Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “DARHT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

(U) Endpoint Energy and Scintillator Geometry Effects on the Swank Factor, Quantum Efficiency, and DQE(0) for High-Energy Radiography

High-energy radiography is used to image imploding materials to better understand weapon design and performance. The Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments (ECSE) is a new facility proposal that aims to collect radiographic images of nuclear material. As part of the facility design, we aim to optimize data quality and radiographic performance by investigating different detector designs. We addressed design decisions by simulating different scintillator designs using M CNP6 and calculated the quantum efficiency, Swank factor, and detective quantum efficiency at zero-frequency (DQE(O)). First, we investigated the effects of the x-ray endpoint energy on the detector response. We generated three x-ray spectra with endpoint energies of 20 MeV, 22 MeV, and 24 MeV. The three raw spectra were filtered using the Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test facility (DARHT) line-of-sight materials along with 1) flat field filtration using 7 cm tungsten alloy in the bullnose and 2) an FTO with 4 plates. The scatter-to-direct radiation ratio was much larger for FTO with 4 plates (50-60%) compared to the flat field with 7 cm of bullnose material (8%). We used these filtered spectra to calculate the detector response for the original DARHT segmented scintillator design. We found that the endpoint energy and filtration had a negligible effect on the detector response. The quantum efficiency was 0.63, the Swank factor was 0.84, and the DQE(O) was 0.53 for all six spectra.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

2020 Review of Axis 2 rf

An intense relativistic electron beam can produce radiofrequency (rf) radiation in many ways. The DARHT II linear induction accelerator produces a 17 MeV, 1.65 kA beam. The dominant sources of rf at DARHT-II and the methods used to suppress this rf are well documented. This note will examine the observed rf over the past six years and its impact on the beam. The recorded waveforms for each hydro starting with 4011 from 10/29/14 are examined to identify the presence of rf. The hydros are chosen because they represent the optimal accelerator performance at any given time rather than tuning or beam studies.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

New Septum Dump Quadrupole Magnet Design

The purpose of the septum dump quadrupole (SDQ) magnet is to expand the beam size on the septum dump of the DARHT Axis 2 downstream transport in the same manner as the S2 magnet expands the beam on the beam stop for mode 1 operations of DARHT Axis 2. This is necessary in order to minimize the heating of the carbon beam dump and suppress desorption of ions. Initially, ions are generated through stimulated desorption and ionization of the monolayers of water vapor stuck to the beam dump surface. These ions propagate upstream at high speeds and act as an electrostatic focusing lens by reducing the beam space charge. As the beam size on the dump decreases, the dump is sufficiently heated so that a surface plasma is formed and much greater quantities of ions are generated through space charge limited emission. The interaction of these ions with the beam causes significant disruption of the beam.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Estimating Beam-Target Heating

At Los Alamos National Laboratory, two high-current linear induction accelerators (LIAs) are used to produce bremsstrahlung source spots for flash radiography of high-explosive driven hydrodynamic experiments at the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility. Measurements of the electron-beam current density profile are valuable for understanding the beam dynamics in order to improve the quality of the radiography source spot. A technique commonly used at DARHT is to image the profile in Cerenkov or Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) light created by the beam striking a thin target inserted into the beam line. Target materials include aluminized dielectrics and titanium foils for OTR, and fused silica wafers for Cerenkov radiation. A practical complication with this technique is heating of the target by the electron beam. If the beam density is too great, the target can be destroyed. Moreover, even if the beam density is kept low enough to be nondestructive, the beam can heat the target to a high enough temperature to desorb gas from the surface. In that case, direct impact ionization of the gas by beam electrons can partially neutralize the beam, causing it to over-focus, thereby spoiling the data, if not destroying the target. The purpose of this note is to review some of the fundamental physics of electron beam heating in order to provide some elementary guidance for design of these imaging experiments to avoid overheating the target. Some specific examples for materials that we often use for imaging targets and beam-target experiments are provided.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Spot Size Optimization of the Scorpius Accelerator

The Scorpius Linear Induction Accelerator (LIA) is being developed by the Advanced Sources and Diagnostics (ASD) Project and will complement other U1a capabilities by providing a multi-pulse, DARHT-class, flash-radiography capability. Commissioning activities are expected to end in Spring of 2026. All of the diagnostics discussed in this chapter are relevant to LIAs that generate high-current relativistic electron beams, and some diagnostics will also be relevant to other accelerators. The Scorpius Accelerator will be the world’s most advance LIA. Although significant technological advancements have been incorporated throughout the machine, many performance aspects of Scorpius will be similar to those of FXR and DARHT Axis-I and -II. These LIAs offer the same challenges, whether it is suppressing beam instabilities, improving diagnostic accuracy, validating computer simulations and beam tunes, or reducing beam-target interaction effects. However, the ultimate figure of merit is consistent between these LIAs, which is spot size and dose.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A Diamagnetic-Loop-Based Beam Radius Monitor (BRM)

We describe a non-interceptive beam radius monitor that employs a diamagnetic loop. In order to increase the signal strength, the diamagnetic loop radius is considerably smaller than the outer wall radius, the device is placed inside a specially built solenoid magnet to allow independent adjustment of the guide magnetic field strength, and there are two counter-wound diamagnetic loops to double the signal strength and to eliminate common mode signals. This device is calibrated and the magnitude of the electron beam offset/tilt contribution to the measured radius estimated. This device is ready to be validated on an electron induction LINAC such a DARHT-I or DARHT-II.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2025

Monitoring the Structural Health of the Stage-Four Gibbs Resistor In Order to Maintain a Functioning Pulse-Forming Network

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is a critical facility used for nuclear weapons research and development (Los Alamos National Laboratory). Its primary function is to provide high-resolution, real-time images of the behavior of materials under extreme conditions, specifically during the hydrodynamic testing of nuclear weapons surrogates. The facility uses advanced radiographic techniques, such as dual-axis X-ray imaging, to capture detailed snapshots of these materials as they react to high-pressure environments. DARHT plays a key role in maintaining the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, supporting the Stockpile Stewardship Program. The facility helps ensure that nuclear weapons perform as designed without the need for nuclear tests. Its dual-axis radiography provides more precise data than traditional single-axis imaging, offering a comprehensive view of the internal dynamics of a weapon's primary stage.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Effects of Electron Beam Endpoint Energy on Linear Induction Accelerator Performance

An analysis of beam end-point energy and its effect on accelerator performance is presented. The analysis assumes a 2.0 MeV injector and a linear induction accelerator composed of DARHT Axis-I induction cells operated at nominal voltages. The beam current was scaled to maintain a dose within the range of 3 to 5 MeV photon energy that is consistent with that of the Axis-I nominal dose. The results indicate that beam emittance, space charge effects (including the beam break-up instability), and beam-target interactions are reduced as the end-point energy is increased. Additionally, the spot size growth due to a given average voltage variation across the induction cells is shown to be nearly unchanged for end-point energies above 10 MeV.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Septum Dump Quadrupole Measurements and Analysis

The purpose of the septum dump quadrupole (SDQ) magnet is to expand the beam size on the septum dump of the DARHT Axis 2 downstream transport. This is necessary in order to minimize the heating of the carbon beam dump and suppress desorption of ions. Initially, ions are generated through stimulated desorption and ionization of the monolayers of water vapor stuck to the beam dump surface. These ions propagate upstream at high speeds and act as an electrostatic focusing lens by reducing the beam space charge. As the beam size on the dump decreases, the dump is sufficiently heated so that a surface plasma is formed and much greater quantities of ions are generated through space charge limited emission. The interaction of these ions with the beam causes significant disruption of the beam. Because the SDQ focuses the beam in one plane and defocuses the beam in the orthogonal plane, it is critical that the beam in the focusing plane be over-focused so that the beam size in this plane is large on the beam stop. Thissets a minimum field at which the SDQ must operate. Recent magnetic measurements of the SDQ show that the actual field is about 15% lower than the design field. This note investigates the possible causes for this discrepancy and a path forward.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Direct Measurement of Backstreaming Ions from the Axis 2 Septum Dump and RF Generation

The DARHT-II accelerator produces a 2-kA, 17-MeV beam in a 1600-ns pulse. After exiting the accelerator, the pulse is sliced into four short pulses by a kicker and quadrupole septum and then transported for several meters to a high Z material target for conversion to x-rays for radiography. The un-kicked beam is diverted to a graphite dump. The interaction of this beam with the dump produces ions that propagate back to the target beamline and affect the beam properties. Coupling of the electron beam and ions to the beam dump vacuum chamber can also produce significant amounts of radiofrequency fields (RF) that disrupt the beam transport to the target. This requires a change in the nominal tune in order to minimize the heating of the carbon beam dump and suppress desorption of ions. Initially, ions are generated through stimulated desorption and ionization of the monolayers of water vapor stuck to the beam dump surface. These ions propagate upstream at high speeds and act as an electrostatic focusing lens by reducing the beam space charge. As the beam size on the dump decreases, the dump is sufficiently heated so that a surface plasma is formed and much greater quantities of ions are generated through temperature limited thermionic emission. The interaction of these ions with the beam creates RF which causes significant disruption of the beam. The results of a 3D PIC simulation show that ions can propagate back to the target beam line in about 500 ns. A beam position monitor (BPM) located just upstream of the septum was modified to include four capacitive pickups in addition to four of the usual inductive pickups. The inductive and capacitive pickups provide a measure of the beam current. The capacitive pickups are very sensitive to low velocity ions. As ions from the beam dump pass through the BPM the inductive and capacitive pickup will record two different measures of the beam current. Initial results from this BPM will be discussed along with other measurements which indicate the presence of backstreaming ions.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Final Focus Solenoid Design Considerations

Radiography utilizing intense relativistic electron beams requires a final focus magnet to produce a small beam spot on the x-ray conversion target. A solenoid magnet is generally used for the final focus magnet. This note addresses design considerations of the final focus solenoid that impact the spot size. The spot size on target is a function of the beam size entering the final focus magnet, the beam emittance and energy spread and spherical aberration inherent in a solenoid magnet. The present final focus solenoid designs for both Axis 1 and Axis 2 of the DARHT facility are evaluated. A new design is proposed for both Axis 1 and Axis 2.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of the effect of spherical aberrations on a solenoid scan

Solenoid scans are often used to determine the beam emittance of an intense relativistic electron beam (IREB). In a solenoid scan, the beam size is measured at a location downstream of the solenoid as a function of the strength of the solenoid magnetic field. The emittance is then inferred using a beam optics model of the transport of the beam through the solenoid magnet to the imaging location. This requires precise knowledge of the field strength and shape as a function of the current supplied to the solenoid. The beam optics model for an IREB needs to include an accurate model of the magnetic field. Unfortunately, most beam optics models do not include the effect of spherical aberrations which are inherent in a solenoid magnet. Spherical aberrations are manifested as an essentially quadratic increase in the solenoid magnetic field as a function of radius. One consequence of this is that the focal length will be dependent on the beam radius. This note examines the sensitivity of a typical solenoid scan performed on DARHT axis 2 to spherical aberrations. The sensitivity to spherical aberrations is examined as a function of the beam envelope size and the drift distance from the solenoid magnet to the imaging station.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2019

Beam Stability Requirements [Slides]

The allowable budget for beam-instability motion can be estimated from requirements, PIC simulations, and DARHT-I data. The same beam dynamics assessment that was done for the CDR is now underway for the new solid-state powered Scorpius LIA. We have made progress in assessing the same beam physics concerns since re-planning ASD-Scorpius to take advantage of solid-state pulsed power. To summarize, beam transport and stability concerns investigated so far appear to be manageable with mitigation measures identified in CDR.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Initial conditions for simulations of beam physics in linear induction accelerators

Flash radiography of hydrodynamic experiments driven by high explosives is a well-known diagnostic technique in use at many laboratories. At Los Alamos, the DualAxis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility two linear induction electron accelerators (LIAs) make the bremsstrahlung radiographic source spots for point projection radiographs from orthogonal views. A new LIA, called Scorpius, is presently under development to advance this technology. To better understand electron-beam physics in these LIAs, numerical simulations are frequently performed with the objective of improving the radiography. At Los Alamos we frequently use the TRAK ray-trace and LSP particle-in-cell (PIC) codes to simulate the injector, and the XTR and LAMDA envelope/centroid codes along with LSP to simulate transport of the accelerated beam through the LIAs. The LIA simulations need the injected beam parameters as initial conditions for calculating beam transport and stability. The determination of these initial conditions is the topic of this note.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Beam Spill in Downstream Transport due to Injector Faults [PowerPoint]

We have investigated injector faults with numerical experiments. For this investigation we used the nominal tune that is also being used to assess beam stability. Beam spill in the DST due to a serious injector fault was evaluated using the LSP slice algorithm. Only the most serious fault investigated (-350 keV) caused beam spill in the DST. DST transport focusing solenoids limit the beam spill. Beam spill in the DST is the result of large halo caused by betatron oscillations of the mismatched beam. Bremsstrahlung radiation from the DST beam spill was estimated from Tom Martin scaling normalized to DARHT-I. In conclusion, Scorpius is reasonably safe from beam spill radiation in the DST due to injector faults.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

High-Performance/-Precision/-Z(HPPZ) Scintillator Grids via Advanced Electrochemistry. Phase I – Project # 20210572MFR- Mid year review [Slides]

Scintillation grids with improved imaging resolution in time and space, are required for future mission needs at various facilities (pRad user station, LANSCE, DARHT, Scorpius etc). Current technologies use inorganic crystal scintillators, which are positioned within a high-Z scintillator septa. Dense and high-Z materials are optimal for gamma-ray detection making them promising candidates for development of high -performance/-precision/-Z (HPPZ) scintillator grids. The current resolution of standard chemical etching and fabrication processes of high-Z materials is very low, leading to undesired undercutting and ultimately reducing crystal performance efficiency. Goals are to: Perform initial feasibility studies with the aim of producing complex parts for applications with difficult-to-process high-Z material; Use of pulse and pulse-reverse electrochemical methods on additive approaches to produce high-precision Au and Re scintillator grids at a small scale; and, Follow up in Phase II with the delivery of a large-scale scintillator grid of the best material candidate with unprecedented properties for LANL needs determined in Phase I.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Imaging Station Multi-Foil Target

The Axis II Downstream Transport (DST) of the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Testing (DARHT) Facility is the final subassembly of the particle accelerator whose primary objective is to focus the 4-pulse beam as it enters the Target Region. Before the beam reaches the Target Region, it passes through two imaging stations located in the DST. At Imaging Station E (ISE) and Imaging Station C (ISC), diagnostics are conducted and experimenters study beam physics using specialized targets. Different targets are used depending on the objective of the study. The desire to conduct specific experiments has driven a need for a multi-foil target. This new design has been engineered to allow for new capabilities, and diagnostics to be studied at ISC. To accommodate new parameters, three different configurations have been conceived. Although each of the three designs differ from each other, their function and purpose remain consistent. Each target is engineered to secure a variable amount of target foils at variable spacing while Imaging Station experiments are conducted. Beam diagnostics and data from the targets are analyzed through various sized viewports on the imaging stations. The objective of this technical note is to document the purpose and functionality of the targets. Design considerations, assembly instructions, and maintenance recommendations are also discussed. Additionally, each target and its respective advantages and disadvantages are covered in detail.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗