Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

A Conceptual Design Study for an Unmanned, Reusable Cargo Lunar Lander

Motivated by the aggressive timeline of NASA’s Artemis Program, the feasibility of evolving a mid-sized, reusable and refuelable cargo lunar lander technology demonstrator into the descent element of the three- stage human lander was assessed with the goal of forming synergies between both acquisition programs. Requirements for such a concept are that it must be deployed on commercial launch vehicles that are expected to enter into service consistent with Artemis’ timeline. In order to assess this concept’s feasibility, a physics-based analysis of alternatives was conducted where mission and vehicle architectures are traded side-by-side. Mission trades considered include the impacts of traveling to near-rectilinear halo orbit quickly versus slowly; vehicle trades include fuel and oxidizer tank configurations, number of engines, and propellant combinations, as well as several technology options, e.g. reduced and zero boil-off strategies. Results and discussions are presented to facilitate the consideration of this concept. lunar lander, systems analysis, multidisciplinary design and analysis, space systems, analysis of alternatives,

Robertson, Bradford↗
NASA NTRS2007

CECE: A Deep Throttling Demonstrator Cryogenic Engine for NASA's Lunar Lander

As one of the first technology development programs awarded under NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, the Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) Deep Throttling, Common Extensible Cryogenic Engine (CECE) program was selected by NASA in November 2004 to begin technology development and demonstration toward a deep throttling, cryogenic Lunar Lander engine for use across multiple human and robotic lunar exploration mission segments with extensibility to Mars. The CECE program leverages the maturity and previous investment of a flight-proven hydrogen/oxygen expander cycle engine, the RL10, to develop and demonstrate an unprecedented combination of reliability, safety, durability, throttlability, and restart capabilities in a high-energy, cryogenic engine. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and NASA Glenn Research Center personnel were integral design and analysis team members throughout the requirements assessment, propellant studies and the deep throttling demonstrator elements of the program. The testbed selected for the initial deep throttling demonstration phase of this program was a minimally modified RL10 engine, allowing for maximum current production engine commonality and extensibility with minimum program cost. In just nine months from technical program start, CECE Demonstrator No. 1 engine testing in April/May 2006 at PWR's E06 test stand successfully demonstrated in excess of 10:1 throttling of the hydrogen/oxygen expander cycle engine. This test provided an early demonstration of a viable, enabling cryogenic propulsion concept with invaluable system-level technology data acquisition toward design and development risk mitigation for both the subsequent CECE Demonstrator No. 2 program and to the future Lunar Lander Design, Development, Test and Evaluation effort.

Giuliano, Victor J.↗
NASA NTRS2007

The Lunar Lander "HabiTank" Concept

This paper will summarize the study that was conducted under the auspices of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), lead by Johnson Space Center s Engineering Directorate in support of the Lunar Lander Preparatory Study (LLPS) as sponsored by the Constellation Program Office (CxPO), Advanced Projects Office (APO). The lunar lander conceptual design and analysis is intended to provide an understanding of requirements for human space exploration of the Moon using the Advanced Projects Office Pre-Lander Project Office selected "HabiTank" Lander concept. In addition, these analyses help identify system "drivers," or significant sources of cost, performance, risk, and schedule variation along with areas needing technology development. Recommendations, results, and conclusions in this paper do not reflect NASA policy or programmatic decisions. This paper is an executive summary of this study.

Kennedy, Kriss J.↗
NASA NTRS2009

Synthetic and Enhanced Vision System for Altair Lunar Lander

Past research has demonstrated the substantial potential of synthetic and enhanced vision (SV, EV) for aviation (e.g., Prinzel & Wickens, 2009). These augmented visual-based technologies have been shown to significantly enhance situation awareness, reduce workload, enhance aviation safety (e.g., reduced propensity for controlled flight -into-terrain accidents/incidents), and promote flight path control precision. The issues that drove the design and development of synthetic and enhanced vision have commonalities to other application domains; most notably, during entry, descent, and landing on the moon and other planetary surfaces. NASA has extended SV/EV technology for use in planetary exploration vehicles, such as the Altair Lunar Lander. This paper describes an Altair Lunar Lander SV/EV concept and associated research demonstrating the safety benefits of these technologies.

Prinzell, Lawrence J., III↗
NASA NTRS2019

Attitude Control and Orbit Determination of a Crewed Spacecraft with Lunar Lander in near Rectilinear Halo Orbit

NASA's Gateway program plans to place a crew-tended spacecraft in cislunar Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). The craft will support arrivals of crews in Orion and the undocking and return of a crewed lunar lander. The impact to at-titude control of a Gateway with the addition of a lunar lander is investigated. Perturbations from Orion and a lander's docking and undocking from the Gate-way are considered. Deep Space Network (DSN) tracking is supplemented with optical measurements to lunar north pole craters to analyze the possible benefit in solution accuracy and/or DSN scheduling relief.

Newman, Clark P.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Common Lunar Lander (CLL) Propulsion System

A description of the Common Lunar Lander (CLL) propulsion system is given. Among the topics discussed are the following: system characteristics, system mission requirements, key drivers to subsystem selection, system readiness level, and point design output. Additionally, a schematic of the system is provided.

Hyatt, Don↗
NASA NTRS1992

Lunar lander conceptual design

This paper is a first look at the problems of building a lunar lander to support a small lunar surface base. A series of trade studies was performed to define the lander. The initial trades concerned choosing number of stages, payload mass, parking orbit altitude, and propellant type. Other important trades and issues included plane change capability, propellant loading and maintenance location, and reusability considerations. Given a rough baseline, the systems were then reviewed. A conceptual design was then produced. The process was carried through only one iteration. Many more iterations are needed. A transportation system using reusable, aerobraked orbital transfer vehicles (OTV's) is assumed. These OTV's are assumed to be based and maintained at a low Earth orbit (LEO) space station, optimized for transportation functions. Single- and two-stage OTV stacks are considered. The OTV's make the translunar injection (TLI), lunar orbit insertion (LOI), and trans-Earth injection (TEI) burns, as well as midcourse and perigee raise maneuvers.

Stecklein, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Thermal Considerations for Designing the Next Lunar Lander

The Vision for Space Exploration calls for NASA to develop a lunar lander that is capable of delivering humans anywhere on the moon's surface at any time. This presents a significant challenge for thermal engineers, as the lander must be able to survive both the freezing 14-day long lunar night as well as the harsh lunar noon. These problems and potential solutions are presented for each stage of the proposed mission that will return American astronauts to the moon.

Garrison, Matthew B.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Robotic Lunar Landers For Science And Exploration

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory have been conducting mission studies and performing risk reduction activities for NASA s robotic lunar lander flight projects. In 2005, the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Mission #2 (RLEP-2) was selected as an ESMD precursor robotic lander mission to demonstrate precision landing and determine if there was water ice at the lunar poles; however, this project was canceled. Since 2008, the team has been supporting SMD designing small lunar robotic landers for science missions, primarily to establish anchor nodes of the International Lunar Network (ILN), a network of lunar geophysical nodes. Additional mission studies have been conducted to support other objectives of the lunar science community. This paper describes the current status of the MSFC/APL robotic lunar mission studies and risk reduction efforts including high pressure propulsion system testing, structure and mechanism development and testing, long cycle time battery testing, combined GN&C and avionics testing, and two autonomous lander test articles.

Cohen, B. A.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Static Controls Performance Tool for Lunar Landers

This document presents a static analysis tool used to evaluate the controllability of Lunar landers. This was created as part of the NASA Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown (Lunar CATALYST) program. This tool is capable of accepting typical design information such as location and direction of thrusters, maximum thruster forces, gravity vectors, and center of mass locations. The tool evaluates how far the center of gravity can move from its starting position while still maintaining control. This type of analysis is intended to support results produced by time domain simulations. The code created for this project was implemented in Python, and it was designed to be integrated into systems level optimization tools to yield first-cut results on optimal thruster placement.

Aretskin-Hariton, Eliot D.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Lander Fuel Cell (LLFC) ACO

This is the one-page status report for the STMD Announcement for Collaborative Opportunity (ACO) Lunar Lander Fuel Cell (LLFC) task to be presented at the fiscal year 2020 (FY20) Game Changing Development (GCD) Annual Review.

Fuel Cell↗
NASA NTRS1991

Tracking Systems to Support the Common Lunar Lander (CLL)

A discussion of the tracking system for Artemis (the Common Lunar Lander) is presented. Among the topics presented are the following: major drivers for system definition, results of vendor survey, baseline system properties, program considerations, and mission phases requiring tracking.

Culpepper, William X.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

On the Myth of Fuel Consumption Minimization of a Lunar Lander

Many articles have based the solution of trajectory optimization of a lunar lander on minimizing fuel consumption. This optimization is attempted by minimizing the burn-time of the descent engine, or by maximizing the total mass of the vehicle during the maneuver. The general myth, is that minimizing fuel is possible. However, the first law of thermodynamics cannot be violated. Therefore, the work that the descent engine must do to dissipate the energy of the vehicle from orbit to landing is constant. The higher the power setting of the engine, the less time it takes to dissipate the total mechanical energy, but it does not save any fuel.

Guidance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Results from the Radio Frequency Mass Gauge Technology Demonstration on the Intuitive Machines Nova-C Lunar Lander

A cryogenic propellant mass gauge known as the Radio Frequency Mass Gauge (RFMG) was integrated into the Intuitive Machines (IM) Nova-C lunar lander and provided an estimate of the liquid oxygen and liquid methane mass in the lander propellant tanks throughout the IM-1 mission, including during microgravity coast phases. An RFMG electronics controller was used to measure and record the spectrum of the RF signal reflected from an antenna sensor in each tank over the frequency range 100 to 1,300 MHz. The RF spectrum of each of the tanks is unique and is sensitive to the index of refraction of the propellants and the spatial distribution of the liquid within the tanks. Electromagnetic simulation software was used to simulate the antenna response spectra for a given tank geometry, fluid properties, and liquid–vapor configurations within the tank. Over 10,000 antenna response simulations were completed for each propellant tank prior to the IM-1 mission and represented various volumetric fill levels and fluid configurations. The simulated spectra served as a database against which measured tank spectra were compared. For analysis, a spectral matching algorithm was used to find the best match between measured and simulated spectra, and the gauged mass was calculated from the most highly correlated fluid mass simulations. RFMG measurements were recorded during tank loading on the launch pad and during translunar coast, lunar orbit insertion, low lunar orbit, powered descent to the lunar surface, and postlanding on the Moon. This paper describes the RF and fluid simulations, the RFMG measurements and analysis of spectral data, the RFMG instrument, and the gauged results throughout all phases of the IM-1 mission.

lunar lander↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Results from the Radio Frequency Mass Gauge Technology Demonstration on the Intuitive Machines Nova-C Lunar Lander

A cryogenic propellant mass gauge known as the Radio Frequency Mass Gauge (RFMG) was integrated into the Intuitive Machines (IM) Nova-C lunar lander and provided an estimate of the liquid oxygen and liquid methane mass in the lander propellant tanks throughout the IM-1 mission, including during microgravity coast phases. An RFMG electronics controller was used to measure and record the spectrum of the RF signal reflected from an antenna sensor in each tank over the frequency range 100 to 1,300 MHz. The RF spectrum of each of the tanks is unique and is sensitive to the index of refraction of the propellants and the spatial distribution of the liquid within the tanks. Electromagnetic simulation software was used to simulate the antenna response spectra for a given tank geometry, fluid properties, and liquid–vapor configurations within the tank. Over 10,000 antenna response simulations were completed for each propellant tank prior to the IM-1 mission and represented various volumetric fill levels and fluid configurations. The simulated spectra served as a database against which measured tank spectra were compared. For analysis, a spectral matching algorithm was used to find the best match between measured and simulated spectra, and the gauged mass was calculated from the most highly correlated fluid mass simulations. RFMG measurements were recorded during tank loading on the launch pad and during translunar coast, lunar orbit insertion, low lunar orbit, powered descent to the lunar surface, and postlanding on the Moon. This paper describes the RF and fluid simulations, the RFMG measurements and analysis of spectral data, the RFMG instrument, and the gauged results throughout all phases of the IM-1 mission.

lunar lander↗
NASA NTRS1991

Common Lunar Lander (CLL) Engineering Study Results

Information is given in viewgraph form on the Common Lunar Lander (CLL) engineering study results. The mission is to provide a delivery system to soft-land a 200 kg payload set at any given lunar latitude and longitude. Topics covered include the study schedule, mission goals and requirements, the CLL reference mission, costs, CLL options, and two stage performance analysis.

Stecklein, Jonette↗
NASA NTRS2009

Overview of the Altair Lunar Lander Thermal Control System Design

NASA's Constellation Program has been developed to successfully return humans to the Lunar surface prior to 2020. The Constellation Program includes several different project offices including Altair, which is the next generation Lunar Lander. The planned Altair missions are very different than the Lunar missions accomplished during the Apollo era. These differences have resulted in a significantly different thermal control system architecture. The Altair project has employed a rather unique development approach as compared with previous manned spacecraft programs. Altair started the design process by developing a single-string (no fault tolerance), minimum functionality design. This first design and analysis cycle resulted in the baseline design for the entire process. From this point of departure, Altair continued the development process by adding vehicle functionality for the purposes of minimizing the risk of Loss Of Crew (LOC) and Loss Of Mission (LOM). Through the subsequent design and analysis cycles, the project office compared the added mass associated with the reduction of LOC/LOM and selected the most mass efficient design solutions. The current paper will summarize the Altair mission profile, the operational phases, and the LOC/LOM decisions that were made during the various design cycles. The evolution of the thermal control system design through Lunar Design and Analysis Cycle 3 (LDAC-3) will also be described in this paper.

Stephan, Ryan A.↗