Receptivity of a super-sonic acoustic mode through a normal shock
Presentation to go with previous IR Request ID: 1780436 for AIAA Aviation 2025 presentation by the same title
Harris, Shaun Ransom [Sandia National Laboratories↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “ID”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Motion video from isochrome transit rate
companion presentation to recently approved SPIE conference paper of same title having Request ID 1781903
Sandusky, John [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-↗
Idaho National Laboratory CY 2025 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Analysis, Methodology, and Results for Radionuclides
This report details calculations of potential dose—at public receptor locations surrounding the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site boundary and INL in-town facilities—from radionuclides reported to be in use and potentially emitted from INL facilities during calendar year (CY) 2025. All calculations were performed in accordance with the requirements of Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, “Protection of the Environment,” Part 61, “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs),” Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” (40 CFR 61, Subpart H). Modeling methodology, model-input parameters, and contribution to dose by facility, source, and radionuclide at the maximally exposed individual (MEI) location are also discussed. The information in this report supports the “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants—Calendar Year 2025 INL Report for Radionuclides” (DOE-ID 2026). During CY 2025, the estimated annual potential dose at the INL Site MEI location was 2.45E-02 mrem/yr, up from the previous year, but remaining far less than the regulatory standard of 10 mrem/yr (CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart H). Approximately 92% of the total dose to the INL Site MEI originated from Materials and Fuels Complex sources. Emissions from INL in-town facilities resulted in an estimated annual potential dose of 4.50E-03 mrem/yr to the MEI, down slightly from the CY 2024 estimated dose. Year-to-year variations in estimated annual dose can be attributed to adjustments in laboratory operations, changes to facility infrastructure, and variation in meteorological conditions.
42 - ENGINEERING↗
Hydropower Infrastructure – LAkes, Reservoirs, and RIvers (HILARRI)
HILARRI is a database of links between major datasets of operational hydropower dams and powerplants, and inland water bodies. These connections are critical for conducting large-scale analysis of hydropower infrastructure and their associated natural and engineered water systems. Features include: – Dams from the National Inventory of Dams (2024) and the Global Reservoir and Dam Database (GRanD v1.3) – Hydropower plants from the Existing Hydropower Assets dataset (EHA 2024) These hydropower infrastructure features are linked to several major datasets that provide hydrologic and hydraulic information relevant for analysis of hydropower systems that includes the integral water resources. That information comes from: – Products from the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) – NHDPlusV2 Medium Resolution river network flowlines, – NHD waterbodies (limited to lakes and reservoirs), – NHD Watershed Boundary Dataset (HUC12-level for the Conterminous United States (CONUS)) – NHD High Resolution waterbodies – HydroLAKES water bodies (lakes and reservoirs) – LAGOS-US lakes and reservoirs – EPA National Lakes Assessment (2007, 2012, 2017, and 2022) – The Reservoir Sedimentation Database (RESSED) Unique identifiers are used to facilitate joining to the original full datasets. For example, characteristics of NHD flowlines such as estimated average flow rate can be joined from the NHDPlusV2 dataset to a dam or power plant listed in HILARRI based on the ID field, “COMID”, that is common to both datasets. HILARRI only includes basic information about identifiers, location, and data quality or usage notes. It does not contain the attributes or time series data associated with these sites. The HILARRI dataset incorporates information from several datasets to facilitate more effective and accurate analysis of hydropower infrastructure and their associated waterbodies. For example, dams were checked against the most recent American Rivers Dam Removal Database to identify and flag facilities that may no longer exist. Additionally, dams that are listed multiple times in the NID are identified and flagged to avoid double-counting when analyzing and summarizing information. Other quality flags include certainty of operational hydropower (i.e., if one or more datasets indicates hydropower at a particular location), whether an associated water body is accurate or composed of multiple polygons, or whether there is a known issue with reported characteristics in one of the underlying datasets. These additional data flags are designed to increase confidence in data usage for individual to large-scale analyses.
13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
Hydropower Capacity Factor Trends & Analytics for the United States
This data repository contains all code, input data, and data generated for Turner et al. (2024)—“Hydropower capacity factors trending down in the United States”. File descriptions: – hydro-cf-trends-inputs.zip: Full set of input data used in this study, organized for direct entry into “/data” directory of hydro-cf-trends data processing pipeline. – hydro-cf-trends.zip: Full data processing pipeline, coded using the R {targets} framework. This is a snapshot release (v1.0) of the code repository stored at https://code.ornl.gov/turnersw/hydro-cf-trends/. – hydro-cf-trends-results.zip: Provides all dam level results required to reproduce results and graphics in Turner et al. (2024). Dams are identified by the “complxID” (root of the hydropower plant ID in the Existing Hydropower Assets Database, inherited from HILARRI). Results include: • dam_CF_trends.csv: Table of long-term trends in annualized capacity factors for 610 dams and modeled annualized capacity factors for 362 modeled dams (naturalized and assimilated flows). • dam_annualized_CF_gen.csv: Annualized time series of the following variables for each of 610 hydropower dams with nameplate > 5MW – Reported nameplate capacity (MW) – Implied maximum annual generation (MWh) – Reported net generation (MWh) – Computed annual capacity factor – Modeled annual capacity factor (362 modeled plants only)
13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
Comparison of Infiltration Test Methods for Soil Health Assessment
Infiltration rate (IR) has been commonly used as a metric to evaluate soil quality and health. For the USDA Soil Quality Test Kit, a 15-cm (6-in) diameter (ID) cylinder is used to measure IR with 444 cm 3 (equivalent to 2.54 cm or 1 in) of water while other standard IR procedures require substantially larger volumes of water. The general objective of this study was to compare different methods for IR measurement. Using three replications, IR measurements were conducted along a 9-m (27-ft) long transect in two different soil types by the double-ring infiltrometer (DRI) using 25- and 50-cm (10-and 20-in, respectively) cylinders, single-ring infiltrometer (SRI) using 25- and 50-cm cylinders, Cornell sprinkle infiltrometer (CSI) using a 24.1-cm (9.5-in) cylinder, the USDA recommended procedure using a 15-cm diameter cylinder (hereafter referred to as USDA-15 method), and a modified USDA method using a 24.1-cm diameter cylinder. Although the USDA-15 method is simple and requires a small amount of water, based on high variability among replications and significant reduction in IR during early stages of water entry into the soil, the procedure does not offer an accurate estimate of the soil infiltration potential. The CSI procedure was reproducible, but it is more cumbersome to perform than other methods. The DRI, SRI, and CSI methods required a much greater volume of water than the USDA-15 method but produced results that are more consistent. The most consistent results were obtained by the CSI and DRI methods. The modified USDA method results were similar to the SRI method and were an improvement over the original USDA-15 method. For assessing soil health, additional investigations should be conducted to evaluate a modified version of the USDA procedure using a larger cylinder.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Litter Production of Oak-Hickory Forest at Missouri Ozark (MOFLUX) Site: 2003-2022
This dataset contains measurements of litter production at the second-growth upland oak-hickory forest at the Missouri Ozark AmeriFlux (MOFLUX) site. The MOFLUX site is located in the University of Missouri Baskett Forest situated in the Ozark Border Region of central Missouri, USA, and is part of the AmeriFlux network (site ID: US-MOz). During 2003, 24 circular vegetation plots (each 0.08 hectares) were established in the MOFLUX forest. The plots were situated 50 meters apart on 5 linear transects radiating out from the flux tower base in southeast, south, southwest, west, and northwest directions—there were 5 plots per transect except for the northwest one, which had only 4 due to the presence of a small pond at the terminus (Fig. 1). Litter measurements were initiated in October 2003 and continue to the present. Data through 2022 are reported in this dataset. On each plot, two subplots were established for the collection of litter. Subplots were setup using a stratified random design to ensure the collectors were not immediately adjacent to one another. Litter collectors were usually emptied at monthly intervals, or less during the autumn leaf drop. Samples were dried to constant mass and then sorted before determining the dry mass of leaf, vegetative and woody litter. These litter data have been valuable in modeling efforts to examine the impacts of intensifying moisture extremes (i.e., moisture excess and deficit conditions) on soil carbon cycling. More recent data will be added periodically with no changes to previously released data or the format and structure of the data file. This dataset contains one data file in comma separate (.csv) format. Additional metadata are provided: one data dictionary and a file-level metadata file in comma separate (.csv) format and a user guide in PDF (*.pdf) format.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Leaf-area index of Oak-Hickory Forest at Missouri Ozark (MOFLUX) site: 2007–2022
This data set contains measurements of leaf-area index (LAI) at the Missouri Ozark (MOFLUX) site during growing seasons from 2007-2022. The MOFLUX site is located in the University of Missouri Baskett Forest, a second growth oak-hickory forest situated in the Ozark Border Region of central Missouri, USA. MOFLUX is part of the AmeriFlux network (site ID: US-MOz) and an eddy covariance tower marks the middle of the site (Figure 1). During 2003, 24 circular vegetation plots (each 0.08 hectares) were established within a ~250 meter (m) radius around the tower. The plots were situated 50 m apart along 5 linear transects radiating out from the flux tower base in southeast, south, southwest, west, and northwest directions. There were 5 plots per transect except for the northwest one, which had only 4 due to the presence of a small pond at the terminus. At weekly intervals during the growing season, leaf-area index measurements were taken within each vegetation plot on the 5 transects running from the central flux tower. A plant canopy analyzer (model LAI-2000 Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln NE) was used to make the LAI measurements. We collected samples to enable measurement of the mean LAI of each transect. LAI observations are useful for understanding vegetation phenology, and to aid in the interpretation of ecosystem gas exchange. This dataset contains one data file in comma separate (.csv) format. Additional metadata are provided: one data dictionary and a file-level metadata file in comma separate (.csv) format and a user guide in PDF (*.pdf) format.
ESS-DIVE CSV File Formatting Guidelines Reporting ↗
Existing Hydropower Assets (EHA) Alaska Plant Database Extension
This dataset is an extension and subset of the Existing Hydropower Assets (EHA) Plant Database, 2025, released by Oak Ridge National Laboratory through HydroSource covering hydropower plants in Alaska. The extension enhanced EHA to support modeling performed under the Department of Energy Hydropower Office's SECURE Water Act Section 9505 Fourth Assessment (9505). Included is a spatial dataset containing the location of the powerhouse and plant characteristics and a spatial dataset containing the location of the point-of-diversion and plant characteristics. Enhancements made in this dataset from EHA include updating plant’s spatial locations to explicitly represent the location of the powerhouse; identifying a plant’s point-of-diversion (source of water) spatial location; adding State of Alaska Plant ID, Intertie Region, and Alaska Energy Region as attributes, and revising the County, Pt_Own, OwType, and Dam_Own attributes with updated information.
Broman, Daniel P [Pacific Northwest National Labor↗
input4MIPs.CMIP7.UofMD.UofMD-landState-3-1-1
CMIP7 Forcing Datasets (input4MIPs). This dataset Source ID: UofMD-landState-3-1-1 is part of input4MIPs under "["Solar"]" category. More information about the dataset can be found at the following links: https://input4mips-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dataset-overviews/nitrogen-deposition/ https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/database-views/input4MIPs_source-id_CMIP7.html https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dataset-overviews/ The dataset is available at: https://esgf-node.ornl.gov/search?project=input4MIPs&versionType=all&&activeFacets=%7B%22source_id%22%3A%5B%22UofMD-landState-3-1-1%22%5D%7D
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
input4MIPs.CMIP7.uoexeter.UOEXETER-CMIP-2-0-0
CMIP7 Forcing Datasets (input4MIPs). The dataset is available at: https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/?mip_era=CMIP7&target_mip=CMIP&activity_id=input4MIPs&institution_id=uoexeter&source_id=UOEXETER-CMIP-2-0-0 This dataset Source ID: UOEXETER-CMIP-2-0-0 is part of input4MIPs under " ['aerosolProperties', 'emissions'] " category. More information about the dataset can be found at the following links: https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dataset-overviews/stratospheric-volcanic-so2-emissions-aod/ https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/database-views/input4MIPs_source-id_CMIP7.html https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dataset-overviews/
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
input4MIPs.CMIP7.SOLARIS-HEPPA.SOLARIS-HEPPA-CMIP-4-6
CMIP7 Forcing Datasets (input4MIPs). The dataset is available at : https://esgf-node.ornl.gov/search/input4mips/?mip_era=CMIP7&target_mip=CMIP&activity_id=input4MIPs&institution_id=SOLARIS-HEPPA&source_id=SOLARIS-HEPPA-CMIP-4-6 This dataset Source ID: SOLARIS-HEPPA-CMIP-4-6 is part of input4MIPs under " solar " category. More information about the dataset can be found at the following links: http://solarisheppa.geomar.de/cmip7 https://input4mips-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dataset-overviews/solar/ https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/database-views/input4MIPs_source-id_CMIP7.html https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dataset-overviews/
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
input4MIPs.CMIP7.DRES.DRES-CMIP-BB4CMIP7-2-0
CMIP7 Forcing Datasets (input4MIPs). The dataset is available at: https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/?mip_era=CMIP7&target_mip=CMIP&activity_id=input4MIPs&institution_id=DRES&source_id=DRES-CMIP-BB4CMIP7-2-0 This dataset Source ID: DRES-CMIP-BB4CMIP7-2-0 is part of input4MIPs under " ['emissions'] " category. More information about the dataset can be found at the following links: https://www.globalfiredata.org https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/database-views/input4MIPs_source-id_CMIP7.html https://input4mips-controlled-vocabularies-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dataset-overviews/
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
KBase Narrative - kb_DRAM E. coli annotation
Here we are annotating a E. coli K-12 genome using both DRAM and RAST then using those annotations to build models. The genome is from NCBI RefSeq ID NC_000913.
Shaffer, Michael↗
Metagenomes from Eastern Brazilian Amazonian floodplains in the wet and dry seasons
Brief sample description Sediment samples from 0 to 10 cm depth were collected in triplicate from two floodplains of the Eastern Brazilian Amazon, one located on the Amazonas River (FP2, 2°28'11.2"S 54°38'49.9"W) and the other at the intersection between the Amazonas and the Tapajós rivers (FP3, 2°22'44.8"S 54°44'21.1"W), in the wet and dry seasons (May and October 2016, respectively). Total DNA was extracted in duplicate from 0.25 g of sediment using PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit. The metagenomic libraries were constructed using NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and paired-end sequenced (2 x 150 bp) on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Detailed information about the study sites, sampling, sediment physicochemical properties, DNA extraction and quantification have been previously described by Gontijo et al. (2021). Sample IDs: M1, M2 and M3: FP2, wet season M4, M5 and M6: FP3, wet season M7, M8 and M9: FP2, dry season M10, M11 and M12: FP3, dry season
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
KBase Narrative - kb_DRAM P. normanii annotation with model
Here we are annotating a P. normanii metagenome assembled genome using both DRAM and RAST then using those annotations to build models. The genome is from NCBI genome ID GCA_000398025.1
Flynn, Rory↗
Article including Gene lists, and clone information
Supplementary information includes genelists and strain ids
cbi↗
Structural Insights into the Dynamics of Water in SOD1 Catalysis and Drug Interactions
Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) is a crucial enzyme that protects cells from oxidative damage by converting superoxide radicals into H 2 O 2 and O 2 . This detoxification process, essential for cellular homeostasis, relies on a precisely orchestrated catalytic mechanism involving the copper cation, while the zinc cation contributes to the structural integrity of the enzyme. This study presents the 2.3 Å crystal structure of human SOD1 (PDB ID: 9IYK), revealing an assembly of six homodimers and twelve distinct active sites. The water molecules form a complex hydrogen-bonding network that drives proton transfer and sustains active site dynamics. Our structure also uncovers subtle conformational changes that highlight the intrinsic flexibility of SOD1, which is essential for its function. Additionally, we observe how these dynamic structural features may be linked to pathological mutations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). By advancing our understanding of hSOD1’s mechanistic intricacies and the influence of water coordination, this study offers valuable insights for developing therapeutic strategies targeting ALS. Our structure’s unique conformations and active site interactions illuminate new facets of hSOD1 function, underscoring the critical role of structural dynamics in enzyme catalysis. Moreover, we conducted a molecular docking analysis using SOD1 for potential radical scavengers and Abelson non-receptor tyrosine kinase (c-Abl, Abl1) inhibitors targeting misfolded SOD1 aggregation along with oxidative stress and apoptosis, respectively. The results showed that CHEMBL1075867, a free radical scavenger derivative, showed the most promising docking results and interactions at the binding site of hSOD1, highlighting its promising role for further studies against SOD1-mediated ALS.
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗