Current and Future Science using Free Flying Robots on the ISS The Astrobee Facility and Research Opportunities
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Astrobee free-flying robots have completed their fifth successful year of operations housed in the Japanese Experimental Module (JEM) on the International Space Station (ISS). In this paper, we introduce two Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) used to operate and monitor in real-time the Astrobee free-flying robots onboard the ISS and report on the impact these GUIs have in the operator’s cognitive load. A review of the state-of-the-art GUI design for remotely teleoperated scenarios with minimal time delay is presented and the study’s conclusion used to determine the elements and recommendations to create an interface that minimizes its impact on the overall performance of an operator during an activity at the ISS. The Ground Data System (GDS) is one of the two GUIs in the study: it contains several tabs, each of which displays a different set of controls for specific tasks e.g. Overview, Run Plan, Teleoperate, Guest Science; some also display video and a three-dimensional (3D) representation of the ISS and robot based on the Astrobee’s telemetry. Most tabs enable a single operator-robot connection, however some of its tabs are capable to monitor and control up to three Astrobees simultaneously. The GDS Helper is a text-based user interface created to facilitate commanding and monitoring of an Astrobee robot directly from an SSH session. In full interactive mode it displays a maximum of 5 sections: general commanding, feedback/ack, telemetry, guest science commanding, and data, all in one view. In batch mode, it enables complex command scripting while retaining some interactive capabilities. A comparative analysis between these GUIs is carried out at an analogous ISS environment at the NASA Ames Research Center’s Granite Lab and its results presented. While GDS is able to provide an operator with control and situational awareness via its video and 3D displays, its several tabs may introduce an overwhelming amount of information confusing and delaying the operator especially during time-sensitive maneuvers where the operator may need to switch back and forth between them. GDS helper in the other hand does not provide video or 3D displays thus not allowing an operator to attain situational awareness, however it provides the operator with a design displaying commonly used data in a single window, enabling the operator to understand the state of the robot at a glance and control it through a commands entered via keyboard instead of a combination of mouse clicks and keyboard input. The results of the experiments measure the cognitive load across several operators maneuvering Astrobee to accomplish tasks ranging from fully manual to supervised activities. A GUI combining a single window displaying data along video and a 3D display is expected to reduce the operator’s cognitive load.
We present the localization approach for Astrobee,a new free-flying robot designed to navigate autonomously on board the International Space Station (ISS). Astrobee will conduct experiments in microgravity, as well as assisst astronauts and ground controllers. Astrobee replaces the SPHERES robots which currently operate on the ISS, which were limited to operating in a small cube since their localization system relied on triangulation from ultrasonic transmitters. Astrobee localizes with only monocular vision and an IMU, enabling it to traverse the entire US segment of the station. Features detected on a previously-built map, optical flow information,and IMU readings are all integrated into an extended Kalman filter (EKF) to estimate the robot pose. We introduce several modifications to the filter to make it more robust to noise.Finally, we extensively evaluate the behavior of the filter on atwo-dimensional testing surface.
We present the localization approach for Astrobee, a new free-flying robot designed to navigate autonomously on the International Space Station (ISS). Astrobee will accommodate a variety of payloads and enable guest scientists to run experiments in zero-g, as well as assist astronauts and ground controllers. Astrobee will replace the SPHERES robots which currently operate on the ISS, whose use of fixed ultrasonic beacons for localization limits them to work in a 2 meter cube. Astrobee localizes with monocular vision and an IMU, without any environmental modifications. Visual features detected on a pre-built map, optical flow information, and IMU readings are all integrated into an extended Kalman filter (EKF) to estimate the robot pose. We introduce several modifications to the filter to make it more robust to noise, and extensively evaluate the localization algorithm.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Astrobee free-flying robots recently completed their third successful year of operations, housed in the Japanese Experimental Module (JEM) on the International Space Station. We summarize the three years of operation, giving special attention to JAXA's 1st and 2nd Kibo Robot Programming Challenge (RPC) and the mapping processes and tools that make Astrobees' autonomous operation possible. The JEM is an ever changing, dynamic environment where light settings, cargo, payloads, and crew members constantly move and interact with one another. The 1st JAXA Kibo RPC event, a collaboration between JAXA and NASA, was held in 2020. Students from several countries in the Asia-Pacific region competed in programming challenges with a simulated Astrobee. The finalists were then invited to run their code on an actual Astrobee in the JEM. For the final round, students programmed Astrobee to visit three different locations to obtain data that would instruct the robot to complete a final task with the participation of ISS crew. The first competition was a tremendous success, leading to an equally successful 2nd JAXA Kibo RPC in 2021 with even larger participation. The 3rd JAXA Kibo RPC will occur in 2022 expanding further to incorporate US participants. These activities led to several firsts in Astrobee’s history: operation of an Astrobee free-flying robot without crew supervision in preparation for on-orbit operations, autonomous image acquisition towards updates of the navigation map, non-NASA code running on the robot (both from JAXA and participating students), two heterogeneous free-flying robots from two different space agencies working together (Int-Ball and Astrobee) during the final event in 2020, the first payload using Astrobee, and having Astrobee controlled from a non-NASA location (Tsukuba Space Center). The preparation towards these activities involved constant evaluation of the different components of Astrobee's systems, specially mapping and localization. The paper describes the evolution of these systems such as the improvements made in localization to reduce localization drift by using graph-based optimization instead of the extended Kalman Filter localizer. Additionally, it reports on the mapping process and analysis tools created to validate map consistency across different activities in the constantly changing JEM environment. These enhancements have enabled the Astrobee facility to successfully execute over 100 ISS activities supporting over a dozen researchers and partners around the world.
Since 2019, NASA has been operating three Astrobee free flying robots on board the International Space Station (ISS) providing an autonomous and flexible research platform for national and international payload developers in microgravity and serving as a robotic assistant for astronauts on the ISS. During its use on the ISS, in particular with over 750 hours of free-flyer operation as of March 2022, Astrobee and its Docking Station have encountered multiple software and hardware anomalies. These anomalies were either resolved remotely via software and firmware updates, or, where not possible, with hardware replacements on orbit or by the return of the faulty unit to NASA’s ground facilities for its repair. Despite being inherently designed to be repaired or replaced on orbit, Astrobee and its systems can still suffer anomalies that would be complex enough to disassemble, cause risks of hardware damage, or use excessive crew time to perform the repair in orbit. That was the case for the anomaly the Astrobee unit ‘Honey’ encountered, reason why it needed to be down-massed for repair. One of the most common points of failure was found to be the SD card, which is used for the different Astrobee processors and for the Dock Station. Other comparable SD card anomalies were found also on the Astrobee ground units, which provided useful data in the effort of upgrading their systems. This presentation will focus on 1) The overview of the different faults and anomalies on Astrobee and its systems on orbit and on the ground 2) The processes and procedures implemented to resolve the anomalies 3) The implementation of software updates and hardware upgrades in order to reduce the risk on returning anomalies 4) The lessons learned in increasing Astrobee’s robustness and resilience to such anomalies.
The SPHERES facility is a set of three free-flying satellites launched in 2006. In addition to scientists and engineering, middle- and high-school students program the SPHERES during the annual Zero Robotics programming competition. Zero Robotics conducts virtual competitions via simulator and on SPHERES aboard the ISS, with students doing the programming. A web interface allows teams to submit code, receive results, collaborate, and compete in simulator-based initial rounds and semi-final rounds. The final round of each competition is conducted with SPHERES aboard the ISS. At the end of 2017 a new robotic platform called Astrobee will launch, providing new game elements and new ground support for even more student interaction.
The SPHERES (Synchronized Position Hold Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellite) facility is a set of three free-flying satellites launched in 2006. In addition to scientists and engineers, middle- and high-school students program the SPHERES during the annual Zero Robotics programming competition. Zero Robotics conducts virtual competitions via simulator and on SPHERES aboard the ISS (International Space Station), with students doing the programming. A web interface allows teams to submit code, receive results, collaborate, and compete in simulator-based initial rounds and semi-final rounds. The final round of each competition is conducted with SPHERES aboard the ISS. At the end of 2017 a new robotic platform called Astrobee will launch, providing new game elements and new ground support for even more student interaction.
Astrobee is complex autonomous system comprehending components on board the International Space Station and on Earth. It aims to help scientists and engineers drive innovative research faster as well as becoming the foundation for autonomous systems operating on future un-crewed space stations. I would have not believed I was going to work with Astrobee 10 years ago, let alone when I was a growing up. Being a kid in the mid 80s-90s in Costa Rica was quite different from today. Dreaming of working in space robotics was, unsurprisingly, only a dream. During this presentation, I will talk about the events that helped me navigate through the road that took me from this small Central American country to create maps on a weekly basis for the Astrobee robots in the International Space Station.
Astrobee is complex autonomous system comprehending components on board the International Space Station and on Earth. It aims to help scientists and engineers drive innovative research faster as well as becoming the foundation for autonomous systems operating on future un-crewed space stations. I would have not believed I was going to work with Astrobee 10 years ago, let alone when I was a growing up. Being a kid in the mid 80s-90s in Costa Rica was quite different from today. Dreaming of working in space robotics was, unsurprisingly, only a dream. During this presentation, I will talk about the events that helped me navigate through the road that took me from this small Central American country to create maps on a weekly basis for the Astrobee robots in the International Space Station.
Astrobee is a new class of free-flying robots that operate in the interior of the International Space Station (ISS). In addition to providing a research platform for zero-g free-flying robotics (replacing the Synchronized Position Hold Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellites (SPHERES)), Astrobee improves the efficiency of ISS operations by providing flight and payload controllers with a mobile camera/sensor platform. The Astrobee system consists of three robots, a docking station, and a ground data system. Development began in late 2014, and Astrobee will launch to ISS in late 2018. This paper provides an overview of the capabilities of the Astrobee system, the concept of operations for ISS operations support, and the challenges of operating a free-flying robot within the constraints of the ISS environment.
Astrobee is a new class of free-flying robots that operate in the interior of the International Space Station (ISS). In addition to providing a research platform for zero-g free-flying robotics (replacing the Synchronized Position Hold Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellites (SPHERES)), Astrobee improves the efficiency of ISS operations by providing flight and payload controllers with a mobile camera/sensor platform. The Astrobee system consists of three robots, a docking station, and a ground data system. Development began in late 2014, and Astrobee will launch to ISS in late 2018. This paper provides an overview of the capabilities of the Astrobee system, the concept of operations for ISS operations support, and the challenges of operating a free-flying robot within the constraints of the ISS environment.
This paper analyzes Wi-Fi signal propagation inside pressurized modules of the International Space Station (ISS). Various flight datasets were collected by the Astrobee fleet of autonomous free-flying robots developed by the NASA Ames Research Center (ARC). The enclosed module spaces of the ISS pose unique challenges for Wi-Fi signal propagation, and understanding these challenges is crucial for optimizing connectivity in such environments. The survey data presented are valuable for optimizing wireless access point (WAP) locations and conditions. A computational method is developed to analyze the wireless communication system, RF coverage, and module compositions. The method is both rigorous and practical for assessing the ISS wireless system performance. The computational tools in this paper serve as a complementary approach to direct, on-orbit measurements, which is a complicated and expensive task. In some operational scenarios, ground measurements may be intractable due to the size of the spacecraft. Results from this research will aid future space missions and commercial spacecraft, providing insights into optimal WAP placements and robust wireless communication systems.
2015 mid-year review charts of the Human Exploration Telerobotics 2 project that describe the Astrobee free-flying robot and the Robonaut 2 humanoid robot. A planned replacement for Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, Reorient, Experimental Satellite (SPHERES), which is currently in use in the International Space Station (ISS).
This paper describes the development and design of the Astrobee Free-Flyer propulsion nozzle assemblies. As will be illustrated in this paper, the Free-Flyer nozzles are thrust control devices used to propel the Astrobee Free-Flyer robot autonomously inside the International Space Station (ISS). The development process, design evolution, and prototyping methods, are described. Key design features are discussed in greater detail to highlight how a seemingly simple design can present surprisingly large challenges. Several lessons learned are given.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.