Thermal protection systems for liquid hydrogen tanks
Thermal protection systems for cryogenic fuels - liquid hydrogen for space missions
LIQUID HYDROGEN↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Hydrogen Tank”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Self-pressurization of a flightweight liquid hydrogen tank: Effects of fill level at low wall heat flux
Experimental results are presented for the self pressurization and thermal stratification of a 4.89 cu m liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux (2.0 and 3.5 W/sq m) in normal gravity. The test tank was representative of future spacecraft tankage, having a low mass to volume ratio and high performance multilayer thermal insulation. Tests were performed at fill levels of 29 and 49 pcts. (by volume) and complement previous tests at 83 pct. fill. As the heat flux increases, the pressure rise rate at each fill level exceeds the homogeneous rate by an increasing ratio. Herein, this ratio did not exceed a value of 2. The slowest pressure rise rate was observed for the 49 pct. fill level at both heat fluxes. This result is attributed to the oblate spheroidal tank geometry which introduces the variables of wetted wall area, liquid-vapor interfacial area, and ratio of side wall to bottom heating as a function of fill level or liquid depth. Initial tank thermal conditions were found to affect the initial pressure rise rate. Quasi steady pressure rise rates are independent of starting conditions.
Vandresar, N. T.↗
Self-pressurization of a flightweight liquid hydrogen tank - Effects of fill level at low wall heat flux
Experimental results are presented for the self pressurization and thermal stratification of a 4.89 cu m liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux (2.0 and 3.5 W/sq m) in normal gravity. The test tank was representative of future spacecraft tankage, having a low mass to volume ratio and high performance multilayer thermal insulation. Tests were performed at fill levels of 29 and 49 pcts. (by volume) and complement previous tests at 83 pct. fill. As the heat flux increases, the pressure rise rate at each fill level exceeds the homogeneous rate by an increasing ratio. Herein, this ratio did not exceed a value of 2. The slowest pressure rise rate was observed for the 49 pct. fill level at both heat fluxes. This result is attributed to the oblate spheroidal tank geometry which introduces the variables of wetted wall area, liquid-vapor interfacial area, and ratio of side wall to bottom heating as a function of fill level or liquid depth. Initial tank thermal conditions were found to affect the initial pressure rise rate. Quasi steady pressure rise rates are independent of starting conditions.
Van Dresar, N. T.↗
Zero Boil-Off Methods for Large Scale Liquid Hydrogen Tanks Using Integrated Refrigeration and Storage
NASA has completed a series of tests at the Kennedy Space Center to demonstrate the capability of using integrated refrigeration and storage (IRAS) to remove energy from a liquid hydrogen (LH2) tank and control the state of the propellant. A primary test objective was the keeping and storing of the liquid in a zero boil-off state, so that the total heat leak entering the tank is removed by a cryogenic refrigerator with an internal heat exchanger. The LH2 is therefore stored and kept with zero losses for an indefinite period of time. The LH2 tank is a horizontal cylindrical geometry with a vacuum-jacketed, multi-layer insulation system and a capacity of 125,000 liters. The closed-loop helium refrigeration system was a Linde LR1620 capable of 390W cooling at 20K (without any liquid nitrogen pre-cooling). Three different control methods were used to obtain zero boil-off: temperature control of the helium refrigerant, refrigerator control using the tank pressure sensor, and duty cycling (on/off) of the refrigerator as needed. Summarized are the IRAS design approach, zero boil-off control methods, and results of the series of zero boil-off tests.
ZBO↗
Prediction of pressurant mass requirements for axisymmetric liquid hydrogen tanks
Experimental data from several test series are compared to an existing correlation that predicts the amount of pressurant gas mass required to expel liquid hydrogen from axisymmetric tanks. It was necessary to use an alternate definition of the tank equivalent diameter to accommodate thermal mass in the tank wall that is initially warm and to accommodate liquid residuals in the tank after expulsion is stopped. With this modification, the existing correlation predicted mass requirements to within 14 percent of experimental results. Revision of the correlation constants using a nonlinear least-squares fit of the current experimental data has a minor effect, thus supporting the validity of the original correlation's form, its fitted constants, and the alternate definition of the tank equivalent diameter.
Vandresar, N. T.↗
Results of Use of Heat Flux Sensors on Liquid Hydrogen Tanks
Heat flux sensors were used to characterize the performance of insulation on the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER), a large-scale test article designed to simulate upper stage cryogenic propellant tank thermal performance in simulated space environments. Usually, the insulation heat loads are derived from calculations removing all other heat sources and attributing the residual heat load to the insulation system. Testing for SHIIVER included the tank being just insulated with spray-on-foam insulation as well as covering the domes with multilayer insulation while leaving the barrel section insulated with spray-on-foam. Heat flux sensors were located at multiple locations on both domes as well as on the barrel section of the tank. Results from the SHIIVER testing using the heat flux sensors are compared to other calculated heat inputs for both liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen testing as a function of tank fill level. Further investigation into the transient nature of the SHIIVER testing including the heat flux sensors provided insight into heat flow patterns that may not have been otherwise seen using temperature sensors and calculated insulation heat loads. While the demonstrated uncertainties in the absolute values in the heat flux sensors are high, the values and the trends match well with other calculation methods. The results of SHIIVER allow for the use of heat flux sensors for measurements of insulation performance and dynamic system thermal response for future applications.
Cryogenic Fluid Management↗
Results of Use of Heat Flux Sensors on Liquid Hydrogen Tanks
ABSTRACT: Heat flux sensors were used to characterize the performance of insulation on the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER), a large-scale test article designed to simulate upper stage cryogenic propellant tank thermal performance in simulated space environments. Usually, the insulation heat loads are derived from calculations removing all other heat sources and attributing the residual heat load to the insulation system. Testing for SHIIVER included the tank being just insulated with spray-on-foam insulation as well as covering the domes with multilayer insulation while leaving the barrel section insulated with spray-on-foam. Heat flux sensors were located at multiple locations on both domes as well as on the barrel section of the tank. Results from the SHIIVER testing using the heat flux sensors are compared to other calculated heat inputs for both liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen testing as a function of tank fill level. Further investigation into the transient nature of the SHIIVER testing including the heat flux sensors provided insight into heat flow patterns that may not have been otherwise seen using temperature sensors and calculated insulation heat loads. While the demonstrated uncertainties in the absolute values in the heat flux sensors are high, the values and the trends match well with other calculation methods. The results of SHIIVER allow for the use of heat flux sensors for measurements of insulation performance and dynamic system thermal response for future applications.
Cryogenic Fluid Management↗
Vapor Cooling of a Structural Skirt for a Large-Scale Hydrogen Tank
The demonstration of vapor cooling on a structural skirt was one of the main objectives of the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER) testing. SHIIVER consisted of a 4-meter diameter stainless steel tank with an aluminum forward skirt. The forward skirt was cooled by directing effluent vapor from the tank through two flow channels that each went 360 degrees around the interior of the skirt in a helical pattern. Flow rates, temperatures, and pressures in the system were measured allowing for the calculation of heat load removed via cooling stream and heat load reduction into the tank. Testing occurred at fill levels between 25% and 90% full using both liquid hydrogen and liquid nitrogen. Boil-off rate was varied independent of the skirt performance by adding multilayer insulation over the spray-on-foam insulation on the tank domes, while leaving the barrel insulated only with spray-on-foam. The results from the testing, which demonstrate vapor cooling reversed heat flow from the skirt into the tank and reduces total propellant heat load by as much as 19%, are analyzed and discussed.
Cryogenic Fluid Management↗
Simulations of Zero Boiloff, Densification, and Solidification in a Large-Scale Liquid Hydrogen Tank
The current research utilizes an Energy of Fluid (EOF) approach to develop a finite volume-based Computation Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model to create a benchmark simulation of the densification of liquid hydrogen (LH2) in an experimental Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) tank at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The computational code will incorporate the FLUENT pressure-based model with User Defined Functions (UDF) to implement the EOF model. The enhanced model will solve the energy equation in terms of internal energy and provide temperature and pressure calculations for a given tank geometry. Specifically, a convection term will be added to an already existing code for a more accurate simulation of LH2 densification. However, currently the research focuses on utilizing User Defined Scalars (UDS) with FLUENT to show the built-in solvers are as accurate as the written UDS. This will reduce the computational time down significantly by utilizing an already built in solver for the momentum equation. A custom UDF has been written to solve transient and steady state conduction, and results obtained using the UDF agree with results obtained using the built-in FLUENT solver. Currently, a convection UDF is being added and will be verified using known solutions for solidification and validated with the experimental results from the Cryogenics Test Laboratory (CTL) at KSC for the IRAS densification process.
Colin Philip Mahony↗
Numerical Simulation of No-Vent Chill and Fill of a Large Liquid Hydrogen Tank
To enable the design of future in-space cryogenic propellant transfer vehicles, high accuracy models of the cryogenic propellant transfer process are desired. For in-space refueling applications, accurate simulations are desired of the propellant tank chilldown and no-vent fill (NVF) process in order to estimate the amount of propellant required, to determine the maximum sustainable flow rate to fill the tank, and to establish a timeline for the filling process. NVF is a complex process that involves numerous two-phase heat and mass transfer phenomena, such as boiling at the wall and evaporation and condensation at the liquid/vapor interface. In recent years, progress has been made in developing a numerical modeling technique using the Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP) that has been validated against several small-scale liquid nitrogen NVF tests. This paper presents GFSSP numerical model validation against three liquid hydrogen NVF tests on a large-scale propellant tank. Comparing the GFSSP model to the data for pressure, fill level, and wall temperature, the mean absolute percentage error is below 20% across the range of simulated conditions, indicating very good predictive agreement for this large-scale hydrogen NVF test series.
Alok Majumdar↗
Numerical Simulation of No-Vent Chill and Fill of a Large Liquid Hydrogen Tank
To enable the design of future in-space cryogenic propellant transfer vehicles, high accuracy models of the cryogenic propellant transfer process are desired. For in-space refueling applications, accurate simulations are desired of the propellant tank chilldown and no-vent fill (NVF) process in order to estimate the amount of propellant required, to determine the maximum sustainable flow rate to fill the tank, and to establish a timeline for the filling process. NVF is a complex process that involves numerous two-phase heat and mass transfer phenomena, such as boiling at the wall and evaporation and condensation at the liquid/vapor interface. In recent years, progress has been made in developing a numerical modeling technique using the Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP) that has been validated against several small-scale liquid nitrogen NVF tests. This paper presents GFSSP numerical model validation against three liquid hydrogen NVF tests on a large-scale propellant tank. Comparing the GFSSP model to the data for pressure, fill level, and wall temperature, the mean absolute percentage error is below 20% across the range of simulated conditions, indicating very good predictive agreement for this large-scale hydrogen NVF test series.
Alok Majumdar↗
Cryogenic Propellant Storage and Transfer Engineering Development Unit Hydrogen Tank
The Cryogenic Propellant Storage and Transfer (CPST) project has been a long-running program in the Space Technology Mission Directorate to enhance the knowledge and technology related to handling cryogenic propellants, specifically liquid hydrogen. This particular effort, the CPST engineering development unit (EDU), was a proof of manufacturability effort in support of a flight article. The EDU was built to find and overcome issues related to manufacturability and collect data to anchor the thermal models for use on the flight design.
Werkheiser, Arthur↗
Pressurization of a Flightweight, Liquid Hydrogen Tank: Evaporation and Condensation at a Liquid Vapor Interface
Evaporation and condensation at a liquidvapor interface is important for long-term, in-space cryogenic propellant storage. Yet the current understanding of interfacial physics does not predict behavior or evaporation condensation rates. The proposed paper will present a physical model, based on the 1-D Heat equation and Schrages equation which demonstrates thin thermal layers at the fluidvapor interface.
Cryogenic hydrogen↗
Pressurization of a Flightweight, Liquid Hydrogen Tank: Evaporation and Condensation at a Liquid Vapor Interface
Evaporation and condensation at a liquid-vapor interface is important for long-term, in-space cryogenic propellant storage. Yet the current understanding of inter-facial physics does not consistently predict behavior of evaporation or condensation rates. The proposed paper will present a physical model, based on the 1-D Heat equation and Schrage's equation, which demonstrates thin thermal layers at the fluid vapor interface.
cryogenic hydrogen↗
Vehicle-scale investigation of a fluorine jet-pump liquid hydrogen tank pressurization system.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cady, E. C.↗
A carbon dioxide purge and thermal protection system for liquid hydrogen tanks
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Jackson, L. R.↗
Thermal analyses and design of liquid hydrogen tank fluid line fittings
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fowler, J. M.↗
External insulator for liquid hydrogen tanks
With optimized insulation thickness, tank temperatures were always below 311 K (100 F). This conclusion indicated that an aluminum tank could be used with an optimized insulation system if desired. The N2 purged systems were always lighter than CO2 purged systems. The lower condensation temperature was the controlling factor. Closed cell foam systems were lightest. Closed cell foams, in spite of their need for protective outer insulation, produced insulation systems which were lighter than systems which allowed cryodeposition. Foam system durability established for TMAX = 316 K (110 F). Tests for a subsonic application established this durability; higher temperature limit foam durability was unknown at this. An increase in foam TMAX from 316 K (110 F) to 450 K (350 F) potentially decreased TPS mass by 25 percent.
Sharpe, E. L.↗