SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Booster”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Operation of the NSLS-II Injector with a Lower Booster Injection Energy

The NSLS-II injector consists of a 200 MeV linac and a 3 GeV full-energy booster synchrotron. The linac contains five traveling-wave S-band accelerating structures driven by two high-power klystrons. Optimization of the NSLS-II injector has continued since user operation started in October 2014. Beam losses have been minimized by the injector tuning and stabilization, and high level software has been developed to characterize the booster and injection parameters. However, due to the recently increased frequency of klystrons arcing which shortens the lifetime of the klystron, operation of the linac with lowered klystron output power would allow injection to be maintained with fewer trips and extended lifetime of klystrons. Apart from the energy difference, the low energy klystron operation is quite similar to the nominal 200 MeV operation. Injection trials were carried out with scaled magnet settings of the linac, linac-to- booster (LtB) transport line, and the booster. The beam was successfully injected into the booster on May 31, 2017 at the low energy mode of the 170 MeV LtB injection. Overall transfer efficiency from the linac to the storage ring is identical to the standard 200 MeV operation. The 170 MeV injection mode has been adopted in NSLS-II user operation ever since the beam study. In the most recent injector studies on June 28 and July 3, 2017, the booster injection energy was further decremented to the final target value of 100 MeV via applying the same method established in the 170 MeV operation. The ultimate value of 100 MeV is determined by the special requirement of operating the injector at single klystron while repairing the other klystron or with two klystrons with significantly reduced outputs for the purpose of maximizing klystron lifetimes.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2026

Contextual modeling and Bayesian Optimization for Improved Injection at the Fermilab Booster

The Fermilab accelerator complex delivers high-intensity proton beams to serve the lab’s neutrino, muon, and fixed-target programs. A normal-conducting Linac accelerates H− beam to 400 MeV and injects into the Booster rapid cycling synchrotron via charge exchange, which accelerates protons to 8 GeV. Injection from the Linac into the Booster is a critical area for high-power performance of the Fermilab proton complex. The Booster is a high-intensity proton ring with extreme space-charge forces which necessitates precise control over the beam losses through the acceleration cycle. The main challenge for the reliability of Booster performance is compensating for drifting conditions in the beam from the Linac, which can drift daily in energy by up to O(1) MeV w.r.t. design. Drifts in Linac orbit and energy must be corrected to match the Booster, while simultaneously accommodating interdependent drifts in transverse and longitudinal beam quality. Operationally, compensation for these changes is addressed by manual tuning of the Linac output energy and/or Booster acceptance, which can be inefficient and time-consuming. This works describes contextual Bayesian Optimization for injection tuning that takes into account the state of Linac beam via information from instrumentation in the injection line (Beam position monitors (BPMs), beam loss monitors (BLMs), wire scanners for transverse profiles (WSs)), as well as RF cavity setting parameters from the Linac.

Sharankova, R. [Fermilab] (ORCID:000000027014593X)↗

NASA NTRS1974

A study of two statistical methods as applied to shuttle solid rocket booster expenditures

The state probability technique and the Monte Carlo technique are applied to finding shuttle solid rocket booster expenditure statistics. For a given attrition rate per launch, the probable number of boosters needed for a given mission of 440 launches is calculated. Several cases are considered, including the elimination of the booster after a maximum of 20 consecutive launches. Also considered is the case where the booster is composed of replaceable components with independent attrition rates. A simple cost analysis is carried out to indicate the number of boosters to build initially, depending on booster costs. Two statistical methods were applied in the analysis: (1) state probability method which consists of defining an appropriate state space for the outcome of the random trials, and (2) model simulation method or the Monte Carlo technique. It was found that the model simulation method was easier to formulate while the state probability method required less computing time and was more accurate.

Perlmutter, M.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Space shuttle phase B wind tunnel model and test information. Volume 1: Booster configuration

Archived wind tunnel test data are available for flyback booster or other alternative recoverable configurations as well as reusable orbiters studied during initial development (Phase B) of the Space Shuttle. Considerable wind tunnel data was acquired by the competing contractors and the NASA Centers for an extensive variety of configurations with an array of wing and body planforms. All contractor and NASA wind tunnel test data acquired in the Phase B development have been compiled into a database and are available for application to current winged flyback or recoverable booster aerodynamic studies. The Space Shuttle Phase B Wind Tunnel Database is structured by vehicle component and configuration type. Basic components include the booster, the orbiter and the launch vehicle. Booster configuration types include straight and delta wings, canard, cylindrical, retroglide and twin body. Orbiter configuration types include straight and delta wings, lifting body, drop tanks, and double delta wings. Launch configurations include booster and orbiter components in various stacked and tandem combinations. This is Volume 1 (Part 1) of the report -- Booster Configuration.

Glynn, J. L.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Space shuttle phase B wind tunnel model and test information. Volume 1: Booster configuration

Archived wind tunnel test data are available for flyback booster or other alternative recoverable configurations as well as reusable orbiters studied during initial development (Phase B) of the Space Shuttle. Considerable wind tunnel data was acquired by the competing contractors and the NASA Centers for an extensive variety of configurations with an array of wing and body planforms. All contractor and NASA wind tunnel test data acquired in the Phase B development have been compiled into a database and are available for application to current winged flyback or recoverable booster aerodynamic studies. The Space Shuttle Phase B Wind Tunnel Database is structured by vehicle component and configuration type. Basic components include the booster, the orbiter, and the launch vehicle. Booster configuration types include straight and delta wings, canard, cylindrical, retroglide and twin body. Orbiter configuration types include straight and delta wings, lifting body, drop tanks and double delta wings. Launch configurations include booster and orbiter components in various stacked and tandem combinations. This is Volume 1 (Part 2) of the report -- Booster Configuration.

Glynn, J. L.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Liquid rocket boosters for the Space Shuttle - An outline of trade issues and analysis techniques

Numerous liquid rocket booster configurations were studied to replace the Solid Rocket Boosters on the current Space Shuttle. While improved safety, reliability, performance and economy of operation were sought, the designs also sought to minimize volumetric growth to reduce aerodynamic loads and structural modifications. Aero loads could be significant as a function of booster diameter if extrapolated directly from solid rocket characteristics. Procedures to meet these goals with analytical booster sizing and simple dynamic simulations are shown. Engine chamber pressure proved to be a good independent variable for implications of pressure-fed and pump-fed engines, fuel and material selection. For some configurations, ascent trajectory modifications were suggested: longer vertical rise, lofting, heads-up orientation, and higher first and second stage target altitudes. Since engine manufacture would dominate booster costs, booster simplification of reuse are discussed based on cost estimates.

Kelly, W. D.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Liquid Rocket Booster (LRB) for the Space Transportation System (STS) systems study. Volume 1: Executive summary

The feasibility of replacing the Space Transportation System (STS) Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) with Liquid Rocket Boosters (LRBs) was studied. Feasibility required acceptable technical risk, program costs, and a program plan which supports STS requirements. Three major goals were identified to direct booster design and operation: increased STS safety and reliability; STS/LRB integration with minimum impact; and increased STS performance. Two booster engine designs were studied. The first engine design was a turbopump-fed engine with state-of-the-art design, and the second was a pressure-fed engine which might provide a lower cost alternative to the pump-fed concept. Both booster concepts were carried through to completion of conceptual design and all system impacts and program costs were identified. Applications for LRB use in the Advanced Launch System (ALS) program were studied using the pump-fed LRB baseline concept and variations on the baseline concept. Support for the Pressure-Fed Booster Test Bed (PFBTB) included test program planning and costs and technical support.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1989

Liquid Rocket Booster (LRB) for the Space Transportation System (STS) systems study. Appendix F: Performance and trajectory for ALS/LRB launch vehicles

By simply combining two baseline pump-fed LOX/RP-1 Liquid Rocket Boosters (LRBs) with the Denver core, a launch vehicle (Option 1 Advanced Launch System (ALS)) is obtained that can perform both the 28.5 deg (ALS) mission and the polar orbit ALS mission. The Option 2 LRB was obtained by finding the optimum LOX/LH2 engine for the STS/LRB reference mission (70.5 K lb payload). Then this engine and booster were used to estimate ALS payload for the 28.5 deg inclination ALS mission. Previous studies indicated that the optimum number of STS/LRB engines is four. When the engine/booster sizing was performed, each engine had 478 K lb sea level thrust and the booster carried 625,000 lb of useable propellant. Two of these LRBs combined with the Denver core provided a launch vehicle that meets the payload requirements for both the ALS and STS reference missions. The Option 3 LRB uses common engines for the cores and boosters. The booster engines do not have the nozzle extension. These engines were sized as common ALS engines. An ALS launch vehicle that has six core engines and five engines per booster provides 109,100 lb payload for the 28.5 deg mission. Each of these LOX/LH2 LRBs carries 714,100 lb of useable propellant. It is estimated that the STS/LRB reference mission payload would be 75,900 lb.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1992

The performance of a winged booster powered by combined rocket and airbreathing propulsion

A conceptual level analysis was performed on a horizontal-takeoff, two-stage-to-orbit system consisting of a rocket and turboramjet powered hypersonic booster and a rocket powered orbiter. The analysis includes estimates of vehicle aerodynamics, performance, and weights. Rocket and airbreathing systems on the booster are operated in parallel and at full thrust for ascent to a Mach 6 staging point, while cruise-back is accomplished using airbreathing propulsion alone. Rocket engines on the orbiter are ignited at staging to propel the orbiter. Booster weights were determined for various combinations of rocket and airbreathing propulsion. The combinations that resulted in the lowest vehicle gross and empty weights were determined. Results show that the lowest gross weight occurs when only airbreathing engines are used. The empty weight of the all airbreathing booster, however, is quite high. Significant reductions in booster empty weight is accomplished with the addition of rocket engines. Also, the use of rockets on the booster greatly decreases the time to staging and the cruise-back distance.

Lepsch, Roger A., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2001

Survey of Advanced Booster Options for Potential Shuttle Derivative Vehicles

A never-ending major goal for the Space Shuttle program is to continually improve flight safety, as long as this launch system remains in operational service. One of the options to improve system safety and to enhance vehicle performance as well, that has been seriously studied over the past several decades, is to replace the existing strap-on four segment solid rocket boosters (SRB's) with more capable units. A number of booster upgrade options have been studied in some detail, ranging from five segment solids through hybrids and a wide variety of liquid strap-ons (both pressure and pump fed with various propellants); all the way to a completely reusable liquid fly back booster (complete with air breathing engines for controlled landing and return). All of these possibilities appear to offer improvements in varying degrees; and each has their strengths and weaknesses from both programmatic and technical points of view. The most beneficial booster upgrade/design, if the shuttle program were to continue long enough to justify the required investment, would be an approach that greatly increased both vehicle and crew safety. This would be accomplished by increasing the minimum range/minimum altitude envelope that would readily allow abort to orbit (ATO), possibly even to zero/zero, and possibly reduce or eliminate the Return to Launch Site (RTLS) and even the Trans Atlantic Landing (TAL) abort mode requirements. This paper will briefly survey and discuss all of the various booster'upgrade options studied previously, and compare their relative attributes. The survey will explicitly discuss, in summary comparative form, options that include: five segment solids; several hybrid possibilities; pressure and/or pump-fed liquids using either LO2/kerosene, H2O/kerosene and LO2/J2, any of which could be either fully expendable, partly or fully reusable; and finally a fully reusable liquid fly back booster system, with a number of propellant and propulsion system options. Performance and configuration comparison illustrations and tables will be included to provide a comprehensive survey for the paper.

Sackheim, Robert L.↗

NASA NTRS2004

Counterrotatable booster compressor assembly for a gas turbine engine

A counterrotatable booster compressor assembly for a gas turbine engine having a counterrotatable fan section with a first fan blade row connected to a first drive shaft and a second fan blade row axially spaced from the first fan blade row and connected to a second drive shaft, the counterrotatable booster compressor assembly including a first compressor blade row connected to the first drive shaft and a second compressor blade row interdigitated with the first compressor blade row and connected to the second drive shaft. A portion of each fan blade of the second fan blade row extends through a flowpath of the counterrotatable booster compressor so as to function as a compressor blade in the second compressor blade row. The counterrotatable booster compressor further includes a first platform member integral with each fan blade of the second fan blade row at a first location so as to form an inner flowpath for the counterrotatable booster compressor and a second platform member integral with each fan blade of the second fan blade row at a second location so as to form an outer flowpath for the counterrotatable booster compressor.

Moniz, Thomas Ory↗

NASA NTRS2009

Ares I First Stage Booster Deceleration System: An Overview

In 2005, the Congressional NASA Authorization Act enacted a new space exploration program, the "Vision for Space Exploratien". The Constellation Program was formed to oversee the implementation of this new mission. With an intent not simply to support the International Space Station, but to build a permanent outpost on the Moon and then travel on to explore ever more distant terrains, the Constellation Program is supervising the development of a brand new fleet of launch vehicles, the Ares. The Ares lineup will include two new launch vehicles: the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle and the Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicle. A crew exploration vehicle, Orion, will be launched on the Ares I. It will be capable of docking with the Space Station, the lunar lander, Altair, and the Earth Departure Stage of Ares V. The Ares V will be capable of lifting both large-scale hardware and the Altair into space. The Ares First Stage Team is tasked with developing the propulsion system necessary to liftoff from the Earth and loft the entire Ares vehicle stack toward low Earth orbit. The Ares I First Stage booster is a 12-foot diameter, five-segment, reusable solid rocket booster derived from the Space Shuttle's four segment reusable solid rocket booster (SRB). It is separated from the Upper Stage through the use of a Deceleration Subsystem (DSS). Booster Tumble Motors are used to induce the pitch tumble following separation from the Upper Stage. The spent Ares I booster must be recoverable using a parachute deceleration system similar to that of the Shuttle SRB heritage system. Since Ares I is much heavier and reenters the Earth's atmosphere from a higher altitude at a much higher velocity than the SRB, all of the parachutes must be redesigned to reliably meet the operational requisites of the new launch vehicles. This paper presents an overview of this new booster deceleration system. It includes comprehensive detail of the parachute deceleration system, its design and deployment sequences, including how and why it is being developed, the requirements it must meet, and the testing involved in its implementation.

King, Ron↗

DOE OSTI2014

Perpendicular Biased Ferrite Tuned Cavities for the Fermilab Booster

The aging Fermilab Booster RF system needs an upgrade to support future experimental program. The important feature of the upgrade is substantial enhancement of the requirements for the accelerating cavities. The new requirements include enlargement of the cavity beam pipe aperture, increase of the cavity voltage and increase in the repetition rate. The modification of the present traditional parallel biased ferrite cavities is rather challenging. An alternative to rebuilding the present Fermilab Booster RF cavities is to design and construct new perpendicular biased RF cavities, which potentially offer a number of advantages. An evaluation and a preliminary design of the perpendicular biased ferrite tuned cavities for the Fermilab Booster upgrade is described in the paper. Also it is desirable for better Booster performance to improve the capture of beam in the Booster during injection and at the start of the ramp. One possible way to do that is to flatten the bucket by introducing second harmonic cavities into the Booster. This paper also looks into the option of using perpendicularly biased ferrite tuners for the second harmonic cavities.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Beam Based RF Voltage Measurements and Longitudinal Beam Tomography at the Fermilab Booster

Increasing proton beam power on neutrino production targets is one of the major goals of the Fermilab long term accelerator programs. In this effort, the Fermilab 8 GeV Booster synchrotron plays a critical role for at least the next two decades. Therefore, understanding the Booster in great detail is important as we continue to improve its performance. For example, it is important to know accurately the available RF power in the Booster by carrying out beam-based measurements in order to specify the needed upgrades to the Booster RF system. Since the Booster magnetic field is changing continuously measuring/calibrating the RF voltage is not a trivial task. Here, we present a beam based method for the RF voltage measurements. Data analysis is carried out using computer programs developed in Python and MATLAB. The method presented here is applicable to any RCS which do not have flat-bottom and flat-top in the acceleration magnetic ramps. We have also carried out longitudinal beam tomography at injection and extraction energies with the data used for RF voltage measurements. Beam based RF voltage measurements and beam tomography were never done before for the Fermilab Booster. The results from these investigations will be very useful in future intensity upgrades.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2014

Design study of the CEPC booster

Design study of the CEPC booster is reported. The booster provides 120 GeV beams for the collider with topup injection frequency of 0.1 Hz. To save cost, energy of the linac injector for the booster is chosen as 6GeV, corresponding to the magnetic field of 30 Gs. In this paper, lattice of the booster is described; the low injection energy issues are studied; beam transfer from linac to booster and from booster to collider are discussed.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

NASA NTRS1989

The liquid rocket booster and its potential for the STS

Results of the liquid rocket booster study initiated by NASA to define an alternative to solid rocket boosters, are presented. The prime study contractors, Martin Marietta Corporation and General Dynamics, have identified liquid rocket booster configurations that can increase shuttle performance to 70 klb. These boosters will provide improved reliability, hold down, verification prior to vehicle release, engine-out and abort capabilities. Phasing of these boosters into Space Transportation System (STS) operations without adversely affecting flight rate is described.

Space Shuttle↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Informing the Space Launch System Booster Separation Initial CFD Run Matrix with Observed Parametric Sensitivity

It currently requires significant computational cost to simulate the flow physics of the booster separation event on the Space Launch System. This comes from the large parametric space in which the event occurs, as pre-separation flight conditions and separated booster core-relative trajectories can vary. Functionally removing the risk of core-booster collision mandates careful assessment of the fluid dynamics in terms of several trajectory parameters. However, simulating the entire trajectory envelope is computationally intractable given the high parametric dimension. In order to reduce the uncertainty in the resulting low-parametric-resolution aerodynamic booster separation database, a data-driven approach was developed to select which breakpoints should be studied by simulations and experiments and which should be relegated to a regression-based interpolation procedure. This technique works by simulating cases where the flow physics are most sensitive to changes in the parameters and leaving the less parametrically sensitive regions for interpolation. The result is a booster separation run matrix whose computational cost is comparable to that of previous database generations but has lower interpolation errors.

SLS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Informing the Space Launch System Booster Separation Initial CFD Run Matrix with Observed Parametric Sensitivity

SLS↗