Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Shrub biomass”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

56 records · Page 4

Integrating Characteristic Arctic Vegetation in a Land Surface Model Improves Representation of Carbon Dynamics Across a Tundra Landscape: Modeling Archive

This modeling archive is in support of the Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments in the Arctic (NGEE Arctic) publication "Integrating Characteristic Arctic Vegetation in a Land Surface Model Improves Representation of Carbon Dynamics Across a Tundra Landscape", by Murphy et al. (2025). This archive contains model input files and outputs from landscape-scale simulations conducted using ELM, the land model component of the Department of Energy’s Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM), at the Council NGEE Arctic field site (Council Road mile marker 71) on Alaska’s Seward Peninsula. Input data and model output from two sets of ELM simulations are provided. The first set of simulations were conducted with the two default ELM Arctic plant functional types (PFTs; broadleaf deciduous boreal shrub and a C3 grass) and the second set of simulations were conducted with a set of nine Arctic-specific PFTs including nonvascular mosses and lichens, graminoids, forbs, evergreen dwarf shrubs, three height classes of deciduous shrubs (dwarf, low, and low to tall), and deciduous alder shrubs (Sulman et al., 2021). Parameter names and major parameter changes in the Arctic-specific PFT configuration are described in Sulman et al. (2021) and archived in the Sulman et al. (2021) dataset (see below). Simulations were spatially explicit, covering an approximately 6.4X3.3 km domain at the Council site with a spatial resolution of 100 m for a total of 2,112 simulated grid cells under each ELM PFT configuration. The modeling archive contains meteorological forcing (seven *.nc files and one *.txt file), a domain definition file (one *.nc files), land surface configuration files (two *.nc files), parameter files (two *.nc files), annual ELM output files spanning 1980-2014 (68 *.nc files), and a User’s Guide (*pdf file). Additional information on the provided files is in the “Modeling Archive Contents” section of the User’s Guide. Model outputs are aggregated to the column scale (i.e. PFT-specific outputs are not provided here).

Murphy, Bailey [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000203995221)↗

Cropland and Land-Clearing Emission Factors From Firex-AQ

The Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) campaign is a NOAA/NASA interagency intensive study of North American fires that took place from July to September 2019. Agricultural fires were sampled on 7 flights from August 21st to September 3rd, 2019. We present emission factors for gas-phase and aerosol-phase species for the different fuel types identified during the campaign. We discuss the dependence of these emission factors on both fuel type and burning characteristics such as modified combustion efficiency (MCE). We analyze 73 fires encompassing four different agricultural fuels (corn, rice, soybean, wheat) and four different types of land-clearing fuels (grass, slash, pile, shrub). Approximately half of all sampled fires were burning corn agricultural residue. We report emission factors for 118 VOCs, where two thirds of emissions are made up of species with lifetimes against oxidation by OH of less than 12 hours (near-field impacts) and the remainder have longer-lifetimes (far-field impacts). We also include an additional 9 aerosol species, 12 halogenated species, 5 sulfur-containing species, and 22 nitrogen-containing species, including NH3 and NOx. There is a statistically significant difference in MCE between agricultural and land-clearing fires that accounts for some of the differences in emission factors across these fuels. VOCs generally have a strong negative correlation with MCE but with different slopes across fuel types. There is a significant positive relationship between MCE and three gas-phase (NO, NO2, SO2) and two aerosol-phase (pCl, pNH4) species. Many emission factors show additional dependence factors beyond MCE that could be related to fuel composition, fire temperature, soil moisture, or other possible differences in burning conditions. Therefore, important differences in emission factors may result when averaging together different types of agricultural and land-clearing fuels in compilations for use in modeling efforts.

biomass burning↗