Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “NEPTUNE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1986

Visible phase curves of Uranus and Neptune and scattering in their atmospheres

The Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 narrow angle cameras have been imaging Uranus and Neptune (through several filters) from distances of several AU for the past four years. The justification for this is to determine the way in which the albedoes of the two planets vary with angle from the sun. The Voyager 1 spacecraft has already reached a phase angle of approx. 40 deg. for Neptune and approx. 70 deg. for Uranus. The albedo of a gaseous planet depends on the phase angle (angle from the sun through the planet to the observer), the color being observed, and the vertical distribution and nature of aerosols and clouds in the atmosphere of the planet. Since the colors are known and the phase angles, and phase curves will be used to constrain models of the aerosol and cloud structrures of Uranus and Neptune. A knowledge of the way albedo varies with phase angle allows one to compute the total amount of sunlight being absorbed by a planet. With knowledge of the solar flux incident on the planet and knowledge of how much infrared is being emitted by the planet (at least in the direction of the Earth and sun) one can determine a rough extimate of the internal heat source of the planet. Although Jupiter and Saturn have measured internal heat sources of magnitude comparable to their absorbed energy from the sun, preliminary results indicate that Uranus may not have an internal heat and that Neptune if it has one that heat source is small.

Wenkert, D.↗
NASA NTRS1986

The Voyager encounter with Uranus and Neptune

Voyager 2 approaches Uranus at a relative low phase angle and high southerly latitude. Only when the spacecraft is very close to Uranus does the geometry change appreciably. Most of the important observations occur within six hours of closest approach. Voyager flies through an Earth and solar occulation zone and leaves Uranus at a relatively high phase angle of about 145 degrees. There isn't much of an opportunity to look at the equatorial region of the planet. At Neptune, on the other hand, the approach is more nearly equatorial (about 35 deg S lat). Voyager 2 will come much closer to Nepture than to any of the other gas giants as it skims within about 2000 km of Neptune's cloudtops. It will pass through earth and solar occultation zones at both Neptune and its satellite, Triton. Again, Voyager 2 will leave Neptune at about 35 deg S latitude. Voyager operational instrument, interplanetary trajectories and planetary encounters are briefly discussed.

Miner, Ellis D.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Neptune radio emission - Predictions based on planetary scaling laws

In this paper a prediction is advanced concerning Neptune's low-frequency radio emission based on the radiometric Bode's law for radio planets in combination with the magnetostrophic scaling law for magnetized planets. The total emitted radio power is predicted to be about 1.6 x 10 to the 7th W, very nearly the same as that predicted and observed for Uranus. Possible emission spectral shapes, based on Saturn and earth-like models, are shown. Using these models, the radio emission frequency range is predicted to extend from approximately 100 to just over 1000 kHz, with a spectral peak between 350 and 500 kHz. If radiation is beamed approximately in the sunward direction, Neptune should be detectable by the planetary radio astronomy experiment onboard the Voyager spacecraft sometime between 45 and 90 days before closest approach. This detection is likely to represent the first direct evidence of a Neptune magnetic field. Possible implications for Neptune's magnetosphere with regard to the time of first detection are discussed.

Desch, Michael D.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Voyager at Neptune: 1989

The Voyager mission has taken advantage of a rare planetary alignment that occurs at intervals of about 175 years and affords an extraordinary opportunity: a grand tour by a single spacecraft of the outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Voyager 2 will fly past Nepture and its large moon Triton on August 24, 1989. The discovery of Neptune, along with its current history is discussed. The imaging challenges, tracking and data acquisition, and the Voyager spacecraft are explained. Data will be gathered on the ring arcs of Neptune, the atmosphere and surface of Neptune, Triton, and Nereid (the smaller moon).

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1989

Voyager 2 Neptune targeting strategy

The success of the Voyager 2 flybys of Neptune and Triton depends upon the ability to correct the spacecraft's trajectory. Accurate spacecraft delivery to the desired encounter conditions will promote the maximum science return. However, Neptune's great distance causes large a priori uncertainties in Neptune and Triton ephemerides and planetary system parameters. Consequently, the 'ideal' trajectory is unknown beforehand. The targeting challenge is to utilize the gradually improving knowledge as the spacecraft approaches Neptune to meet the science objectives, but with an overriding concern for spacecraft safety and a desire to limit propellant expenditure. A unique targeting strategy has been developed in response to this challenge. Through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation, candidate strategies are evaluated by the degree to which they meet these objectives and are compared against each other in determining the targeting strategy to be adopted.

Potts, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Moist convection on Neptune

A study of methane moist convection on Neptune examines the stability conditions which initiate moist convection of methane clouds. Temperature lapse rates that are unstable to moist convection are subadiabatic by a factor of two or more, while adiabatic and superadiabatic lapse rates are stable. In the observed Neptune temperature structure, vertical velocities greater than 40 m/s are required to lift moist air above the stable region and initiate moist convection. Alternatively, moist convection could be initiated by air that is slightly drier than its surroundings. Moist convective clouds achieve altitudes up to 100 mb, thereby exceeding the temperature minimum and depositing methane in the Neptune stratosphere. At least 2000 such clouds penetrate the Neptune stratosphere/hour.

Stoker, Carol R.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Neptune's deep atmosphere revealed

The brightness temperature of Uranus at 20 cm is 260 + or - 10K, while Neptune it is 318 + or - 16K. Since NH3 is the dominant absorber at this wavelength the microwave spectra of Neptune have been modeled based upon an assumed deep gaseous mixing ratio of NH3 and subsequent loss into clouds. The difference between the two brightness temperatures implies that the NH3 mixing ratio below the level of cloud formation on Neptune compared to Uranus is lower by nearly two orders of magnitude. An alternative explanation is that the 20 cm radiation from Neptune is a combination of thermal plus synchrotron emission as proposed by de Pater and Goertz (1989).

Romani, Paul N.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Uranus photochemistry and prospects for Voyager 2 at Neptune

CH4 is the only photochemically active constituent in the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune. NH3, H2O and H2S are all removed by condensation at pressures greater than 1.5 bars. Although the bulk mole fraction (about 2 percent) of CH4 is 20-30 times its solar value on both planets, it drops to its saturation limit (about 0.0001) at the Uranus tropopause, but remains high (about 2 percent) at the Neptune tropopause. This results in much greater mixing ratios of the product hydrocarbons in the stratosphere of Neptune. On both planets, the photolysis products of CH4 undergo condensation near the tropopause and the upper stratosphere. Voyager observations of the hydrocarbons at Uranus and those planned at Neptune are discussed, along with their implications for upper-atmospheric physics and thermochemistry.

Atreya, S. K.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Plasma observations near Neptune - Initial results from Voyager 2

The plasma science experiment on Voyager 2 made observations of the plasma environment in Neptune's magnetosphere and in the surrounding solar wind. Because of the large tilt of the magnetic dipole and fortuitous timing, Voyager entered Neptune's magnetosphere through the cusp region, the first cusp observations at an outer planet. Thus the transition from the magnetosheath to the magnetosphere observed by Voyager 2 was not sharp but rather appeared as a gradual decrease in plasma density and temperature. The maximum plasma density observed in the magnetosphere is inferred to be 1.4 per cubic centimeter (the exact value depends on the composition), the smallest observed by Voyager in any magnetosphere. The plasma has at least two components; light ions (mass, 1 to 5) and heavy ions (mass, 10 to 40), but more precise species identification is not yet available. Most of the plasma is concentrated in a plasma sheet or plasma torus and near closest approach to the planet. A likely source of the heavy ions is Triton's atmosphere or ionosphere, whereas the light ions probably escape from Neptune. The large tilt of Neptune's magnetic dipole produces a dynamic magnetosphere that changes configuration every 16 hours as the planet rotates.

Belcher, J. W.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Voyager 2's encounter with Neptune answered many questions about the 'blue' planet

Voyager 2 observations of Neptune from August 1989 are examined. Voyager 2 discovered 6 new moons around Neptune and collected information on the shape and composition of Neptune's rings. The spots and clouds detected in the planet's atmosphere are described. Consideration is given to Neptune's magnetic field and auroras.

Tsurutani, Bruce T.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Global magnetic anomaly and aurora of Neptune

The large offset and tilt of Neptune's dipole magnetic field combine to create a global magnetic anomaly, analogous to but much more important than earth's South Atlantic Anomaly. Energetic particle precipitation loss within the Neptune anomaly creates 'atmospheric drift shadows' within which particle fluxes are greatly reduced. The energetic particle dropout observed by Voyager near closest approach occurred near the predicted times when Voyager passed within the atmospheric drift shadow. Extremely soft, structured bursts of ions and electrons within the drift shadow may result from plasma wave-induced pitch angle scattering of trapped particles confined near the magnetic equator. The dropout does not necessarily imply that Voyager passed through an earth-like discrete auroral zone, as earlier reported. The ion and electron fluxes observed within the dropout period correspond to particles that must precipitate to Neptune's atmosphere within the anomaly region. This anomaly precipitation can account for a major portion of the ultraviolet emissions previously identified as Neptune aurora.

Cheng, Andrew F.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Optical navigation during the Voyager Neptune encounter

Optical navigation techniques were required to successfully complete the planetary exploration phase of the NASA deep-space Voyager mission. The last of Voyager's planetary encounters, with Neptune, posed unique problems from an optical navigation standpoint. In this paper we briefly review general aspects of the optical navigation process as practiced during the Voyager mission, and discuss in detail particular features of the Neptune encounter which affected optical navigation. New approaches to the centerfinding problem were developed for both stars and extended bodies, and these are described. Results of the optical navigation data analysis are presented, as well as a description of the optical orbit determination system and results of its use during encounter. Partially as a result of the optical navigation processing, results of scientific significance were obtained. These results include the discovery and orbit determination of several new satellites of Neptune and the determination of the size of Triton, Neptune's largest moon.

Riedel, J. E.↗
NASA NTRS1991

The ring arcs of Neptune

After the corotation resonance with an exterior satellite proved inapplicable to the Neptune ring arc confinement, a search for other mechanisms settled on the possible influence of Neptune's magnetic field. The areas of greater optical depth around the ring are much dustier than the low optical depth regions. These particles reside in a plasma; therefore, they must carry some charge. The components of Neptune's magnetic field on the equator at the radius of the ring arcs as a function of Neptunian longitude are shown. The components are those of an offset tilted dipole model. Although the dipole model is probably not a good approximation so close to the planet, the magnitude of the field that is given is probably close to the actual value. The possible importance of the magnetic field on the smallest particles in the ring is indicated by the ratio of the magnetic field on the smallest particles in the ring is indicated by the ratio of the magnetic force to the central gravitation attraction with the field strength of B = 0.01 gauss at the ring distance. A preferred position in the orbit for magnetically perturbed particles seems to require a commensurability between the rotation of the planet and the motion of the particle in the orbit. The period of rotation is assumed to be that of the radio bursts at 16.11 hours. However, without a model for the radio emission, one cannot be absolutely sure. Jupiter's decametric radiation depends on Io's orbital position as well as the rotation, so a synodic periodicity might be appropriate. But the latter radiation is highly directed, whereas Neptune's was seen all along the spacecraft trajectory on the 16.11 hour schedule, i.e., with no shifts in phase relative to a fixed longitude on the planet. The ring orbital period is 10.536 hours which is not commensurate with the rotation period. If the 16.11 hours is interpreted as a synodic period between the rotation and a satellite motion, the closest rotation periods to 16 hours are 15.9 hours if the satellite is 1989N4 and 18.2 hours if the satellite is Triton. The former is near a 3:2 resonance with the ring particle motion. The problem deserves some more thought before a possible herding of small particles by the magnetic field is abandoned.

Peale, S. J.↗
NASA NTRS1991

The magnetic field of Neptune

The Voyager 2 observations obtained during the Neptune encounter are used to develop a spherical harmonic model of the planetary magnetic field of Neptune. The model yields a dipole of magnitude 0.14 G R(N) exp 3, tilted by 47 deg toward 72 deg west longitude. Neptune's quadrupole is equal to or exceeding in magnitude the surface dipole field; the octupole is also very large, although less well constrained. The characteristics of the Neptune's magnetic field are illustrated using contour maps of the field on the planet's surface.

Connerney, J. E. P.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Voyager 2 electron observations in the magnetosphere of Neptune

This paper describes electron data obtained during the Neptune encounter by the Voyager 2 plasma science experiment. The densities and temperatures of low-energy (10-5950 eV) electrons and the electrostatic potential of the spacecraft near Neptune are derived. The data indicate that the escape of charged particles from Triton and the local ionization of atoms in the neutral torus originating from Triton are the major plasma sources. It is inferred that this neutral torus of hydrogen atoms has a density of about 300/cu cm and an inner boundary at 8 R(N). The data near Neptune exhibit signatures suggesting that both precipitation into Neptune's atmosphere and ring absorption are important plasma loss mechanisms. Plasma transport in the magnetosphere appears to be very fast; the diffusion coefficient is 1 x 10 exp -7 L exp 3 R(N) exp 2/sec.

Zhang, Ming↗
NASA NTRS1993

First observations of CO and HCN on Neptune and Uranus at millimeter wavelengths and the implications for atmospheric chemistry

Observations are presented which show that CO is present in both the troposphere and stratosphere of Neptune, whereas is confined to the Neptune stratosphere with a mean mole fraction in the 0.003-30 mbar pressure level range of 1.0 x 10 exp -9. CO is present in both the stratosphere and in the troposphere with a uniformly mixed model fraction of 1.2 x 10 exp -6. Upper limits of 1.0 x 10 exp -10 and 3.0 x 10 exp -8 mole fractions are derived for HCN and CO respectively on Uranus. The origin of these species in the atmosphere of Neptune and their nondetection in that of Uranus are discussed in detail. It is concluded that the most plausible scenario involves upward convection of CO and N2 from Neptune's deep interior and a failure of chemical equilibrium at deep atmospheric levels, allowing excess CO and presumably N2 to reach the upper atmosphere. Nondetection in Uranus may be explained by the lack of a significant internal heat source in the planet and consequent suppression of vertical convection.

Marten, A.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Plasma and radio waves from Neptune: Source mechanisms and propagation

This report summarizes results obtained through the support of NASA Grant NAGW-2412. The objective of this project is to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the radio wave emission observed by the planetary radio astronomy (PRA) instrument on board Voyager 2 as if flew by Neptune. This study has included data analysis, theoretical and numerical calculations, ray tracing, and modeling to determine the possible source mechanism(s) and locations of the Neptune radio emissions. We have completed four papers, which are included in the appendix. The paper 'Modeling of Whistler Ray Paths in the Magnetosphere of Neptune' investigated the propagation and dispersion of lighting-generated whistler in the magnetosphere of Neptune by using three dimensional ray tracing. The two papers 'Numerical Simulations of Bursty Radio Emissions from Planetary Magnetospheres' and 'Numerical Simulations of Bursty Planetary Radio Emissions' employed numerical simulations to investigate an alternate source mechanism of bursty radio emissions in addition to the cyclotron maser instability. We have also studied the possible generation of Z and whistler mode waves by the temperature anisotropic beam instability and the result was published in 'Electron Cyclotron Wave Generation by Relativistic Electrons.' Besides the aforementioned studies, we have also collaborated with members of the PRA team to investigate various aspects of the radio wave data. Two papers have been submitted for publication and the abstracts of these papers are also listed in the appendix.

Wong, H. K.↗
NASA NTRS1994

A model of Triton's role in Neptune's magnetosphere

Escape of neutral hydrogen (H) and nitrogen (N) from Triton's maintains a large neutral cloud, called the Triton torus, in Neptune's magnetosphere. We have developed the first detailed Monte Carlo simulation model of the Triton torus that includes the collisionality, the complex geometry, the injection of two neutral species from Triton (H and N), and the combined effects of photoionization, electron impact ionization, and charge exchange. Ionization in Neptune's plasma sheet was modeled using Voyager plasma observations. Collisions cause both the H and N neutral clouds to become more radially extended, both toward Neptune and out beyond the magnetopause, as well as more extended in latitude, when compared with collisionless models. Moreover, collisions of H with the much more massive N greatly enhance the collisional ejection of H from the system and into Neptune's atmosphere. This effect decreases the probability of H ionization within the magnetosphere relative to that for N, and furthermore causes model results for two-species injection from Triton to differ significantly from those for H injection alone. For a hydrogen escape rate from Triton of 5 x 10(exp 25)/s, as given by photo-chemical models of Triton's upper atmosphere, a nitrogen escape rate of 5 x 10(exp 24)/s gives proton and N(+) sources of 5.6 x 10(exp 24)/s and 3.3 x 10(exp 24)/s, respectively, whose ratio is close to the observed ratio of protons to heavies. A nitrogen escape rate of 2 x 10(exp 25)/s, yields an N(+) source more than twice that of protons, inconsistent with the Voyager data.

Decker, R. B.↗