or are affected by the consequences of post-closure criticality. In addition, FEPs not previously considered are identified for further development.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Optimization of Dry Storage Canister Cutting Operations - 20534

A recent project investigated the optimal cutting method for the opening of a welded dry storage/shielded canister (DSC) or dual purpose canister (DPC) containing Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF). Due to the lack of a disposal path for UNF in the U.S., the majority of UNF is currently moved into welded DSCs and DPCs designed by Orano TN, NAC, and Holtec. As the DSCs/DPCs were neither designed nor licensed for disposal and may not be able to be emplaced in a geologic repository due to physical emplacement constraints, near-term thermal limitations, or long-term criticality issues, the UNF in these existing DSCs/DPCs may need to be repackaged into transportation, aging, and disposal canisters (TADs), generic standard TADs (STADs), transportation casks, new cask/canister systems, and/or cask/canister/package systems suitable for disposal. These DSCs/DPCs may also be opened to simply remove the UNF in preparation for recycling, re-storage, or placement into a waste package suitable for disposal. Regardless of need, the DSCs/DPCs would require to be cut open by a potentially large scale operation. This project examined the multiple means for cutting welded metal systems and considered several factors to determine an optimal approach. Issues arose around some of the cutting approaches when applied to systems with 2 or 3 lids and with pre-cutting gas testing required. The resulting preferences in cutting methods with an optimized application for the opening of DSCs/DPCs are presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Ground Motion Inputs for the Seismic Shake Table Test

Currently, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) is stored in on-site independent spent-fuel storage installations (ISFSIs) at seventythree (73) nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the US. Because a site for geologic repository for permanent disposal of SNF has not been constructed, the SNF will remain in dry storage significantly longer than planned. During this time, the ISFSIs, and potentially consolidated storage facilities, will experience earthquakes of different magnitudes. The dry storage systems are designed and licensed to withstand large seismic loads. When dry storage systems experience seismic loads, there are little data on the response of SNF assemblies contained within them. The Spent Fuel Waste Disposition (SFWD) program is planning to conduct a full-scale seismic shake table test to close the gap related to the seismic loads on the fuel assemblies in dry storage systems. This test will allow for quantifying the strains and accelerations on surrogate fuel assembly hardware and cladding during earthquakes of different magnitudes and frequency content. The main component of the test unit will be the full-scale NUHOMS 32 PTH2 dry storage canister. The canister will be loaded with three surrogate fuel assemblies and twenty-nine dummy assemblies. Two dry storage configurations will be tested – horizontal and vertical above-ground concrete overpacks. These configurations cover 91% of the current dry storage configurations. The major input into the shake table test are the seismic excitations or the earthquake ground motions – acceleration time histories in two horizontal and one vertical direction that will be applied to the shake table surface during the tests. The shake table surface represents the top of the concrete pad on which a dry storage system is placed. The goal of the ground motion task is to develop the ground motions that would be representative of the range of seismotectonic and other conditions that any site in the Western US (WUS) or Central Eastern US (CEUS) might entail. This task is challenging because of the large number of the ISFSI sites, variety of seismotectonic and site conditions, and effects that soil amplification, soil-structure interaction, and pad flexibility may have on the ground motions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

DPC Direct Disposal R&D Independent Technical Review: Plan

Developing and evaluating approaches for direct geologic disposal of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) is a cross-cutting multi-disciplinary activity that is directly tied to the implementation of DPCs by the nuclear industry. The ultimate goal of the DPC direct disposal R&D program is to facilitate and maximize safe, cost-effective, licensed direct disposal. Independent Technical Review (ITR) is needed to maximize the impact of the R&D program on future implementation. The review will involve a team of experts representing the nuclear industry, repository sciences, and licensing. The team will be charged to review a set of representative technical reports and other information, and answer a set of questions that focus on R&D steering.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Challenges in Long-Term Records Preservation and Access - 19549

The US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) mission includes preserving records and information about the nation's Cold War-era weapons projects and making that information available for years to come. As LM assumes responsibility for each project, records documenting operations and cleanup activities are absorbed into a central recordkeeping system. Each record category is governed by a federal retention requirement. Routine administrative records are kept just a few years, while the most important records have 'permanent' retention requirements and are transferred to the National Archives typically within 25 years of creation. It is relatively easy for LM to meet retention requirements for these routine and permanent records. LM's big preservation challenge is with records with tremendously long retention requirements. Records with 75-year retention requirements are common, and a small subset of LM records pertaining to waste disposal requires 150-year retention periods. LM must consider the best format for maintaining each of its records collections. Should physical records be boxed up for long-term storage, or should they be digitized? Each option has associated benefits, costs, and risks. Keeping records in paper format avoids digitizing expense and preserves the original media, but the paper must be maintained in a certified storage facility. A vermin infestation or sprinkler malfunction at a certified facility may be rare but could easily destroy records. Keeping the paper and making reference or backup electronic copies reduces the risk of loss but requires diligence and resources to keep the physical records and electronic versions synchronized. This becomes an overwhelming task in a database with millions of records. Entirely replacing paper records with digitized versions as electronic records introduces the risk that records could be lost due to a cybersecurity incident or made inaccessible by evolving technology. LM's early electronic records management efforts were limited to documents saved to PDF format. More recently, LM has embraced the benefits of maintaining records in native formats. (A spreadsheet includes formulas and other details lost when converted to a PDF file.) But whether the file is saved as a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet or PDF document, how do we ensure the file is readable in 75 or 150 years when these records meet their retention requirement? We have no way of knowing for sure from our 2019 vantage point-no more than we would expect to get good technology advice from someone 150 years ago. We cannot predict the technological future, but we can make sure our current electronic records environment is healthy and future ready. This includes making sure the electronic recordkeeping system is built on a modern platform and ensuring that each record in the system is saved in a current format. Quality standards are critical for electronic records to be future ready. Implementing quality involves an organization-wide approach to having consistently formatted file names and complete and descriptive metadata. Quality PDF documents are scanned to settings that ensure characters are machine-readable (with optical character recognition, or OCR). LM is currently replacing its electronic recordkeeping system and simultaneously modernizing its organizational approach to data management; it is replacing a traditional electronic records repository with a system that also manages records stored anywhere across the computer network. This new records management approach will require new thinking in how LM manages a dramatically increased volume of information across the network while not losing focus on its responsibility for long-term records preservation and access. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Initial Neutronics and Thermal-Hydraulic Coupling for Spent Nuclear Fuel Canister

This report documents work performed supporting the US Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition, Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology, under work breakdown structure element 1.08.01.03.05, “Direct Disposal of Dual Purpose Canisters.” In particular, this appendix fulfills the M3 milestone, M3SF-19OR010305015, “Multiphysics criticality consequence analysis capability development status report,” as Revision 1 to M3SF-19OR010305016, “Initial neutronic and thermal hydraulic coupling for waste package” within work package SF-19OR01030501, “Direct Disposal of Dual Purpose Canisters–ORNL.” This report presents the initial development status of a multiphysics criticality consequence simulation framework, Terrenus. Terrenus currently couples two physics codes: the Monte Carlo radiation transport code Shift and the thermal-hydraulics code COBRA-SFS. The coupling capability has been demonstrated using a simplified 3 x 3 fuel pin lattice. Terrenus will be developed further to include (1) general geometry package support, allowing modeling of a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) cask with all structural details, (2) a depletion solver to determine the change in nuclide composition at the end of each time step, and (3) a mechanics code to determine any structural impact due to a criticality event. Future research and development works include identifying/developing a modern two-phase thermal-hydraulics code and developing an approach to solve fast neutronic transients. The goal of this multiphysics framework is to determine the feasibility of direct disposal of currently loaded SNF canisters by including or excluding a criticality event from a repository performance analysis framework in terms of consequences. The revision 1 to this report includes extending Terrenus to a 17 x 17 pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assembly. We also investigated the phenomena necessary to quench a critical reaction, and investigated the water level necessary to achieve criticality in a typical canister. Finally, we describe the initial implementation of a critical power search capability.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Fe-saponite growth on low-carbon and stainless steel in hydrothermal-bentonite experiments

Hydrothermal experiments on engineered barrier system (EBS) materials were conducted to characterize high temperature interactions between bentonite and candidate waste container steels (304SS, 316SS, low-C steel) for deep geological disposition of nuclear spent fuel. In this study, hydrothermal experiments were performed using Dickson reaction cells at temperatures and pressure of up to 300 °C and 15–16 MPa, respectively, for four to six weeks. Wyoming bentonite was saturated with a 1900 ppm K-Ca-Na-Cl solution in combination with stainless and low-C steel coupons. Authigenic Fe-saponite precipitated utilizing steel as a growth substrate with Fe being supplied by steel corrosion. Concurrent with Fe-saponite formation, sulfides precipitated from sulfide-bearing fluids, from pyrite dissolution, near the steel interface. Sulfide mineral formation is dependent on the steel substrate composition: stainless steel produced pentlandite ((Ni, Fe) 9 S 8 ) and millerite (NiS), whereas low C steel generated pyrrhotite (Fe 7 S 8 ). The presence of sulfides suggests highly reduced environments at the steel-clay barrier interface potentially influencing overall steel corrosion rates and (re)passivation mechanisms. Finally, results of this research show that nuclear waste steel container material may act as a substrate for mineral growth in response to corrosion during hydrothermal interactions with bentonite barriers.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

ASNF Dry Storage Pilot with HFIR Fuel: Concept Plan

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) currently manages a large inventory of aluminum-clad spent nuclear fuel (ASNF) from U.S. High Performance Research Reactors and also some fuel from foreign research reactors. A transition to new dry storage configurations is desired to facilitate decisions related to potential storage of future ASNF and transitioning current ASNF out of aging storage facilities. DOE has developed designs for a set of DOE Standard Canisters (DSCs) to provide sealed, road-ready dry storage suitable for interim storage, transportation, and potentially disposition in a future repository. Extensive experiments and modeling activities have been carried out to develop the technical basis for such storage, with results to date indicating this storage approach should be safe and viable following suitable drying processes.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Updated Analysis of Clad Degradation

This report provides an analysis of the clad barrier function associated with the direct disposal of dual purpose canisters (DPCs) under hypothetical conditions in a shale repository and in an alluvial repository, including the effect of a postulated criticality event inside a disposed DPC. Should a postulated criticality event occur in a hypothetical shale repository, cladding will primarily degrade by general corrosion. Stress corrosion cracking, hydride cracking, creep failure, pitting and crevice corrosion, rod pressurization, and clad unzipping are calculated to have little impact on cladding persistence. At the higher temperature expected during a postulated criticality event in a saturated shale repository, general corrosion of cladding would be rapid - on the order of 0.034 microns/yr. A few hundred years after onset of a postulated criticality event in a shale repository complete general corrosion of fuel assembly grid spacer walls and guide tubes will likely result in settling of fuel rods upon each other. This rod consolidation should displace the water moderator and possibly terminate a postulated criticality. The primary potential degradation pathway for cladding in a hypothetical alluvial repository is localized corrosion by fluoride, which cannot occur in a shale repository. Fluoride-enhanced corrosion of cladding would be accelerated under the slightly higher (< 100°C) temperatures associated with a postulated criticality event. The impact of criticality in both cases (shale and alluvial) would be to increase the amount of failed cladding. But it would require very specialized transport pathways.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of DWPF Sludge Batch 6 (Macrobatch 7): Pour Stream Glass Samples

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) began processing Sludge Batch 6 (SB6), also referred to as Macrobatch 7 (MB7), in June 2010. SB6 is a blend of the heel of Tank 40 from Sludge Batch 5 (SB5), H-Canyon Np transfers and SB6 that was transferred to Tank 40 from Tank 51.1 SB6 was processed using Frit 418. Sludge is received into the DWPF Chemical Processing Cell (CPC) and is processed through the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) and Slurry Mix Evaporator Tank (SME). The treated sludge slurry is then transferred to the Melter Feed Tank (MFT) and fed to the melter. During processing of each sludge batch, the DWPF is required to take at least one glass sample to meet the objectives of the Glass Product Control Program (GPCP) and to complete the necessary Production Records so that the final glass product may be disposed of at a Federal Repository. The DWPF requested various analyses of radioactive glass samples obtained from the melter pour stream during processing of SB6 as well as reduction/oxidation (REDOX) analysis of MFT samples to determine the impact of Argon bubbling. Sample analysis followed the Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP) and an Analytical Study Plan (ASP). Four Pour Stream (PS) glass samples and two MFT slurry samples were delivered to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) from the DWPF. Table 1-1 lists the sample information for each pour stream glass sample. SB6 PS3 (S03472) was selected as the official pour stream sample for SB6 and full analysis was requested. This report details the visual observations of the as-received SB6 PS No.3 glass sample as well as results for the chemical composition, Product Consistency Test (PCT), radionuclide content, noble metals, and glass density. REDOX results will be provided for all four pour stream samples and vitrified samples of MFT-558 and MFT-568A. Where appropriate, data from other pour stream samples will be provided.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

An Assessment of the Error Due to Computing Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Porosity Using the Porosity Response Surface Approach

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Performance Assessment (WIPP PA) must predict the likelihood that radionuclides will escape into the biosphere via mechanisms that depend on geohydraulic flow. Ideally, one would predict the geohydraulic flow using coupled geohydraulic and geomechanical simulations, but such coupled simulations are not computationally tractable. Instead, Sandia has historically used a look-up table of porosities for a given fluid pressure and time, called the porosity response surface, but this approach can introduce porosity errors because it largely ignores the porosity’s dependence on the past fluid pressure history. This report discusses efforts to quantify these porosity errors for both the legacy and new porosity response surfaces. Six hundred different fluid pressure histories were fed through the legacy/new geomechanical model and the legacy/new porosity response surface to generate six hundred porosity error histories. The error associated with the legacy porosity surface was substantial, while the error associated with the new porosity surface was typically small, except when fluid pressures exceeded the lithostatic pressure at the repository. In response to the errors at high pressures, a preliminary study of the WIPP PA’s sensitivity to these porosity errors was conducted. The study found that reducing the porosity errors at high pressures negligibly affected predictions of radionuclide releases. Finally, an initial machine-learned model for porosity was developed. This ML model significantly reduced the porosity error at high pressures, but sizable errors remained, so more development is necessary before coupling an ML model to the geohydraulic model.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Cigeo Pilot Phase - 19024

Within the incremental development of the Cigeo deep geological repository, the Pilot Phase (PP) concept emerged during the 2013 public debate on Cigeo. The PP is a period of time that covers the beginning of the project, after its construction license is granted. It mainly aims at acquiring and / or confirming in situ, in a representative environment and in the operating conditions of Cigeo, the data selected for the design and safety demonstration. In parallel, it will emphasize the gradual and cautious approach for starting a complex industrial installation such as Cigeo. The Pilot Phase which is scheduled for a total duration of at least a decade will include 'inactive' tests (without radioactive waste) and then radioactive waste package disposal operations. The PP should be considered as a phase during which additional knowledge will be obtained and demonstration that cannot be fully acquired within the Underground Research Laboratory will be completed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Launching a Research Archive for FUSRAP Site Records - 17057

The US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) maintains a broad set of Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) document collections. The LM FUSRAP technical staff regularly needs access to documents contained in these record collections. The majority of the FUSRAP records are maintained in a large paper-based collection in the LM records storage facility. These records cover the period prior to 1997 in which DOE was responsible for the remediation efforts of FUSRAP sites. Other FUSRAP records are maintained as PDF files in LM's record keeping system. LM also maintains FUSRAP information in reference repositories in SharePoint directories and on network drives. The reference collection allows LM to keep abreast of active site remediation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) since 1997. Searching these FUSRAP collections in its current arrangement can be time-consuming and can result in incomplete searches. In response, LM proactively developed the FUSRAP Document Information System (FDIS) to provide a rapid, single-point search and retrieval system to provide real-time access to reference copies of FUSRAP documents. Each entry in FDIS includes metadata listing the FUSRAP site, document title, date, source collection, and pertinent keywords. More significant entries (e.g., certification documents, site characterization reports, waste manifests) include a PDF scan of the entire document. Each PDF file is processed using an advanced optical character recognition (OCR) tool. The first significant content added to FDIS is 45,000 entries documenting remediation work performed primarily in the early 1990's by Bechtel National, Inc. With the entries in FDIS, technical staff will be able to search the collection by site, category and keyword to quickly locate precise required content. LM records staff are also adding records that document remediation and monitoring work at FUSRAP sites where cleanup activities are considered complete. Documents for completed FUSRAP sites will be processed before documents for sites currently being remediated. In the future, FDIS will be populated with information about FUSRAP sites with ongoing remediation work as they are released to LM stewardship. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Estimating Public Dose Along Hypothetical Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Routes

In the future, it will be necessary to transport large quantities of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from nuclear power plant sites to an interim storage facility (ISF) or a repository when such a facility is available. Because it is impossible to shield all of the radiation from this material, the general public will receive a very small, but quantifiable, dose from this transportation campaign. This paper describes the estimated collective effective radiation dose to the public due to SNF shipments under routine conditions and compares the estimated dose figures to the natural background radiation dose. To determine the estimated collective effective dose to the public, this analysis uses the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Stakeholder Tool for Assessing Radioactive Transportation (START), a geographic information system (GIS) routing tool, and a set of unit dose factors (UDFs) which were developed to calculate the estimated dose to the public along transportation routes. The estimated doses of radiation to which the public would be exposed during shipments of SNF is expected to be a consideration, along with many other factors, when making routing decisions. In all cases studied in this paper, estimated doses to the public will be orders of magnitude lower than the natural background radiation dose and will meet all US federal regulatory requirements for radiation dose/exposure to members of the public. The sample routes analyzed in this paper are expected to be representative of future SNF shipment routes in terms of length and mode of transportation, although they do not represent actual routes or destinations. This paper considers four routes from two shutdown reactor sites to two destinations. It must be noted that the specified origin sites are not necessarily the first sites under consideration for a de-inventory process. Further, the destination sites reviewed in this report are only to illustrate estimated dose figures along different routes and should not be taken as potential sites for an ISF or repository. For illustrative purposes only, the shortest distance rail route was found between each origin and destination point, and the collective effective dose to the public from the SNF cask was estimated along each route. This paper is not intended to make recommendations for routing decisions, but rather is intended to inform further discussion about the transportation of SNF and other radioactive materials.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

CSA, the French LILW Disposal Facility: Taking Stock of the 30 years' Operating Experience - 20009

French Andra's currently operational LILW repository, Aube disposal facility, is almost 30 years old. From the beginning, the repository has benefited from the lessons learned from the first disposal facility, the CSM. It has nevertheless continued to evolve, to improve and to adapt, seeking to gain in efficiency, safety and cost optimization. This is a look at what has changed at the CSA since 1992 - and the effect these changes had on its operating practices, construction principles and the entire management organization. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗