Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “REYNOLDS NUMBER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1960

Effect of Reynolds Number on the Force and Pressure Distribution Characteristics of a Two-Dimensional Lifting Circular Cylinder

A two-dimensional lifting circular cylinder has been tested over a Mach number range from 0.011 to 0.32 and a Reynolds number range from 135,000 to 1,580,000 to determine the force and pressure distribution characteristics. Two flaps having chords of 0.37 and 6 percent of the cylinder diameter, respectively, and attached normal to the surface were used to generate lift. A third configuration which had 6-percent flaps 1800 apart was also investigated. All flaps were tested through a range of angular positions. The investigation also included tests of a plain cylinder without flaps. The lift coefficient showed a wide variation with Reynolds number for the 6-percent flap mounted on the bottom surface at the 50-percent-diameter station, varying from a low of about 0.2 at a Reynolds number of 165,000 to a high of 1.54 at a Reynolds number of 350,000 and then decreasing almost linearly to a value of 1.0 at a Reynolds number of 1,580,000. The pressure distribution showed that the loss of lift with Reynolds number above the critical was the result of the separation point moving forward on the upper surface. Pressure distributions on a plain cylinder also showed similar trends with respect to the separation point. The variation of drag coefficient with Reynolds number was in direct contrast to the lift coefficient with the minimum drag coefficient of 0.6 occurring at a Reynolds number of 360,000. At this point the lift-drag ratios were a maximum at a value of 2.54. Tests of a flap with a chord of 0.0037 diameter gave a lift coefficient of 0.85 at a Reynolds number of 520,000 with the same lift-drag ratio as the larger flap but the position of the flap for maximum lift was considerably farther forward than on the larger flap. Tests of two 6-percent flaps spaced 180 deg apart showed a change in the sign of the lift developed for angular positions of the flap greater than 132 deg at subcriti- cal Reynolds numbers. These results may find use in application to air- craft using forebody strakes. The drag coefficient developed by the flaps when normal to the relative airstream was approximately equal to that developed by a flat plate in a similar attitude.

Lockwood, Vernard E.↗
NASA NTRS1939

Preliminary Investigation of Certain Laminar-Flow Airfoils for Application at High Speeds and Reynolds Numbers

In order to extend the useful range of Reynolds numbers of airfoils designed to take advantage of the extensive laminar boundary layers possible in an air stream of low turbulence, tests were made of the NACA 2412-34 and 1412-34 sections in the NACA low-turbulence tunnel. Although the possible extent of the laminar boundary layer on these airfoils is not so great as for specially designed laminar-flow airfoils, it is greater than that for conventional airfoils, and is sufficiently extensive so that at Reynolds numbers above 11,000,000 the laminar region is expected to be limited by the permissible 'Reynolds number run' and not by laminar separation as is the case with conventional airfoils. Drag measurements by the wake-survey method and pressure-distribution measurements were made at several lift coefficients through a range of Reynolds numbers up to 11,400,000. The drag scale-effect curve for the NACA 1412-34 is extrapolated to a Reynolds number of 30,000,000 on the basis of theoretical calculations of the skin friction. Comparable skin-friction calculations were made for the NACA 23012. The results indicate that, for certain applications at moderate values of the Reynolds number, the NACA 1412-34 and 2412-34 airfoils offer some advantages over such conventional airfoils as the NACA 23012. The possibility of maintaining a more extensive laminar boundary layer on these airfoils should result in a small drag reduction, and the absence of pressure peaks allows higher speeds to be reached before the compressibility burble is encountered. At lower Reynold numbers, below about 10,000,000, these airfoils have higher drags than airfoils designed to operate with very extensive laminar boundary layers.

Jacobs, E.N.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Reynold-Number Effects on Near-Wall Turbulence

The Reynolds stress budget in a full developed turbulent channel flow for three Reynolds numbers (Re = 180,395,590) are used to investigate the near wall scaling of various turbulence quantities. We find that as the Reynolds number increases, the extent of the region where the production of the kinetic energy is equal to the dissipation increases. At the highest Reynolds number the region of equilibrium extends from y+ - 120 to y+ = 240. As the Reynolds number increases, we find that wall scaling collapses the budgets for the streamwise fluctuating component, but the budgets for the other two components show Reynolds number dependency.

Mansour, N. N.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Flow field and acoustic properties of a Mach number 0.9 jet at a low Reynolds number

An experimental study of the flow field and acoustic properties of a low Reynolds number M = 0.9 jet has been performed in a low pressure anechoic test chamber. The mean flow field was surveyed with a conventional pitot pressure probe and flow fluctuations were detected with a normal hot wire probe. Also, condenser microphone measurements were made in the acoustic field. The flow fluctuations within the jet were found to be dominated initially by a relatively discrete, large-scale, wave-like instability centered around a Strouhal number of 0.44. The axial wavelength of this instability was determined to be 1.45 jet diameters and its azimuthal character includes the n = 0 and n = plus or minus 1 modes. The growth of this instability coupled with its nonlinear breakdown are major contributors to the termination of the potential core region of the jet. The acoustic field of the jet, in contrast to the flow field, has a broad frequency spectrum with a peak amplitude near a Strouhal number of St = 0.2. The results indicate that a nonlinear mechanism involving the large-scale flow instability is responsible for a dominant portion of the noise generated from this jet.

Stromberg, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1946

Effect of Mach and Reynolds Numbers on Maximum Lift Coefficient

A knowledge of the effects of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the maximum lift coefficient is becoming of greater importance as the speeds and altitudes attainable by modern airplanes continually increase. Since most maximum-lift tests conducted to date have been either at full-scale Reynolds numbers and low Mach numbers or at high Mach numbers and small Reynolds numbers, very little is known about the inter-related effects of these two parameters on the maximum lift coefficient. In order to obtain quantitative information on these effects, flight tests were conducted at Ames Aeronautical Laboratory on six airplanes, three having NACA conventional airfoil sections, two having NACA low-drag sections, and the sixth having a North American Aviation - NACA compromise low-drag section. The results of these tests which cover a range of Mach numbers from 0.15 to 0.72 and of Reynolds numbers from 4,400,000 to 19,500,000 are assembled, together with a considerable quantity of pertinent wind-tunnel data, and analyzed in the present report. From this analysis, general conclusions have been reached indicating the manner in which the maximum lift coefficient is influenced by variations of Mach and Reynolds numbers.

AIRPLANES - BELL P-63A (AMER ) FLIGHT TESTS↗
NASA NTRS2002

Investigation of Transonic Reynolds Number Scaling on a Twin-Engine Transport

This paper discusses Reynolds number scaling for aerodynamic parameters including force and wing pressure measurements. A full-span model of the Boeing 777 configuration was tested at transonic conditions in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at Reynolds numbers (based on mean aerodynamic chord) from 3.0 to 40.0 million. Data was obtained for a tail-off configuration both with and without wing vortex generators and flap support fairings. The effects of aeroelastics were separated from Reynolds number effects by varying total pressure and temperature independently. Data from the NTF at flight Reynolds number are compared with flight data to establish the wind tunnel/flight correlation. The importance of high Reynolds number testing and the need for developing a process for transonic Reynolds number scaling is discussed. This paper also identifies issues that need to be worked for Boeing Commercial to continue to conduct future high Reynolds number testing in the NTF.

Curtin, M. M.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Turbulence Model Comparisons and Reynolds Number Effects Over a High-Speed Aircraft at Transonic Speeds

This paper gives the results of a grid study, a turbulence model study, and a Reynolds number effect study for transonic flows over a high-speed aircraft using the thin-layer, upwind, Navier-Stokes CFL3D code. The four turbulence models evaluated are the algebraic Baldwin-Lomax model with the Degani-Schiff modifications, the one-equation Baldwin-Barth model, the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model, and Menter's two-equation Shear-Stress-Transport (SST) model. The flow conditions, which correspond to tests performed in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF), are a Mach number of 0.90 and a Reynolds number of 30 million based on chord for a range of angle-of-attacks (1 degree to 10 degrees). For the Reynolds number effect study, Reynolds numbers of 10 and 80 million based on chord were also evaluated. Computed forces and surface pressures compare reasonably well with the experimental data for all four of the turbulence models. The Baldwin-Lomax model with the Degani-Schiff modifications and the one-equation Baldwin-Barth model show the best agreement with experiment overall. The Reynolds number effects are evaluated using the Baldwin-Lomax with the Degani-Schiff modifications and the Baldwin-Barth turbulence models. Five angles-of-attack were evaluated for the Reynolds number effect study at three different Reynolds numbers. More work is needed to determine the ability of CFL3D to accurately predict Reynolds number effects.

Rivers, Melissa B.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Support-sting interference on boattail pressure drag for Reynolds numbers up to 70 x 10 to the 6th

A model was tested in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel to investigate the effects of Reynolds number on boattail pressure drag for a variety of sting shapes. The boattail pressure drag for constant Mach number increased linearly with Reynolds number over the Reynolds number range tested. The data indicated that, as the disturbance produced by the sting on the boattail increased, the boattail pressure drag became less sensitive to Reynolds number change. Also, it was found that the model base pressure versus Reynolds number curve reached a plateau within the Reynolds number range examined.

Gloss, B. B.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Effects of Atwood and Reynolds numbers on the evolution of buoyancy-driven homogeneous variable-density turbulence

The evolution of buoyancy-driven homogeneous variable-density turbulence (HVDT) at Atwood numbers up to 0.75 and large Reynolds numbers is studied by using high-resolution direct numerical simulations. To help understand the highly non-equilibrium nature of buoyancy-driven HVDT, the flow evolution is divided into four different regimes based on the behaviour of turbulent kinetic energy derivatives. The results show that each regime has a unique type of dependence on both Atwood and Reynolds numbers. It is found that the local statistics of the flow based on the flow composition are more sensitive to Atwood and Reynolds numbers compared to those based on the entire flow. It is also observed that, at higher Atwood numbers, different flow features reach their asymptotic Reynolds-number behaviour at different times. The energy spectrum defined based on the Favre fluctuations momentum has less large-scale contamination from viscous effects for variable-density flows with constant properties, compared to other forms used previously. The evolution of the energy spectrum highlights distinct dynamical features of the four flow regimes. Thus, the slope of the energy spectrum at intermediate to large scales evolves from -7/3 to -1 , as a function of the production-to-dissipation ratio. The classical Kolmogorov spectrum emerges at intermediate to high scales at the highest Reynolds numbers examined, after the turbulence starts to decay. Finally, the similarities and differences between buoyancy-driven HVDT and the more conventional stationary turbulence are discussed and new strategies and tools for analysis are proposed.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS2000

Reynolds Number Effects on the Performance of Lateral Control Devices

The influence of Reynolds number on the performance of outboard spoilers and ailerons was investigated on a generic subsonic transport configuration in the National Transonic Facility over a chord Reynolds number range 41 from 3x10(exp 6) to 30xl0(exp 6) and a Mach number range from 0.50 to 0.94, Spoiler deflection angles of 0, 10, 15, and 20 deg and aileron deflection angles of -10, 0, and 10 deg were tested. Aeroelastic effects were minimized by testing at constant normalized dynamic pressure conditions over intermediate Reynolds number ranges. Results indicated that the increment in rolling moment due to spoiler deflection generally becomes more negative as the Reynolds number increases from 3x10(exp 6) to 22x10(exp 6) with only small changes between Reynolds numbers of 22x10(exp 6) and 30x10(exp 6). The change in the increment in rolling moment coefficient with Reynolds number for the aileron deflected configuration is generally small with a general trend of increasing magnitude with increasing Reynolds number.

Mineck, Raymond E.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Force and Moment Analysis for the High Reynolds Number Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at Ascent Conditions

A high Reynolds number test of the Space Launch System was performed at the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF). The objective of the test was to use the cryogenic testing capabilities of the NTF to acquire data over the largest range of Reynolds numbers possible with a specific focus on the Reynolds numbers closest to flight conditions. The test was performed at Mach numbers from 0.50 to 0.95 which corresponds to the ascent portion of flight for the SLS vehicle. Force and moment data showed that pitching and yawing moment were sensitive to Reynolds number effects over the full range of Mach and Reynolds numbers tested. Axial force also showed sensitivity to Reynolds number with the largest differences seen between Mach 0.50 to 0.90. Surface pressure data showed the highest sensitivity to Reynolds number in the vicinity of the solid rocket booster forward attach region.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Force and Moment Analysis for the High Reynolds Number Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at Ascent Conditions

A high Reynolds number test of the Space Launch System was performed at the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF). The objective of the test was to use the cryogenic testing capabilities of the NTF to acquire data over the largest range of Reynolds numbers possible with a specific focus on the Reynolds numbers closest to flight conditions. The test was performed at Mach numbers from 0.50 to 0.95, which corresponds to the ascent portion of flight for the SLS vehicle. Force and moment data showed that pitching and yawing moment were sensitive to Reynolds number effects over the full range of Mach and Reynolds numbers tested. Axial force also showed sensitivity to Reynolds number with the largest differences seen between Mach 0.50 to 0.90. Surface pressure data showed the highest sensitivity to Reynolds number in the vicinity of the solid rocket booster forward attach region.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRS1979

Peak Strouhal frequency of subsonic jet noise as a function of Reynolds number

The narrowband spectral characteristics of the acoustic field generated by subsonic jets at low Reynolds numbers were studied in terms of a dimensionless power spectral density. It was found that the variation of the sound magnitude of the spectrum is an increasing function of the Reynolds number. The maximum level of the spectrum is not a linear function of the Reynolds number. The spectra are insensitive to Reynolds number above a critical value of about 100,000. Up to Reynolds number of this magnitude, the peak Strouhal frequency observed at 30 deg emission angle is identical with that at 90 deg for any exit Mach number. At higher Reynolds number the peak Strouhal number increases with increasing emission angle. The peak Strouhal number was found to be about 0.2, which is in agreement with previous findings that a few discrete modes at a Strouhal number of around 0.2 in low Reynolds number supersonic jets are powerful noise generators.

Yamamoto, K.↗
NASA NTRS1982

The cryogenic wind tunnel for high Reynolds number testing

An improved way to increase the Reynolds numbers capability of wind tunnels has been developed at the Langley Research Center. Cooling the test gas to cryogenic temperatures by spraying liquid nitrogen into the tunnel circuit increases Reynolds number with no increase in dynamic pressure and a reduction in drive power. In addition, the ability to vary the temperature of the test gas independently of pressure and Mach number allows for the first time the independent determination of Reynolds number, Mach number, and aeroelastic effects. A new fan-driven transonic cryogenic tunnel being built at the Langley Research Center will provide an order of magnitude increase in Reynolds number capability over existing transonic tunnels in the United States when it is completed later this year.

Kilgore, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Comments on Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded shear layers

The effect of Reynolds number on the structure of turbulent boundary layers and channel flows is discussed. Published data are reexamined in light of the following questions: (1) does the boundary layer turbulence structure change after the well known Reynolds number limit viz, when Re(theta) is greater than 6000?; (2) is it possible to disturb a high Reynolds number flat plate turbulent boundary layer near the wall such that the recovery length is O(100 delta)?; and (3) how close is the numerically simulated low Reynolds number flat plate turbulence structure to that observed experimentally? The turbulence structure appears to change continuously with Reynolds number virtually throughout the bounday layer and sometimes in unexpected manners at high Reynolds numbers.

Bandyopadhyay, Promode R.↗
NASA NTRS2001

Reynolds Number Effects on the Performance of Ailerons and Spoilers (Invited)

The influence of Reynolds number on the performance of outboard spoilers and ailerons was investigated on a generic subsonic transport configuration in the National Transonic Facility over a chord Reynolds number range from 3 to 30 million and a Mach number range from 0.70 to 0.94. Spoiler deflection angles of 0, 10, and 20 degrees and aileron deflection angles of -10, 0, and 10 degrees were tested. Aeroelastic effects were minimized by testing at constant normalized dynamic pressure conditions over intermediate Reynolds number ranges. Results indicated that the increment in rolling moment due to spoiler deflection generally becomes more negative as the Reynolds number increases from 3 x 10(exp 6) to 22 x 10 (exp 6) with only small changes between Reynolds numbers of 22 x 10(exp 6) and 30 x 10(exp 6). The change in the increment in rolling moment coefficient with Reynolds number for the aileron deflected configuration is generally small with a general trend of increasing magnitude with increasing Reynolds number.

Mineck, R. E.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Critical Evaluation of the Conference on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics at the University of Notre Dame

As a result of the continued interest in designing efficient low Reynolds number systems, the University of Notre Dame decided to organize a Conference on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics in June 1989. This Conference followed the 1986 International Conference in London by about three years and the first Conference on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Aerodynamics at Notre Dame in 1985 by four years. The emphasis of the 1989 Conference was to assess the state-of-the-art in the chord Reynolds number range from about 10,000 to about 700,000. Applications of current interest include high altitude remotely or robotically piloted vehicles, ultra-light, and human powered vehicles as well as mini-RPVs at low altitudes. Other examples include small axial-flow fans used to cool electronic equipment in the unpressurized sections of high-altitude aircraft and gas turbine blades. High Reynolds number airfoil design strategies attempt to control the onset and development of turbulent boundary layers. This is difficult at low Reynolds numbers because of the increased stability of attached laminar boundary layers. Therefore, laminar separation is common even at small angles of attack at low Reynolds numbers. Under these conditions, the development of a turbulent boundary layer usually depends on the formation of a transitional separation bubble. The purpose of this Conference on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics was to bring together those researchers who have been active in areas closely related to this subject. It is clear from the papers presented that a great deal of progress has been made in understanding the occurrence and behavior of laminar separation and transition as well as their overall effect on the performance of airfoils at low chord Reynolds numbers. This progress has brought us closer to our goal of improving analytical methods for the design and evaluation of a variety of practical applications.

Mueller, Thomas J.↗