Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ASF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

60 records · Page 4

Alaska SAR Facility Mass Storage, Current System

This paper examines the mass storage systems that are currently in place at the Alaska SAR facility (ASF). The architecture of the facility will be presented including specifications of the mass storage media that are currently used and the performances that we have realized from the various media. The distribution formats and media will also to be discussed. Because the facility is expected to survice future sensors, the new requriements and possible solutions to these requriements will also be discussed.

Mass↗

NASA Ames Arc Jet Complex Measurements Handbook

The Arc Jet Measurement System Handbook will serve as a reference of the calculations and formulas used by the Arc Jet Complex Data Acquisition System. It is the objective that Code ASF personnel and experimenters will be able to manually reproduce data calculations performed by the Arc Jet Data Acquisition System using these formulas as a guide.

Jerry Cheng↗

Evaluating SAR Radiometric Terrain Correction products: Optimal products for applied users

Operational applications for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) are under development around the world, driven by the free-and-open access of SAR C-band observations that Sentinel-1 of Copernicus has been providing since 2014. Groups like SERVIR, a joint initiative between NASA and USAID, are at the forefront of remote sensing applied uses, and have made many significant contributions to lower the barrier to access, process, and apply SAR for ecosystem services. A takeaway from the SERVIR experience in using SAR is the need to use the appropriate SAR polarimetric product. Radiometric Terrain Correction (RTC) is a key entry-level product for multiple applications that range from ecosystems to hazards. Many software packages exist to create RTC products from SLC or GRD-type Level-1 SAR data, some of which were released only recently, e.g. Interferometric SAR Computing Environment (ISCE) added an RTC module in April 2020. In addition, new versions of open source softwares are expected to address known issues from previous versions, such as Sentinel-1 Toolbox from the European Space Agency (SNAP-7). Despite the growing availability of RTC software solutions, little work has been done to identify differences between RTC products from different softwares. And to address the question, which open-source software produces the most accurate RTC product? This work evaluates Sentinel-1 RTC products created with three different softwares and approaches, including SNAP-7, ISCE-2, and a pseudo RTC product derived from GEE. The GAMMA-derived RTC product, a known optimal RTC and implemented by Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF), is used as a reference. Time series stacks over ten different sites representing varied terrain and ecosystems are evaluated. Products are evaluated for geolocation quality, absolute radiometric calibration, and for the fidelity of the radiometric terrain flattening. The results provide direct guidance and recommendations about the quality of the RTC products obtained from open source methods. This understanding is key to develop operational applications that rely on SAR Sentinel-1 data that need affordable and scalable solutions.

Africa Flores-Anderson↗

Harmonized Sentinel-1 SAR Global River Geometry and Inundation Database

Satellite-based observations on river geometries are sporadic in time, space, or both. Most satellite-based surface water maps, river widths, water surface elevations (WSE), slopes, and bathymetry are asynchronized in time and space. The current configuration of satellites such as Sentinel-6 measured the WSE but is missing the river width, slopes, and depths. To advance hydrological sciences research, there is a need to produce a harmonized time series of river geometry data of non-SWOT satellites in partnership with the upcoming SWOT mission. The SWOT satellite will measure river width, height, and slope but missing river depth measurements in space and time. Further, none of these current satellites measure the WSE, river width, and slopes synchronously. In this work, we use the Sentinel-1 SAR satellite data archive from 2015 to the present to create a global river width and surface water database at the reach scale. A modified version of the Sentinel SAR surface water classification algorithm from ASF is used to quantify the surface water extent on the stream approximately every six days (at the equator) at 10m spatial resolution globally. This 10m water mask is fed into a workflow to quantify the river widths, surface water inundations, slopes, and synthetic bathymetry in SWORD (SWOT River Database) stream networks. A Satellite HAND is used to address the cloud obscured surface water observations using a trained machine learning algorithm. We use WSE derived from the Global Water Monitor from NASA GSFC, Hydroweb from LEGOS, and ICESat-2 to harmonize the WSE observation. And Landsat-8/9 and Sentinel-2 water observations to fill the gaps in the Sentinel-1 SAR database. We use Congo River Basin as a test case where we have more than 500 radar altimetry-based WSE, continuous series of Sentinel-1, ICESat-2, Landsat-8/9, and Sentinel-2 observations. A Congo River hydrologic model is used to generate the streamflow discharge. The satellite observed river reaches are assimilated with the stream flows computed by the routing models. And the downstream reaches in the river network without satellite observations get optimized for discharge/river geometry at each observation cycle. Our final product is a harmonized river geometry dataset (reach's water extent, WSE, slope, synthetic bathymetry) for Congo Basin's SWORD reaches.

Chandana Gangodagamage↗