Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Solidification Technologies for Radioactive and Chemical Liquid Waste Treatment - Final CRADA Report

This project, organized under DOE/NNSA's Global Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention program, joined Russian and DOE scientists in developing more effective solidification and storage technologies for liquid radioactive waste. Several patent applications were filed by the Russian scientists (Russia only) and in 2012, the technology developed was approved by Russia's Federal State Unitary Enterprise RADON for application throughout Russia in cleaning up and disposing of radioactive waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Waste Generation Overview Refresher, Course 21464

This course, Waste Generation Overview Refresher (COURSE 21464), provides an overview of federal and state waste management regulations, as well as Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) policies and procedures for waste management operations. The course covers the activities involved in the cradle-to- grave waste management process and focuses on waste characterization, waste compatibility determinations and classification, and the storage requirements for temporary waste accumulation areas at LANL.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Compositing and Characterization of SE Quadrant Waste Exemplars

This report outlines the experimental investigation and characterization of transport properties in Hanford SE quadrant High-Level Waste (HLW). The goal of the study was to establish baseline behaviors of bulk composite rheology and settling characteristics to facilitate waste treatment process design for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and avoid waste conditions and properties favorable to bubble cascade gas release events. The study focused on two major objectives: 1) identifying, obtaining, and preparing relevant Hanford tank waste samples for evaluation and 2) quantifying the “as-received” rheology and transport properties of the samples. Twenty-three centrifuged core segments originating from tanks AN-101, AN-106, and AW-105 were selected based on compositional relevance to SE quadrant PUREX cladding waste. These materials were composited into five waste composites enriched with target analytes: aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), phosphate (PO 4 ), uranium (U), and zirconium (Zr). Physical property and transport testing examined particle size distributions, bulk densities, settling behaviors, rheological properties, shear strengths, and just-suspended mixing speeds (NJS). Testing revealed two distinct composite classifications based on rheological characteristics: non-Newtonian composites (Fe and PO 4 ) and Newtonian composites (Al, U, and Zr). The Fe and PO 4 composites exhibited slow settling rates and reduced mobilization proclivity, attributable to strong particle-particle interactions and the formation of yield structures within non-Newtonian slurries. In contrast, the Al, U, and Zr composites displayed rapid settling and dense compaction behaviors, indicative of minimal structuring and interactions. Shear strengths for all composites were generally low relative to prior studies of SE quadrant waste, with only the U composite showing elevated strength approaching values reported in previous literature. Repeat shear strength measurements revealed contributions from dense granular material in the U composite and stronger cohesive properties in the Al composite. Settling data highlighted hindered settling behavior, with rates falling more than one order of magnitude below estimates based on Stokes’ law and rate decreasing as composite UDS content increased. NJS testing demonstrated different mobilization behaviors between cohesive and granular composites. The Fe composite required the highest mixing rate for resuspension, while the Al composite was the easiest to resuspend. Comparison of measured NJS against predictions made using the Zwietering correlation suggests non-Newtonian behavior alters resuspension mechanics, rendering non-Newtonian systems more stable against resuspension lift forces relative to their granular counterparts.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Does the Perfect Waste Package Exist? Development of a Decisional Tool Addressing this Challenge - 17053

The definition of a safe, technically, economically and societally acceptable waste management strategy is highly dependent on the Waste Acceptance Criteria in each country and on the already available disposal routes. It is the reason why there is not a single solution but a combination of optimized solutions depending on the type of waste and on each country's considerations. In fact, when operating a nuclear plant or performing its decommissioning or legacy waste management, one has to consider a large waste diversity in term of natures, types, volumes and radioactivity spectra. All nuclear operators have to take-up the challenge of implementing solutions for conditioning its waste in packages suitable for transport short to long term interim storage and final disposal of it (or prepare for final disposal if the repository is not yet available). Operators have then to answer the following dilemma: either define a complete strategy packaging the waste for final disposal, or 'containerising' it temporarily, pending final disposal. The strategy is highly country dependent; in the first case, one has to take into account the available information and future orientations relative to acceptability of the packages in order to define a robust solution. The approach implemented in France requires a close dialogue between the Operators, the Safety Authority, the Administration and the stakeholders. Moreover it pushes forward whenever possible standardization, contributing to cost minimization. If the second approach has the advantage of leaving the options open, and reducing the initial investments, it inevitably requires future retrieval and re-packaging with potential evolutions/degradation of the initial waste form. It also induces the potential risk to produce additional secondary waste. As an additional drawback, it introduces uncertainties and unknowns related to the future waste management criteria and to the costs. The general idea is that, depending on context, a given route (i.e., treatment, conditioning, and transport), could be considered as efficient or not. Assessing a waste package is certainly highly context dependent. However it should be possible to recognize and to lead an evaluation based on a number of fixed criteria, whatever the context, to be addressed when assessing the development of a final waste package in connection to the overall management route. A waste package is always a combination of a waste container and a waste form and will have to be transported one day from the production site to the final repository or to off-site interim storage facilities. AREVA's approach consists in defining an evaluation grid based on a set of criteria which aim (i) to evaluate whether the different waste treatments, conditionings, transport and packages deserve to be considered within different national contexts, and (ii) to evaluate R and D actions to be performed for improving existing solutions or developing new ones. One of the key lessons to be drawn from AREVA's experience in developing waste packages is that the perfect waste doesn't exist even though the vitrified canister is probably the most efficient one. The performance of a package resulting from a compromise depends on context and is a strength combination between the waste container and the waste form. The approach is to evaluate a waste package development against different set of criteria and to draw optimization diagrams. In such diagram, a given waste package is assessed with respect to selected criteria such as waste form and waste container, stability, level of waste incorporation, integrity lifetime, secondary waste generation, transport, long term behavior, and economical effectiveness, etc. Addressing a waste form is a very key point. This evaluation grid and comparative approach will be presented through examples and comparison providing from AREVA feedback on waste package development related to complex waste management such as problematic waste or legacy waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Re-evaluation of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Passive Institutional Controls Program - Status - 17116

The United States government set forth in 40CFR194.43 requirements for 'Passive Institutional Controls' for nuclear waste repositories. This regulation stated compliance applications for a repository 'shall include detailed descriptions of the measures that will be employed to preserve knowledge about the location, design and contents of the disposal system.' In the early 1990's the U.S. Department of Energy developed and proposed in the Compliance Certification Application of 1996 a robust and complex technical and engineering Passive Institutional Controls Program including such things as records management, large surface markers, salt berms, buried and above-ground information rooms and small subsurface markers/plaques. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Passive Institutional Control program meets the regulatory requirements and is certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Presently this program is being re-evaluated in light of the Nuclear Energy Agency's, Records Knowledge and Memory initiative, shrinking government budgets, and the ethical/moral considerations of risks versus expenditures. This paper will discuss progress made to date in re-evaluating the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Passive Institutional Controls program and expected plans for the future. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Video Camera Improvements to Support Hanford Tank Farms - 17141

Hanford Tank Farms consist of 177 underground storage tanks that contain 56 million gallons of radioactive waste. The current mission is to safely manage this waste in preparation to feed the Waste Treatment Plant. Fulfilling this mission includes inspecting each tank regularly to ensure tank integrity and support ongoing operations such as transferring waste from older single-shell tanks to the newer double-shell tanks. Video cameras derived from commercially available equipment have provided the ability to remotely see inside the tanks, reducing some of the challenges of fulfilling this mission. However, there are many challenges and limitations with the currently used video systems. Among some of the challenges are limited tank interior entry points for camera deployment, high radiation dose rates, limited equipment longevity in the environmental conditions, need for high resolution image quality, low light conditions, and in-tank obstructions. Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has identified and tested new video systems that will effectively manage these challenges and increase capability, efficiency, and improve safety. The new camera systems are planned for deployment to support the next Single Shell Tank Retrieval Project in the A/AX tank Farm complex. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

URS/WTP's Future Leader Program and AECOM's Early Career Professional Technology Exchange - 17239

URS Energy and Construction, Inc. (URS), a subsidiary of AECOM, is the Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) teaming subcontractor on the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project. Recently, the WTP Project has begun a transition toward facility turnover and commissioning. With that transition came the hiring of staff for the startup and commissioning workforce. With many of these individuals being Early Career Professionals (ECPs), URS recognized a need to create and implement a workforce development program to give these professionals the skills to thrive in a professional environment and provide a sense of community to improve talent retention. The result of this recognition of need was the creation of URS/WTP Future Leaders. This paper will share the successes and lessons learned related to founding the URS/WTP Future Leaders. This includes establishing programs such as the Continuous Learning Workshops, Rotational Program, and implementing a mentor program. In addition, establishing a budget and obtaining support from Human Resources will be discussed. By March 2017, the ECP program will have been in effect for approximately two years. As a separate effort, many of AECOM's major waste remediation contractors have started having Early Career Professional Technology Exchanges (ECP TE) in an effort to create collaboration between sites and to establish industry contacts that will continue to be a resource for years to come. Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC; URS/WTP; Savannah River Remediation, LLC; and Nuclear Waste Partnership, LLC have conducted ECP TE, with each site hosting an event. For these events, each participant prepares a presentation and answers questions on the presentation topic. This allows ECPs to practice presentation skills, develop skills in answering questions from their peers and management, and be the expert in the room on a particular topic. Tours of the onsite facilities also are given as a way for ECPs to gain a broader understanding of the waste remediation industry and the challenges that other sites are facing. Accomplishments, lessons learned, and future plans for ECP TE will be discussed. The ECP TE events allow AECOM, as the parent company, to provide a unique learning opportunity to the next generation of engineers within the DOE nuclear field and to ensure the safe operations of these nuclear sites for years to come. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Waste Information Management System with 2016-17 Waste Streams - 17246

The Waste Information Management System (WIMS) 2016-17 was updated to support the Department of Energy (DOE) accelerated cleanup program. The schedule compression required close coordination and a comprehensive review and prioritization of the barriers that impeded treatment and disposition of the waste streams at each site. Many issues related to waste treatment and disposal were potential critical path issues under the accelerated schedule. In order to facilitate accelerated cleanup initiatives, waste managers at DOE field sites and at DOE Headquarters in Washington, D.C., needed timely waste forecast and transportation information regarding the volumes and types of radioactive waste that would be generated by DOE sites over the next 35 years. Each local DOE site historically collected, organized, and displayed waste forecast information in separate and unique systems. In order for interested parties to understand and view the complete DOE complex-wide picture, the radioactive waste and shipment information of each DOE site needed to be entered into a common application. The WIMS application was therefore created to serve as a common application to improve stakeholder comprehension and improve DOE radioactive waste treatment and disposal planning and scheduling. WIMS allows identification of total forecasted waste volumes, material classes, disposition sites, choke points, technological or regulatory barriers to treatment and disposal, along with forecasted waste transportation information by rail, truck and inter-modal shipments. The Applied Research Center (ARC) at Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Florida, developed and deployed the web-based forecast and transportation system and is responsible for updating the radioactive waste forecast and transportation data on a regular basis to ensure the long-term viability and value of this system. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Design, Fabrication and Start-up of Test Facilities for the LAWPS Full-Scale IX Column Test and Engineering Scale Test - 17418

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection's (ORP) primary mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the Tank Farms to protect the Columbia River. Mixed radioactive waste is stored in 177 underground tanks at the Hanford Site as reported in DOE/ORP 2003-02, Environmental Impact Statement for Retrieval, Treatment, and Disposal of Tank Waste and Closure of the Single Shell Tanks at the Hanford Site, Richland WA, Inventory and Source Term Data Package. The 177 underground tanks are estimated to contain about 56 million gallons of waste. The Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project provides for the early production of immobilized low activity waste (ILAW) by feeding LAW directly from Tank Farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant's (WTP's) LAW Facility, bypassing the Pretreatment Facility. Prior to the transfer of feed to the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility, tank supernatant waste will be pretreated in the LAWPS to meet the WTP LAW waste acceptance criteria. The LAWPS will also facilitate the return of secondary liquid wastes from the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility to the Tank Farms. In November of 2015 DOE's Tank Operations Contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), awarded a contract to the AECOM Team to design, fabricate and operate two test platforms to generate performance data at two different scales and demonstrate technology maturation. The first platform models the ion exchange (IX) columns at full scale, and the second platform models the integrated flowsheet (cross flow filter (CFF) and IX) at 1/9. scale. Both test platforms underwent shakedown and start-up testing in August 2016 and moved into actual testing and NQA-1 data generation shortly thereafter. This paper covers the engineering design, procurement, construction, installation, and acceptance testing of the test platforms (which are now operational) under an aggressive fast track schedule, and initial test data as available. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Documentation of Radioactive Waste Packages for Disposal in the Konrad Repository - 16253

For the Konrad repository, the plan approval procedure has been completed in 2002. In 2007 all complaints filed against the repository were dismissed, so that there is a legal and un-appealable license decision available. The waste acceptance requirements were revised taking into account additional requirements from the plan approval decision. Today, there are already several hundred waste packages produced that meet all requirements for final disposal in Konrad. The acquisition, verification and quality assurance of the data relevant for disposal is performed in parallel to the waste treatment and packaging. This constitutes the development of database applications, on the one hand to capture and handle specific data for the waste packages to another to manage the disposal procedures. The development of a database application for recording disposal-relevant data of waste packages has already been completed with regard to the radiological requirements. Additional aspects based on the requirements of the plan approval decision, e.g. water law relevant aspects, have to be taken into account. Thus, an upgrade relating to the recording of groundwater debilitating substances will be carried out in a second step, which is expected to be completed in 2016. In parallel, the development of a database application is carried out to coordinate the waste package deliveries to the repository and to document their disposal. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Low Activity Waste Glass Waste Form Data Package for Hanford's Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment - 16480

A Direct Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) flowsheet has been initiated to begin immobilization of Hanford tank wastes. In the DFLAW configuration, a pretreatment system will segregate the high level and the low activity wastes (LAW). The LAW will be immobilized in the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and disposed of in Hanford's Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). To obtain authorization to dispose of wastes in the IDF, a Performance Assessment (PA) must be completed in accordance with DOE Order 435.1. The PA shall include calculations of potential doses to representative future members of the public and potential releases from the facility to provide a reasonable expectation that performance objectives will not be exceeded as a result of operation and closure of the facility. To support the development of the PA, data from ILAW glass testing are needed to model the long term release of contaminants over the compliance period and verify that impacts to groundwater quality will be within performance objective limits. Washington River Protection Solutions is conducting an ILAW glass testing program to produce the required data. This program is a combined effort involving National Laboratories with known expertise in glass waste form research. The work involves accelerated testing to develop parameters that can be used in computer simulations of glass corrosion and contaminant release in the IDF environment. The results of this work will be compiled in an ILAW glass waste form performance data package for the IDF PA. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Program Integration - 16638

The mission of Program Integration is to champion and steer the development and implementation of common and consistent programs between the Tank Operating Contract (TOC) contractor and the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) contractor. TOC is managed by Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) and WTP is managed by Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI). The DOE Office of River Protection (DOE ORP) is the Program Owner. WRPS has been actively managing the TOC at the Hanford Site Tank Farms (TF) since 2008. Programs are already developed, verified, and in use for the TOC, whereas WTP is still in the construction phase. WTP Programs are established for construction only, but not developed for commissioning and future operations. An extensive effort is underway at WTP to develop commissioning programs. In order to drive consistency and minimize differences in program requirements between TF, which will feed the tank waste, and WTP, which will receive and treat the tank waste, DOE-ORP requires the two contractors to integrate and collaborate in program development. Advantages of integration are: - Achieves cost and time savings as WTP is able to review existing TOC programs as starting points in development of its programs. - Promotes interfaces with industry counterparts to share experiences, issues, and lessons learned. ? Minimizes difference in program requirements between the companies. - Helps prepare for and ultimately succeed in Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR). Program Integration is a priority for TOC and WTP, and in order to maintain the focus and drive to this effort, a unified One System Program Integration Council (OSPIC) was created in 2012. Membership of the OSPIC consists of senior managers from both companies and the OSPIC chair's report directly to their respective President. Thirty (30) programs are subject to integration, including but not limited to Conduct of Operations, Worker Safety and Health, Quality Assurance, Contractor Assurance, and Environmental Management. Progress of program development and integration efforts are tracked and monitored, and barriers to integration are resolved in a collaborative fashion within both companies. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

An Industrial Perspective of Research Within the DISTINCTIVE Program - 18045

UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and three industrial partners, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), the National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) and Sellafield Ltd (SL) are supporting the DISTINCTIVE (Decommissioning, Immobilisation and Storage Solutions for Nuclear Waste Inventories) consortium of eleven universities to carry out research in four theme areas of importance to the UK nuclear industry: Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor (AGR), Magnox and exotic spent fuels; PuO{sub 2} and fuel residues; legacy ponds and silo wastes; and structural integrity. This paper describes the main industry challenges in each of these theme areas and some of industry led activities to address these challenges, and provides examples of where the DISTINCTIVE research output is assisting the nuclear industry in meeting these challenges. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Small Waste in a Large Package - Meeting Requirements for Packaging, Transport and Disposal - 18092

A small amount of Class C Mixed Low Level Waste (MLLW) required packaging and disposition to an off-site facility. The AREVA TN RAM cask, designed and licensed for shipping Type B waste packages, was chosen as the most appropriate shipping solution. Due to packaging, shipping and disposal requirements, the standard TN RAM cask could not be utilized without making some modifications. Unique solutions and approaches had to be developed by the AREVA design team to complete the project within the anticipated budget and schedule. The general work scope was to characterize, remove from a pool, profile, package, certify and transport four irradiated components to an approved off-site facility. The material makeup of the components (three stainless steel plates and a lead counterweight) resulted in a MLLW classification which required special packaging and disposal methods. The AREVA design team worked with the disposal facility to identify all requirements associated with disposal of Class B/C MLLW. After defining the packaging and disposal requirements, it was determined that unique spacers and void fillers would be required. The design solution consisted of a liner insert as well as axial and radial spacers filled with inert material. Remaining voids in the liner insert were filled with recycled glass beads to fulfill the requirement for maximum 10% void space in the waste package. The axial spacers also served to center the waste load in the shipping cask to comply with the AREVA TN RAM Cask NRC license. Concentration averaging and waste consolidation were used to reach the Class C MLLW determination for shipping and disposal. This disposal method for Class C waste met the requirements of macro-encapsulation. Therefore, no additional treatment action was required when disposing of Class C MLLW. AREVA's solution provides a model for meeting macro-encapsulation requirements while also meeting void space requirements. This solution provides a model for how to adapt large shipping casks and liners to smaller waste packages that would not normally be a good fit for traditional casks. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Updating the Dry Transfer System - 18110

The Dry Transfer System (DTS) was examined for its ability to be redesigned in order to meet needs associated with repackaging used/spent nuclear fuel (UNF/SNF) from existing storage cask systems into alternative systems, while also incorporating design advances based on some lessons learned from Orano's dry UNF handling facility (T0) located at the La Hague recycling plant. In this redesign, the DTS is envisioned to provide some flexibility through the ability to perform repackaging activities from multiple differently designed cask systems, including those with canisters that will require cutting and welding activities, and potentially with waste packages designed for disposal. The redesigned DTS is also intended to provide some operational flexibility by providing lag storage and include a means for examining UNF/SNF during repackaging, using some features implemented at the T0 facility at La Hague. This paper provides a summary of: the original DTS design, which was evaluated by the NRC and portions of which were cold-tested at Idaho National Lab; the lag storage system designed for the DTS, which is able to flexibly handle different fuel assembly designs while providing structural support for design basis events (e.g., seismic); the incorporation of lessons learned from the La Hague T0 facility into the DTS design to facilitate dry handling of UNF/SNF; and identification of other challenges towards designing a complete system. A revised DTS is envisioned to provide an important tool for the future management of UNF/SNF in preparation for transportation, re-storage, re-transportation, and/or disposal and also provides a means for repackaging UNF/SNF in case recovery from a cask/canister system is necessary (e.g., due to extended storage or a transportation event). (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Characterization of Highly Active Cells in Preparation for Post Operational Clean Out at Sellafield - 18139

The Highly Active Liquor Evaporation and Storage (HALES) Plant at Sellafield receives highly active (HA) raffinate liquors from the Magnox and Thermal Oxide (THoRP) Reprocessing Plants. These liquors are concentrated through evaporation into Highly Active Liquor (HAL), conditioned and stored in HALES before immobilisation in glass in the Waste Vitrification Plant (WVP). Reprocessing operations at Sellafield are nearing completion and hence these liquor feeds will soon cease. Therefore, HALES is starting its planning and preparation phases for Post Operational Clean Out (POCO) and decommissioning. POCO is a transitional phase between operations and decommissioning and encompasses activities undertaken to remove residual inventory and activity from the facility. Key drivers for POCO include risk and hazard reduction and facilitating subsequent decommissioning activities (including potential surveillance and maintenance or care and maintenance regimes). Characterization is a critical enabler for development and implementation of effective POCO. In addition to the key drivers above characterization within HALES will be used to: - Define the start and end points of POCO (radiological condition, inventory sources and location, configuration, etc.); - Develop and technically underpin the wash out strategy (volumes, rates, reagent types, etc.; - Monitor the effectiveness of POCO activities (reduction in inventory/activity, points of diminishing return, confirmation of end points for POCO). There are a number of significant challenges that present to characterization of the HALES facilities. Perhaps the most significant of these is the radiological status of the facility. HALES is an HA facility meaning that the high dose rates limit not only the technology selection for characterization (i.e. those with a very high radiation tolerance) but also place constraints on the access and deployment for the selected technology. Additionally, parts of the facility are circa 60 years old which brings its own challenges such as poor quality construction drawings and limited operational knowledge. Finally, limited sampling capability and minimal data regarding historic operations has resulted in uncertainties that will need to be addressed in order to undertake POCO as efficiently and effectively as possible. The solution to this challenge requires a novel and innovative approach and an example of this is the technique which is described in this paper. This is a radiometric characterization technique which utilizes remotely deployed dosimetry to determine the activity distribution within the vessels of interest to POCO. The results to date have been extremely promising, and the ability to produce concise visual representation of these results has already begun to facilitate better informed discussions around the POCO of the facility. It is expected that in the future this technique will be applicable to other areas of Sellafield which face similar characterization challenges. This paper presents a summary of the development and implementation of the solution along with the results obtained so far. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Synthesis and Characterisation of Caesium Phosphomolybdate and Zirconium Molybdate found in the Highly Active Storage Tanks at Sellafield - 18154

Caesium phosphomolybdate (Cs{sub 3}PMo{sub 12}O{sub 40}.xH{sub 2}O, CPM) and zirconium molybdate (ZrMo{sub 2}O{sub 7}(OH){sub 2}.xH{sub 2}O, ZM) are two known fission products that precipitate out within the Highly Active Storage Tanks (HASTs) at Sellafield, potentially causing 'hot-spots' and blocking pipes. Currently, there is not enough behavioural understanding of these compounds present in the Highly Active Liquor (HAL) for effective Post Operational Clean Out (POCO) strategic planning. As the HASTs do not have an in situ monitoring system the behaviour of the HAL cannot be directly observed. Therefore, as with this research, non-radioactive simulants can be utilised to aid behavioural understanding to assist with the planning of future waste management programs. CPM, along with two different morphologies of ZM were characterised and compared to the common oxide particle material titanium dioxide (TiO{sub 2}). The study provides a detailed physical characterisation of the simulants including: particle shape, particle size, water content and crystal structure, along with zeta particle potential, suspension settling and compressive yield stress. CPM was found to be spheroidal in nature with a particle size of 275 nm and an x value of 13 H{sub 2}O which crystallises as a cubic lattice with space group Pn-3m. ZM was found to have a range of morphologies from cuboidal to wheat-sheaf, varying in size from 10 μm to 20 μm, with an x value of between 3 and 4 H{sub 2}O, which crystallise as a body-centred tetragonal lattice with space group I4{sub 1cd}. TiO{sub 2} used as a comparison simulant was found to be spheroidal in shape with particle size of 725 nm. The isoelectric points (IEPs) of the two ZM samples (ZM-A and ZM-B) with different morphologies were found to be pH 2.5, while for TiO{sub 2} it was pH 3.2. For CPM it could not be confidently identified due to its instability within the acidic environment. The settling rates and compressive yield stress of all simulants were tested in both water and 2 M nitric acid, conditions that replicate the HASTs. TiO{sub 2}, ZM-A and ZM-B all found settled faster in acid than in water. For CPM, slightly faster settling in acid was measured. For all samples it was found that as the particle concentration increased the settling rate decreased, which is a result of hindered settling. For compressive yield stress, similar trends were observed for CPM with little variation in its behaviour in acid and water, suggesting that the particles are highly aggregated in both fluids. For ZM samples little change in equilibrium volume fraction was measured with an increase in pressure (both acid and water). However, overall the sediment bed was denser in water, a result of the rapid settling in acid not allowing the non-spherical particles to pack in an ordered manner. It has been highlighted that both CPM and ZM within the acidic conditions of the HASTs, result in unstable and aggregated compounds, which settle quickly to form large open networks. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Plans for the Removal of Inventory from HLW Storage Tanks and Impact on Vitrification Feeds - 18175

Over the next 4 years Sellafield will cease reprocessing nuclear fuel. This represents a significant change in the mission of Sellafield Ltd, shifting the site focus from reprocessing operations to preparations for decommissioning. The storage tanks which have stored the acidic high level waste produced during reprocessing will require washing out. These tanks have been used since the 1950's and over time the nature of this waste has changed. It poses unique challenges for both removal and vitrification. A large collaborative programme of work is underway at Sellafield to characterise this inventory and prepare a strategy for its removal and vitrification. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗