Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Zirconate”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1992

Shocked zircons in the Onaping Formation: Further proof of impact origin

The Onaping Formation fills the structural basin at Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. This formation is composed of three members: a basal, coarse, mainly quartzitic breccia (Basal Member); a light-colored, heavily included, polymict middle unit (Gray Member); and a similar but dark-colored upper unit (Black Member). Two different origins were proposed for the Onaping: (1) volcanic ash-flow sheet; and (2) impact fall-back ejecta. These origins are critically discussed in a review paper coauthored by proponents of each view.

Bohor, B. F.↗
NASA NTRS2009

Early History of the Moon: Zircon Perspective

The Moon is believed to have formed from debris produced by a giant impact of a Mars sized body with the Earth (at around 4.51 Ga), forming a primitive body with a thick global layer of melt referred to as the Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO). The crystallization of LMO created internal stratification of the Moon forming main geochemical reservoirs. The surface features on the Moon were shaped by the subsequent collision with several large impactors during a short period of time (3.9-4.0 Ga). This process known as the Late Heavy Bombardment is supported by models of planetary motion, suggesting that rapid migration of giant planets could have triggered a massive delivery of planetesimals from the asteroid belt into the inner Solar System at about 3.9 Ga. Although, general chronology of LMO and LHB is well established using both long lived (U-Pb, Rb-Sr, Sm-147-Nd-143 and Ar-Ar) and extinct (Hf-182-W-182 and 146Sm-142Nd) isotope systems, some of these systems such as Ar-Ar are known to reset easily during secondary thermal overprints. As a result important details in the timing of LMO and LHB remain unresolved. In addition, the relative weakness of these systems under high T conditions can potentially bias the chronological information towards later events in the history of the Moon.

Grange, M.L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

4.32 Billion Year Old Impact Melts at Apollo 14: Dating the Procellarum Basin?

Introduction: Recent work has improved our understanding of lunar crustal structure and basin evolution on the Moon, but its early impact history and implications for solar system dynamics remain poorly established [1,2]. In particular, there is a derth of absolute ages, especially for the period >4.0 Ga, that could be related to basin-forming events. Here we present U-Pb isotopic data for Zr-rich minerals found in impact-melt fragments from Apollo 14 soil sample 14163 that, when combined with previously published data, dates an impact event at 4324±15 Ma. The compositions and ages of these impact-melt fragments provide unique information about the timing of early impact events and the composition of the lunar crust. Results: Fourteen rocklets ranging in size from 1 to 3 mm were extracted from soil 14163. Most are impactmelt rocks with 10-30% clasts of mostly pyroxene and plagioclase (100 to 500 μm) in a crystalline matrix. Textures of the matrix vary from subophitic, formed by intergrowths of 10-20 μm plagioclase and pyroxene crystals, to poikilitic, with plagioclase and pyroxene reaching 20-50 μm size. Some fragments that contain no visible clasts have similar textures are also interpreted as impact-melt rocks. All fragments contain notably large proportions of euhedral to subhedral ilmenite, zircon, apatite/merrillite and less abundant zirconolite and baddeleyite in the melt matrices. These grains often form intricate intergrowths with each other and rock-forming minerals, indicating their crystallization from the melt (Fig. 1). However, some slightly larger (~50 μm) zircon and phosphate grains can be interpreted as relict clasts based on their granular textures and relationships with the surrounding phases (Fig. 1). This implies that zircon and phosphate minerals were present in the target rocks. Some of these grains were profoundly remelted during the impact, which resulted in an oversaturation of the melt in Zr and P and crystallization of new grains of Zrrich minerals and phosphates during melt solidification. The presence of zircon and phosphates indicates that the melts were significantly enriched in KREEP components and ties their provenance to the Procellarum- KREEP Terrane (PKT) [3]. Combined U-Pb zircon data obtained for all fragments form two main clusters on a concordia diagram (Fig. 2), between about 4.3 and 3.9 Ga. Phosphate data mostly concentrate on the younger end of this age range but some analyses are almost as old as the older zircon grains (Fig. 2). Figure 1: Zircon (Zr) and phosphate (Apt; Mer) grains in impact melt fragments from Apollo 14 soil 14161. A-zircon grains crystallized from impact melt; B-phosphate grain inherited from the target; C- granular zircon grains Our interpretation of these data is that all U-rich minerals experienced variable resetting of the U-Pb system, with phosphate, where closure temperature is significantly lower than that in zircon, affected more profoundly by Pb loss than zircon. Our best estimate of the time of formation of zircon and phosphate is based on statistically valid analysis of grains interpreted texturally as grown from the impact melt (Fig. 2). Ten of these analyses define an age of 4324±15 Ma (MSWD=3.0, probability of fit P=0.002). Our best estimate for the time of resetting is obtained by combining data from phosphates that are statistically indistinguishable from 3.9 Ga within the analytical uncertainties. This group is represented by 18 analyses of 15 phosphate grains from different fragments (Fig. 2) and defines an age of 3922±6 Ma (MSWD=1.2, P=0.23). Conversely, a minimum age of the target lithologies, remelted in the impact that produced the rocklets studied here (Fig. 2), can be determined from the five oldest analyses of zircon clasts at 4338±13 Ma (MSWD=1.5, P=0.2), which is indistinguishable from the age of the impact melt within the uncertainties. The obtained ages, combined with textural evidence, imply that the impact melt was formed at 4324±15 Ma, and that it occurred in a zircon-rich target with a minimum age of 4338±13 Ma. Further reworking occurred during a second impact event at 3922±6 Ma. Discussion: The younger age of 3922±6 Ma can be interpreted as the time of the Imbrium impact. The older age of 4324±15 Ma would then be the time of formation of the impact melt, which was then caught in the Imbrium ejecta either at the Apollo 14 landing site or within the target rocks of the Imbrium impact. The presence of abundant accessory phases such as zircons and phosphates is consistent with a substantial KREEP component in the analyzed particles. The current distribution of KREEP on the lunar surface appears to be strongly influenced by Imbrum ejecta [4] so interpretation of the 4.32 Ga age depends in part on assumed structure of the pre-impact crust and distribution of KREEP within the crust. If KREEP was present only in the deep crust at 4.32 Ga, then a basin-scale impact possibly analogous to Imbrium or larger may be necessary to excavate a KREEPy impact melt at this time. However, if KREEPy materials were present closer to the surface perhaps due to redistribution related to Mg-suite magmatism, then smaller impacts might be able to rework KREEPy compositions at shallower depths. The coherence of the data on the particles analysed here suggests a large volume of melt that has been preserved since 4.32 Ga, consistent with a large impact event. Relict zircons and mineral clasts suggests that the igneous crust in the vicinity of this impact was well developed by at least 4.34 Ga, similar to the model age of KREEP and older than the isochron ages of many Mg-suite cumulates [5]. A problem that confronts all lunar sample studies using the current collection is that the pre-Imbrium geology of the PKT (the source of these 4.32 Ga impact melts) is not well constrained. The South Pole-Aitken basin contains regions that are moderately enriched in Th, but its ejecta is Th-poor [6]; therefore these A14 fragments are probably not SPA ejecta. Alternatively, these fragments may represent formation of a hypothesized Procellarum basin [7] although the lack of a clearly defined basin ejecta signature is a potential problem with that interpretation. In any case, they provide a younger limit on the age of lunar differentiation and formation of KREEP within the lunar crust. Figure 2: U-Pb data for zircon and phosphate grains from impact melt fragments. A-all data; B-data used for age calculations. References: [1] Orgel C., Michael G., Fassett C. I., van der Bogert C. H., Riedel C., Kneissl T., and Hiesinger H. (2018) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 123, 748- 762. [2] Evans A. J., Andrews-Hanna J. C., Head J. W., Soderblom J. M., Solomon S. C., and Zuber M. T. (2018) J. Geophys. Planets. 123, 1596-1617. [3] Jolliff, B.L., Gillis, J.J., Haskin, L.A., Korotev, R.L. and Wieczorek, M.A. (2000) J. Geophys. Res: Planets 105, 4197-4216. [4] Haskin L. A. (1998) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 103, 1679-1689. [5] Borg L.E., Gaffney A.M., and Shearer C.K. (2015) MAPS 50, 715-732. [6] Moriarty, D.P., Watkins, R.N., Valencia, S.N., Kendall, J.D., Evans, A.J., Dygert, N. and Petro, N.E. (2021) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126. [7] Zhu, M.H., Wünnemann, K., Potter, R.W., Kleine, T. and Morbidelli, A. (2019) J. Geophys. Res: Planets 124, 2117-2140

M D Norman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TEMPERATURE CONSTRAINT OF THE MISTASTIN LAKE IMPACT STRUCTURE IMPACT MELT ROCKS

Impact melt is a product of hypervelocity cratering events formed by the instantaneous melting of near-surface target rocks. The temperatures of impact melt upon formation are believed to be superheated, vastly exceeding the liquidus temperature of igneous rocks formed via endogenic processes. However, quantitative understanding of the formation and duration of superheated temperatures remains incomplete. To date, only one datum on the hottest post-shock temperature (>2370 °C) has been derived by Timms et al. (2017) [1]. These authors studied the microstructures and crystallographic orientations preserved within a rim of vermicular ZrO2 of a zircon grain entrained within impact glass at the Mistastin Lake impact structure, Canada. Diagnostic crystallographic orientation indicated the presence of cubic zirconia, requiring a minimum temperature for the impact melt of >2370°C from the dissociation of zircon to cubic zirconia and liquid SiO2. With only one temperature datum, it cannot be stated whether the temperature of the impact melt sheet was homogenous across the entire structure or if the thermal history of the melt varied with spatial distribution. In this study, we present a preliminary investigation of 70 zircon grains, 22 of which exhibit rims of vermicular ZrO2 dissociation textures, similar to those studied by Timms et al. (2017). To acquire a more accurate temperature profile representative of impact melt, zircon crystals were collected from different types of impact melt bearing units, including additional samples of the impact glass studied by Timms et al. (2017). Of the 22 zircon grains with dissociation textures, at least 4 grains in the impact glass show diagnostic evidence of pre-existing cubic zirconia, and 1 grain from a glass-bearing breccia exhibits granular zircon textures, possible evidence of a transition from high-P to high-T conditions. These results show the heterogeneous post-shock temperature distribution of superheated impact melt within the Mistastin impact structure. [1] Timms, N.E., Erickson, T.M., Zanetti, M.R., Pearce, M.A., Cayron, C., Cavosie, A.J., Reddy, S.M., Wittmann, A. and Carpenter, P.K., 2017. Cubic zirconia in> 2370° C impact melt records Earth's hottest crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 477, pp.52-58.

rock↗
NASA NTRS2024

Microstructural Evolution of the Civet Cat Norite (72255)

The ‘Civet Cat Norite’ is a ~ 2.5 cm clast within the Apollo impact melt breccia sample 72255 collected during Apollo 17 EVA 2 at Boulder 1. The norite is primarily composed of plagioclase and orthopyroxene with fine-scale exsolution lamellae of augite. The plagioclase and orthopyroxene (OPX) coexist with minor quartz and augitic clinopyroxene (CPX), and accessory apatite, baddeleyite, chromite, ilmenite, loveringite, merrillite, rutile and zircon. The major minerals range from 1 to 4 mm in size and show a cataclastic texture indicated by banding of the light and dark phases]. The chemical composition of the orthopyroxene, augitic exsolution lamellae, and exsolved oxides suggest the norite crystallized in the lower crust of the Moon (10 – 70 km depth) and was subsequently excavated by impact(s). Shock pressure estimates for the norite range from 15 – 35 GPa based on maskeleynite formation within the plagioclase, kink banding in pyroxenes, and granular recrystallization in the accessory phosphates. Previous Rb-Sr and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar analyses recalculated with modern decay constants yield relatively young ages of 4.16 ± 0.05 Ga and 3.99 ± 0.03 Ga, respectively. However, recent U-Pb analyses of some zircon grains from within the Civet Cat yield an age of 4.45 ± 0.03 Ga. While this is the oldest age for any rock recovered from the Moon, the full age spread of zircon from the Civet Cat range from ca. 4.46 to 4.02 Ga, indicating variable Pb-loss and complicating interpretation of the primary age. Recent atom probe analyses indicate minimal Pb mobilization within the oldest zircon grain from Civet Cat, supporting the interpretation that these ancient zircon ages reflect the age of the norite, rather than an apparent antiquity caused by reverse discordance. To investigate the potential antiquity and deep crustal origin of the Civet Cat norite, we have undertaken high resolution microstructural analyses of the major, minor, and accessory minerals to characterize the primary igneous textures and secondary overprinting by impact and metamorphism. The employed analytical techniques include scanning electron microscope-based electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analyses, electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) chemical analyses, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of pyroxene, plagioclase, quartz, zircon, and phosphates.

T M Erickson↗
NASA NTRS1986

Early Archean tonalite gneiss in the upper peninsula of Michigan

Geochronological results on tonalite gneiss of northern Michigan that is 3.56 Ga or slightly older is presented. Tonalitic augen gneiss and structurally overlying biotite gneiss and schist are exposed in a dome near Watersmeet. They are part of an extensive gneiss terrane of southern Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan that includes rocks of early to late Archean ages and lies south of the Wawa volcanic subprovince. Two samples of the augen gneiss and one of the biotite gneiss show zircon grains of similar shape, zoning, color, and development of crystal faces. These zircons give Pb/U isotopic ratios that plot on a chord of 3,560 + or - 40 m.y. upper intersect and of 1,250 + or m.y. lower intersect. The 3,560 m.y. number is believed to be a minimum age because analysis of one of the least discordant zircon fractions by ion microprobe that gave a nearly concordant age of 3,650 m.y. The 1,250 m.y. lower intersect is without geological significance: it is interpreted to be a result of multiple lead loss at 2.7, 1.8, and 0.5 Ga by U/Pb in zircon. Archean rocks 10 to 25 km northwest of the Watersmeet dome give a 2.75 Ga age on zircons. Quartz monzonite here is dated at 2.65 Ga.

Peterman, Z. E.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Novel Shock Microstructures in Accessory Minerals from the Haughton Dome, Devon Island, Nunavut, Canada

The 23 km-diameter, ca. 24 Ma Haughton Dome impact structure in the Canadian Arctic on Devon Island, Nunavut (89deg41′W, 75deg22′N) occurred within a two layered target composed of a shallowly-dipping ~1700 m thick succession of Paleozoic limestones and evaporates overlying ca.1.9 Ga high grade gneisses [1, 2]. Within the structure a well preserved impact melt bearing breccia unit contains a variety of shocked clasts from the pre-impact sediments and basement gneisses [3]. Due to their high level of preservation a variety of studies have been undertaken on the clast population of the melt bearing breccia, including characterization of shock within the accessory minerals of the basement lithologies [4, 5]. This study presents high resolution electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) microstructural data for zircon and monazite from historic samples of the basement gneiss, in which bulk shock pressures have been previously constrained based on major phases [4, 6]. Shocked zircon and monazite grains have been investigated from shock stage 1b (sample 72110), 2 (7273) and 3 (7192, Dig-9) [4, 6]. At lower shock levels zircon displays planar microstructures consistent with mechanical shock {112} twin formation [7] and deviatoric transformation to the high pressure polymorph reidite [8]. Zircon grains from shock stage three show a more chaotic microstructure with multiple orientations of tightly spaced sets of reidite that are variably recrystallized to zircon neoblasts. Monazite from lower shock stages contains a number of mechanical twin orientations that are indicative of shock deformation [9]. At higher shock pressures a lath like structure of interlocking twin orientations has been identified. This microstructure is suggestive of a reversion transformation from a high pressure polymorph [10] and is the first evidence for the transformation of monazite during shock.

Erickson, Timmons M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Deciphering Extreme Mineral Records; Microstructural Phase Heritage of Shocked Materials

High-pressure minerals such as coesite, stishovite, and reidite are often used as indicators of shock metamorphism. However, high-pressure and high-temperature phases are metastable at ambient conditions and, therefore, often revert to a more energetically favorable phase. During solid-state transformations, the crystallographic orientations of the stable polymorph are controlled by the transformation pathway from the parent. Microstructural orientation analysis using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) of the stable phase can reveal systematic intercrystalline orientation relationships (OR) diagnostic of solid-state transformations from these high-pressure or high-temperature polymorph phases (Cayron et al., 2006). Knowledge of polymorph stability fields for a given system can thus be used to infer minimum shock P and/or T conditions that rocks have experienced, which are otherwise unavailable using traditional thermobarometers such as element partition coefficients. Using orientation relationships to infer the former presence of mineral phases has been termed microstructural “phase heritage”, and has successfully been used to probe for evidence of extreme pressures and temperatures resulting from hypervelocity impacts. The reconstruction of polymorphs of ZrSiO4 (zircon, reidite) and ZrO2 (baddeleyite) have further elucidated the behavior of these phases under hypervelocity impact conditions (Timms et al., 2017a; White et al., 2018), and OR analysis of shocked monazite has identified a previously unrecognized tetragonal high-P polymorph (Erickson et al., 2019). Zircon will convert to the low tetragonal polymorph reidite at shock stresses above ~21 GPa. However, upon decompression at temperatures above 1200 °C reidite will revert to zircon (Kusaba et al., 1985). Recrystallized zircon neoblasts encased in impact melt often show systematic misorientation relationships of 90° about <110> indicative of reversion from the reidite (Fig. 1), and preserving cryptic evidence of the high-P history that is often erased by the post shock thermal spike (Cavosie et al., 2016). Microstructural OR analysis of a dissociated zircon corona composed of baddeleyite (monoclinic-ZrO2) has identified the former presence of cubic zirconia within impact melt glass from the Mistastin Lake impact structure, Labrador, CA. Based on stability fields in the ZrO2-SiO2 binary phase diagram, cubic zirconia records thermal conditions in excess of 2370 °C at ambient P, indicating that the Mistastin impact melt is the hottest rock identified on Earth’s surface (Timms et al., 2017b). Shock-deformed monazite (monoclinic La,Ce,ThPO4) containing lamellae comprised of interlocking laths has been identified from the Haughton Dome impact structure, Nunavut, Canada and Nördlinger-Ries Crater, southern Germany. The lath-structured lamellae are composed of four systematic orientation variants, which OR analyses indicate originate from a tetragonal parent whereby the [010]monoclinic aligns with either [100] or [010]tetragonal (Erickson et al., 2019). These results highlight utility of microstructural phase heritage analyses for the identification of unstable high-P or high-T polymorphs that uniquely record the extremely transient shock conditions produced by hypervelocity impacts.

Timmons Erickson↗