Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Abrasion cleaning”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

57 records · Page 4

Reducing module soiling with scalable and robust photocatalytic coatings

The air-glass interface at the front of a photovoltaic (PV) module reflects approximately 4% of incident light, decreasing the potential power output of the module by the same amount. Today’s modules reduce this loss by adding a low-refractive-index (1.25-1.30) SiO2 coating to the sunward side of the module glass; this antireflection coating recovers approximately 3% of the 4% light that would otherwise be lost. While such antireflection coatings work very well on clean, new modules, they do not inhibit soiling—the accumulation of soilants such as dust, pollen, soot, or other foreign material—on the module glass, and soilants reflect and scatter incident light. An improved coating would serve provide not only an antireflection effect, but also an anti-soiling effect. The goal of this project was to develop such a coating and provide a path for it to be manufactured in the U.S. The project successfully designed and fabricated coatings that provided >3% transmittance gain compared to bare glass (matching the performance of commercial antireflection coatings) and displayed anti-soiling behavior in standard laboratory soiling effects. This was achieved by using a Swift Coat proprietary coating deposition technique, aerosol impact-driven assembly (AIDA), to control the porosity and thus refractive index of coatings of photocatalytic materials—such as TiO2—that would otherwise increase (instead of decrease) reflection. These combined antireflection/anti-soiling coatings passed PV industry standard module reliability tests as well as coating-specific abrasion tests, showing that they have the durability needed for decades in the field. Swift Coat scaled the AIDA hardware and deposition process to make mini-modules that were monitored for nearly two years during field tests administered by a third party, as well as demonstrated scaling to the widths of full-sized modules. The fielded mini-modules outperformed reference modules (with commercial antireflection coatings) in two locations, providing a 1% absolute average performance boost and larger increases during periods of heavier soiling. Swift Coat’s cost analysis indicated a coating manufacturing cost below the sales price of today’s antireflection coatings. More than five module manufacturers sampled and assessed the coatings, and three provided letters of support. The coating developed in this project increases the energy output of PV modules, thereby decreasing the cost per kilowatt-hour of solar energy generated. Cheaper solar electricity benefits the public by accelerating the transition to a stable, affordable, carbon-free energy economy. In addition, for select applications in which PV modules are highly visible—such as on residential rooftops—the coating provides an aesthetic benefit because it stays cleaner than today’s modules. Finally, Swift Coat and its prospective customers are U.S. companies, and successful commercialization of this technology will provide U.S. jobs and a secure solar supply chain.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Preparing for Planetary Surface Exploration by Measuring Habitat Dust Intrusion with Filter Tests During an Analogue Mars Mission

As humans venture deeper into space more issues related to operations will become apparent. While the perils ofdust particles may not be widely recognized, it is one of the major issues astronauts will face on the surface of theMoon and Mars. Dust particles present a problem for both astronaut health and equipment as revealed during theApollo era lunar surface missions. Dust particles cling to spacesuits and field gear, which upon ingress would begincirculating throughout the spacecraft or habitat. An astronaut's health is compromised by the dust particle's potentialto embed in the lungs and cause respiratory illnesses. The extreme abrasiveness and granularity of the particles makeit near impossible to completely shield a spacecraft or habitat from dust related damage. NASA's Glenn ResearchCenter collaborated with Crew 188 at the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS) in Utah to measure how much dustentered the habitat during a series of extravehicular activities (EVAs), or surface excursions. A NASA GRCdeveloped multistage filter system, coined the Scroll Filter System, was tested, for its effectiveness in removing dustthat entered the airlock and habitat after the EVAs. An optical particle counter measured the ambient airlockparticulates five times including: before the start of operations; after the crew left for EVA; in the middle of the EVAwith the settled air; before the crew entered the airlock after EVA; and finally, after the crew simulated repressurizationand suit brushing off in the airlock. Data was also collected in several of the working environmentlocations around MDRS and outside the habitat in the wind. Data collected from this research will help establishfilter equipment for life support systems and prescribed operations for astronaut transition from a planetary surfaceinto a desired clean habitat. Measurements may aid in updating a baseline expected dust load for a surface habitatand further facilitate the mitigation of astronaut's exposure to dust particles on the surface of celestial bodies.

Kobrick, Ryan L.↗

Wear in particle based CSP systems from particle abrasion and attrition at high temperature

High temperature particle-based receivers offer distinct advantages over conventional molten salt receivers due to their ability to achieve temperatures above 700 ºC, direct absorption of solar energy as they fall through a beam of concentrated sunlight, and the relative ease of storage (and retrieval using a secondary working fluid) in insulated storage tanks. The use of particles, however, also raises concerns with material degradation from the flow of hot or cold particles through discharge hoppers or along the inner receiver surfaces and other system components (e.g. tubes, valves etc.), depending on operating mode of the receiver. The flow of particles over surfaces may result in loss of material from abrasive wear, impact erosion from impingement under gravitational fall and particle attrition as particles fall and move on top of each other. In the present study, the performance of candidate materials and particles were evaluated through a series of abrasion erosion and particle attrition experiments at room temperature as well as at 800 °C. Candidate materials were subject to abrasive wear from particles at low particle to material velocities inside a resistance heated kiln, and analyzed for changes in mass and surface morphology using cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) tests. The wear rate for different specimens was noted to be largely driven by the strength of chromia scales built on the specimens from exposure to high temperature. Particle attrition measurements explored the susceptibility of particles to breakdown from particle to particle interaction and the generation of fines from this process. At the low velocities expected in particle based CSP plants, the particles tested exhibited near negligible breakdown. However, changes in the particle hardness at 800 ºC resulted in a significantly higher particle breakdown to sizes <40 microns raising potential environmental concerns. In addition to particle breakdown, it was also noted that the sample had oxides from the stainless steel test setup mixed in with the particles. Similar oxides can be expected to turn up in the utility scale particle based CSP plants as well. The presence of oxide was also noted to affect the solar absorptivity of the mixture compared to a clean initial specimen, potentially resulting in a change in the overall efficiency of the CSP plant.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗