Optimum preemphasis-deemphasis filter characteristics for LCRU television
Optimum preemphasis-deemphasis filter pair for FM transmission of Lunar Communications Relay Unit color television
Pannelton, R. J.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Lunar Relay”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Lunar far-side communication
Lunar far side communication, discussing libration point and lunar orbit relay system for high bit rate telemetry, TV and astronaut backpack communication
Coffman, J. W.↗
Apollo 15 Mission Report
A detailed discussion is presented of the Apollo 15 mission, which conducted exploration of the moon over longer periods, greater ranges, and with more instruments of scientific data acquisition than previous missions. The topics include trajectory, lunar surface science, inflight science and photography, command and service module performance, lunar module performance, lunar surface operational equipment, pilot's report, biomedical evaluation, mission support performance, assessment of mission objectives, launch phase summary, anomaly summary, and vehicle and equipment descriptions. The capability of transporting larger payloads and extending time on the moon were demonstrated. The ground-controlled TV camera allowed greater real-time participation by earth-bound personnel. The crew operated more as scientists and relied more on ground support team for systems monitoring. The modified pressure garment and portable life support system provided better mobility and extended EVA time. The lunar roving vehicle and the lunar communications relay unit were also demonstrated.
Source record↗
Stabilizing influence of earth perturbations on polar lunar orbiters
A class of highly inclined lunar orbits is discussed for which earth perturbations have significant influence on the orbit evolution and the usefulness of the orbit for scientific exploration. The theory of the long-term motion of particles under third-body and zonal harmonic perturbations is taken as a starting point for investigations of orbits with relatively long lifetimes and evolutionary patterns that enhance the effectiveness of the satellite as a lunar farside relay. An equilibrium solution in the doubly-averaged three-body problem with oblateness is identified and the results of some numerical integrations are presented.
Uphoff, C.↗
A Flat-Panel 8x8 Sequentially Rotated Wideband Microstrip Patch Phased Array Antenna for K/Ka-band 6U CubeSat Communications Applications
Flat-panel electronically-scanned phased arrays have recently become a mainstream technology in the areas of radar and satellite applications, particularly due to their low profile and not having to steer the beams mechanically, both of which helps in realizing a lightweight phased array solution that also occupies a smaller volume. Typically for satellite applications, circularly polarized element radiators are often employed in order to deal with the signal fading problem. In this project, the main objective was to design a flat-panel phased array solution for 6U CubeSat communication applications. As for the required specifications, the array should have two operating bands: 22.55–23.55 GHz and 25.5–27.5 GHz, which span part of the K and Ka bands. For both these bands, the panel should be able to radiate dual circular polarization, in both transmit and receive modes, and with a stable gain performance. Since the individual bands are very closely spaced, it was realized that a single wideband design would be a better solution than a closely spaced dual-band design. Thus, a stacked microstrip patch configuration was selected for the element radiator design, which is known to be wideband. Now, it is rather difficult to realize both wide impedance and axial ratio bandwidths simultaneously, and at high frequencies, without complicating the element stacked patch design.. As a result, a sequential rotation technique wasemployed to significantly improves the axial ratio bandwidth and circular polarization purity of an array, all the while improving the pattern symmetry (P. S. Hall, “Application of Sequential Feeding to Wide Bandwidth, Circularly Polarised Microstrip Patch Arrays,” IEE Proc. H (Microw., Antennas Propag.), vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 390–398, Oct. 1989). The designed element radiator is a circularly-polarized probe-fed stacked patch antenna, which has a 10-dB matching bandwidth of 22.3– 30 GHz, with only a 5.14% axial ratio bandwidth around the center frequency of the required band, i.e., ~25 GHz. However, the resulting array demonstrates a very low axial ratio (≪ 3 dB) over the entire bandwidth, due to the application of the sequential rotation technique. The 8×8 array was able to scan up to ±51° and ±40° at frequencies 23.05 GHz and 26.5 GHz (center frequencies of the lower and upper bands), respectively, while maintaining a ≤ 3 dB axial ratio and a ≤ 3 dB gain drop from the corresponding peak broadside value at both the principle and the diagonal radiation planes. The designed layout for the 8×8 phased array prototype is shown in Fig. 1, which is currently undergoing fabrication and RF assembly. The antenna will be tested in the far-field anechoic chambers of the Antenna and Microwave Laboratory (AML) at San Diego State University and at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC).
5G↗
A Dual Linear/Circular Polarized Wideband Flat Panel Phased Array Antenna for K/Ka-band 6U CubeSat Communications Applications
Circular polarized (CP) electromagnetic waves are preferred for space-to-space and space-to-ground satellite communications (SATCOM). CubeSats with 6U sizes (1U represents a 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm), that will rotate together with the Moon as it orbits Earth require high gain CP antenna systems to maintain reliable communication links. Here, we have designed an 8x8 dual linear and dual circularly polarized phased array antenna (PAA) aperture that offers 22-28 GHz bandwidth, with maximum gain of 23 dBic, and beam scanning capability of ±50o with acceptable axial ratio over all scan angles. A stacked patch topology is selected to achieve wide impedance bandwidth. Each driven patch has two via feed point locations that are connected to grounded coplanar waveguide (CPW) feed structures. By utilizing phase shifters from the Anokiwave RFICs (AWMF-0165) employed for the beamforming network (BFN), we have generated both dual linear polarization and dual circular polarization in each patch. Each driven and parasitic patch is innovatively shaped to achieve excellent isolation between two feed points which, in turn, leads to low cross polarization, high efficiency and good axial ratio over the entire bandwidth. Each chip has eight outputs which feed one 2x2 sub-array consisting of four dual linear or dual circularly polarized driven patches, simultaneously. Each 2x2 sub-array of the 8x8 array are sequentially rotated which improves axial ratio performance when the antenna operates in the dual circularly polarized mode. By utilizing a mirror effect, cross-polarized fields are also improved when operated in a dual linear polarized mode. The 8x8 array aperture is simulated taking into account the effect of the multilayer printed circuit board (PCB) stack-up of the BFN and co-simulated with the power splitter outputs and chip outputs and results are compared with only passive array performance. The performance of the antenna is still excellent when non-ideal chip performances are included in the simulation analysis. The fabricated array will be tested for radiation patterns in the Antenna and Microwave Laboratory (AML) of the San Diego State University and the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) spherical near field chambers. The design of the 8x8 antenna array with BFN layout is shown in Fig. 1.
5G↗
Long period lunar and solar effects on the motion of Relay 2
Relay II satellite orbit perturbations due to lunar and solar gravitational effects and solar radiation pressure
RELAY II SATELLITE↗
The Earth Based Ground Stations Element of the Lunar Program
The Lunar Architecture Team (LAT) is responsible for developing a concept for building and supporting a lunar outpost with several exploration capabilities such as rovers, colonization, and observatories. The lunar outpost is planned to be located at the Moon's South Pole. The LAT Communications and Navigation Team (C&N) is responsible for defining the network infrastructure to support the lunar outpost. The following elements are needed to support lunar outpost activities: A Lunar surface network based on industry standard wireless 802.xx protocols, relay satellites positioned 180 degrees apart to provide South Pole coverage for the half of the lunar 28-day orbit that is obscured from Earth view, earth-based ground stations deployed at geographical locations 120 degrees apart. This paper will focus on the Earth ground stations of the lunar architecture. Two types of ground station networks are discussed. One provides Direct to Earth (DTE) support to lunar users using Kaband 23/26Giga-Hertz (GHz) communication frequencies. The second supports the Lunar Relay Satellite (LRS) that will be using Ka-band 40/37GHz (Q-band). This paper will discuss strategies to provide a robust operational network in support of various lunar missions and trades of building new antennas at non-NASA facilities, to improve coverage and provide site diversification for handling rain attenuation.
Gal-Edd, Jonathan↗
The Lunar Polesitter
Here-to-fore, sailcraft mission and system studies have focused on sailcraft applications in support of NASA's science missions and, in a few studies, on the needs of other federal agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Department of Defense (DoD). These studies have identified numerous promising applications for solar sails, leading NASA to support proposal efforts for three NASA New Millennium Program (NMP) flight demonstration opportunities (the Space Technology-5, -7, and -9 opportunities) as well as an extensive three-year ground development program in FY 2003-2005 sponsored by the NASA In-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) Program. What has not been done to date, however, is to investigate how the technology might also benefit the nation's (and NASA's) emerging interest in the Human Exploration Initiative (HEI). This paper reports on the first effort to address this shortfall in mission applications studies in support of HEI: the use of solar-sail-propelled Lunar Polesitter spacecraft which make use of the natural properties of the Earth-Moon L2 point and solar sail propulsion to enable their positioning near the Lunar poles to serve as communications relay stations. Suitably positioned, such spacecraft enable continuous communications to and from the Earth from any point on the lunar far side. The paper shows that a viable sailcraft system design exists permitting station-keeping of a Lunar Polesitter relay station at 40 Lunar radii from the Moon in the anti-Earth direction, displaced 6-8 Lunar radii below the Earth- Moon plane.
West, John L.↗
Lunar far-side communication satellites
Data relay and tracking capability of lunar communication satellites
LUNAR SATELLITE↗
Lunar far-side communication satellites
Data relay and tracking capability of lunar communication satellites above lunar far side surface
Schmid, P. E.↗
International Coordination and Cooperation on LunaNet Spectrum
LunaNet is planned to be the network of networks operated by a set of cooperating organizations to provide interoperable Communications, networking, Position, Navigation, and Timing (CPNT) services to users on and around the Moon based on a framework of mutually agreed-upon standards, protocols, frequency bands and interface requirements. LunaNet follows a service-oriented architecture that is agnostic about the types of organizations that provide services, e.g., government, industry, or academia. LunaNet is open, scalable, resilient, secure, and extensible. To achieve these goals, LunaNet Service Providers (LNSP) must coordinate with each other to define and develop the architecture, to plan initial and evolved capabilities, and to operate their networks. One of the central LunaNet tenets is the use of shared spectrum. For example, the Lunar Augmented Navigation Service (LANS) acts like a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) such as the US Global Positioning System (GPS) or European Galileo but the LNSPs’ contributions to LunaNet must use the same frequency band (2483.5 MHz-2500.0 MHz) and transmit the same waveform synchronized by highly accurate clocks so that Users ‘see’ one virtual network and use the same multilateration algorithm to determine their positions. This necessitates a high degree of spectrum coordination. NASA’s Lunar and Human Spaceflight Spectrum Management Team has been actively supporting development of the LunaNet Interoperability Specification (LNIS), soliciting inputs from spectrum policy and planning experts across NASA, ESA and JAXA. Cislunar spectrum use considerations have been studied and adjudicated within the Space Frequency Coordination Group (SFCG) and inform the ongoing discussion of a lunar communication and navigation architecture within the existing radio regulatory framework of the International Telecommunication Union, leading to the 2027 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-27). The frequency plan contained in the publicly released draft of the LunaNet Interoperability Specification reflects the initial phase of exploration (roughly to 2030) defining an optimal set of radio frequencies in appropriately allocated services consistent with WRC-23 decisions for use by known or planned CPNT applications, while striving to maximize coexistence and compatibility amongst cislunar systems and other systems within the near-Earth regime (< 2 million km from Earth). Important considerations include: protection of extremely sensitive receive-only radio astronomy systems on the lunar far side, known as the Shielded Zone of the Moon (SZM); compatibility between Direct with Earth (DWE) communications links and links needed to support relay satellites in lunar orbit with their customer systems on orbit or on the lunar surface; compatibility between multiple lunar surface communications systems and capabilities over varied and challenging terrain and distances; as well as ensuring compatibility and interoperability between navigation systems which either leverage Earth-based or in-situ lunar systems. In addition, the lunar CPNT architecture is envisioned to be the basis – with adjustments – of the future Mars CPNT architecture as we expand into the solar system using Interplanetary Networking (IPN). The second phase of lunar spectrum definition will address planned international capabilities for the next decade that will require action at WRC-27 and beyond. This paper will discuss each of these considerations in more depth and how the current LunaNet frequency plan addresses them.
LunaNet↗
Transfers from TLI to Lunar Frozen Orbits with Applications to NASA’s CLPS & Artemis Programs
This paper will focus on trajectory transfers from trans-lunar injection (TLI) to lunar frozen orbits with applications to NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) and Artemis Human Landing System (HLS) programs. For a CLPS application, the CS-3 mission is explored, which will deploy a communications relay satellite in lunar elliptical frozen orbit followed by landing a payload on the lunar farside during dawn. Given HLS will land a crew near the lunar south pole with lighting and timing requirements, the effect of varying the Earth-Moon transit duration to influence the approach direction upon landing will be explored.
lunar frozen orbits↗
Lunar Asset Messaging and On Orbit Navigation
NASA has titled its 2020 thrust for the Moon, Artemis. The increased focus on the Moon as a destination for future human and robotic expeditions necessitates general purpose navigational and communications infrastructure reducing their complexity to help establish a sustained presence. A framework through which Lunar missions can relay communications and localize their positions shifts the burden from the individual mission and enables resource allocation tailored to mission-specific goals. During the summer of 2020, student interns under the Innovation to Flight (i2F) program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in collaboration with the University of Colorado Boulder designed, built, and tested a prototype framework capable of providing surface assets with communication and positioning services. The team utilized the existing i2F CubeSat bus in addition to developing several CubeSat engineering development units (EDUs), a ground vehicle, and a ground station to simulate a scenario in which a lunar surface mission is supported by these services. A primary goal of the summer was to develop a method for localizing the ground vehicle through trilateration. Distances are inferred from the round-trip time of flight (ToF) of radio signals between an asset and several elements. Signals were sent and received using LimeSDR software defined radios on-board both the ground vehicle and the EDUs; ToF and trilateration were calculated on a Qualcomm Snapdragon development board located within the LA MOON payload data system. The ModalAI chipset on the Qualcomm was instrumental in executing visual based position estimation. Communications was facilitated through a bent-pipe approach addressing the NASA requirement to provide solutions for in communication denied locations. The ground vehicle relayed information to other surface assets in addition to its ground station through the supporting constellation. This project demonstrates the feasibility of a lunar CubeSat constellation for the support of surface assets and explores packaging and operations of the components critical to trilateration and bent-pipe communication into a standard CubeSat form factor. When implemented, this framework will open a door for new surface missions designed with lower power requirements and increased operational access.
Huang, Calvin↗
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).
LunaNet↗
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).
LunaNet↗
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
Under the guidance of NASA’s Space Communication and Navigation (SCaN) program, this document, along with its companion documents, LunaNet Services Requirements Document (TBD) and the LunaNet Concept of Operations and Architecture (TBD), provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet) for services to the human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft platform, or node. The expectation is that the needs of NASA, its partners and other users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the combined, cooperative lunar network.
LunaNet↗
Roles of the ground and flight crew in Apollo operations.
The functions performed by ground personnel and flight crews of Apollo missions are reviewed, covering vehicle systems operation and management, Saturn launch vehicle, command-service and lunar modules, lunar rover, communication relay unit and ground-commanded TV assembly. Details of the flight path, scientific experiments, photographic equipment and crew health monitoring are also discussed in terms of these functions. The coordinated combination of large numbers of experts and data processing equipment on the ground with the crew's capabilities to operate the spacecraft and exercise on-the-spot judgements is viewed as the backbone of the successful fulfillment of Apollo missions.
Wolfer, B. M.↗