Jptraj - the new jpl trajectory monitor.
Trajectory monitoring system for running single sequence of programs for lunar trajectories
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Trajectory monitoring system for running single sequence of programs for lunar trajectories
Scientific satellites may require translunar orbits aligned with the Sun-Earth line, with most of the period spent in either the sunward or antisunward direction. To maintain alignment, the orbit's line of apsides must rotate at a rate equal to mean angular motion of the Earth about the Sun. To maintain this rotation of the line of apsides by use of fuel onboard the spacecraft is prohibitively expensive. Farquhar and Dunham proposed a method for maintaining the desired alignment by gaining momentum at the expense of the Moon during a close approach (a lunar swingby) as the spacecraft passes beyond lunar orbit, then returning the momentum at the second lunar swingby as the spacecraft returns within the lunar orbit. The cycle of double-lunar swingbys may then be repeated. Dunham presented the orbit parameters necessary to achieve double-lunar swingby orbits which will maintain Sun-Earth line alignment. The details of the Keplerian approach to calculation of these parameters are presented. Methods for solution of the necessary equations for these parameters are presented.
Direct-ascent and parking-orbit trajectories for lunar and interplanetary space flight for both powered-flight and coasting phases
Hybrid patched conic iterative technique for accurate moon-earth /transearth/ trajectory generation
A new method is described for design of an Earth-Moon transfer trajectory with substantial savings of propellant over classical methods.
With the current push to send landers back to the moon, properly modeling the thermal environment for the descent is critical. Descent in this paper is described as: descending from low lunar orbit to touch down on surface. There are several challenges during this period, including: many electronics (such as battery, avionics, transponder, etc…) have higher heat loads due to higher power levels, a significant portion of the view factor to space has been blocked out by the moon making heat rejection less efficient, components that normally do not have direct line of sight to the sun may get exposure due to the lander rotating to align for descent, and thruster firing will dump more heat into the lander. All of these factors combine during the most critical phase of a lander mission make it essential that the thermal environment has been properly set up during design and analysis. This paper presents one method of setting up the thermal environment during descent in Thermal Desktop and will also include some tips and tricks.
No abstract available
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aircraft simulation of lunar excursion module landing approach trajectories
Earth and lunar trajectory and landing site requirements for lunar excursion system
Earth oblateness effects on lunar and interplanetary trajectories, using algorithm based on orbital elements variations
A method is described to construct trajectories from the earth to the moon which utilizes the existence of lunar capture orbits and the concept of 'stability boundary'. These orbits are ballistic and represent a new family of trajectories. They go into orbit about the moon from a suitable position about the earth with no required thrusting. This method is applied to a mission being studied at JPL called Lunar GAS (Get Away Special). Other applications are discussed.
The Lunar Lander Ascent Module (LLAM) will leave the lunar surface and actively rendezvous in lunar orbit with the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). For initial LLAM vehicle sizing efforts, a nominal trajectory, along with required delta-V and a few key sensitivities, is very useful. A nominal lunar ascent and rendezvous trajectory is shown, along with rationale and discussion of the trajectory shaping. Also included are ascent delta-V sensitivities to changes in target orbit and design thrust-to-weight of the vehicle. A sample launch window for a particular launch site has been completed and is included. The launch window shows that budgeting enough delta-V for two missed launch opportunities may be reasonable. A comparison between yaw steering and on-orbit plane change maneuvers is included. The comparison shows that for large plane changes, which are potentially necessary for an anytime return from mid-latitude locations, an on-orbit maneuver is much more efficient than ascent yaw steering. For a planned return, small amounts of yaw steering may be necessary during ascent and must be accounted for in the ascent delta-V budget. The delta-V cost of ascent yaw steering is shown, along with sensitivity to launch site latitude. Some discussion of off-nominal scenarios is also included. In particular, in the case of a failed Powered Descent Initiation burn, the requirements for subsequent rendezvous with the Orion vehicle are outlined.
The analysis of the gross aspects of the flight mechanics for lunar trajectories from orbital launch is presented. An attempt is made to define the launch requirements from an earth orbit, the geometrical relationships existing between an Orbital Launch Facility in earth orbit and the moon in its orbit, the departure trajectory sensitivity to energy and time requirements, the launch-on-time problem and the orbital "escape window".
Steepest descent method to compute powered flight trajectory optimization for lunar and interplanetary transfer