Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “decarbonization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

Decarbonization Technology Snapshot: Heat Pump Water Heaters

Heat pump water heaters use electricity to move heat from one place to another instead of generating heat directly. In many cases they replace gas-fired water heaters and are significantly more energy efficient, reducing on-site Scope 1 emissions and often resulting in reduced total emissions.

building decarbonization

Emerging Technologies for Decarbonizing Silicon Production

Abstract Silicon (Si) is an important material for alloying, solar photovoltaics, and electronics. However, current methods of producing silicon require energy consumption of around 11–13 kWh/kg Si and direct carbon emissions are 4.7–5 tons CO 2 per ton Si which conflicts with global efforts to limit climate change. In this work, we discuss several promising methods for reducing or eliminating carbon emissions from the silicon production process. Such methods include using biocarbon, integrating the current process with carbon capture and utilization/storage (CCU/CCS), metallothermic reduction, hydrogen reduction, and molten salt electrolysis. We present the positive aspects and challenges of each approach. Biocarbon coupled with CCU/CCS is the most industrially mature technology and can be carbon–neutral or -negative but is not carbon-free. Hydrogen directly reducing silicon dioxide is not thermodynamically favorable, but it may be viable to use hydrogen in conjunction with other processes to reduce emissions. Metallothermic and electrochemical methods of production are promising and have the potential to create high-purity silicon with no reduction-related carbon emissions but have only been demonstrated at lab scale. Economic viability will likely be the next determining factor for which technologies are more widely researched and implemented. Graphical Abstract

08 HYDROGEN

Decarbonizing Hydrogen Production: Assessing A Net-Negative Pathway

Hydrogen is gaining prominence as a key factor in the world's transition to a cleaner energy future. The International Energy Agency (IEA)'s Global Hydrogen Review 2023 reports that the number of low-emission hydrogen production projects is increasing rapidly. The potential for growth in new applications such as heavy industry, transportation, and power generation is significant. The IEA urges more decisive action to spur demand for low-emission hydrogen to achieve climate goals. While hydrogen is produced through various industrial methods, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, low-carbon hydrogen is critical for mitigating climate change and is incentivized by the Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (45V). To this end, we have evaluated a commercial technology that can produce low- or negative-carbon hydrogen via ethanol catalytic oxidative reforming. This study assessed life cycle greenhouse gas emissions (carbon intensity or CI) associated with the hydrogen production technology. A total of 24 scenarios were evaluated, encompassing (a) Gen1 versus Gen2 ethanol inputs, (b) carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) of upstream fermentation CO2, and (c) oxygen sourcing via air separation unit (ASU) versus purchased or on-site production of oxygen as a byproduct of hydrogen electrolysis with a proton exchange membrane (PEM). Key findings include that the base case CI for hydrogen production using Gen2 ethanol from corn stover is lower than Gen1 dry mill corn ethanol. The study also points out that the CI for hydrogen production using PEM-O2 is lower than that using ASU-O2, whether the PEM-O2 is produced on-site or off-site (importing). When sourcing oxygen from on-site PEM-O2, the Gen1 and Gen2 ethanol-derived hydrogen exhibit favorable net-negative CI values for all evaluated scenarios, especially if the upstream ethanol CCS is included. As a reference, the 45V regulatory threshold for generating clean hydrogen tax credits is a CI below 0.45 kg CO2e/kg hydrogen.

BIOMASS FUELS,HYDROGEN

Comparison of Silicon Decarbonization Methods to Reduce Process Emissions and Energy Consumption

The demand for silicon is rising due to its use in solar cells, electronics, and alloying as part of the green transition. However, these products require silicon metal (metallurgical grade silicon, >98% Si) as their main raw material before undergoing further chemical refining, usually via gas phase in methods such as the Siemens process. Silicon metal is currently produced in a submerged arc furnace via carbothermic reduction of quartz, which results in 10-12 tCO2/tSi. More than 40% of these emissions are process emissions, meaning they do not include contributions from electricity generation or transport. This talk will discuss promising methods to reduce or eliminate these process emissions. These include the use of biocarbon and carbon capture, aluminothermic reduction, electrochemical reduction with molten salts, and use of hydrogen in a modified Siemens process. Biocarbon and carbon capture is a straightforward method to reduce the net carbon emissions of the process, but long-term sustainable production of high-quality charcoal is a challenge. Aluminothermic reduction makes good use of aluminum byproducts such as dross but is perhaps limited in its applications to aluminum-silicon alloy products. Electrochemical reduction is promising as a method of producing high purity Si from quartz, without further need for the Siemens process, but is still in early stages of research and slow processing times are a concern. Finally, the use of hydrogen in a modified Siemens process would also result in a high purity Si product from quartz, however the process has considerable logistical challenges with corrosive and unstable gases at high temperatures. This talk will further expand on the potential merits and challenges of each method, while comparing their potential to reduce emissions and/or energy consumption while meeting global demand.

decarbonization

Lessons Learned from the Clean Energy to Communities (C2C) Peer-Learning Cohort Evaluating and Prioritizing Municipal Buildings for Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization Investment

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), with support from World Resources Institute (WRI), designed and led a six-month peer-learning cohort from January through July 2024 on "Enhancing Resilience at Critical Facilities through Solar, Storage, and Microgrids" as part of the U.S Department of Energy's Clean Energy to Communities (nrel.gov/c2c) (C2C) program. Representatives from 15 municipalities, municipal utilities, colleges, and Tribes from across the United States participated in monthly workshops covering best practices for planning and deploying local resilience projects. This document shares key takeaways, lessons learned, and resources from the cohort.

buildings

Mobilizing mine lands for biobased decarbonization strategies

Over 163 000 ha of mine lands in Pennsylvania (PA) have the potential to produce willow as a feedstock for renewable energy generation. Each year these lands could produce between 454 000 and 907 000 dry Mg of willow, which can be a feedstock for bioenergy (i.e., biopower) with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS) or sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production. We used a spatially explicit model to explore cost-minimized allocation of willow biomass from abandoned mine lands (AML) to be used for BECCS or SAF production and to abate carbon dioxide. The results suggest that between 454 000 and 907 000 dry Mg of biomass can be produced on AML in PA at costs from $94 to $250 per dry Mg. This AML willow biomass could be combined with other available biomass and aggregated to ten facilities to produce 17.9 TWh of power; alternatively, it could produce 958 million liters of jet fuel, 638 million liters of renewable diesel, and 1.289 billion liters of naphtha, along with 0.735 TWh of electricity. From this analysis, in PA, under the BECCS pathway, up to 36 million Mg per year of CO2 could be abated at costs of up to $134 per Mg; under the SAF pathway, up to 17.5 million Mg per year of CO2 could be abated at costs up to $150 per Mg of CO2. The use of mine land willow as a supplemental feedstock for SAF and BECCS would need strong incentive programs if costs of production are to be comparable with production on agricultural land.

Wahlstrom, Mallory [Pennsylvania State University]

Decarbonizing nitrogen fertilizer production via the electrochemical nitrogen oxidation reaction

Nitric acid is an important commodity chemical with extensive applications in both agricultural and industrial sectors. However, current production methods involve a combination of the Haber–Bosch and Ostwald processes, which are both energy and carbon emission intensive. The electrochemical nitrogen oxidation reaction (NOR) to produce nitric acid or nitrates shows great potential as an environmentally friendly method for producing fertilizers under mild conditions. The key to progress in this field lies in understanding the fundamental mechanistic insights and establishing robust experimental methods, which is essential for the efficient design and synthesis of electrocatalysts for NOR. Additionally, poor gas mass transport in conventional electrochemical reactors at present lead to lower NOR activity, thereby limiting the progress in this field. In this work, we present a synergistic computational and experimental approach to map out the potential chemical and electrochemical steps and determine the energetics on PtO 2 catalyst to gain mechanistic insights into NOR. Here, this study marks the first attempt to perform NOR in a vapor-fed reactor designed using advanced (additive) manufacturing. The vapor-fed reactor significantly improved the N 2 mass transport to the catalyst, allowing us to report the highest rate for nitrate production to date at 3.3 μmol cm -2 h -1 at 2.01 V vs RHE.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION