Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ULF waves”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

Relationships between SC- and SI-associated ULF waves and ionospheric HF Doppler oscillations during the great geomagnetic storm of February 1986

The SC- and SI-associated ionospheric Doppler velocity oscillations and geomagnetic pulsations during the great geomagnetic storm of February 1986 are interpreted. This is done by considering the 'dynamo-motor' mechanism of ionospheric E-field and the global compressional oscillations of the magnetosphere and the ionosphere, respectively.

Yumoto, K.↗

ULF wave electric fields at synchronous orbit during substorms

Characteristics of the wave electric fields in the frequency range 3 to 22 mHz in the equatorial plane (on GEOS 2) during four substorms were investigated. During intervals of about ten min duration after the substorm onset, large electric fields appear at synchronous orbit. In particular, 3 to 4 spectral peaks in the wave electric field data can be discerned. The dominant models occur at approximately 6 and approximately 10 mHz. Additional peaks exist around 15 and 20 mHz. Although the sense of polarization of these modes varies, these modes tend to have right handed polarization with a typical ellipticity of 0.2. The major axis usually points to the east, lying at an angle of 0 to 50 deg with the azimuthal direction. Mapped into the ionosphere, this corresponds to a north-west orientation. New wave activity appears some 30 to 40 min after the onset lasting about 10 min. The wave properties of these events are relatively close to those events occurring near the substorm onset, except for the orientation angle of the major axis which is now 140 to 180 deg. Because the magnetometer data is not available, the generation mechanism of the waves studied is hard to identify. There is some evidence that these waves are a superposition of compressional waves, produced by the collapse of the magnetotail, and the field line resonances, triggered by these compressional waves.

Laakso, Harri↗

Linear and nonlinear properties of the ULF waves driven by ring-beam distribution functions

The problem of the exitation of obliquely propagating magnetosonic waves which can steepen up (also known as shocklets) is considered. Shocklets have been observed upstream of the Earth's bow shock and at comets Giacobini-Zinner and Grigg-Skjellerup. Linear theory as well as two-dimensional (2-D) hybrid (fluid electrons, particle ions) simulations are used to determine the properties of waves generated by ring-beam velocity distributions in great detail. The effects of both proton and oxygen ring-beams are considered. The study of instabilities excited by a proton ring-beam is relevant to the region upstream of the Earth's bow shock, whereas the oxygen ring-beam corresponds to cometary ions picked up by the solar wind. Linear theory has shown that for a ring-beam, four instabilities are found, one on the nonresonant mode, one on the Alfven mode, and two along the magnetosonic/whistler branch. The relative growth rate of these instabilities is a sensitive function of parameters. Although one of the magnetosonic instabilities has maximum growth along the magnetic field, the other has maximum growth in oblique directions. We have studied the competition of these instabilities in the nonlinear regime using 2-D simulations. As in the linear limit, the nonlinear results are a function of beam density and distribution function. By performing the simulations as both initial value and driven systems, we have found that the outcome of the simulations can vary, suggesting that the latter type simulations is needed to address the observations. A general conclusion of the simulation results is that field-aligned beams do not result in the formation of shocklets, whereas ring-beam distributions can.

Killen, K.↗