Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MARS EXPLORATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1992

Space suits and life support systems for the exploration of Mars

The requirements and technologies needed for space suits to be used for the manned exploration of Mars are examined. Alternative concepts are proposed for both the space suit and the portable life support system (collectively called the Extravehicular Mobility Unit, or EMU) needed for Mars exploration. EMU system requirements are outlined. It is pointed out that the most fundamental difference between a Mars EMU and those that preceded it is that the design of a Mars EMU must be driven by science and permanent habitability requirements, while all prior EMU designs have been driven by engineering requirements. The EMU weight issues are discussed, and the system mass and mobility concerns are addressed, along with the backpack-to-body-weight ratio. The challenges of thermal and cosmic radiation protection, micrometeorite protection, and EMU system and crew heat rejection are dealt with briefly, as well as the physiological issues of pressure regulation and bacterial or contaminant isolation. A mathematical model is then presented for evaluation of candidate EMU designs and for concept optimization and selection. Lead technology issues are also discussed.

Kuznetz, Lawrence H.↗
NASA NTRS2003

Making Human Exploration of Mars Biologically Reversible

Mars is interesting because it may have had life in the past and because it may be a place for life in the future. However we are uncertain of the current state of life on Mars. There are at least three possibilities: 1) there is life on Mars that is distinctly different from life on Earth, 2) there is life on Mars that is genetically related to life on Earth, 3) there is no life on Mars. Until we know which of these possibilities is correct we must explore Mars in a way that keeps our options open with respect to future life. I argue that this means that we must explore Mars in a way that is biologically reversible. In this paper I discuss the implications for reversible exploration for human missions to Mars.

Kay, Chris↗
NASA NTRS1997

Thermal Insulation for Mars Surface Exploration

There is currently a significant amount of interest in Mars exploration by NASA to send a series of orbiting spacecraft and landers to Mars over the next decade. For the science and engineering systems that will land on the surface of Mars, there is a great challenge for thermal control.

mars↗
DOE OSTI2019

Measuring the Elemental Composition of Phobos: The Mars-moon Exploration with GAmma rays and NEutrons (MEGANE) Investigation for the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) Mission

The Mars-moon Exploration with GAmma rays and NEutrons (MEGANE) investigation will use gamma-ray and neutron spectroscopy to measure the elemental composition of Mars' moon Phobos. MEGANE is part of the Japanese Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission that will make comprehensive remote sensing measurements of both of Mars' moons Phobos and Deimos. MMX will also return to Earth regolith samples of Phobos. The science goals of the MEGANE investigation mirror those of the MMX mission. MEGANE will use elemental composition measurements to determine if Phobos is a captured asteroid or the end result of a giant impact event on Mars, study Phobos surface processes, provide reconnaissance to support the sample site selection, and supply compositional context for the returned samples. To accomplish its measurements, MEGANE will use a high-purity Ge gamma-ray spectrometer (GRS), and a neutron spectrometer (NS) that consists of two 3He gas proportional neutron sensors. The GRS derives heritage from similar instruments from NASA's MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging mission and the Psyche mission that is currently in development; the NS is based on similar instruments used for NASA's Lunar Prospector and Psyche missions.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
NASA NTRS2004

Lunar and Planetary Science XXXV: The Future of Mars Surface Exploration

The session The Future of Mars Surface Exploration includes the following topics: 1) High Resolution Laser Scanning Techniques for Rock Abrasion and Texture Analyses on Mars and Earth; 2) Definitive Mineralogical Analysis of Mars Analog Rocks Using the CheMin XRD/XRF Instrument; 3) Quantitative Mineralogical Analysis of Mars Analogues Using CHEMIN Data and Rietveld Refinement; 4) In Situ Analytical Strategy for Mars Combining X-Ray and Optical Techniques; 5) In-Situ Dating on Mars: The Potential of OSL Dating; 6) Experiment of Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons (DAN): Searching for Water-rich Spots from the Rover on the Surface of Mars; and 7) Developing an Automated Science Analysis System for Mars Surface Exploration for MSL and Beyond.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1998

Rovers for Mars Polar Exploration

Mobility is a generic capability needed for Mars exploration. Requirements for mobility range from those to get observations of individual rocks all the way to getting high resolution observations of regional areas. Table 1 shows the required-range of mobility to achieve various tasks. The Pathfinder mission and field experiments simulating rover missions [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] provide guidance as to rover capabilities that can reasonably be expected in the next decade. Rover mobility can be accomplished in a variety of ways, the most common being wheels or tracks and legged-walkers. Wheeled vehicles can traverse over rocks smaller than 1/2 wheel diameter, and with path planning to avoid larger rocks, can traverse terrains comparable to those seen on Mars in the Viking and Pathfinder landing sites. Slopes of 45 deg can be easily negotiated by wheeled rovers. Walking vehicles can negotiate even more complex terrain but requires computation capability to select each leg placement. Extremely complex terrain was traversed by the Nomad II walker which descended into (and most of the way out of) an active volcanic caldera (Mount Spur, AK) in 1995, although a slope failure eventually resulted in broken legs. The traverse range of a rover is limited by its science objectives, performance capabilities, and operational lifetime. The speed of rover traverse is a relative minor factor. With a different communication system, and no stops for science experiments, Sojourner could probably have traveled a kilometer. But, achieving land speed records is not a major objective of a science mission. Achieving science objectives requires targeting particular objects and studying them in detail, and the associated operational requirements will likely limit rover traverse range significantly. Traversing from target to target requires relatively few command cycles provided the traverse is over a short enough distance that it can be adequately planned. An operational goal of 100 m traverse per command cycle, arriving at a predetermined target, seems achievable. Investigating science targets requiring manipulator or instrument placement and sample collection will likely take several command cycles per target. Mission simulations [6] have demonstrated that traverse dI stances of 100-300 m, with detailed investigation of 5-10 targets take 50-100 command cycles, not unlike the Pathfinder experience in spite of the use of larger, faster, more capable rovers. Significant advances in rover autonomy will be needed to improve this Situation and it is not clear how much improvement will be brought to flight programs in the next decade. Dust accumulation on solar panels degrades power over time and, without dust removal, rover operational lifetimes may be limited to 90 sols.

Stoker, Carol↗
NASA NTRS1998

Rovers for Mars Polar Exploration

Mobility is a generic capability needed for Mars exploration. Requirements for mobility range from those needed to get observations of individual rocks all the way to those for getting high-resolution observations of regional areas. The Pathfinder mission and field experiments simulating rover missions provide guidance as to rover capabilities that can reasonably be expected in the next decade. Success of rover missions in achieving science goals depends on having adequate support imaging to enable traverses to targets of high science interest. Rover field experiments to date have used aerial photographs to provide support imaging. Pathfinder Sojourner operated in the field of view of the IMP camera. Plans for the future involve the use of descent imagers. However, the descent imager planned for the 2001 mission achieves resolution adequate to plan rover traverses only in the near vicinity of the lander (within a few hundred meters). Aircraft could provide aerial support imaging with a resolution of 10 cm over the entire area accessible to a rover. Aircraft could also provide the mobility needed to explore regional scale areas

Stoker, C.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Spacecraft exploration of Mars

Soviet and American spacecraft exploration of Mars over the past quarter century is reviewed. Data on the earliest Soviet attempts to send spacecraft to observe the planet are presented. Of the series of spacecraft that were announced (designated Mars 1 to Mars 7), none fulfilled all its scientific goals, but some good photographs and other important data were obtained. Of the six spacecraft in the Mariner series, two failed, but Mariner 4 first revealed the cratered surface of Mars, and Mariner 9 discovered all the major geologic features. The Viking mission, with its two Orbiters, two Landers, and its 6-yr duration, surpassed in quantity and variety of data all other missions combined. The Phobos mission ended in two failures, but the second of the two spacecraft acquired significant new data about Mars and Phobos. An appendix listing special issues of journals containing collections of papers about Mars is provided.

Snyder, Conway W.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Human exploration of Mars

Novel approaches to the human exploration of Mars are considered with emphasis on a space suit design, extraterrestrial surface mobility, and water supply. A possible way of transporting personnel on the surface of Mars uses a suborbital rocket that will hop from one site to the next, refuelling each time it lands and giving the Martian explorers effective global mobility. Telepresence could be used to avoid limiting the people on Mars to a small exploration area as a result of a lack of transportation infrastructure. Drawings and photographs are included.

Gwynne, Owen↗
NASA NTRS1991

Mars Observer as a precursor to intensive exploration of Mars

The Mars Observer Mission, to be launched by the United States in September 1992, is designed to perform an extended orbital study of the Martian surface, atmosphere, climate, and gravitational and magnetic fields using a spacecraft in Mars orbit for one Martian year. This information will add to the global data base that is necessary for increasing scientific understanding of Mars, as well as for planning the next stages of intensive exploration of the planet. Future missions will progress from more specific robotic exploration to eventual human exploration, and will require progressively more detailed engineering information. Mars Observer will provide key basic data including planet shape, gravity field, geodetic framework, topography, characteristics of the surface, atmospheric profiles, dust content of the atmosphere, and wind field. Special data products for engineering purposes could be obtained from the currently planned data return, and additional engineering data could be returned by augmentation to the basic Mars Observer's operation.

Cunningham, Glenn E.↗
NASA NTRS2018

The Dust in the Atmosphere of Mars and Its Impact on the Human Exploration of Mars: A NESC Workshop

The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) Chief Scientist provided support to produce an NESC final report on the "Dust in the Atmosphere of Mars and Its Impact on Human Exploration" workshop held June 1315, 2017, in Houston, TX. This report follows the standard NESC report format to describe the findings, observations, and NESC recommendations developed by the workshop participants. The key stakeholders for the final report are the Mars mission designers and engineers for the precursor missions and the crewed mission, and the NESC. Further stakeholders are the mission planners deciding on the payload selections for the Mars missions.

Winterhalter, Daniel↗
NASA NTRS2006

Advances in Distributed Operations and Mission Activity Planning for Mars Surface Exploration

A centralized mission activity planning system for any long-term mission, such as the Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER), is completely infeasible due to budget and geographic constraints. A distributed operations system is key to addressing these constraints; therefore, future system and software engineers must focus on the problem of how to provide a secure, reliable, and distributed mission activity planning system. We will explain how Maestro, the next generation mission activity planning system, with its heavy emphasis on portability and distributed operations has been able to meet these design challenges. MER has been an excellent proving ground for Maestro's new approach to distributed operations. The backend that has been developed for Maestro could benefit many future missions by reducing the cost of centralized operations system architecture.

Mars Exploration Rover (MER)↗