NASA NTRS2020
Superconductors can carry an order-of-magnitude higher current than room temperature copper wires and can do so with two orders-of-magnitude lower alternating current (AC) electrical losses. These advantages underlie our estimates that turboelectric propulsion of large aircraft can be enabled by superconducting machines. However, even the much smaller losses of superconductors pose thermal management issues at the low temperatures required for superconductivity, and predicting those losses and validating the predictions has been a developing process at NASA Glenn Research Center over the last decade. Since Glenn’s earliest assessments of the feasibility of fully superconducting machines for turboelectric propulsion, the available models of AC losses in superconductors have changed significantly, as well as the state of development of superconducting wire for the coils of electric machines. While the models available to us have improved significantly, the value of the AC losses predicted by these models have only increased as more fidelity was developed. The fabrication of medium temperature superconducting wires (Tc near 40 K) has advanced, and wires can be produced with finer filaments and tighter twisting than a decade ago. However, the ideal wire configurations, developed decades ago for low temperature superconductors (Tc < 25 K), still elude manufacturers of medium and high temperature (Tc > 77 K) superconductors. This report discusses the developments, the current limitations, and the expectations that future configurations of superconducting wire can yet be produced that will provide suitably low AC losses for the aircraft propulsion application. The report presents a basic discussion of the types of AC losses in superconductors, followed by a discussion of the evolution of our understanding of the practical consequences of those AC losses. Next, there is a discussion of the superconducting wire configurations that have been developed, which were partially guided by that understanding. A brief discussion of the modes of removing the heat produced by the losses is presented. Lastly, a comparison is presented between losses in currently available MgB2 wire and other important cases, including copper at room temperature, copper at liquid hydrogen temperature, and expected future MgB2 wire. Room temperature copper has 100 times the loss of today’s MgB2 and 300 times the expected loss of future MgB2. That implies we can expect much higher efficiency from fully superconducting machines than from machines with copper stators, and high efficiency targets remain the driver behind investment in MgB2 development and medium temperature superconductor research.