Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RANS CFD”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Analysis of Low-Speed Stall Aerodynamics of a Business Jets Wing Using STAR-CCM+

Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted: to study the low-speed stall aerodynamics of a GIII aircrafts swept wing modified with (1) a laminar-flow wing glove, or (2) a seamless flap. The stall aerodynamics of these two different wing configurations were analyzed and compared with the unmodified baseline wing for low-speed flight. The Star-CCM+ polyhedral unstructured CFD code was first validated for wing stall predictions using the wing-body geometry from the First AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop.

fluid mechanics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Vision 2030 Aircraft Propulsion Grand Challenge Problem: Full-engine CFD Simulations with High Geometric Fidelity and Physics Accuracy

2014 NASA published the outcome of the 2030 CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) Vision study: “CFD Vision 2030: A path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences” . The study provided a comprehensive review of the state of the art of CFD in 2014 for aerospace applications including, but not limited to, numerical algorithms, physics models, MDAO (Multidisciplinary Design Analysis and Optimization) and HPC (High Performance Computing) hardware. The study also proposed four conceptual ideas of Grand Challenge problems that would build on and benefit from advances outlined in the roadmap. The proposed challenges were meant to foster more detailed descriptions of grand challenge problems for specific disciplines. One of the proposed challenges was in the gas turbine propulsion area, focusing on transient full engine simulations. The current paper addresses detailed technical aspects of that challenge, and proposes a plan to approach it in a gradual manner, which includes high fidelity modeling of components, component coupling, and targeted experimental campaigns relying on common research models.

turbine engine↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind-US Simulations of the NASA 1507 Inlet Test Case

Steady-state, Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed of the NASA 1507 Inlet Test Case from the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) held in January 2023 using the Wind-US CFD solver. The simulations were performed with bleed regions modeled as surface patches and the Slater bleed boundary condition models were applied within those regions. Both the constant-plenum-pressure and the fixed-plenum-exit bleed models where applied. The vortex generators were modeled using the Bender-Anderson-Yagle (BAY) vortex generator model. The CFD simulations were performed for inlet engine-face flow ratios varying from supercritical to subcritical inlet operation until inlet unstart. The results of the CFD simulations were compared to wind-tunnel data which included boundary layer profiles, axial static pressure distributions, bleed rates, total pressure recovery performance curves, and engine-face total pressure rake profiles. The CFD simulations were able to match most of the boundary layer rake data near the geometric throat, but the boundary layers on the centerbody were thinner than indicated by the wind-tunnel data. For the supercritical CFD simulations, the engine-face flow ratio was at least 2% to 2.5% lower than indicated by the wind-tunnel data, but still consistent with the level of supercritical bleed. The engine-face flow rates of the wind-tunnel tests had an uncertainty of ±2% which could explain the differences. The supercritical engine-face flow rates of the wind-tunnel data indicated a 5% supercritical bleed rate rather than the reported 7.18% bleed rate. The CFD simulations were able to calculate the maximum total pressure recovery of pt2/pt = 0.907 as observed for the wind-tunnel data. The CFD simulations with the constant-pressure bleed model were able to obtain a much lower engine-face total pressure ratio than indicated by both the wind-tunnel data and the CFD simulations using a fixed-plenum-exit bleed model. The CFD simulations indicated a sharp static pressure rise for the terminal shock rather than a more gradual rise indicated by the wind-tunnel data. The CFD simulations were not able to accurately compute the total pressure variation across the engine-face total pressure rake.

Supersonics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

RANS Predictions of Inlet/Isolator Unstart at Mach 4

This paper describes several approaches to back pressuring an inlet/isolator model at Mach 4.0 and the differences in unstart predictions using common RANS simulation methods. The CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel were used for this work. Verification and validation was conducted on a relevant shock-wave-boundary-layer-interaction case with both solvers. Using aftmounted back pressure flaps did not produce a stable pre-combustion shock train. An unstart comparison between CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel as well as common 2-equation turbulence models was conducted with numerical back pressure. Unstart predictions using a novel louver back pressure mechanism was done with OVERFLOW. There is notable differences in shock train travel and predicted unstart limit due to turbulence modeling, temporal resolution, and use of the 2D simplification.

CFD↗
NASA NTRS2013

Investigations of Fluid-Structure-Coupling and Turbulence Model Effects on the DLR Results of the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

The accurate calculation of aerodynamic forces and moments is of significant importance during the design phase of an aircraft. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been strongly developed over the last two decades regarding robustness, efficiency, and capabilities for aerodynamically complex configurations. Incremental aerodynamic coefficients of different designs can be calculated with an acceptable reliability at the cruise design point of transonic aircraft for non-separated flows. But regarding absolute values as well as increments at off-design significant challenges still exist to compute aerodynamic data and the underlying flow physics with the accuracy required. In addition to drag, pitching moments are difficult to predict because small deviations of the pressure distributions, e.g. due to neglecting wing bending and twisting caused by the aerodynamic loads can result in large discrepancies compared to experimental data. Flow separations that start to develop at off-design conditions, e.g. in corner-flows, at trailing edges, or shock induced, can have a strong impact on the predictions of aerodynamic coefficients too. Based on these challenges faced by the CFD community a working group of the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Technical Committee initiated in 2001 the CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW) series resulting in five international workshops. The results of the participants and the committee are summarized in more than 120 papers. The latest, fifth workshop took place in June 2012 in conjunction with the 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. The results in this paper will evaluate the influence of static aeroelastic wing deformations onto pressure distributions and overall aerodynamic coefficients based on the NASA finite element structural model and the common grids.

Keye, Stefan↗
NASA NTRS2008

RANS Analyses of Turbofan Nozzles with Wedge Deflectors for Noise Reduction

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to evaluate a promising concept for reducing the noise at take-off of dual-stream, turbofan nozzles. The concept, offset stream technology, reduces the jet noise observed on the ground by diverting (offsetting) the majority of the fan flow below the core flow, thickening this layer between the high velocity core flow and the ground observers. In this study a wedge placed in the internal fan stream is used as the diverter. Wind, a Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code, was used to analyze the flowfield of the exhaust plume and to calculate nozzle performance. Results showed that the wedge effectively diverts the fan flow and the turbulent kinetic energy on the observer side of the nozzle is reduced. The reduction in turbulent kinetic energy should correspond to a reduction in noise. The blockage due to the wedge reduces the fan massflow proportional to its blockage and the overall thrust is consequently reduced. The CFD predictions are in very good agreement with experimental data. This noise reduction concept shows promise for reduced jet noise at a small reduction in thrust. It has been demonstrated that RANS CFD can be used to optimize this concept.

DeBonis, James R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Accuracy of RANS Simulations for Mars Entry Vehicles

Accurate yet inexpensive predictions of aerodynamic coefficients for Mars entry vehicles have remained a consistent challenge over the past five decades. Below Mach 6, drag on the backshell becomes significant and must be accurately predicted. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models are commonly used, despite their poor predictions of backshell pressure. While scale-resolving simulations have shown promise in the past decade, there is still a need for cheap, accurate RANS predictions for large aerodynamic databases. The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) is used as a case study to examine predictive accuracy and known shortcomings for RANS predictions of Mars entry vehicles. Several different grid generation techniques are compared, including a comparison between prismatic boundary layer grids and fully unstructured, tetrahedral grids. Comparisons are made to experimental data for Mach 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5. The accuracy of predicted aerodynamic coefficients is examined. Overpredictions in axial force and drag are explained by a closer examination of the surface pressure. These findings document sensitivities and best practices for future RANS database development of Mars entry vehicles.

CFD↗
NASA NTRS2019

Recommendations for Future Efforts in RANS Modeling and Simulation

The roadmap laid out in the CFD Vision 2030 document suggests that a decision to move away from RANS research needs to be made in the current timeframe (around 2020). This paper outlines industry requirements for improved predictions of turbulent flows and the cost-barrier that is often associated with reliance on scale resolving methods. Capabilities of RANS model accuracy for simple and complex flow flow fields are assessed, and modeling practices that degrade predictive accuracy are identified. Suggested research topics are identified that have the potential to improve the applicability and accuracy of RANS models. We conclude that it is important that some part of a balanced turbulence modeling research portfolio should include RANS efforts.

Bush, Robert H.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Model-Invariant Hybrid Computations of Separated Flows for RCA Standard Test Cases

NASA's Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences (RCA) subproject has identified several smooth-body separated flows as standard test cases to emphasize the challenge these flows present for computational methods and their importance to the aerospace community. Results of computations of two of these test cases, the NASA hump and the FAITH experiment, are presented. The computations were performed with the model-invariant hybrid LES-RANS formulation, implemented in the NASA code VULCAN-CFD. The model- invariant formulation employs gradual LES-RANS transitions and compensation for model variation to provide more accurate and efficient hybrid computations. Comparisons revealed that the LES-RANS transitions employed in these computations were sufficiently gradual that the compensating terms were unnecessary. Agreement with experiment was achieved only after reducing the turbulent viscosity to mitigate the effect of numerical dissipation. The stream-wise evolution of peak Reynolds shear stress was employed as a measure of turbulence dynamics in separated flows useful for evaluating computations.

Woodruff, Stephen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024 Summary: Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000-R Turbulence Model

This paper summarizes solutions submitted for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) test suite of the High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop. The goal of the workshop is to establish standards for verification of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches to simulations of steady and unsteady turbulent flows. The RANS verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model with quadratic constitutive relation and rotation correction, SA-neg-QCR2000-R. The verification test cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a three-dimensional subsonic flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in a tunnel, and a subsonic flow around a wing-body configuration developed for verification of solvers participating in the 5 𝑡 ℎ High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The turbulencemodel formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and reference solutions are described in detail. Solutions for the test cases are computed by seven established CFD solvers on adaptedand fixed-grid families using different discretization approaches. While some noticeable differences between solutions remain, the results achieved by contributing solvers show that different solutions computed for the same RANS model on different grid families can converge to a common limit with grid refinement. The apparent requirements for grid convergence are a well designed family of grids that provide sufficient resolution in important areas and a strong solver capable of deep iterative convergence on each grid. For each test case in the study, the variation between aerodynamic forces computed by different solvers on the finest grids of different families is less than 2%.

Boris Diskin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jet Cases for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource

Three new supersonic jet cases were built for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR). These cases were taken from the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test problem, which utilized data taken at NASA GRC consisting of non-intrusive measurements of jet plume velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. The three jet cases all used a Mach 1.63 axisymmetric nozzle: a heated jet for each at on-design conditions, a temperature-matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions are obtained using three established Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) codes: Wind-US, FUN3D, and VULCAN-CFD, all using the Menter Shear Stress Transport k- turbulence model with vorticity source term (SST-V). The NASA TMR requires at least two CFD codes yielding essentially identical results to certify that the approaches are verified, meaning that they solve the posed CFD equations as intended. The three codes generally provided very close agreement with each other for jet plume quantities, with the only exception being static temperature. This discrepancy was determined to be the result of whether or not turbulent kinetic energy was considered in the definition of total energy. Validation of the SST-V turbulence model for this case (its level of agreement/disagreement with experimental data) is also addressed.

turbulance↗
NASA NTRS2019

Sketch-To-Solution: An Exploration of Viscous CFD with Automatic Grids

Numerical simulation of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations has become a critical tool for the design of aerospace vehicles. However, the issues that affect the grid convergence of three dimensional RANS solutions are not completely understood, as documented in the AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop series. Grid adaption methods have the potential for increasing the automation and discretization error control of RANS solutions to impact the aerospace design and certification process. The realization of the CFD Vision 2030 Study includes automated management of errors and uncertainties of physics-based, predictive modeling that can set the stage for ensuring a vehicle is in compliance with a regulation or specification by using analysis without demonstration in flight test (i.e., certification or qualification by analysis). For example, the Cart3D inviscid analysis package has automated Cartesian cut-cell gridding with output-based error control. Fueled by recent advances in the fields of anisotropic grid adaptation, error estimation, and geometry modeling, a similar work flow is explored for viscous CFD simulations; where a CFD application engineer provides geometry, boundary conditions, and flow parameters, and the sketch-to-solution process yields a CFD simulation through automatic, error-based, grid adaptation.

Kleb, William L.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Implicit Large-Eddy Simulations of Hot and Cold Supersonic Jets in Loci-CHEM

Turbulence is a critical factor in most aero- and propulsion-related flows. For many years, the industry-standard approach to incorporating the effect of turbulence in computational fluid dynamics (CFD)calculations has been the Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) modeling approach. RANS implicitly time-averages turbulent motion, and models its effect on the mixing of species, momentum, and energy in a flow field. The approach is economical and often allows a CFD calculation to proceed to steady-state. However, it makes several simplifying assumptions, and the results will only be as good as the RANS turbulence model. Meanwhile, the last two decades have witnessed rapid and explosive growth in computational power, the development of CFD codes which scale well over thousands of processors, and the refinement of unstructured grid-generation tools which facilitate rapid surface and volume gridding of complex geometries. CFD engineering calculations of 108– 109 finite-volume cells have become routine. Thus, large eddy simulation (LES), which attempts to directly resolve the unsteady motion of the largest scales of turbulence, is increasingly of interest for many fluids engineering problems. Additionally, hybrid RANS-LES approaches such as Spalart’s Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), which attempt to marry the best strengths of both methods, are in active use and development. Because it seeks to accurately resolve the unsteady motion of the largest scales of turbulence, LES places certain requirements on the numerical method used to discretize and advance the Navier Stokes equations. In particular, LES requires high time accuracy and minimal intrinsic numerical dispersion and dissipation over a wide range of length scales.

C I Morris↗
NASA NTRS2011

Time Accurate CFD Simulations of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle in the Transonic Regime

Significant asymmetries in the fluid dynamics were calculated for some cases in the CFD simulations of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle through its abort trajectories. The CFD simulations were performed steady state and in three dimensions with symmetric geometries, no freestream sideslip angle, and motors firing. The trajectory points at issue were in the transonic regime, at 0 and +/- 5 angles of attack with the Abort Motors with and without the Attitude Control Motors (ACM) firing. In some of the cases the asymmetric fluid dynamics resulted in aerodynamic side forces that were large enough that would overcome the control authority of the ACMs. MSFC's Fluid Dynamics Group supported the investigation into the cause of the flow asymmetries with time accurate CFD simulations, utilizing a hybrid RANS-LES turbulence model. The results show that the flow over the vehicle and the subsequent interaction with the AB and ACM motor plumes were unsteady. The resulting instantaneous aerodynamic forces were oscillatory with fairly large magnitudes. Time averaged aerodynamic forces were essentially symmetric.

Rojahn, Josh↗
NASA NTRS2011

Time Accurate CFD Simulations of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle in the Transonic Regime

Significant asymmetries in the fluid dynamics were calculated for some cases in the CFD simulations of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle through its abort trajectories. The CFD simulations were performed steady state with symmetric boundary conditions and geometries. The trajectory points at issue were in the transonic regime, at 0 and 5 angles of attack with the Abort Motors with and without the Attitude Control Motors (ACM) firing. In some of the cases the asymmetric fluid dynamics resulted in aerodynamic side forces that were large enough that would overcome the control authority of the ACMs. MSFC s Fluid Dynamics Group supported the investigation into the cause of the flow asymmetries with time accurate CFD simulations, utilizing a hybrid RANS-LES turbulence model. The results show that the flow over the vehicle and the subsequent interaction with the AB and ACM motor plumes were unsteady. The resulting instantaneous aerodynamic forces were oscillatory with fairly large magnitudes. Time averaged aerodynamic forces were essentially symmetric.

Ruf, Joseph↗
NASA NTRS2014

Wind-US Results for the AIAA 2nd Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop

This presentation contains Wind-US results presented at the 2nd Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop. The workshop was organized by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Air Breathing Propulsion Systems Integration Technical Committee with the purpose of assessing the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics for air breathing propulsion applications. Attendees included representatives from government, industry, academia, and commercial software companies. Participants were encouraged to explore and discuss all aspects of the simulation process including the effects of mesh type and refinement, solver numerical schemes, and turbulence modeling. The first set of challenge cases involved computing the thrust and discharge coefficients for a 25deg conical nozzle for a range of nozzle pressure ratios between 1.4 and 7.0. Participants were also asked to simulate two cases in which the 25deg conical nozzle was bifurcated by a solid plate, resulting in vortex shedding (NPR=1.6) and shifted plume shock (NPR=4.0). A second set of nozzle cases involved computing the discharge and thrust coefficients for a convergent dual stream nozzle for a range of subsonic nozzle pressure ratios. The workshop committee also compared the plume mixing of these cases across various codes and models. The final test case was a serpentine inlet diffuser with an outlet to inlet area ratio of 1.52 and an offset of 1.34 times the inlet diameter. Boundary layer profiles, wall static pressure, and total pressure at downstream rake locations were examined.

Wind-US↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-31264-DND

Nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic models (TSD, Euler/Navier-Stokes (RANS), LES) are complex, expensive solutions. CFD used by industry mostly for steady/static loads cases. Limit Cycle Oscillation (LCO) is an equilibrium point of the nonlinear aeroelastic system induced by nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics (shock dynamics, separated flow) and/or nonlinear structural dynamics (geometric and material nonlinearities). While Euler solutions can generate LCOs, viscosity yields improved accuracy (shock strength, position). Most common aeroelastic CFD codes currently consist of nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics with linear structural dynamics. Van der Pol system is a simple example of LCOs.

Walter A Silva↗