Innovative Nuclear Fuel Designs at INL
Video describing the nuclear fuel design innovations at INL.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “innovative nuclear materials”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Fueling Nuclear Research at MFC: The Environmental Backbone of Nuclear Operations
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review guidelines are an essential part of the approval process of any construction or modification being done at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The Material and Fuels Complex (MFC) Environmental team is responsible for writing and reviewing Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), Environmental Compliance Permits (ECPs), Air Permitting Applicability Determinations (APADs), and other NEPA compliance documentation. This documentation allows for innovation in MFC research by permitting the introduction of new laboratory equipment, research facilities, and materials for researchers to use in their experiments. Without the work of the Environmental team, nuclear research and operations at MFC would not be possible.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Innovative Separations Research and Development Needs for Advanced Fuel Cycles
Deployment of advanced nuclear reactors will inevitably introduce new challenges for devising and implementing an efficient, safe, and economical nuclear fuel cycle that meets society’s need for clean energy and expectations for environmental stewardship. The growing urgency for decarbonizing the US and global economies makes such technological challenges all the more compelling. The Office of Materials and Chemical Technologies within US Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy stewards the capabilities and knowledge relied upon by government policy makers to make informed decisions regarding nuclear fuel cycle options. Such decisions in turn rely on the development of efficient and economical separation methods that can accept the used nuclear fuel containing actinides and fission products (FPs) to recycle selected actinides, recover valuable by-products, and deliver waste streams that are suitable for disposal. To help guide the future direction of fuel cycle separations research, taking into account emerging technologies, the Office of Materials and Chemical Technologies sponsored the Innovative Separations R&D Needs for Advanced Fuel Cycles workshop, held virtually August 30–September 1, 2021. Based upon 60 contributed white papers, 6 plenary lectures, and 3 days of discussions, the outcome of the workshop and subsequent deliberations was the generation of this report identifying seven future research directions (FRDs) plus three crosscutting areas of research.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Advanced Reactor Supply Chain Assessment (GAIN Report)
Several net-zero scenario evaluations predict a rapid ramp up of nuclear energy in the coming decades. If this materializes, it will most likely strain the supply chains associated with the potential advanced reactor concepts awaiting deployment. To help assess the current and potential capacities of the various advanced reactor supply chains, the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) conducted a survey of companies able to produce components for advanced reactors in the near future (namely for sodium, gas-cooled, and molten salt reactors). Using an aggressive nuclear deployment scenario, the objective was to assess the ability of the various supply chains to meet the considerable demand projections for certain key components (vessels, heat exchangers, pumps, graphite, and sensors) and identify potential challenges. While individual companies were unable to meet the most optimistic nuclear deployment rate projections, it was found that on aggregate, a United States-based supply chain projected that expansion could be ramped up to meet a larger future demand of these components. However, meeting projected demand for several more complex items (namely gas or salt heat exchangers) was found to be more challenging. Deploying new reactors at scale necessitates the production of more and more supply chain components, requiring a ramp up in production. Supply chain companies were surveyed, and respondents appeared less able to meet short term demand (next year) versus longer-term demand projections (5 and 10 years). This reflects the need to obtain orders with adequate lead times (can range from 3 to 30 months). Future demand will need to be met by expanding existing capacity. These expansions will require suppliers to raise capital or secure other types of support (federal loans or grants) to invest in facilities, equipment, and workforce. Individual suppliers indicated financial investments could be in the range of $\$ $100 million to $\$ $1 billion for their own facilities (depending on the type of facility). The biggest risk, according to respondents, related to general uncertainties surrounding the future nuclear industry and whether the potential demand projections will materialize into real demand that is actionable from a business perspective. Businesses do not seem willing to take investments risks without clear orders. If businesses are not able to invest to expand the supply, it will either delay the deployment of advanced nuclear technology, or the supply chain will be met by suppliers outside of the United States. This report only focuses on the domestic supply chain’s ability to meet the various projections stipulated here for the specific assessed components (vessels, heat exchangers, pumps, graphite, and sensors). The report does not cover all reactor designs or all components that may ultimately be needed for any one reactor design. It also does not address whether any specific aspect of the supply chain will be cost competitive in the global market, nor how potential state-backed entities could affect the expansion of a United States-based supply chain. The largest challenges in ramping up capacity among respondents appear to be workforce related. This includes workforce availability, experience, training, and turnover. In addition to facility investment, suppliers will also need to invest heavily in long-term workforce training to meet production goals. This issue is not nuclear-specific, and the expansion of any supply chain will likely face similar challenges. While suppliers evaluated expected normal business demand from other markets outside of nuclear, it is possible that other market segments could expand more than predicted and compete for the same suppliers. One potential market that may compete for the same supplier resources is the United States military, as many of these suppliers support both the commercial nuclear sector as well as the Navy with reactors and components. In summary, suppliers in the United States believe that there is a way to increase production in order to begin meeting the demand which will exist for advanced reactors—as long as appropriate investments can be made in the supply chain in an appropriate timeframe. Based on the capacity projections and lead times, investment will be needed to meet the 5-year and 10-year production targets. Therefore, if significant nuclear deployment is to occur in the 2030s, investment and ramp up of the advanced nuclear supply chain will need to begin in the near future for the United States to successfully deploy these advanced reactors with domestic supply chains.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Pillars of Innovation Across Southeast Idaho & the Interstate-15 Corridor
Since 1949, Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been home to developing civilian and defense nuclear reactor technologies and managing spent nuclear fuel. Today, INL is the nation’s nuclear energy research laboratory, sustaining the safe and efficient operation of existing reactors, powering science in space, and breaking ground on the future fleet of advanced nuclear reactors. INL is only one of many rising technology resources in the region, however. Along the Interstate 15 (I-15) corridor, technology and cybersecurity industries and intellectual assets are rapidly expanding. Creating an innovation hub in this region would unite capabilities to solve current and future challenges in nuclear reactor sustainment and expanded deployment, integrated fuel cycle solutions, integrated energy systems, advanced materials and manufacturing for extreme environments, and secure and resilient cyber-physical systems.
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
A case study in contrastive learning information combination: Application to technical forensics of additive manufacturing filament source identification
Combination of information from disparate data sources into a single decision is a core challenge in many fields, including the field of technical forensics. Technical forensics (TF) utilizes technical characterization of questioned samples to determine properties of that sample; these properties are then used to infer information of forensic interest, such as provenance, age, or attribution. TF is utilized in traditional forensic applications, such as the attribution of material fragments from an explosive, and in nuclear forensic applications, such as the attribution of actinides which have been interdicted out of regulatory control. The challenge of combining information from disparate sources, described alternately by many terms including “Data Fusion” and “Data Integration”, is exacerbated in the technical forensics domain due to at least two factors: the challenge of interpreting each information source singularly, and the relatively small data set sizes available. Extensive literature exists attempting to combine technical forensics information sources, both in manual and automated processes. These attempts are often bespoke to the specific information sources (such as the bi-, tri-, or quad-isotope chart (Moody, Grant, and Hutcheon 2005)), with some emerging examples of simple early- and late- fusion (, respectively). Simultaneous to the information combination efforts described in the previous paragraph, the field of natural language processing attempted (and largely succeeded) in combining information from multiple non-technical information sources. The ecosystem of “multi-modal” language models, which can take text and images as input, and generate text and images as output, became large and diverse by 2025 (Khan et al. 2025). In a generalized sense, many of these methods are trained by learning neural networks which can convert raw text or images into a vector of numbers describing the text or image, hereafter called “embeddings” and the neural networks performing the conversion are called “embedders”. By using a separate embedder for text and images, finding coincident text and images (such as images with their captions), and optimizing the parameters of the embedders such that the embeddings for the text and the image are similar, the field has found a bridge between text and images (Girdhar et al. 2023). It is the contention of the authors of this report that this insight is not limited to text and images but instead can be extended to any modality which can be found coincidently. The subject of the rest of this report is the application of this method to example multi-modal technical forensic data. Some details about the data used in this report are not appropriate for this report, and are included in a companion report (PNNL-38669).
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Cycle Science & Technology Overview
The Fuel Cycle Science & Technology Division delivers innovative leadership in the development and assessment of science and engineering-based solutions for the integrated nuclear fuel cycle, critical materials recovery, national security and space related applications through world-class staff and research capabilities.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Nuclear Fuel and Pu Redox Studies from The Glenn T. Seaborg Institute at Idaho National Laboratory
The Glenn T. Seaborg Institute at Idaho National Laboratory (INL-GTSI) focuses on advancing fundamental research in the actinide sciences by providing unique opportunities to early career scientists and engineers to gain experience studying the actinide elements and their associated systems. The INL-GTSI is built from three focus areas that are based on the expertise and supporting infrastructure at INL and include solid state chemistry and physics, solution phase chemistry and physics, and forensic and isotope science. INL is the lead Laboratory for nuclear energy research and development in the U. S. and the research on nuclear fuels performed under the INL-GTSI gives good examples of solid state studies. Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) alloys are leading fuel candidates for conversion of high performance research and test reactors to low-enriched fuels. During irradiation, generated fission gas accumulates into bubbles and self-organizes into a gas bubble superlattice (GBS) that effectively stores fission gases and inhibits fuel swelling. A study on the early self- organizing behavior of the GBS shows that not only grain boundaries but the interfaces between the U-Mo matrix and uranium carbide (UC) impurities are important to GBS formation.[1] In solution, understanding the complex redox behavior of plutonium in aqueous environments is critical for establishing optimized nuclear waste reprocessing solvent systems and storage tank environments. INL-GTSI researchers have produced an experimentally validated multi-scale model of the gamma radiation induced behavior of plutonium ions in concentrated aqueous HNO3 solutions.[2] Here, gamma radiation effected only minimal steady state changes in the redox distribution of the plutonium oxidation states. The redox cycling between Pu(IV) and Pu(III) is demonstrated to be mediated by the •OH/NO3• radical oxidation of Pu(III) and the H2O2/HNO3 driven reduction of Pu(IV). The INL-GTSI offers young researchers the unique chance to work directly with actinide bearing materials in a U. S. National Laboratory environment. Further topical areas of interest to the INL-GTSI include, but are not limited to, fundamental actinide properties, structure/property (electronic, magnetic, thermal) relations, actinide quantum criticality, f- electron interactions, electron correlations, computational studies, new phases, defect effects, interface interactions, isotope production and separation, forensic analytical chemistry, structure and dynamic properties of actinides in non-aqueous media, separations chemistry and kinetics for advanced nuclear fuel cycles, radiation effects, and innovative and advanced ligand design for complexation of the actinides.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
The Complex, Unique, and Powerful Imaging Instrument for Dynamics (CUPI 2 D) at the Spallation Neutron Source (invited)
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory is planning to build the Second Target Station (STS) at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS). STS will host a suite of novel instruments that complement the First Target Station’s beamline capabilities by offering an increased flux for cold neutrons and a broader wavelength bandwidth. A novel neutron imaging beamline, named the Complex, Unique, and Powerful Imaging Instrument for Dynamics (CUPI 2 D), is among the first eight instruments that will be commissioned at STS as part of the construction project. CUPI 2 D is designed for a broad range of neutron imaging scientific applications, such as energy storage and conversion (batteries and fuel cells), materials science and engineering (additive manufacturing, superalloys, and archaeometry), nuclear materials (novel cladding materials, nuclear fuel, and moderators), cementitious materials, biology/medical/dental applications (regenerative medicine and cancer), and life sciences (plant–soil interactions and nutrient dynamics). The innovation of this instrument lies in the utilization of a high flux of wavelength-separated cold neutrons to perform real time in situ neutron grating interferometry and Bragg edge imaging—with a wavelength resolution of δλ/λ ≈ 0.3%—simultaneously when required, across a broad range of length and time scales. This manuscript briefly describes the science enabled at CUPI 2 D based on its unique capabilities. The preliminary beamline performance, a design concept, and future development requirements are also presented.
47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
Advanced Fuels Campaign 2019 Accomplishments
The mission of the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) is to perform or support research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) activities to identify and mature innovative fuels and cladding materials and associated technologies with the potential to improve the performance and safety of current and future reactors; increase the efficient utilization of nuclear energy resources; contribute to enhancing proliferation resistance of the nuclear fuel cycle; and address challenges related to waste management and ultimate disposal. AFC pursues its mission objectives using a goal-oriented, science-based approach that seeks to establish a fundamental understanding of fuel and cladding behaviors under conditions that arise during fabrication, normal steady-state irradiation, off-normal transient scenarios, and storage/disposal. This approach includes advancing the theoretical understanding of fuel behavior, conducting fundamental and integral experiments, and supporting the mechanistic, multi-scale modeling of nuclear fuels to inform and guide fuel development projects, advance the technological readiness of promising fuel candidates, and ultimately support fuel qualification and licensing initiatives. In the area of advanced tools for the modeling and simulation of nuclear fuels, the AFC works in close partnership with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, participating with NEAMS in developing mechanistic fuel behavior models and providing experimental data to inform and validate its most advanced tools. Specifically, AFC objectives in thecoming five year horizon include: 1. support the industry-led development of Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) technologies with improved reliability and performance under normal operations and enhanced tolerance during hypothetical accident scenarios, with implementation of lead test rods/assemblies of one or more ATF concepts in commercial reactor(s) by or before 2022 and batch reloads of near-term concept(s) in the 2023-2026 timeframe; 2. lead research and development on innovative fuel and cladding technologies for applications to future advanced reactors, especially fast-spectrum reactors, including reactors that utilize both once-through and recycle scenarios; 3. continue the development and demonstration of a multi-scale,science-based approach to fuel development and testing, andcontribute to the establishment of a state-of-the-art R&D infrastructure necessary to accelerate the development of new fuel concepts; and collaborate with NEAMS on the development and validation of multi-scale, multi-physics, and increasingly predictive fuel performance models and codes. 4. collaborate with NEAMS on the development and validation of multi-scale, multi-physics, and increasingly predictive fuel performance models and codes.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Innovative control mechanism for research and test reactors using mandrel-shaped control rods
Research and test reactors have historically played a pivotal role in supporting the initial development of nuclear reactors. They continue to provide essential data for enhancing fuel designs and material knowledge. However, with many such reactors aging and the growing demand for data to bolster advanced reactor development, it is more necessary to research potential design attributes of the next generation of research and test reactors. For test reactors dedicated to fuel and material testing, the design of control mechanisms significantly influences the stabilization of neutron flux levels in irradiation positions while sustaining criticality. This study presents an innovative control mechanism for potential research and test reactor designs. It employs small absorber rods that move in opposite axial directions to maintain axial symmetry of power and neutron flux during burnup cycles. These rods maximize reactivity worth while also offering flexibility to flatten the radial power distribution. An axial translation of the control mechanisms’ absorbers, as compared to the rotational movement of absorbers in control cylinders, also provides a benefit to available excess reactivity and cycle length. Additionally, this work utilizes a simplified core model of the Advanced Test Reactor to assess the performance of this control mechanism. Compared to the current control system based on rotating control cylinders, the new control mechanism has the potential to enhance, or at least maintain, neutronic performance parameters in this reactor design.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Analysis of Potential Target Materials for the Mu2e Production Target
The need for high intensity secondary beams in particular muon beams is becoming increasingly evident, necessitating innovation in target design. Ideal muon production targets are temperature stable while producing high muon yields. We have identified radiation length and nuclear interaction length as proxies for these parameters, with longer radiation length decreasing energy deposition in the target and shorter nuclear interaction length increasing muon yield. In this poster, we summarize some of our analysis of potential target materials in relation to these factors.
43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
Materials and Fuels Complex FY-23 - FY-27: Five-Year Investment Strategy
The Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) vision is to “Advance nuclear energy science and technology to meet U.S. energy, environmental, and economic needs.” The Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) serves as the foundation of a nuclear RD&D enabling test bed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and is an integral part of a National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) strategy. MFC facilities focus on developing and maintaining RD&D capabilities that can increase research throughput, reduce barriers to deployment, and facilitate commercialization of new ideas and technologies for clean and secure sources of energy.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Destructive Analysis of TRISO Particles: Crush/Burn/Leach Followed by Davies-Gray Titration and IDMS
The accurate accounting of nuclear materials is a cornerstone of international nuclear safeguards. One emerging challenge in this domain is the fabrication of TRIstructural ISOtropic (TRISO) particle fuels. Although these innovative fuel forms are critical for advanced reactor applications, their robust refractory ceramics and coating compositions present significant obstacles to destructive analysis (DA) methods. Ensuring full and quantitative recovery from these particles is essential for accurate mass accountancy. The current study was initiated to address these challenges, first by validating a previously established destructive method developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the quantitative recovery of uranium from TRISO particles and then following that process with uranium content determination through isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) and Davies-Gray titration. This study expands on the scope of a digestive method that was developed under the Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification program and is currently implemented in both the Coated Particle Fuel Development Laboratory and Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratory at ORNL. The success of the previous Advanced Gas Reactor work relied on developing a DA method to evaluate the fabrication process and reactor experiments. The methodology described in this report was designed to rigorously investigate the efficacy of the crush/burn/leach sample preparation of TRISO particles; it aims to quantify uranium recovery while also assessing the effects of TRISO constituents (e.g., silicon and zirconium) on analytical precision and accuracy. By comparing the results from the titration method and IDMS, we sought to determine whether existing analytical procedures accepted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) could be effectively translated to TRISO fuel forms. The team employed an approach that involved processing replicate TRISO samples, optimizing the milling (i.e., crushing) step and performing serial leaches. The elemental composition of the analytical samples was examined to prepare for interference studies in the second year of this project. The integration of gamma spectrometry to verify residual uranium activity further strengthened the validation. Statistical methods were applied to the collected data to evaluate the uncertainties arising from sampling, sample preparation and uranium quantification. These uncertainties were then compared to the IAEA’s international target values (ITVs). Additional data collected in upcoming project work will strengthen the uncertainty estimates. Ultimately, it is hoped that this project will contribute materially to the body of work related to characterization of TRISO based fuels for the purpose of material accountancy and its applications to international safeguards.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Inverse prediction of PuO2 processing conditions using Bayesian seemingly unrelated regression with functional data
Over the past decade, a variety of innovative methodologies have been developed to better characterize the relationships between processing conditions and the physical, morphological, and chemical features of special nuclear material (SNM). Different processing conditions generate SNM products with different features, which are known as “signatures” because they are indicative of the processing conditions used to produce the material. These signatures can potentially allow a forensic analyst to determine which processes were used to produce the SNM and make inferences about where the material originated. This article investigates a statistical technique for relating processing conditions to the morphological features of PuO 2 particles. We develop a Bayesian implementation of seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) to inverse-predict unknown PuO 2 processing conditions from known PuO 2 features. Model results from simulated data demonstrate the usefulness of the technique. Applied to empirical data from a bench-scale experiment specifically designed with inverse prediction in mind, our model successfully predicts nitric acid concentration, while results for Pu concentration and precipitation temperature were equivalent to a simple mean model. Our technique compliments other recent methodologies developed for forensic analysis of nuclear material and can be generalized across the field of chemometrics for application to other materials.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Materials and Fuels Complex (FY22 – FY26 Five-Year Investment Strategy)
The Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) vision is to “Advance nuclear energy science and technology to meet U.S. energy, environmental, and economic needs.” The Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) serves as the foundation of a nuclear RD&D enabling test bed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and is an integral part of a National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) strategy. MFC facilities focus on developing and maintaining RD&D capabilities that can increase research throughput, reduce barriers to deployment, and facilitate commercialization of new ideas and technologies for clean and secure sources of energy.
07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
The Need for International Consensus and Acceptance of Free Released Material - 20177
World Nuclear Association (WNA) believes that the waste hierarchy is best implemented when a good compromise exists between disposal and reuse/recycling methods of valuable materials and waste generated by the nuclear industry. The rapid normalization of recycling in both domestic and industrial worlds strengthens WNA's position, as new facilities worldwide emerge providing treatment for clearance. As a foundation for reuse and recycling, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) provided international guidance on clearance (Safety Guide RSG 1.7) [1], defining associated threshold values approved by all member states. Nevertheless, despite this consensus, a lack of alignment of national regulations has occurred as countries have departed for this international guidance, leading to confusion, even between neighborhood countries. As a consequence, this discrepancy between national rules, despite industrial and technical international consensus based on radiological and environmental considerations appeared as a brake, weakening public acceptance as well as nuclear industry credibility. As a matter of fact, what is allowed in one side of a border may be forbidden on the other side. Conversely, an international consensus on clearance would promote: - Sustainability improvements, including preservation of natural and rare resources resulting from optimized recycling and reuse practices; - A broader acceptance of free released materials; - taking advantage of the available technologies worldwide in materials treatment aiming for clearance; - Increased sharing and use of methods, know-how and operators, leading to better efficiency, innovation, improvement as well as technical and financial mastery. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗