Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Sparse Matrix”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Accelerating GNNs on GPU Sparse Tensor Cores through N:M Sparsity-Oriented Graph Reordering

Recent advancements in GPU hardware support have introduced the capability to leverage N:M sparse patterns for substantial performance gains. Graphs in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are typically sparse, but the sparsity is often irregular, not conforming to such sparse patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel graph reordering algorithm, the first of its kind, to reshape irregular graph data into the N:M structured sparse pattern at the tile level, allowing linear-algebra-based graph operations in GNNs to benefit from the N:M sparse hardware. The optimization is lossless, maintaining the accuracy of GNN. It can remove 98-100\% violations of the N:M sparse patterns at the vector level, and increase the proportion of conforming graphs in SuiteSparse collection from 5-9\% to 88.7-93.5\%. On A100 GPUs, the optimization accelerates Sparse Matrix Matrix (SpMM) by up to 43X (2.3X -- 7.5X on average) and speeds up the key graph operations in GNNs on real graphs by as much as 8.6X (3.5X on average).

artificial intelligence, graph neural networks↗
DOE OSTI2023

Distributed out-of-memory NMF on CPU/GPU architectures

We propose an efficient distributed out-of-memory implementation of the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm for heterogeneous high-performance-computing systems. The proposed implementation is based on prior work on NMFk, which can perform automatic model selection and extract latent variables and patterns from data. In this work, we extend NMFk by adding support for dense and sparse matrix operation on multi-node, multi-GPU systems. The resulting algorithm is optimized for out-of-memory problems where the memory required to factorize a given matrix is greater than the available GPU memory. Memory complexity is reduced by batching/tiling strategies, and sparse and dense matrix operations are significantly accelerated with GPU cores (or tensor cores when available). Input/output latency associated with batch copies between host and device is hidden using CUDA streams to overlap data transfers and compute asynchronously, and latency associated with collective communications (both intra-node and inter-node) is reduced using optimized NVIDIA Collective Communication Library (NCCL) based communicators. Benchmark results show significant improvement, from 32X to 76x speedup, with the new implementation using GPUs over the CPU-based NMFk. Good weak scaling was demonstrated on up to 4096 multi-GPU cluster nodes with approximately 25,000 GPUs when decomposing a dense 340 Terabyte-size matrix and an 11 Exabyte-size sparse matrix of density 10 -6 .

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Exploring the Use of Novel Spatial Accelerators in Scientific Applications

Driven by the need to find alternative accelerators which can viably replace GPUs in next-generation Supercomputing systems, this paper proposes a methodology to enable agile application/hardware co-design. The application-first methodology provides the ability to come up with design of accelerators while working with real-world workloads, available accelerators, and system software. The iterative design process targets a set of kernels in a workload for performance estimates that can prune the design space for later phases of detailed architectural evaluations. To this effect, in this paper, a novel data-parallel device model is introduced that simulates the latency of performance-sensitive operations in an accelerator including data transfers and kernel computation using multi-core CPUs. The use of off-the-shelf simulators, such as pre-RTL simulator Aladdin or multiple tools available for exploring the design of deep neural network accelerators (e.g., Timeloop) is demonstrated for evaluation of various accelerator designs using applications with realistic inputs. Examples of multiple device configurations that are instantiable in a system are explored to evaluate the performance benefit of deploying novel accelerators. The proposed device is integrated with a programming model and system software to potentially explore the impacts of high-level programming languages/compilers and low-level effects such as task scheduling on multiple accelerators. We analyze our methodology for a set of applications that represent high-performance computing (HPC) and graph analytics. The applications include a computational chemistry kernel realized using tensor contractions, triangle counting, GraphSAGE and Breadth-first Search. These applications include kernels such as dense matrix-dense matrix multiplication, sparse matrix-spare matrix multiplication, and sparse matrix-dense vector multiplication. Our results indicate potential performance benefits and insights for system design by including accelerators that realize these kernels along-side general purpose accelerators.

AI, codesign, Accelerated Computing, Modeling and ↗
DOE OSTI2019

Performance of Gather/Scatter Operations

In this paper we describe the performance of two operations, gather and scatter. The operations we describe are simplified versions of those used in the implementation of sparse matrix libraries such as sparse-blas. Similar operations can also be found in benchmarks such as HPCG. Gather and scatter operations are memory load and store operations that are related to other memory operations such as Stream Triad and DAXPY, but have an additional dependence between memory loads that affects performance. We describe how the operations behave on current technology and identify features that enhance their performance. However, our description of hardware is general rather than specific to a single architecture.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗