Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Earth Science constellation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Testing the Definition of the ESC Envelope

The previous effort, including a successful Change Control Request, addressed shrinking the size of the Earth Science Constellations' (ESC) Envelope by reducing the Margin. Fundamental to the purpose of the Envelope is the case where the argument of perigee of the secondary object circulates from 90 degrees to 270 degrees. This ("outside of the envelope, always outside the envelope") case was tested both numerically in a spreadsheet and analytically. Results showed how it is important to include the fact that a secondary with a different semi-major axis has a different frozen eccentricity value.

ESC envelope↗
NASA NTRS2017

Aqua Spacecraft Status Extended Mission

This will be presented at the Earth Science constellation Mission Operations Working Group meeting June 13-15, 2017 to discuss Aqua spacecraft status extended mission.

Aqua↗
NASA NTRS2017

Aura Extended Mission Plans

This will be presented at the Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Working Group meeting June 13-15, 2017 to discuss the Aura extended mission plans.

summary of efforts↗
NASA NTRS2017

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This will be presented at the Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Working Group meeting to discuss Operations Coordination Plan Status.

statu↗
NASA NTRS2018

To Maneuver or Not to Maneuver that Is the Question

The Earth Observing System (EOS) missions, Terra, Aqua, and Aura, are NASA's flagship Earth Science missions and are part of the International Earth Science Constellation (ESC). The ESC is composed of satellites that fly in the Afternoon Constellation (also known as the A-Train) and the Morning Constellation. All missions fly in 705-kilometer altitude, polar sun-synchronous orbits that are inclined 98.2 degrees. NASA's key operational priorities are to keep the satellites safe and maintain open and cooperative communications between all member missions. As the NASA Mission Director for the EOS Aqua and Aura satellites since their respective launches in 2002 and 2004, Mr. Guit has been responsible for the safety and operations of the satellites as they have successfully operated in the A-Train. Mr. Guit will present a recent EOS Aqua debris avoidance maneuver planning and execution challenge, how it was overcome, and how it affected the other member missions of the A-Train constellation.

Orbital debris↗
NASA NTRS2019

EOS Aura Mission Status

This presentation will introduce topics regarding EOS Aura status for the Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Working Group (MOWG) at Toulouse, France.

mission status↗
NASA NTRS2019

Operations Coordination Plan Status

This presentation will introduce topics of note for the Earth Science Constellation (ESC) Mission Operations Working Group (MOWG) meeting being held in Toulouse, France from June 5-7, 2019.

Case, Warren F.↗
NASA NTRS2006

Constellation Operations: Lessons Learned For Future Exploration

The Earth science community has long advocated placing numerous instruments in space to study the Earth and its environment. Space agencies from many countries have responded to this call with a wide range of orbiting satellites. Scientists also envisioned placing some satellites in constellations, to enable diverse remote sensing instruments to observe the same part of the Earth (or its atmosphere) at about the same time, thereby increasing the opportunities for coincident science observations. The Earth Science Afternoon Constellation is answering this call, but there have been unique challenges on the way to its deployment. Currently, the Afternoon Constellation is to comprise six satellites. Three are currently on orbit: NASA's Earth Observing System (EOS)-Aqua (2002) and EOS-Aura (2004), and CNES's Polarization & Anisotropy of Reflectances for Atmospheric Sciences coupled with Observations from a Lidar (PARASOL) (2004). Two more satellites, the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and Cloudsat, are to be jointly launched in late 2005, followed by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) in 2008. The Afternoon Constellation is unlike most satellite constellations in that: 1) It is not a homogenous mix of identical satellites; rather it comprises several satellites with complementary observational capabilities; 2) The satellites are not spaced around the Earth to provide instantaneous, global coverage (as for a communications satellite constellation); rather they orbit in close proximity so observations occur at about the same time over approximately the same region; and 3) Lastly, the satellites are not managed and controlled by one organization; rather the list of organizations is diverse: CNES in France, NASA Centers at Goddard, Langley, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the US Air Force facility in New Mexico. The PARASOL launch and early orbit (L&EO) phase proved to be a learning experience for constellation members (including Constellation management). Prior to launch, all members signed an operations coordination document that spelled out basic requirements for keeping the constellation safe and resolving non-nominal events. Once PARASOL reached orbit and the mission teams gained experience using the newly-developed constellation monitoring tools, it became clear that some of the guidelines in the signed agreements had to be adjusted. This paper presents the L&EO lessons learned and how they were used to prepare for the next phase - the period following the CloudSat/CALIPSO launch.

Kelly, Angelita C.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Magnetospheric Constellation: Leveraging Space 2.0 for Big Science

Earth's magnetosphere is a large magnetic cavity formed through the interaction of the solar wind and Earth's intrinsic magnetic field. Solar wind energy enters this cavity through a boundary - the magnetopause - separating Earth's field from the solar wind. This energy leads to many forms of "space weather", including the aurora, geomagnetic storms, and energization of the Van Allen radiation belts. Despite decades of research, we still do not understand the extent of dayside reconnection sites, nor do we have a quantifiable understanding of how much energy enters the magnetosphere during different solar wind conditions - necessary for space weather prediction. On the nightside, impulsive flows at various spatial and temporal scales occur frequently during storms and substorms, and couple to the ionosphere through still unresolved physical mechanisms. Because the magnetosphere is so large, it has been understood since the dawn of the space age that a full understanding of this complex region could only be achieved with a large fleet of in situ spacecraft. NASA has studied one such constellation, the socalled "Magnetospheric Constellation" (MagCon), since the1990's, but it is deemed too expensive to implement using traditional approaches. The CubeSat/ SmallSat revolution represents a fundamental disruption to traditional mission architectures, and in this paper I will discuss how, by leveraging innovation in spacecraft subystems, advanced manufacturing, and access to space, we can finally realize this long-term vision of exploration and discovery. The proposed modular approach, utilizing rideshare and propulsive ESPAs, would also enable worldwide participation in the mission, and is applicable to any constellation mission, including Earth Science missions.

Kepko, Emil Larry↗
NASA NTRS2015

Distributed Space Mission Design for Earth Observation Using Model-Based Performance Evaluation

Distributed Space Missions (DSMs) are gaining momentum in their application to earth observation missions owing to their unique ability to increase observation sampling in multiple dimensions. DSM design is a complex problem with many design variables, multiple objectives determining performance and cost and emergent, often unexpected, behaviors. There are very few open-access tools available to explore the tradespace of variables, minimize cost and maximize performance for pre-defined science goals, and therefore select the most optimal design. This paper presents a software tool that can multiple DSM architectures based on pre-defined design variable ranges and size those architectures in terms of predefined science and cost metrics. The tool will help a user select Pareto optimal DSM designs based on design of experiments techniques. The tool will be applied to some earth observation examples to demonstrate its applicability in making some key decisions between different performance metrics and cost metrics early in the design lifecycle.

Constellation↗
NASA NTRS2020

CloudSat - From the A-Train to the C-Train

The CloudSat satellite was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base, in California, on April 28, 2006. It was launched with the CALIPSO satellite, a joint mission between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Centre National D'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). CloudSat and CALIPSO were designed to fly in formation with each other, to combine their complimentary scientific measurements. The two missions were maneuvered into the Earth Science Afternoon Constellation (A-Train) shortly after launch and have flown in formation together since then. Originally designed to fly for 22 months, the CloudSat satellite has far exceeded expectations. Inflight anomalies on CloudSat necessitated changes to both the daily concept of operations and formation flying operations with CALIPSO. In 2011, a severe battery anomaly restricted CloudSat science data collection and maneuverability to the sunlit portions of the orbit. In 2017, CloudSat suffered a reaction wheel failure, triggering the criteria established to exit the A-Train. CloudSat successfully exited the A-Train in early 2018, suspending formation flying and joint science observations with CALIPSO. The joint CloudSat/CALIPSO science team continued collaboration with discussions focused on resuming joint observations. As both satellites were aging and CALIPSO was nearing the exhaustion of satellite propellant, the decision was made to lower CloudSat to the CALIPSO graveyard orbit, to be joined by CALIPSO as soon as feasible. With NASA’s approval, CloudSat was maneuvered to the lower orbit over the course of several months in mid-2018. Once CloudSat was in place, and with approval from CNES, CALIPSO began the delicate dance of lowering their orbit and re-aligning the satellite ground tracks. CloudSat and CALIPSO resumed formation flying in the newly dubbed C-Train (CloudSat and CALIPSO) orbit in the Fall of 2018. The ingenuity of the CloudSat and CALIPSO teams made the concept of the C-Train a reality. This paper will discuss the decision processes and the operational challenges the CloudSat flight team faced while designing and implementing the C-Train.

Witkowski, M.M.↗
NASA NTRS2017

CloudSat at 11— Now What?

The CloudSat mission recently completed eleven years of on-orbit operations, providing unique radar profiles of the vertical structure of clouds. CloudSat is a member of the A-Train, an international constellation of Earth-science satellites at 705 km altitude with an ascending node at 1:30 PM local time. Five years into the mission, the CloudSat spacecraft survived a near-death experience when its battery developed a current-limiting impedance restriction. Dramatic changes were made to the operations of the spacecraft, allowing the mission to continue providing unique weather- and climate-related data on clouds. While several more years of operations are possible, a number of challenges still exist. We discuss the science, the history, and options for the future of CloudSat.

Vane, Deborah G.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Distributed Spacecraft Mission (DSM) Plume Design Reference Mission (DRM) Inter-Satellite Link Modeling, Analysis and Simulation

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Radical Innovation Initiative (RI2) plans to focus intently on DSM capability advancements in FY22-24. A DSM mission involves multiple spacecraft, arranged in a constellation, to achieve one or more common goals via the use of inter-satellite links (ISL) between the satellites. Recently, the GSFC Internal Research & Development (IRAD) program established Enceladus as a design reference mission (DRM) for the current DSM effort to foster the conceptual development of communication architecture, requirements, and solutions for future DSM ISL, as well as being able to push other research areas of interest. Enceladus is an icy moon of the planet Saturn. The DRM Enceladus mission concept involves a constellation of 24 small satellites, orbiting Enceladus around 100 km altitude in 3 planes, as observing nodes for science measurement. The mission science data will be sent back to Earth through a relay orbiting Saturn, using the constellation’s inter-satellite links. A QualNet/STK simulation model of the Relay and constellation ISL optical and RF links is developed for the design and optimization of the link and orbital parameters, as well as the inter-networking protocols. Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) is utilized in the application layer modeling. This paper describes the plume DRM mission concept of an Enceladus constellation to relay science data to Earth and includes the proposed communication architecture and operation concepts. We present details of the QualNet/STK engineering model for this communication scenario to simulate the end-to-end data traffic through multiple layers (physical, data link, networking, transport and application). A link analysis for the constellation’s ISL, constellation to Relay and Direct to Earth (DTE) optical link is provided and discussed. The results of end-to-end traffic simulation for the data throughout/latency evaluation and assessment of the communication architecture are presented. The investigation of the concept of optical multiple access (OMA) for the Plume DRM is discussed. The modeling and simulation methodology developed in this paper is applicable to other DSMs in near Earth and deep space such as Earth-Moon L1/L2 and Lunar regions.

Distributed Spacecraft Mission (DSM) Inter-satelli↗