Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “comets Oort cloud”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

The mass of the Oort cloud

The total mass of comets in the Oort cloud is calculated. The distribution of cometary masses is found based on the observed distribution of cometary magnitudes corrected for observational selection effects by Everhart (1967), and a derived relationship between brightness and nucleus mass. A cloud population of 1.4 trillion comets brighter than an absolute magnitude of 11 as found by Weissman (1982) is used. The estimated total mass is 1.9 earth masses. The probable error in the estimate is about one order of magnitude. Most of the mass of the Oort cloud is concentrated in the size range of the observed long-period comets. The mass estimate is consistent with either cometary formation among the outer planets, or in satellite fragments of the primordial solar nebula.

Weissman, P. R.

Empirical data from Oort's cloud

Empirical evidence on the size and origin of the Oort cloud of comets is compared with theories on the origin of the Oort cloud. Data on the binding energy of the very long period comets indicate that the Oort cloud is five times smaller than previously thought and that the mean velocity perturbation introduced by stellar passages is smaller than Oort believed. The bimodal brightness distribution of 'new' comets indicates that their formation mechanism is straightforward accretion without later fragmentation. Data on retrograde versus prograde orbits and their relevance to the rotation of the Oort cloud are examined. Models of the solar nebula are discussed in the light of the foregoing evidence.

Desemme, A. H.

Dynamical evolution of the Oort cometary cloud

The dynamical evolution of comets in the Oort cloud under the influence of stellar perturbations has been modeled using Monte Carlo techniques. It is shown that the cloud has been depleted over the history of the solar system. Comets are lost from the cloud by direct ejection due to close stellar encounters, diffusion of aphelia to distances beyond the sun's sphere of influence, or diffusion of perihelia into the planetary region where Jupiter and Saturn perturbations either eject them on hyperbolic trajectories or capture them to short-period orbits. The population of the cloud is estimated to be 1.0 - 1.5 x 10 to the 12th comets and the total mass is on the order of 1.9 earth masses. In addition to random passing stars, less frequent encounters with giant molecular clouds may play a significant role in randomizing the orbits of comets in the cloud and reducing the effective radius of the sun's sphere of influence.

Weissman, P. R.

Comets: Data, problems and objectives

Relevant results from the observations of Comet Kohoutek are presented with an outline summary of basic knowledge concerning comets, both subjects being confined to data related to the nature and origin of comets rather than the phenomena (for example, plasma phenomena are omitted). Places of cometary origin in the developing solar system are discussed, along with the proto-Uranus-Neptune region versus the much more distant fragmented interstellar cloud region, now frequented by comets of the Opik-Oort cloud. The Comet Kohoutek results add new insights, particularly with regard to the parent molecules and the nature of meteoric solids in comets, to restrict the range of the physical circumstances of comet formation.

Whipple, F. L.

Comets: Data, problems, and objectives

A highly abridged review of new relevant results from the observations of Comet Kohoutek is followed by an outline summary of our basic knowledge concerning comets, both subjects being confined to data related to the nature and origin of comets rather than the phenomena (for example, plasma phenomena are omitted). The discussion then centers on two likely places of cometary origin in the developing solar system, the proto-Uranus-Neptune region versus the much more distant fragmented interstellar cloud region, now frequented by comets of the Opik-Oort cloud. The Comet Kohoutek results add new insights, particularly with regard to the parent molecules and the nature of meteoric solids in comets, to restrict the range of the physical circumstances of comet formation. A few fundamental and outstanding questions are asked, and a plea made for unmanned missions to comets and asteroids in order to provide definitive answers as to the nature and origin of comets, asteroids, and the solar system generally.

Whipple, F. L.

Star Passages Through the Oort Cloud

Stars passing through the Oort cloud eject comets to interstellar space and initiate showers of comets into the planetary region.

Oort cloud comets cometary orbits shower comets

Comet Bowell /1980b/ - An active-looking dormant object

The absence of molecular emissions in the spectrum of Comet Bowell, a nearly constant amount of dust in its coma, a slow expansion rate of the coma and implied low particle velocities, a tail width that does not increase with increasing distance from the nucleus, the absence of tail particles less than 0.5 mm in diameter, and the development of an elongated coma, lead to the conclusion that the solid particles in the coma and tail are not recent ejecta, and that the comet has probably been dormant. It is speculated that 10 to the 13th g of observed coma and tail particles is either a leftover pristine material that has never contacted the nucleus surface, or a product of erratic activity associated with chemical instability, at temperatures below 40 K, stimulated by cosmic ray and/or UV irradiation of the surface layer during the comet's Oort cloud stay. It remains possible that the comet may temporarily become active near perihelion.

Sekanina, Z.

On the number of comets around other single stars

It is shown how to obtain interesting limits on the number of comets in orbit around other single stars in clouds similar to the one present in our own solar system. The number of comets around white dwarf stars is constrained directly, and this in turn constrains the presence of comets around main-sequence stars. If a white dwarf possesses a cloud of comets similar to the Oort cloud, it will occassionally accrete a comet. The accretion of a comet may add enough heavy elements to the atmosphere of the white dwarf to produce a recognizable spectral signature; it is suggested that the calcium reported in the white dwarf G 74-7 is due to recent comet accretion. This signature will persist until sedimentation has removed the heavy elements from the atmosphere; the mean time between accretion events is comparable to the sedimentation time for cool DA stars, so this signature should be frequently observed if cometary systems are common. The possibility that cometary systems greater than or approximately equal to 3 times more massive than the Oort cloud are present around most white dwarf stars are excluded and how this limit can be improved is indicated. It is shown that a star keeps most of its comets during the vigorous mass loss phase prior to the appearance of the white dwarf star. Thus, the constraints obtained here may be applied to the main-sequence progenitors of the white dwarfs.

Alcock, C.

Thermal history of comets during residence in the Oort cloud - Effect of radiogenic heating in combination with the very low thermal conductivity of amorphous ice

The thermal history of long-period comets initially composed of amorphous ice is studied. It is shown that such comets with a small nucleus thermal conductivity (kappa) experience a runaway increase in the internal temperature during residence in the Oort cloud. The temperature increase is a result of rapid release of the latent heat at crystallization triggered by gradual heating due to decay of radioactive nuclides. The time of the runaway temperature increase is about ten to a hundred million years after the formation of the nucleus depending on the fraction of refractory grains which contain radioactive nuclides. Most of the amorphous ice in the nuclides except just beneath the surface transforms into crystalline ice due to the runaway temperature increase. This implies that the ice in short-period comets is crystalline from the initial time when the long-period comet becomes a short-period one. In comets with large kappa the temperature does not rise much compared to the small kappa case and the initial amorphous ice is preserved. A criterion for the crystallization of the nucleus ice is derived.

Haruyama, Jun'ichi

Properties of Cometary Nuclei

Active long- and short-period comets contribute about 20 to 30 % of the major impactors on the Earth. Cometary nuclei are irregular bodies, typically a few to ten kilometers in diameter, with masses in the range 10(sup 15) to 10(sup 18) g. The nuclei are composed of an intimate mixture of volatile ices, mostly water ice and hydrocarbon and silicate grains. The composition is the closest to solar composition of any known bodies in the solar system. The nuclei appear to be weakly bonded agglomerations of smaller icy planetesimals, and material strengths estimated from observed tidal disruption events are fairly low, typically 10(sup 2) to 10(sup 4) N m(sup -2). Density estimates range between 0.2 and 1.2 g cm(sup -3) but are very poorly determined, if at all. As comets age they develop nonvolitile crusts on their surfaces which eventually render them inactive, similar in appearance to carbonaceous asteroids. However, dormant comets may continue to show sporadic activity and outbursts for some time before they become truly extinct. The source of the long-period comets is the Oort cloud, a vast spherical cloud of perhaps 10(sup 12) to 10(sup 13) comets surrounding the solar system and extending to interstellar distances. The likely source for short-period comets is the Kuiper belt. a ring of perhaps 10(sup 8) to 10(sup 10) remnant icy planetesimals beyond the orbit of Neptune, though some short-period comets may also be long-period comets from the Oort cloud which have been perturbed into short-period orbits.

comets nuclei volitile ices Oort cloud Kuiper belt

The dilemma of the new-comet flux

The question of the constancy of the flux rate of 'new' comets from the Oort cloud is critical in studies of the origin of comets. The large numbers may be explained by our being in a 'comet shower' or else by a loss of intrinsic brightness by new comets during their first passage through the inner solar system-hence the dilemma. Improvements in the quality and quantity of reliable orbits now make possible fairly precise evaluation of the data involved in the dilemma and a realistic comparison of the two alternatives. If we are in a comet shower, the increase with respect to the last several tens of thousands of years is not more than a factor of 1.8 nor a magnitude loss during first passage of more than 0.85 mag. This applies if new comets are defined as those with periods greater than 10(exp 6) yr. If the limit is set at 2.8 x 10(exp 6) yr, we may not be really in a comet shower and a good fraction of the comets with periods in the range P greater than 10(exp 6) and less than 2.8 x 10(exp 6) yr may be returning comets. The Oort cloud would then be fairly stable to nearly 40,000 AU. If we assume the reality of comet fading in the sense that few new comets are observable on their returns when more distant than 3.0 AU from the Sun, and if we then limit the discussion to comets with perihelion distance q less than 3.0 AU, there is no evidence for a shower.

Whipple, F. L.

The Meteoritic Component in Impact Deposits

An important part of the history of impacts on Earth, and their influence on the terrestrial environment and biotic evolution, is the provenance of the impacting bolides. This will reflect the history of the large-body object flux in the inner solar system. The physical and chemical properties of projectiles, as well as their orbital evolution, has influenced the dynamics and the relative timing of impact events. Possible impact scenarios include random impacts by individual asteroids or comets, or clusters of impacts due to major collisions in the asteroid or Kuiper belts, or large perturbations of the Oort cloud of comets. Over the last several years, a combination of trace element, isotopic, and petrologic data have yielded significant insights into this impact history. The trace element chemistry of sediments, in particular the concentration of siderophiles (e.g., Ir), is a useful tool to detect impacts and provides supporting evidence for suspected impact deposits. However, siderophiles are not especially useful in distinguishing between types of projectiles. Interelement abundances of PGEs can distinguish a chondritic signature, but since most asteroids, and probably all comets are chondritic, these data do little to distinguish between chondritic source materials. Perhaps the most significant chemical argument used to constrain provenance, is that the total amount of Ir in the global Cretaceous-Tertiary (KT) boundary ejecta layer is considerably less than that expected by a low-velocity, 10 km asteroid impact and is most consistent with the impact of a high-velocity, low-Ir comet. Alternatively, much of the Ir may have been buried in the Chicxulub crater and/or ejected to escape velocity.

Kyte, Frank T.

Dynamical evolution of the Oort cloud

New studies of the dynamical evolution of cometary orbits in the Oort cloud are made using a revised version of Weissman's (1982) Monte Carlo simulation model, which more accurately mimics the perturbation of comets by the giant planets. It is shown that perturbations by Saturn and Jupiter provide a substantial barrier to the diffusion of cometary perihelia into the inner solar system. Perturbations by Uranus and Neptune are rarely great enough to remove comets from the Oort cloud, but do serve to scatter the comets in the cloud in initial energy. The new model gives a population of 1.8 to 2.1 x 10 to the 12th comets for the present-day Oort cloud, and a mass of 7 to 8 earth masses. Perturbation of the Oort cloud by giant molecular clouds in the galaxy is discussed, as is evidence for a massive 'inner Oort cloud' internal to the observed one. The possibility of an unseen solar companion orbiting in the Oort cloud and causing periodic comet showers is shown to be dynamically plausible but unlikely, based on the observed cratering rate on the earth and moon.

Weissman, P. R.

Gamma ray bursts from collisions of primordial small mass black holes with comets

Recent results of BATSE (a collaborative project on independent sky surveys of gamm ray bursts and optical sky patrols) reinforce the isotropic distribution of gamm-ray bursts. Alternatively to cosmological models, collisions between small mas primordial black holes and comets in the Oort cloud are proposed. Assuming typical Oort cloud densities and velocities for comets and primordial black holes, many of the observed properties of gamma-ray bursts can be explained.

Bickert, K. F.

(abstract) The Impactor Flux in the Pluto-Charon System

The impactor flux on Pluto and Charon consists of long-period comets from the Oort cloud passing through the region, and intermediate-period comets evolving inward to (or outward from) short-period orbits. The source of the intermediate-period comets is likely an extended disk of remnant planetesimals beyond the orbit of Neptune, commonly referred to as the Kuiper belt, though the Oort cloud may be an additional source of some short-period comets. The Pluto-Charon system actually circulates within the Kuiper belt, and with an aphelion of 49.3 AU, moves through a region where remnant planetesimal orbits would likely be stable over the age of the solar system. The recent discovery of two objects at Kuiper belt distances, 1992 QB 1 and 1993 FW, and the fact that the orbit determined for 1992 QB 1 is likely of low eccentricity and low inclination, have provided strong observational evidence for the Kuiper belt. Weisman et al (1989) showed that, for the expected number of objects in the Kuiper belt necessary to provide the short-period comet flux, cometary cratering on Pluto and Charon is dominated by Kuiper belt comets. We will provide updated estimates of the numbers, based on an improved understanding of Oort cloud and Kuiper belt dynamics since 1989, and on improved estimates for the radii and masses for Pluto and Charon. Because Pluto and Charon actually penetrate the stable region of the Kuiper belt beyond 40 AU, expected cratering rates for the pair are substantially higher than for Triton, which is located at the inner edge of the Kuiper belt. However, the Pluto-Charon system is tidally evolved and this may have led to resurfacing events at various times in its history. Thus, detailed predictions of the integrated crater density or comparisons with Triton are not very meaningful without a knowledge of that history. Differences in the suspected compositions of Pluto and Charon may also lead to different surface rheologies and thus, different retention times for cratered surfaces.

Pluto

Magnetic reversal spurts: Rain gauges for comet showers

Abrupt increases in the rate of magnetic reversals (magnetic reversal spurts) were first studied by many others. They hypothesized that spurts result from increased turbulence in the earth's core dynamo during episodes of intense bolide bombardment of the earth. Mechanisms for creating episodes of intense bombardment of the earth involve gravitational perturbation of the Oort cloud of comets, either by a hidden planet, a solar companion, or massive matter in the galactic plane. Herein, the time variation in reversal rate is analyzed using methods of statistical density estimation. A smooth, continuous estimate of reversal rate is obtained using an adaptive kernel method, in which the kernel width is adjusted as a function of reversal rate. The estimates near the ends of the data series (at 165 my ago and the present) are obtained by extending the data by reflection. The results show that the reversal spurts are not associated demonstrably with extinctions or well-dated impacts. If the spurts do record episodes of intense bombardment of the earth, then the mass extinctions do not, in general, occur at times of impacts. Furthermore, the large impact craters seen are not obviously related to the spurts, suggesting that the craters may have been caused by bolides of a different nature and with a different temporal pattern. However, the most simple explanation seems to be that the spurts do not record comet showers, either because the recording mechanism suggested by Muller and Morris is not effective or because comet showers are not triggered in the ways considered by Hut et al.

Lutz, T. M.

Where Are the Interstellar Comets?

The existing theories of comet dynamics held that large numbers of comets are ejected to interstellar space and that other stellar systems would do the same; however, no comet on a hyperbolic orbit has ever been observed. Calculations developed by Duncan et al. are used to show that most comets thought to be ejected would actually be captured by the Oort Cloud.

comets interstellar comets Oort Cloud orbital dyna