Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SUPPRESSOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

Subsonic and supersonic jet flow and acoustic characteristics and supersonic suppressors

To study the similarities and differences between subsonic and supersonic jets, velocity and impact pressure fluctuations were determined along the axis over a jet Mach number range of 0.6 to 1.4 for a 2 in. diameter convergent nozzle and for a one inch diameter jet flow. Static pressure distribution fluctuations due to shear and turbulence in the jet flow for subsonic and supersonic jets were related to acoustic radiation to the far field. Also determined were flow and acoustic characteristics of a single shroud, and multiple shroud tube and shroud suppressors for supersonic and subsonic exhaust velocities. A compressor consisting of 191 tubes and 191 shrouds decreased the primary Mach number drastically for both jet Mach numbers of 1.4 and 0.7; rms impact and static pressure fluctuations on the axis were also reduced from values existing for an equivalent area single nozzle.

Nagamatsu, H. T.↗

Flight velocity influence on jet noise of conical ejector, annular plug and segmented suppressor nozzles

An F106 aircraft with a J85-13 engine was used for static and flight acoustic and aerodynamic tests of a conical ejector, an unsuppressed annular plug, and three segmented suppressor nozzles. Static 100 ft. arc data, corrected for influences other than jet noise, were extrapolated to a 300 ft. sideline for comparison to 300 ft. altitude flyover data at M = 0.4. Data at engine speeds of 80 to 100% (max dry) static and 88 to 100% flight are presented. Flight velocity influence on noise is shown on peak OASPL and PNL, PNL directivity, EPNL and chosen spectra. Peak OASPL and PNL plus EPNL suppression levels are included showing slightly lower flight than static peak PNL suppression but greater EPNL than peak PNL suppression. Aerodynamic performance was as anticipated and closely matched model work for the 32-spoke nozzle.

Brausch, J. F.↗

Flyover and static tests to investigate external flow effect on jet noise from nonsuppressor and suppressor exhaust nozzles

The effect of external air flowing across exhaust nozzles on the jet noise characteristics of supersonic transport aircraft at high takeoff speeds was investigated. A series of flyover and static tests were conducted using an F-106B aircraft modified with two underwing nacelles each containing a calibrated J85-GE-13 turbojet engine. Comparison of flyover and static data indicated that external flow reduces the noise of an auxiliary inlet ejector nozzle. An unsuppressed plug nozzle was not affected while the plug suppressor configurations were not as effective in flight.

Burley, R. R.↗

Subsonic and supersonic jets and supersonic suppressor characteristics

Convergent and parallel flow nozzles were used with room temperature air to investigate the flow and acoustic characteristics over a Mach number range of 0.6 to 1.5. For subsonic jets the maximum sound pressure levels occurred at 19.1 from the axis and the sound pressure level decreased monotonically with increasing angle. But for supersonic jets the sound pressure was nearly constant over most of angular positions. The power spectra for subsonic jets were similar with the peak occurring at 4 KHz and for a Mach 1.4 jet the peak occurred at 5 KHz. Near field sound pressure level distributions were quite similar for subsonic jets, but for supersonic jets the distributions were quite different. Mean and fluctuating velocity contours were determined for a convergent nozzle with the impact and piezoelectric impact pressure gage probes for Mach numbers of 0.6 to 1.4. A supersonic suppressor of 191 tubes and shrouds was investigated at Mach numbers of 1.4 and 0.7.

Nagamatsu, H. T.↗

Subsonic and supersonic jets and supersonic suppressor characteristics.

The flow and acoustic characteristics over a Mach number range of 0.6 to 1.5 were determined for convergent and parallel flow nozzles with room temperature air. Mean velocity and fluctuating impact and static pressure distributions were investigated. Near- and far-field acoustic measurements were obtained, and overall sound power levels were compared with subsonic theory of Lighthill and supersonic theory of Nagamatsu and Horvay. Flow and acoustic characteristics of single and multiple shroud supersonic suppressors were studied. With 191 tubes and shrouds the overall sound power level for a Mach 1.4 jet was reduced 15.3 and 20.5 db respectively.

Nagamatsu, H. T.↗

Noise suppressor

Suppressor reduces noise propagated through ducts. It provides high attenuation in given duct length. Entire device forms acoustic trap which utilizes reflective elements on ends to direct sound energy into sound-dissipating element in center. Device achieves large suppression by utilizing interactive effects of different suppression devices.

Zorumski, W. E.↗

Development of acoustically lined ejector technology for multitube jet noise suppressor nozzles by model and engine tests over a wide range of jet pressure ratios and temperatures

An experimental program comprising model nozzle and full-scale engine tests was undertaken to acquire parametric data for acoustically lined ejectors applied to primary jet noise suppression. Ejector lining design technology and acoustical scaling of lined ejector configurations were the major objectives. Ground static tests were run with a J-75 turbojet engine fitted with a 37-tube, area ratio 3.3 suppressor nozzle and two lengths of ejector shroud (L/D = 1 and 2). Seven ejector lining configurations were tested over the engine pressure ratio range of 1.40 to 2.40 with corresponding jet velocities between 305 and 610 M/sec. One-fourth scale model nozzles were tested over a pressure ratio range of 1.40 to 4.0 with jet total temperatures between ambient and 1088 K. Scaling of multielement nozzle ejector configurations was also studied using a single element of the nozzle array with identical ejector lengths and lining materials. Acoustic far field and near field data together with nozzle thrust performance and jet aerodynamic flow profiles are presented.

Atvars, J.↗

Suppressor nozzle and airframe noise measurements during flyover of a modified F106B aircraft with underwing nacelles

The effect of flight velocity on the jet noise and thrust of a 104-tube suppressor nozzle was investigated using an F-106B delta wing aircraft modified to carry two underwing nacelles each containing a turbojet engine. The nozzle was mounted behind one of the nacelles. Flight velocity had a large adverse effect on thrust and a small adverse effect on suppression when correlated with relative jet velocity. The clean airframe noise of the aircraft was measured at Mach 0.4 and was compared with that predicted from an empirical expression. The 83 db measured value was considerably below the predicted value.

Burley, R. R.↗

Noise suppressor

A tuned noise suppressor is described consisting of annular acoustically porous elements for incorporation into the inlet and exhaust ducts of turbofan engines. The apparatus uses sound wave absorption, reflection, and incompatibility for achieving high noise reduction in the short distance. In addition, it has a duct of uniform inner diameter which does not block the duct flow.

Zorumski, W. E.↗

Test of acoustic tone source and propulsion performance of C8A Buffalo suppressor nozzle

Results are presented for a static acoustic and propulsion performance ground test conducted at the Boeing hot nozzle facility on the C8A Buffalo noise suppressor nozzle. Various methods to remove a nozzle-associated 2000-Hz tone are evaluated. Results of testing this rectangular-array lobed nozzle for propulsion performance and acoustic directivity are reported. Recommendations for future nozzle modifications and further testing are included. Appendix A contains the test plan. Appendix B presents the test log. Appendix C contains plots of the one-third octave sound pressure levels recorded during the test. Appendix D describes the acoustic data recording and reduction systems. The performance data is tabulated in Appendix E.

Marrs, C. C.↗

Suppressor nozzle and airframe noise measurements during flyover of a modified F106B aircraft with underwing nacelles

The effect of flight velocity on the jet noise and thrust of a 104-tube suppressor nozzle was investigated using an F-106B delta wing aircraft modified to carry two underwing nacelles each containing a turbojet engine. The nozzle was mounted behind one of the nacelles. Flight velocity had a large adverse effect on thrust and a small adverse effect on suppression when correlated with relative jet velocity. The clean airframe noise of the aircraft was measured at Mach 0.4 and was compared with that predicted from an empirical expression. The 83-dB measured value was considerably below the predicted value.

Burley, R. R.↗

Static and wind tunnel near-field/far-field jet noise measurements from model scale single-flow baseline and suppressor nozzles. Volume 1: Noise source locations and extrapolation of static free-field jet noise data

A test was conducted in the Boeing Large Anechoic Chamber to determine static jet noise source locations of six baseline and suppressor nozzle models, and establish a technique for extrapolating near field data into the far field. The test covered nozzle pressure ratios from 1.44 to 2.25 and jet velocities from 412 to 594 m/s at a total temperature of 844 K.

Jaeck, C. L.↗

Inlet noise suppressor design method based upon the distribution of acoustic power with mode cutoff ratio

A liner design for noise suppressors with outer wall treatment such as in an engine inlet is presented which potentially circumvents the problems of resolution in modal measurement. The method is based on the fact that the modal optimum impedance and the maximum possible sound power attenuation at this optimum can be expressed as functions of cutoff ratio alone. Modes with similar cutoff ratios propagate similarly in the duct and in addition propagate similarly to the far field. Thus there is no need to determine the acoustic power carried by these modes individually, and they can be grouped together as one entity. With the optimum impedance and maximum attenuation specified as functions of cutoff ratio, the off-optimum liner performance can be estimated using an approximate attenuation equation.

Rice, E. J.↗

The effect of forward speed on J85 engine noise from suppressor nozzles as measured in the NASA-Ames 40- by 80-foot wind tunnel

An investigation to determine the effect of forward speed on the exhaust noise from a conical ejector nozzle and three suppressor nozzles mounted behind a J85 engine was performed in a 40- by 80-foot wind tunnel. The nozzles were tested at three engine power settings and at wind tunnel forward speeds up to 91 m/sec (300 ft/sec). In addition, outdoor static tests were conducted to determine (1) the differences between near field and far field measurements, (2) the effect of an airframe on the far field directivity of each nozzle, and (3) the relative suppression of each nozzle with respect to the baseline conical ejector nozzle. It was found that corrections to near field data are necessary to extrapolate to far field data and that the presence of the airframe changed the far field directivity as measured statically. The results show that the effect of forward speed was to reduce the noise from each nozzle more in the area of peak noise, but the change in forward quadrant noise was small or negligible. A comparison of wind tunnel data with available flight test data shows good agreement.

Atencio, A., Jr.↗

Static and wind tunnel near-field/far field jet noise measurements from model scale single-flow baseline and suppressor nozzles. Volume 2: Forward speed effects

A model scale flight effects test was conducted in the 40 by 80 foot wind tunnel to investigate the effect of aircraft forward speed on single flow jet noise characteristics. The models tested included a 15.24 cm baseline round convergent nozzle, a 20-lobe and annular nozzle with and without lined ejector shroud, and a 57-tube nozzle with a lined ejector shroud. Nozzle operating conditions covered jet velocities from 412 to 640 m/s at a total temperature of 844 K. Wind tunnel speeds were varied from near zero to 91.5 m/s. Measurements were analyzed to (1) determine apparent jet noise source location including effects of ambient velocity; (2) verify a technique for extrapolating near field jet noise measurements into the far field; (3) determine flight effects in the near and far field for baseline and suppressor nozzles; and (4) establish the wind tunnel as a means of accurately defining flight effects for model nozzles and full scale engines.

Jaeck, C. L.↗

An experimental study on porous plug jet noise suppressor

This paper contains a description of the configuration and operating characteristics of a porous center body plug nozzle jet noise suppressor that provides shock free flow over a wide range of nozzle pressure ratios. The elimination of the 'shock associated noise' and 'screeching' is accomplished by equalization of pressure along the jet axis. Because of the geometrical features of the porous plug nozzle, shear noise reductions are also observed at all subsonic and supersonic flow conditions tested. Additional benefits are the localization of the noise sources in the flow and the reduction of the spatial scale of the structure of the jet flow, which enhance the performance of an acoustic shield or baffle.

Maestrello, L.↗

Comparison of inlet suppressor data with approximate theory based on cutoff ratio

Inlet suppressor far-field directivity suppression was quantitatively compared with that predicted using an approximate linear design and evaluation method based upon mode cutoff ratio. The experimental data was obtained using a series of cylindrical point-reacting inlet liners on a YF102 engine. The theoretical prediction program is based upon simplified sound propagation concepts derived from exact calculations. These indicate that all of the controlling phenomenon can be approximately correlated with mode cutoff ratio which itself is intimately related to the angles of propagation within the duct. The theory-data comparisons are intended to point out possible deficiencies in the approximate theory which may be corrected. After all theoretical refinements are made, then empirical corrections can be applied.

Rice, E. J.↗

Comparison of inlet suppressor data with approximate theory based on cutoff ratio

This paper represents the initial quantitative comparison of inlet suppressor far-field directivity suppression with that predicted using an approximate liner design and evaluation method based upon mode cutoff ratio. The experimental data was obtained using a series of cylindrical point-reacting inlet liners on an Avco-Lycoming YF102 engine. The theoretical prediction program is based upon simplified sound propagation concepts derived from exact calculations. These indicate that all of the controlling phenomenon can be approximately correlated with mode cutoff ratio which itself is intimately related to the angles of propagation within the duct. The objective of the theory-data comparisons is to point out possible deficiencies in the approximate theory which may be corrected. After all theoretical refinements have been made, then empirical corrections can be applied.

Rice, E. J.↗