Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “REACTOR MATERIALS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Standardization of accelerator irradiation procedures for simulation of neutron induced damage in reactor structural materials

Self-ion irradiation is widely used as a method to simulate neutron damage in reactor structural materials. Accelerator-based simulation of void swelling, however, introduces a number of neutron-atypical features which require careful data extraction and in some cases introduction of innovative irradiation techniques to alleviate these issues. We briefly summarize three such atypical features: defect imbalance effects, pulsed beam effects, and carbon contamination. The latter issue has just been recently recognized as being relevant to simulation of void swelling and is discussed here in greater detail. It is shown that carbon ions are entrained in the ion beam by Coulomb force drag and accelerated toward the target surface. Beam-contaminant interactions are modeled using molecular dynamics simulation. By applying a multiple beam deflection technique, carbon and other contaminants can be effectively filtered out, as demonstrated in an irradiation of HT-9 alloy by 3.5 MeV Fe ions.

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory↗
DOE OSTI2020

Irradiated Microstructure of Zorita Materials

Reactor baffle plate materials were harvested from the decommissioned Zorita nuclear power reactor after 38 years of service and were characterized with transmission electron microscope. The samples were Type 304 stainless steels and had been irradiated to 0.05, 16.9, ad 48.6 dpa. Faulted dislocation loops, voids, and irradiation-induced precipitates were observed in this material. While dislocation loops were the dominant irradiation defects for all samples, small voids and precipitates were also observed at 16.9 and 48.6 dpa, but not at 0.05 dpa. The size of dislocation loops increased with irradiation dose and saturated below 16.9 dpa. The loop density continued to increase between 16.9 and 48.6 dpa. For voids, both the density and mean size were small, and the volume swelling was negligibly small even at 48.6 dpa. In addition, carbides or G-phase precipitates were detected at 16.9 and 48.6 dpa, and a complex dose dependence was observed. A range of irradiation hardening was estimated at each dose, and the resulting yield strengths were consistent with the previous tensile results measured from the Halden and BOR-60 specimens.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Technical Gap Assessment for Materials and Component Integrity Issues for Molten Salt Reactors

Material selection and qualification is an important consideration for the deployment of molten salt reactors (MSRs). This report summarizes the most important materials issues that must be considered for licensing MSRs. Because of the variety of MSR designs under consideration, this report considers materials for both fluoride and chloride applications, with both fast and thermal neutron spectra.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Long-term Prediction of Emissivity of Structural materials for High Temperature Reactor Systems

The purpose of this research was to extend the recent short-term studies of emissivity of reactor materials performed independently at the University of Missouri and University of Wisconsin to tests aimed at longerterm predictions of emissivity. The University of Missouri measured hemispherical emissivity, which provides an integrated measurement, while the University of Wisconsin measured spectral emissivity (2 to 10 μm wavelength) from which the integrated quantity can be obtained. Hemispherical emissivity is needed for MELCOR, RELAP and FLUENT type heat transfer code calculations, while spectral emissivity is needed for a detailed Monte Carlo Transport theory computation of heat transfer and fundamental modeling verification. The objectives of the study were: Objective 1: Defining materials for long-term emissivity in cross-cutting reactor applications - procurement, preparation, and analyses of materials. Objective 2: High temperature materials testing in various environments and post-test surface analysis Objective 3: Independent hemispherical and spectral emissivity testing. Objective 4: Development of models to gain a predictive capability for long-term emissivity and application and validation in current RCCS research programs. The research has been performed at two universities over a four-year term with the participation of students, scientific staff, and faculty. The report describes progress in realizing the objectives, and the accomplishments at the two universities. There was considerable progress with respect to Objectives 1-3. The model development was redirected towards modeling of interrelationships between the spectra and hemispherical emissivities and uncertainty analysis of total hemispherical emissivity measurements.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

A simplified approach for creep damage and remaining life calculation for materials surveillance in advanced reactors

High temperature reactor materials will experience a combination of mechanical degradation caused by creep and fatigue and environmental degradation caused by neutron irradiation and, in some cases, exposure to corrosive coolants. A materials surveillance program is one option for ensuring the safe, reliable operation of key reactor components under these conditions. Such a program would monitor the degradation in key material properties over time, using this data to predict how changes in the material properties affect components performance. This could then be used to make plant operational decisions and support eventual plant license extensions. Past work de-scribes such a material surveillance program based on passively actuated mechanical test articles that impose creep-fatigue type loading on test materials driven only by changes in temperature, for example those experienced by components under standard operating cycles. This report focuses on two aspects of the proposed material surveillance program: how to design the test articles to mimic the mechanical response of the corresponding component and how to use ex-situ test data to deter-mine the amount of damaged experienced by the test article (and hence the corresponding compo-nent) in service. Specifically, this report derives and validated simplified methods for both tasks, replacing earlier, more complicated approaches based on simulating the test article response and finding the best specimen design or current damage via complex numerical optimization. The sim-plified methods for each task developed here can be implemented in spreadsheet software and are simple enough for practical use in future operating plants. This report derives the methods (one for sizing and two options for damage inference), verifies the simplified approaches versus more so-phisticated methods, and compares the results of applying the simplified methods to previous re-sults using the complex numerical optimization approach. The report also provides a worked sam-pled problem applying the simplified techniques to a realistic high temperature reactor component.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Adaptation of Crack Growth Detection Techniques to US Material Test Reactors

A key component in evaluating the ability of Light Water Reactors to operate beyond 60 years is characterizing the degradation of materials exposed to radiation and various water chemistries. Of particular concern is the response of reactor materials to Irradiation Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking (IASCC). Some materials testing reactors (MTRs) outside the U.S., such as the Halden Boiling Water Reactor (HBWR), have deployed a technique to measure crack growth propagation during irradiation. This technique incorporates a compact loading mechanism to stress the specimen during irradiation. A crack in the specimen is monitored using the Direct Current Potential Drop (DCPD) method. A project is underway to develop and demonstrate the performance of a similar type of test rig for use in U.S. MTRs. The first year of this three year project was devoted to designing, analyzing, fabricating, and bench top testing a mechanism capable of applying a controlled stress to specimens while they are irradiated in a pressurized water loop (simulating PWR reactor conditions). During the second year, the mechanism will be tested in autoclaves containing high pressure, high temperature water with representative water chemistries. In addition, necessary documentation and safety reviews for testing in a reactor environment will be completed. In the third year, the assembly will be tested in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR) and Post Irradiation Examinations (PIE) will be performed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2015

ADAPTATION OF CRACK GROWTH DETECTION TECHNIQUES TO US MATERIAL TEST REACTORS

A key component in evaluating the ability of Light Water Reactors to operate beyond 60 years is characterizing the degradation of materials exposed to radiation and various water chemistries. Of particular concern is the response of reactor materials to Irradiation Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking (IASCC). Some test reactors outside the United States, such as the Halden Boiling Water Reactor (HBWR), have developed techniques to measure crack growth propagation during irradiation. The basic approach is to use a custom-designed compact loading mechanism to stress the specimen during irradiation, while the crack in the specimen is monitored in-situ using the Direct Current Potential Drop (DCPD) method. In 2012 the US Department of Energy commissioned the Idaho National Laboratory and the MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory (MIT NRL) to take the basic concepts developed at the HBWR and adapt them to a test rig capable of conducting in-pile IASCC tests in US Material Test Reactors. The first two and half years of the project consisted of designing and testing the loader mechanism, testing individual components of the in-pile rig and electronic support equipment, and autoclave testing of the rig design prior to insertion in the MIT Reactor. The load was applied to the specimen by means of a scissor like mechanism, actuated by a miniature metal bellows driven by pneumatic pressure and sized to fit within the small in-core irradiation volume. In addition to the loader design, technical challenges included developing robust connections to the specimen for the applied current and voltage measurements, appropriate ceramic insulating materials that can endure the LWR environment, dealing with the high electromagnetic noise environment of a reactor core at full power, and accommodating material property changes in the specimen, due primarily to fast neutron damage, which change the specimen resistance without additional crack growth. The project culminated with an in-pile demonstration at the MIT Reactor. The test rig and associated support equipment were used to apply loads to a representative Compact Tensile specimen during one MITR operating cycle, while measuring crack growth using the DCPD method. Although the test period was short (approximately 70 days), and the accumulated neutron dose relatively small, successful operation of the test rig was demonstrated. The specimen was cycled more than 8000 times (more than would be typical for a long term IASCC test), which was sufficient to propagate a crack of over 2 mm.

Crack Growth↗
DOE OSTI2015

Calculation of neutron and gamma fluxes in support to the interpretation of measuring devices irradiated in the core periphery of the OSIRIS Material Testing Reactor

Technological irradiations carried out in material testing reactors (MTRs) are used to study the behavior of materials under irradiation conditions required by different types of nuclear power plants (NPPs). For MTRs, specific instrumentation is required for the experiment monitoring and for the characterization of irradiation conditions, in particular the flux of neutrons and photons. To measure neutron and photon flux in experimental locations, different sensors can be used, such as SPNDs (self-powered neutron detectors), SPGDs (self-powered gamma detectors) and ionization chambers. These sensors involve interactions producing ultimately a measurable electric current. Various sensors have been recently tested in the core periphery of the OSIRIS reactor (located at the CEA-Saclay center) in order to qualify their responses to the neutron and the photon flux. One of the key input data for this qualification is to have a relevant evaluation of neutron and gamma fluxes at the irradiation location. The objective of this work is to evaluate the neutron and the gamma flux in the core periphery of the OSIRIS reactor. With this intention, specific neutron-photonic three-dimensional calculations have been performed and are mainly based on the TRIPOLI-4{sup R} three-dimensional continuous-energy Monte Carlo code, developed by CEA (Saclay Center) and extensively validated against reactor dosimetry benchmarks. In the case of the OSIRIS reactor, TRIPOLI-4{sup R} code has been validated against experimental results based on neutron flux and nuclear heating measurements performed in ex-core and in-core experiments. In this work, simultaneous contribution of neutrons and gamma photons in the core periphery is considered using neutron-photon coupled transport calculations. Contributions of prompt and decay photons have been taken into account for the gamma flux calculation. Specific depletion codes are used upstream to provide the decay-gamma sources required by TRIPOLI-4 calculations. In this paper, the neutron-photonic calculation scheme used for the neutron-gamma flux evaluation in the OSIRIS core periphery will be first detailed. Then, a comparison of calculated and measured values of neutron and gamma fluxes will be introduced. (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Methodology comparison for gamma-heating calculations in material-testing reactors

The Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) is a Material-Testing Reactor (MTR) under construction in the south of France at CEA Cadarache (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission). It will typically host about 20 simultaneous irradiation experiments in the core and in the beryllium reflector. These experiments will help us better understand the complex phenomena occurring during the accelerated ageing of materials and the irradiation of nuclear fuels. Gamma heating, i.e. photon energy deposition, is mainly responsible for temperature rise in non-fuelled zones of nuclear reactors, including JHR internal structures and irradiation devices. As temperature is a key parameter for physical models describing the behavior of material, accurate control of temperature, and hence gamma heating, is required in irradiation devices and samples in order to perform an advanced suitable analysis of future experimental results. From a broader point of view, JHR global attractiveness as a MTR depends on its ability to monitor experimental parameters with high accuracy, including gamma heating. Strict control of temperature levels is also necessary in terms of safety. As JHR structures are warmed up by gamma heating, they must be appropriately cooled down to prevent creep deformation or melting. Cooling-power sizing is based on calculated levels of gamma heating in the JHR. Due to these safety concerns, accurate calculation of gamma heating with well-controlled bias and associated uncertainty as low as possible is all the more important. There are two main kinds of calculation bias: bias coming from nuclear data on the one hand and bias coming from physical approximations assumed by computer codes and by general calculation route on the other hand. The former must be determined by comparison between calculation and experimental data; the latter by calculation comparisons between codes and between methodologies. In this presentation, we focus on this latter kind of bias. Nuclear heating is represented by the physical quantity called absorbed dose (energy deposition induced by particle-matter interactions, divided by mass). Its calculation with Monte Carlo codes is possible but computationally expensive as it requires transport simulation of charged particles, along with neutrons and photons. For that reason, the calculation of another physical quantity, called KERMA, is often preferred, as KERMA calculation with Monte Carlo codes only requires transport of neutral particles. However, KERMA is only an estimator of the absorbed dose and many conditions must be fulfilled for KERMA to be equal to absorbed dose, including so-called condition of electronic equilibrium. Also, Monte Carlo computations of absorbed dose still present some physical approximations, even though there is only a limited number of them. Some of these approximations are linked to the way how Monte Carlo codes apprehend the transport simulation of charged particles and the productive and destructive interactions between photons, electrons and positrons. There exists a huge variety of electromagnetic shower models which tackle this topic. Differences in the implementation of these models can lead to discrepancies in calculated values of absorbed dose between different Monte Carlo codes. The magnitude of order of such potential discrepancies should be quantified for JHR gamma-heating calculations. We consequently present a two-pronged plan. In a first phase, we intend to perform compared absorbed dose / KERMA Monte Carlo calculations in the JHR. This way, we will study the presence or absence of electronic equilibrium in the different JHR structures and experimental devices and we will give recommendations for the choice of KERMA or absorbed dose when calculating gamma heating in the JHR. In a second phase, we intend to perform compared TRIPOLI4 / MCNP absorbed dose calculations in a simplified JHR-representative geometry. For this comparison, we will use the same nuclear data library for both codes (the European library JEFF3.1.1 and photon library EPDL97) so as to isolate the effects from electromagnetic shower models on absorbed dose calculation. This way, we hope to get insightful feedback on these models and their implementation in Monte Carlo codes. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2011

Development and experimental validation of a calculation scheme for nuclear heating evaluation in the core of the OSIRIS material testing reactor

The control of the temperature in material samples irradiated in a material testing reactor requires the knowledge of the nuclear heating caused by the energy deposition by neutrons and photons interacting in the irradiation device structures. Thus, a neutron-photonic three-dimensional calculation scheme has been developed to evaluate the nuclear heating in experimental devices irradiated in the core of the OSIRIS MTR reactor (CEA/Saclay Center). The aim is to obtain a predictive tool for the nuclear heating estimation in irradiation devices. This calculation scheme is mainly based on the TRIPOLI-4 three-dimensional continuous-energy Monte Carlo transport code, developed by CEA (Saclay Center). An experimental validation has been carried out on the basis of nuclear heating measurements performed in the OSIRIS core. After an overview of the experimental devices irradiated in the OSIRIS reactor, we present the calculation scheme and the first results of the experimental validation. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617

Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic deformation are not separable hence requiring a unified treatment with a viscoplastic model. Several bounding design methods in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B assume a decoupled treatment of creep and plasticity so establishing the boundary of the rate insensitive regimes for advanced reactor structural materials is necessary to set limits for the use of these bounding design methods. In the rate sensitive regime new bounding methods or fully inelastic analysis are required for the design of Division 5 Class A components. During temperature transients these components may operate in both the rate insensitive and rate sensitive regions, requiring computational models that can represent both types of behavior. This work establishes criteria for material rate sensitivity and develops a new composite method for modeling constitutive response in both the rate sensitive and rate insensitive regimes for three Division 5, Class A materials: 316H austenitic stainless steel, Grade 91 ferritic-martensitic steel, and Alloy 617, a nickel-based alloy. Both the criteria and new modeling strategy apply the concept of a normalized activation energy for thermally activated mechanisms developed by Kocks, Mecking, and co-workers. Specifically, this work quantifies the average rate sensitivity of the three materials from an experimental database collected from the literature. Additionally, this work develops rate sensitivity criteria and a complete model for each material that can transition between both deformation regimes and provides several example simulations demonstrating the accuracy of the models and the numerical performance of the composite modeling method.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of LEU fuels to support the high-performance reactors. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel. The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR. The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-licensed reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Impact Study on the Methodology used for Photon- Heating Determination in Material-Testing Reactors

Determination of photon heating by calculation is an important issue for the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR), the next international Material-Testing Reactor (MTR) under construction at CEA Cadarache research center in the south of France. Accurate knowledge of photon heating in structure materials and irradiation devices is necessary for JHR design and safety studies. In this paper, we quantify the impact of different photon-heating calculation routes by comparing absorbed dose and KERMA calculations (Kinetic Energy Released per Mass) from two different Monte Carlo codes, TRIPOLI-4.9{sup R} and MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code). These calculations are carried out in JHR-representative geometries with the nuclear-data library JEFF3.1.1 and the photon-data library EPDL97. Discrepancies amounting to up to 18% between absorbed dose and KERMA are found in JHR irradiation devices and are linked to charged-particle transport effects taking place in heterogeneous materials of small dimensions. In a JHR assembly cell, discrepancies of about 1% on photon KERMA and of about 3% on absorbed dose are highlighted between the two Monte Carlo codes. These latter discrepancies are small compared to typical sources of uncertainty for Monte Carlo calculation (for instance, nuclear data uncertainty) and are supposed to be due to differences in the processing of gamma-production data by neutron interactions and to differences in electromagnetic-shower models and implementation between the two codes. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of the high-performance reactors to operate with LEU fuels. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel.The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR.The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-regulated reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification.

Shokes, Tamara↗
DOE OSTI2025

Depletion Analysis of a Generic Fast Spectrum Molten Salt Reactor Supporting Material Control and Accounting (Rev.1)

Advanced reactors are of interest for a variety of use scenarios, and there are numerous advanced reactor designs being considered, which includes molten salt reactors (MSRs). Depending on the design, advanced reactors may have more extensive material control and accounting (MC&A) processes than current Light Water Reactor (LWR) designs. This project evaluated the use of Monte Carlo simulations for generating information that could guide the development of MC&A approaches for MSRs. In particular, the current capabilities of MCNP version 6.3 internally coupled with CINDER’90 were assessed for a fast spectrum liquid fueled MSR with online fission product removal and refueling. The fission product removal and refueling was performed in batches, and a Python wrapper was developed to control the simulations and update the fuel composition.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Deformation Mechanisms, Strain Localization, and Fracture in Highly Irradiated Austenitic Steels – Light-Water Reactor Core Materials – via Advanced inSEM Techniques

The present report describes the establishing of an advanced experimental approach – high-resolution digital image correlation or µDIC – for testing miniature irradiated specimens in the ORNL’s Low Activation Materials Development and Analysis (LAMDA) facility. As expected, the µDIC approach will allow for studying strain localization inside grains, for instance, during dislocation channel-grain boundary interaction processes. This information is of high importance for understanding degradation processes in irradiated austenitic steels – in-core materials of Light Water Reactors. The Level 4 report provides a brief introduction, lists materials designated for µDIC testing and delivered in LAMDA this FY, discusses methodical concerns and preliminary observations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗