Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Scale-Resolving”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

58 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HLPW-5: Overview and Workshop Summary

The Fifth AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop was held with the goal of assessing the numerical prediction capability of current-generation computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology for swept, medium/high-aspect-ratio wings in high-lift configurations. A key aspect of this endeavor was the use of Technology Focus Groups (TFG), which included both mesh generation and flow-solver experts working together to accelerate advancements for their particular CFD methodology, by addressing key questions of importance prior to the workshop. The high-lift version of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM-HL) configuration was the focus of this workshop, and was used for three unique test cases. Wind-tunnel data were available for comparison for one of the test cases. Altogether, 365 datasets of CFD results were submitted by 47 teams, with 41 teams contributing to the multiple configurations of Case 1, 40 to Case 2, and 18 to Case 3. This paper provides a high-level summary of the results and conclusions from the workshop. As concluded from past workshops, fixed-grid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods continued to be inaccurate and inconsistent for high-lift flows near maximum lift. However, application of mesh-adaptation technology helped to achieve improved consistency. Scale-resolving methods appeared most promising for predicting high-lift flow physics, particularly at maximum lift. Best practices for these methods were refined over the course of the workshop and new challenges were identified.

Adam M Clark↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation Experiments for Turbulent Separation over an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution

Historically, the flow physics involved with most turbulent separated flows have presented fundamental challenges to validating numerical approaches. As recognized by the CFD Vision 2030 study commissioned by NASA, validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and other scale-resolving methods for turbulent separated flow requires data from advanced, high-fidelity experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. In accordance with this effort, a new test platform, referred to as the NASA Axisymmetric Afterbody, was designed to obtain detailed measurements of the flow field undergoing a smooth, adverse pressure gradient induced separation for a fixed Reynolds number, Re = 180,000. The parametric body offers a range of flow states progressing from fully attached, to incipient separation, and finally to small-scale separated flow based on variable afterbody geometries. In an initial effort to evaluate RANS turbulence model capabilities, the present configurations of the axisymmetric model host a mild adverse pressure gradient over the contoured boattail section, inducing incipient turbulent separation, as well as a slightly larger adverse pressure gradient, inducing a small-scale region of turbulent separation. Experiments include steady pressure measurements and 2-D PIV to provide the preliminary dataset for simulation studies, which examine the effect of variable grid domains and RANS turbulence models. This is done in an effort to understand and evaluate the critical variability between solutions for the present model configurations. Results indicate potential discrepancies may be due to the effect of the square tunnel test section walls, relatively large blockage ratio, and slight variability in reference parameters. Ongoing work will focus on higher fidelity experimental campaigns to obtain surface flow visualizations and Stereo-Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) to deliver higher spatial resolution of the three-dimensional flow field to aid turbulence modelers.

Validation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Capabilities and Improvements to the High-Order Glenn Flux Reconstruction Code

The Glenn Flux Reconstruction (GFR) code is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code under development at NASA Glenn Research Center. GFR is based on the high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method and provides a large-eddy simulation (LES) capability that is both accurate and efficient for complex aeropropulsion flows. Three significant new capabilities have been added to the code that improve its performance and functionality. First, a variety of explicit Runge-Kutta methods, including some with adaptive time stepping, were added to GFR with two methods offering a 33% improvement in time-to-solution. Second, GFR can now utilize fully unstructured, mixed-element meshes to more easily facilitate the grid generation process for complex geometries. Finally, a rotating reference frame capability has been added to GFR for solving rotating turbomachinery problems. A selection of results demonstrating these new capabilities are presented in this work. The Taylor-Green vortex problem is used to verify the new unstructured capability by showing similar accuracy and resolution for all element types. LES of the Turbulent Heat Flux Phase III (THX3) experiment with comparison to another high-order LES code and a popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code demonstrates the accuracy of the code for complex aeropropulsion flows. Finally, LES of a spacecraft cabin ventilation fan shows the ability of GFR to efficiently establish a fan performance map and identify operating points for further analysis at high orders of accuracy.

High-Order Methods↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Capabilities and Improvements to the High-Order Glenn Flux Reconstruction Code

The Glenn Flux Reconstruction (GFR) code is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code under development at NASA Glenn Research Center. GFR is based on the high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method and provides a large-eddy simulation (LES) capability that is both accurate and efficient for complex aeropropulsion flows. Three significant new capabilities have been added to the code that improve its performance and functionality. First, a variety of explicit Runge-Kutta methods, including some with adaptive time stepping, were added to GFR with two methods offering a 33% improvement in time-to-solution. Second, GFR can now utilize fully unstructured, mixed-element meshes to more easily facilitate the grid generation process for complex geometries. Finally, a rotating reference frame capability has been added to GFR for solving rotating turbomachinery problems. A selection of results demonstrating these new capabilities are presented in this work. The Taylor-Green vortex problem is used to verify the new unstructured capability by showing similar accuracy and resolution for all element types. LES of the Turbulent Heat Flux Phase III (THX3) experiment with comparison to another high-order LES code and a popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code demonstrates the accuracy of the code for complex aeropropulsion flows. Finally, LES of a spacecraft cabin ventilation fan shows the ability of GFR to efficiently establish a fan performance map and identify operating points for further analysis at high orders of accuracy.

Direct Numerical Simulations↗