Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TRANSONIC FLUTTER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1980

Experimental and analytical transonic flutter characteristics of a geared-elevator configuration

The flutter model represented the aft fuselage and empennage of a proposed supersonic transport airplane and had an all movable horizontal tail with a geared elevator. It was tested mounted from a sting in the transonic dynamics tunnel. Symmetric flutter boundaries were determined experimentally at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 1.14 for a geared elevator configuration (gear ratio of 2.8 to 1.0) and an ungeared elevator configuration (gear ratio of 1.0 to 1.0). Gearing the elevator increased the experimental flutter dynamic pressures about 20 percent. Flutter calculations were made for the geared elevator configuration by using two analytical methods based on subsonic lifting surface theory. Both methods analyzed the stabilizer and elevator as a single, deforming surface, but one method also allowed the elevator to be analyzed as hinged from the stabilizer. All analyses predicted lower flutter dynamic pressures than experiment with best agreement (within 12 percent) for the hinged elevator method. Considering the model as mounted from a flexible rather than rigid sting in the analyses, had only a slight effect on the flutter results but was significant in that a sting related vibration mode was identified as a potentially flutter critical mode.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic flutter study of a wind-tunnel model of an arrow-wing supersonic transport

A 1/20-size, low-speed flutter model of the SCAT-15F complete airplane was tested on cables to simulate a near free-flying condition. Only the model wing and fuselage were flexible. Flutter boundaries were measured for a nominal configuration and a configuration with wing fins removed at Mach numbers M from 0.76 to 1.2. For both configurations, the transonic dip in the wing flutter dynamic pressure q boundary was relatively small and the minimum flutter q occurred near M = 0.92. Removing the wing fins increased the flutter q about 14 percent and changed the flutter mode from symmetric to antisymmetric. Vibration and flutter analyses were made using a finite-element structural representation and subsonic kernel-function aerodynamics. For the nominal configuration, the analysis (using calculated modal data) predicted the experimental flutter q levels within 10 percent but did not predict the correct flutter mode at the higher M. For the configuration without wing fins, the analysis predicted 16 to 36 percent unconservative (higher than experimental) flutter q levels and showed extreme sensitivity to mass representation details that affected wing tip mode shapes. For high subsonic M, empennage aerodynamics had a significant effect on the predicted flutter boundaries of several symmetric modes.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic flutter study of a wind-tunnel model of an arrow-wing supersonic transport

A 1/20-size, low-speed flutter model of the SCAT-15F complete airplane was tested in a wind-tunnel on cables to simulate a near free-flying condition. Only the model wing and fuselage were flexible. Flutter boundaries were measured for a nominal configuration and a configuration with wing fins removed at Mach numbers M from 0.76 to 1.2. For both configurations, the transonic dip in the wing flutter dynamic pressure q boundary was relatively small and the minimum flutter q occurred near M = 0.92. Removing the wing fins increased the flutter q about 14 percent and changed the flutter mode from symmetric to antisymmetric. Vibration and flutter analyses were made using a finite-element structural representation and subsonic kernel-function aerodynamics. For the nominal configuration, the analysis (using calculated modal data) predicted the experimental flutter q levels within 10 percent but did not predict the correct flutter mode at the higher M. For the configuration without wing fins, the analysis predicted 16 to 36 percent unconservative (higher than experimental) flutter q levels and showed extreme sensitivity to mass shapes.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1959

Transonic Flutter Characteristics of a 45 deg Sweptback Wing with Various Distributions of Ballast Along the Leading Edge

An investigation of the use of ballast at the leading edge of a sweptback wing as a flutter fix has been made. The investigation was conducted in the Langley transonic blowdown tunnel with wing models which had an aspect ratio of 4, sweepback of the quarter-chord line of 450, and a taper ratio of 0.2. Four ballast configurations, which included different amounts of ballast distributed at two different span-wise locations, were investigated. Full-span sting-mounted models were employed. Data were obtained over a Mach number range from 0.65 to 1.32. Comparison of the data for the ballasted wings with data for a similar wing without ballast shows that in the often critical Mach number range between 0.85 and 1.05, the dynamic pressure required for flutter is increased by as much as 100 percent due to the addition of about 6 percent of the wing mass as ballast at the leading edge of the outboard sections. Furthermore, there are indications that similar benefits of leading-edge ballast can be obtained at Mach numbers above M = 1.1. Changing the spanwise location of the ballast and increasing the amount of the ballast by a factor of about 2 had very little additional effect on the dynamic pressure required for flutter. The possibility, therefore, exists that the beneficial effects obtained may be accomplished by using less than the minimum of about 6 percent of the wing mass as ballast as investigated in this paper.

John R Unangst↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic flutter and gust-response tests and analyses of a wind-tunnel model of a torsion free wing airplane

An exploratory study of a 1/5.5 size, complete airplane version of a torsion free wing (TFW) fighter aircraft was conducted. The TFW consisted of a wing/boom/canard assembly on each fuselage side that was interconnected by a common pivot shaft so that the TFW could rotate freely in pitch. The effect of the TFW was evaluated by comparing data obtained with the TFW free and the TFW locked to the fuselage. With the model mounted on cables to simulate an airplane free flying condition, flutter boundaries were measured at Mach number (M) from 0.85 to 1.0 and gust responses at M = 0.65 and 0.90. The critical flutter mode for the TFW free configuration was found experimentally to occur at M = 0.95 and had the rigid TFW pitch mode as its apparent aerodynamic driver.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1983

The design, testing and analysis of aeroelastically tailored transonic flutter model wings

An investigation of both the static aeroelastic and flutter characteristics of an aft swept wing, aeroelastically tailored to washout in one design and to washin in another, has been performed using two one-fourth-scale cantilever models representing the two designs. The models have been designed using an MSC/NASTRAN finite element model to preserve the full-scale airplane washout and washin characteristics. Test results show that the effect of the skin-to-core adhesive on model stiffness must be considered in the design cycle. Flutter analyses correlate fairly well with test results. Consideration is also given to F-16 metal and washout wing flutter speeds and mass ratio effects.

Murphy, A. C.↗