SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization Poster for presenting at Waste Management Symposium 2023, which starts 2/26/2023.
The BR2 nuclear reactor is a material testing reactor (MTR) located in Mol, Belgium, and operated by the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN) since 1963. The reactor is highly versatile as the number and location of fuel elements and control rods can change significantly from cycle to cycle to accommodate different needs. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL or Argonne) Reactor Conversion (RC) team has collaborated with SCK CEN for over a decade on the conversion of domestic and international research reactors from highly enriched uranium (HEU, ≥20 wt.% of 235 U) to low enriched uranium (LEU, <20 wt.% of 235 U) fuel. The U.S. High-Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) project within the M3 Reactor Conversion Program aims at converting five U.S. high performance research reactors (MITR, MURR, NBSR, HFIR, and ATR) and one critical facility (ATR-C) to LEU fuel. These USHPRRs still use and regularly refuel with HEU fuel. Each facility has a unique reactor design, operating conditions, and fuel element design to accomplish its mission. The goal of the USHPRR project is to convert the USHPRRs and the critical facility to LEU fuel while maintaining experimental performance and ensuring safe facility operation. The current technical report focuses on two reactors requiring very high-density LEU fuel: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR) and the National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR). To support the conversion of these reactors, so-called design demonstration elements (DDE) are planned to be irradiated in the BR2 reactor under conditions similar to the targeted reactors and using a prototypic geometry. In support of this experiment, SCK CEN studied and modeled the DDE irradiations using MCNP6.2 to investigate the feasibility of irradiating the MITR DDE and NBSR DDE in BR2. Argonne reviewed and confirmed the conclusions of this study. Structural analysis is another step toward converting USHPRR to LEU fuel. The objective of the current report is to provide information useful to the structural analysis of the NBSR & MITR DDEs to support its irradiation in BR2. Specifically, the goal is to provide the fast neutron (E>0.1MeV) fluence in the cladding of the fuel plates in BR2 for the whole period of irradiation (8 cycles for MITR DDE and 10 cycles for NBSR DDE). Additionally, fast neutron fluences in the side plates and in the NBSR DDE’s outside plates were calculated and reported. Neutronic calculations were performed using MCNP6.2 on the RTRHPC cluster.
The conversion mechanism was studied in vivo in the pulmonary circulation of the intact anesthetized dog and in vitro in plasma by using L-Leu-angiotensin I, D-Leu-angiotensin I, and des-Leu-angiotensin I which had been synthesized by the solid-phase technique. The results obtained indicate that pulmonary conversion in vivo and plasma conversion in vitro occur via a dipeptidylcarboxypeptidase and that a D-amino acid at the C-terminus prevents conversion.
This report summarizes an effort to identify the source of anomalous localized edge pitting and bond line corrosive attack of experimental mini fuel plates manufactured at the commercial fuel vendor BWXT and tested in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) as part of the Miniplate 1 (MP-1) irradiation test. The MP-1 test was conducted by the US High Performance Research Reactor Project (USHPRR) and overseen by the Fuel Qualification Pillar (FQ). The test involved evaluation of a mix of 62 “vendor” fuel plates fabricated at BWXT and 12 “laboratory” fuel plates fabricated at Idaho National Laboratory using commercial-scale and labscale fabrication processes respectively. The MP-1 test was the first in a series of tests to generate data to support qualification of a new plate-type low-enriched uranium (LEU) U-10Mo monolithic fuel system. The major objective of the MP-1 experiment was to test, for the first time, miniplates fabricated by a commercial fuel vendor over the range of irradiation conditions relevant to conversion of NRC regulated High Performance Research Reactors (HPRRs) from high-enriched uranium to LEU. The focus of the efforts described in this report are the vendor fuel plates to inform changes in the fabrication process prior to fabrication of the next miniplate experiment MP2.
This is the second paper on a 252 Cf production study performed in support of efforts to convert the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The first paper primarily focuses on validating computational tools and nuclear data. This companion paper evaluates another critical aspect: the 252 Cf production capability with a proposed LEU core. HFIR must maintain its world-class performance and missions following conversion and because 252 Cf is a vital, multipurpose neutron-emitting radioisotope, the ability to efficiently produce 252 Cf must be preserved. In this study, the HFIRCON transport and depletion tool, several nuclear data libraries, and Campaign 78 data were used to compute 252 Cf production, sensitivity, and safety metrics. Further, results indicate the 252 Cf production and production rates are slightly higher with a 95MW th LEU core compared with those obtained with the 85MW th HEU core. Additionally, the target peak fission rate densities, discharge cumulative fission densities, and heat deposition rates with the LEU core are within a few percent of those calculated with the HEU core. The findings suggest HFIR’s 252 Cf production capability can be effectively maintained with an LEU core without adversely affecting the safety metrics.
A series of structural analyses have been performed to support the conversion of the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) from the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU; ≥20 wt% U-235) to low-enriched uranium (LEU; <20 wt% U-235) fuel. The irradiation thermo-mechanical analysis evaluated the effects of fuel swelling, irradiation creep, thermal expansion, as well as thermal resistance from the oxide layer growth for the MURR LEU element in prototypic thermal and irradiation conditions as presented in Part I of this article. Overall, this irradiation thermo-mechanical analysis predicts smaller gap thickness reductions in previously limiting regions, and larger reductions in the middle of the outermost end channels where power density is not typically a maximum. Due to substantial differences between the channel gap reductions assumed for the previous safety analyses and those predicted by the irradiation thermo-mechanical analysis, a need to evaluate their impact on the thermal hydraulics safety analyses arose. This article presents the results from the steady-state safety analysis for normal operation as well as the two most limiting accident scenarios. The calculation models were revised in order to account for the spatial and temporal variation of the channel gap thicknesses. The results show that sufficient safety margins are still maintained for normal operation as well as during the postulated accident transients. This work provides a methodology of incorporating the irradiation thermo-mechanical behavior of plate-type fuel into the thermal hydraulics safety analyses.
The Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) participates in the fuel fabrication pillar of lhe National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) Office of Material Minimization and Management (M3) Office of Conversion Pillar. Y-12's primary responsibility is to establish a reliable fabrication process of low-enriched uranium-molybdenum (LEU-Mo) feedstock tor United States High Performance Research Reactors (US HPRRs). This update compares US HPRR LEU-Mo feedstock fabrication ettorts over the past several casting campaigns at Y-12 which vary in process methodologies and fabrication parameters. With recent changes to the latest feedstock casting campaign, Process Design Standard-2 (PD-STD-2). Y-12 has seen a significant decrease in isotopic uranium variability of the fuel feedstock fabricated.
This presentation provides on update on the ATR Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) Fuel Development project to the United States High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Program.
As a part of conversion efforts from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel under direction of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, multiple proposed designs of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) have been created and assessed regarding reactor physics performance metrics, including designs utilizing uranium silicide dispersion fuel (U3Si2-Al). This report updates the previous analyses that evaluated the nuclear safety performance of LEU fuel designs with respect to selected accident events from the HFIR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Both the Low Density (LD) and High Density (HD) Optimized designs’ reactivity initiated accident fuel performance improved relative to the HEU fuel, attributed to greater 238 U negative Doppler feedback. However, the thermal margins for primary coolant system accidents were reduced with some acceptance criteria unable to be met. The need to resolve reduced thermal margin, open modeling items, and unresolved assumptions was identified.
This paper presents a series of 252 Cf production validation and code-to-code comparison studies performed based on data from the production campaigns at the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). These studies support efforts to convert HFIR from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. HFIR must maintain its world-class performance and missions following this conversion, and because 252 Cf is a vital neutron-emitting radioisotope used for a variety of high-impact applications (e.g., reactor startup, cancer treatment), the ability to efficiently produce 252 Cf must be preserved. In this work, the HFIRCON, Shift, ORIGEN, and TCOMP codes were deployed, and several sets of data libraries were investigated to better understand the calculation codes and the data biases. As-loaded target composition data, as-run irradiation history data, and post-irradiation measurements from recent multi-cycle irradiation campaigns of the HEU core were used to validate and determine methodology biases. Further, the findings demonstrated a good agreement, with results falling within 3 standard deviations of measurements. This paper lays the ground work for the second paper, which evaluates and compares 252 Cf production and safety metrics with the HEU core and a proposed LEU core.
Nonpower reactors licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission require a startup test plan as part of any facility modification to verify operability prior to resumption of operations. In order to support conversion of the University of Missouri Research Reactor from the use of highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel, a startup test plan has been devised to measure certain reactor physics parameters for the initial all-fresh LEU core licensing documentation that will be submitted. These parameters include the approach to critical, primary coolant void coefficient of reactivity, flux trap void coefficient of reactivity, determination of flux trap sample reactivity worth, radial and axial thermal neutron flux mapping, control blade worth calibration, primary and pool coolant temperature coefficient of reactivity, and flux mapping of experimental positions. Here, predictions for these parameters made using the Monte Carlo N-Particle Version 5 (MCNP5) radiation transport code are reported. These predictions will support the startup tests by providing a baseline set of expectations and additional insight into the performance of the LEU core.
The National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR) is a 20-MW heavy-water moderated and cooled, enriched-fuel, tank-type reactor located in the NIST Center for Neutron Research laboratory complex. NBSR is one of six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, that actively collaborates with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Material Management and Minimization (M3) Reactor Conversion Program to convert from the use of highly enriched uranium fuel to the use of low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt% U-235) fuel. On the LEU U-10Mo fuel qualification side, mini-plate and large-plate irradiations have been successfully performed, and more experiments are either ongoing or planned. As an additional experimental campaign to support licensing of the LEU fuel for the use in the NBSR, the NBSR Design Demonstration Element (DDE) will be a full-sized test element similar to the NBSR LEU fuel element and irradiated in a test reactor under conditions as prototypic of the NBSR LEU fuel element operating conditions as possible.
The European Mini-Plate Irradiation Experiment (EMPIrE) was designed to support the development and testing of a coated uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) dispersion fuel for the conversion of select high-performance research reactors (HPRRs) to utilize low-enriched uranium (LEU). To aid in the development of the coated fuel form, the EMPIrE test included several plate designs and irradiated them in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at a high meat power density (~21 kW/cm 3 ) and to high fuel particle fission densities (~6.4 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 ). These conditions mimic the bounding conditions of the BR-2 reactor in Belgium, where a concurrent irradiation experiment was performed, and exceed those previously explored in dispersion U-Mo fuel plates. A local fuel swelling analysis, as determined through high-fidelity, post-irradiation mini-plate profilometry, was used along with statistical methods to non-destructively evaluate the overall performance and separate the effects of convoluted fabrication variables. While some effects observed with this non-destructive analysis were subtle, others had more significant, and possibly competing, effects on the fuel swelling behavior. In closing, these observations will be examined further with destructive examinations to more fully assess them as the fuel design is developed and qualified.
Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Material Management and Minimization’s mission includes the conversion of civilian research reactors from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. Analyses have shown that the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) will need to operate at 95 MW for the LEU silicide dispersion fuel designs to match key performance metrics obtained with HEU fuel at 85 MW. To prove safe operation of HFIR after installation of plant modifications to increase power, a high power HEU test cycle was proposed. Neutronics model updates and reactor physics analyses are performed to support the development of safety design reports for the high power (HP) HEU test cycle. Reactor physics metrics evaluated herein include fuel depletion, actinide production, cycle length, fission rate density distributions, axial power peaking factors, and reactor kinetic parameters. These reactor physics analyses support the development of future LEU safety design reports by providing key input for future HP HEU HFIR thermal hydraulics and reactor transient safety analyses.
The mission for our work is to develop high-density, monolithic U-Mo fuel for research reactor conversions. Current reactors use HEU dispersion fuels. Both domestic and abroad, programs are converting to a monolithic LEU-10Mo fuel source.
Over the last several decades, many reactors have successfully been converted from high enriched uranium (HEU) to low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels in United States in support of its global non-proliferation objectives. Of the reactors slated for conversion, five high-performance research reactors (HPRRs) remain. The high-flux isotope reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of the five. Conversion of HFIR requires the qualification of a new fuel. To aid in the conversion process as well as improve safety margins, COMSOL Multiphysics was chosen to support and eventually supplement the steady-state heat-transfer code (SSHTC). In order to use COMSOL as a supplementary tool, i.e. one used for safety basis calculations, the code needs to undergo a verification and validation process. Verification and validation are important processes for the use of any software; however, physics-based solvers have a unique challenge, in that the validation is much more rigorous and its domain is only applicable to the general scope of the problem. This document details the verification and validation of COMOSL for analysis of HFIR. This report is intended for two different users: (1) current and future users of COMSOL for HFIR and (2) for individuals interested in assessing the scope of the validation of COMSOL for HFIR. This report is divided into six sections. The first of which details the process of verification and validation. Section one provides an overview of key concepts from ASME V&V 10, 20, and 40 and how these concepts are used to provide a validation of any multiphysics software. Section two covers the approach needed in order to validate multiphysics software for a given HFIR analysis. Parts three through five split up the key concepts highlighted in section two. The final section provides concluding remarks which demonstrate the scope and limitations of the validation study and how these may be expanded and improved.
This paper provides an overview of the base model specifically developed to perform parametric sensitivity studies on the U-10Mo monolithic fuel system. U-Mo monolithic fuels are being considered for the conversion of test reactors into high-performance research reactors that operate using proliferation-resistant, low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuels. These plate-type fuels contain a high-density, low-enrichment fuel sandwiched between zirconium diffusion barriers and encapsulated in aluminum claddings. All U.S. high-performance research reactors have released the designs of their LEU monolithic fuel reactor cores. These designs include nearly 50 distinct fuel plate geometries with different operational parameters. Consequently, a single generic plate geometry representing all the extreme points in this design matrix is unrealistic. To evaluate the performance for various parameters, a set of sensitivity studies was performed. These studies considered various input parameters (i.e., geometric, operational, and material property-related). The results revealed valuable information about plate performance and the sensitivity of this performance to various modeling inputs. To establish a reference state for comparing these result, base model featuring representative irradiation conditions was developed. To capture in-reactor behavior accurately, incorporation of representative constitutive models capable of evolving properties with respect to temperature, irradiation time, and burnup was needed. The behavioral models considered burnup-dependent properties, swelling, creep, and degradation. This paper introduces the base model created for the parametric sensitivity studies. The detailed description of the procedure includes the model geometry, model discretization, thermo-mechanical coupling, material properties and behavioral models. This paper also provides selected results and assesses the performance of the base model.
The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) provides one of the world’s highest steady-state neutron fluxes in the world for neutron scattering experiments focused on impactful scientific discovery, as well as materials irradiation studies and production of medical, industrial, and research isotopes. Efforts are ongoing to convert HFIR from high-enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel while maintaining or enhancing current performance and safety margin, thus sustaining HFIR’s mission portfolio and reactor-based neutron science leadership. This paper presents a status update on the HFIR fuel conversion efforts.