SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Space Launch Vehicles”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Assimilation of Wind Profiles from Multiple Doppler Radar Wind Profilers for Space Launch Vehicle Applications
No abstract available
The Profile Envision and Splicing Tool (PRESTO): Developing an Atmospheric Wind Analysis Tool for Space Launch Vehicles Using Python
Launch vehicle programs require vertically complete atmospheric profiles. Many systems at the ER to make the necessary measurements, but all have different EVR, vertical coverage, and temporal coverage. MSFC Natural Environments Branch developed a tool to create a vertically complete profile from multiple inputs using Python. Forward work: Finish Formal Testing Acceptance Testing, End-to-End Testing. Formal Release
Essential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the Design Influence of Space Launch Vehicle Avionics Systems
No abstract available
A Comparison of Boundary Layer Wind Profiling Systems for Use with Space Launch Vehicles
No abstract available
Development of Composite Bonded Joints for Space Launch Vehicle Structures
No abstract available
Testing and Analysis Correlation of Composite Sandwich Longitudinal Bonded Joints for Space Launch Vehicle Structures
The NASA Composite Technology for Exploration (CTE) Project has been developing and demonstrating critical composite technologies with a focus on joints; incorporating materials, design/analysis, manufacturing, and tests that utilize NASA expertise and capabilities. The CTE project has focused on the development of composite longitudinal bonded joint technologies for conical structures such as the SLS Payload Attach Fitting (PAF) due to challenging joint geometries and loads compared to cylindrical jointed structures. The CTE team selected and designed a double-lap composite bonded joint as the most advantageous longitudinal joint to advance for the CTE project. This paper reports on the longitudinal bonded joint sub-element test articles that were fabricated and tested for several loading conditions to test the capability of the bonded joint design. Test and analysis correlation to the sub-element test articles are presented in the paper.
Space Launch Vehicle Transient Particle Redistribution Modeling and Implications for Optically Sensitive Payloads
No abstract provided
Launch vehicles for space telecommunications applications
Launch vehicles for space telecommunications applications, considering payload capacity for missions involving earth resources, radio and visual astronomy and meteorology
Space Launch System Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I
Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.
Space Launch System Base Aerothermodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I
Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2023. The integrated test flight is composed of launch and ascent of the SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2023. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf is powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, base flow environments for this vehicle are highly complex and extreme. SLS base aerothermodynamics covers rocket plume-induced convection and radiation of the vehicle’s aft region during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This is the first time in-depth base heating flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.
Space Launch System Base Aerothermodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I
Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2023. The integrated test flight is composed of launch and ascent of the SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2023. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf is powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, base flow environments for this vehicle are highly complex and extreme. SLS base aerothermodynamics covers rocket plume-induced convection and radiation of the vehicle’s aft region during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This is the first time in-depth base heating flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.
The Implementation of Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Space Launch System Vehicle Design
The Space Launch System uses a Maximum Likelihood Estimation process in conjunction with Design of Experiments to develop statistically representative vehicles for the Block 1 configuration. These vehicles are then used to estimate maximum load conditions for simulating stressing cases in other simulations. This paper discusses the modeling process and how SLS captures manufacturing uncertainty in the launch vehicle design. It also provides an overview of the differences between Block 1 statistical representations. This paper also discusses proper grid choice as well as which uncertainties drive the vehicle design.
Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I
Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.
Hypergolic Propellant Destruction Evaluation Cost Benefit Analysis
At space vehicle launch sites such as Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) and Kennedy Space Center (KSC), toxic vapors and hazardous liquid wastes result from the handling of commodities (hypergolic fuels and oxidizers), most notably from transfer operations where fuel and oxidizer are transferred from bulk storage tanks or transfer tankers to space launch vehicles. During commodity transfer at CCAFS and KSC, wet chemical scrubbers (typically containing four scrubbing towers) are used to neutralize fuel saturated vapors from vent systems on tanks and tanker trailers. For fuel vapors, a citric acid solution is used to scrub out most of the hydrazine. Operation of both the hypergolic fuel and oxidizer vapor scrubbers generates waste scrubber liquor. Currently, scrubber liquor from the fuel vapor scrubber is considered non-hazardous. The scrubber liquor is defined as spent citric acid scrubber solution; the solution contains complexed hydrazine I methylhydrazine and is used to neutralize nonspecification hypergolic fuel generated by CCAFS and KSC. This project is a collaborative effort between Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), Space and Missile Center (SMC), the CCAFS, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to evaluate microwave destruction technology for the treatment of non-specification hypergolic fuel generated at CCAFS and KSC. The project will capitalize on knowledge gained from microwave treatment work being accomplished by AFSPC and SMC at V AFB. This report focuses on the costs associated with the current non-specification hypergolic fuel neutralization process (Section 2.0) as well as the estimated costs of operating a mobile microwave unit to treat non-specification hypergolic fuel (Section 3.0), and compares the costs for each (Section 4.0).The purpose of this document is to assess the costs associated with waste hypergolic fuel. This document will report the costs associated with the current fuel neutralization process and also examine the costs of an alternative technology, microwave destruction of waste hypergolic fuel. The microwave destruction system is being designed as a mobile unit to treat non-specification hypergolic fuel at CCAFS and KSC.
Ground Processing Affordability for Space Vehicles
Launch vehicles and most of their payloads spend the majority of their time on the ground. The cost of ground operations is very high. So, why so often is so little attention given to ground processing during development? The current global space industry and economic environment are driving more need for efficiencies to save time and money. Affordability and sustainability are more important now than ever. We can not continue to treat space vehicles as mere science projects. More RLV's (Reusable Launch Vehicles) are being developed for the gains of reusability which are not available for ELV's (Expendable Launch Vehicles). More human-rated vehicles are being developed, with the retirement of the Space Shuttles, and for a new global space race, yet these cost more than the many unmanned vehicles of today. We can learn many lessons on affordability from RLV's. DFO (Design for Operations) considers ground operations during design, development, and manufacturing-before the first flight. This is often minimized for space vehicles, but is very important. Vehicles are designed for launch and mission operations. You will not be able to do it again if it is too slow or costly to get there. Many times, technology changes faster than space products such that what is launched includes outdated features, thus reducing competitiveness. Ground operations must be considered for the full product Lifecycle, from concept to retirement. Once manufactured, launch vehicles along with their payloads and launch systems require a long path of processing before launch. Initial assembly and testing always discover problems to address. A solid integration program is essential to minimize these impacts, as was seen in the Constellation Ares I-X test rocket. For RLV's, landing/recovery and post-flight turnaround activities are performed. Multi-use vehicles require reconfiguration. MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) must be well-planned--- even for the unplanned problems. Defect limits and standard repairs need to be in-place as well as easily added. Many routine inspections and maintenance can be like an aircraft overhaul. Modifications and technology upgrades should be expected. Another factor affecting ground operations efficiency is trending. It is essential for RLV's, and also useful for ELV's which fly the same or similar models again. Good data analysis of technical and processing performance will determine fixes and improvements needed for safety, design, and future processing. Collecting such data on new or low-frequency vehicles is a challenge. Lessons can be learned from the Space Shuttle, or even the Concorde aircraft. For all of the above topics, efficient business systems must be established for comprehensive program management and good throughput. Drawings, specifications, and manuals for an entire launch vehicle are often in different formats from multiple vendors, plus they have proprietary constraints. Nonetheless, the integration team must ensure that all data needed is compatible and visible to each appropriate team member. Ground processing systems for scheduling, tracking, problem resolution, etc. must be well laid-out. The balance between COTS (commercial off the shelf) and custom software is difficult. Multiple customers, vendors, launch sites, and landing sites add to the complexity of efficient IT (Information Technology) tools.