SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium metal anode stabilization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2018

Ionic Liquids at Electrified Interfaces: from Double Layers to Decomposition

Ionic liquids are versatile electrolytes whose properties at electrified interfaces have the potential to enable technologies such as supercapacitors and Li-metal battery anodes. At electrified carbon surfaces, ionic liquids form an electric double layer that stores energy and provides the foundation for supercapacitors. At electrified lithium surfaces, ionic liquids decompose to form a solid electrolyte interphase that has the potential to stabilize Li-metal anodes in rechargable batteries. The behavior of two ionic liquids of technological importance, [pyr14][TFSI] and [EMIM][BF4], are examined at these electrified interfaces through molecular dynamics and ab initio techniques.

Haskins, Justin B.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Ionic Liquids at Electrified Interfaces: from Double Layers to Decomposition

Haskins, Justin B.↗

DOE OSTI2024

All‐Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries of High Cycling Stability and Rate Capability Enabled by a Self‐Lithiated Sn‐C Interlayer

Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) have attracted intense interest due to their high theoretical energy density and intrinsic safety. However, constructing durable lithium (Li) metal anodes with high cycling efficiency in ASSLSBs remains challenging due to poor interface stability. Here, a compositionally stable, self‐lithiated tin (Sn)‐carbon (C) composite interlayer (LSCI) between Li anode and solid‐state electrolyte (SSE), capable of homogenizing Li‐ion transport across the interlayer, mitigating decomposition of SSE, and enhancing electrochemical/structural stability of interface, is developed for ASSLSBs. The LSCI‐mediated Li metal anode enables stable Li plating/stripping over 7000 h without Li dendrite penetration. The ASSLSBs equipped with LSCI thus exhibit excellent cycling stability of over 300 cycles (capacity retention of ≈80%) under low applied pressure (<8 MPa) and demonstrate improved rate capability even at 3C. The enhanced electrochemical performance and corresponding insights of the designed LSCI broaden the spectrum of advanced interlayers for interface manipulation, advancing the practical application of ASSLSBs.

Ye, Lei↗

DOE OSTI2022

Long–Cycling Sulfide–Based All–Solid–State Batteries Enabled by Electrochemo–Mechanically Stable Electrodes

Anode significantly determines the energy density of all-solid-state Lithium batteries (ASLBs). Silicon (Si) and Lithium (Li) metal are two of the most attractive anodes because of their ultrahigh theoretical capacities. However, most investigations focus on Li metal; the great potential of Si is underrated. This study investigates Si anode's stability, processability, and cost in ASLBs and compares them with Li metal. Moreover, the single-crystal LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 is stabilized with a lithium silicate (Li 2 SiO x ) through a scalable sol-gel method. ASLBs with a cell-level energy density of 285 Wh kg -1 are obtained through sandwiching Si anode, thin sulfide solid-state electrolyte membrane, and interface stabilized LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 . The full cell delivered a high capacity of 145 mAh g -1 at C/3 and maintained stability for 1000 cycles. This work inspires commercializing the ASLBs on a large scale with exciting manufacturing lines for large-scale, safe, and economical energy storage.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2024

High voltage aqueous electrolyte system for lithium metal or graphite anode

The present invention is directed to aqueous solid state electrolytes that comprise a fluoride additive to stabilize the interface between the anode and aqueous electrolyte. The present invention is also directed to methods of making the solid state electrolyte materials and methods of using the solid state electrolyte materials in batteries and other electrochemical technologies.

Xu, Kang↗

DOE OSTI2024

Comparative Analysis of Reactivity of Al and Ga Doped Garnet Solid State Electrolyte at the Interface with Li Metal

Lithium garnet (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 , LLZO) based solid electrolytes are leading candidate materials for all-solid-state batteries with lithium metal anodes because of their high ionic conductivity, high mechanical toughness, and superior electrochemical stability. While doping LLZO with Al and Ga increases its ionic conductivity by stabilizing the cubic phase, the impact of dopants on its (electro)chemical stability at the interfaces with Li metal is critical. Here, our study of differences between Al- and Ga-doped LLZO when interfaced with lithium metal using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional theory shows a higher propensity of Ga to move across LLZO interface with Li metal and form Ga-Li alloy. Additionally, neutron diffraction reveals loss of cubic phase resulting from the loss of dopant that explains electrochemical behavior differences between Ga- and Al-doped LLZO. Overall, our study reveals the key role of dopant chemistry in enabling stable solid electrolyte materials for all-solid-state batteries.

Klenk, Matthew↗

DOE OSTI2025

Designing Moderately‐Solvating Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

New electrolytes are critical for high‐energy lithium (Li)–sulfur (S) batteries (LSBs) to ensure their stability against Li metal anode and polysulfides (PSs) shuttling which hinder the large‐scale application of LSBs. In this study, the design principle of moderately solvating electrolytes (MSEs) for LSBs is demonstrated by using a multiple‐solvent system comprising of a highly solvating solvent, a weakly solvating solvent, and a non‐solvating solvent to create a well‐balanced electrolyte system. This resulting electrolyte significantly improves the cycle life of LSBs, achieving 300 cycles, which is twice as long as that of similar cells with the conventional electrolyte and it also ensures stable calendar life for at least seven months. The optimal MSE forms robust passivation layers enhancing the structural integrity of both S and Li metal electrodes after cycling. These virtues effectively hinder parasitic side reactions and self‐discharge behavior of LSBs. This electrolyte design principle is versatile and can be applied to other battery chemistries, providing a potential path toward the development of a more efficient and stable battery system. By addressing key challenges such as the instability of electrodes and shuttling of polysulfides, this electrolyte approach offers promising solutions for advancing LSB technology.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2020

NASICON Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 Solid Electrolyte for an All‐Solid‐State Li‐Metal Battery

Abstract A thin solid electrolyte with a high Li + conductivity is used to separate the metallic lithium anode and the cathode in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery. However, most solid Li‐ion electrolytes have a small electrochemical stability window, large interfacial resistance, and cannot block lithium‐dendrite growth when lithium is plated on charging of the cell. Mg 2+ stabilizes a rhombohedral NASICON‐structured solid electrolyte of the formula Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 (LMZP). This solid electrolyte has Li‐ion conductivity two orders of magnitude higher at 25 °C than that of the triclinic LiZr 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . 7 Li and 6 Li NMR confirm the Li‐ions in two different crystallographic sites of the NASICON framework with 85% of the Li‐ions having a relatively higher mobility than the other 15%. The anode–electrolyte interface is further investigated with symmetric Li/LMZP/Li cell testing, while the cathode–electrolyte interface is explored with an all‐solid‐state Li/LMZP/LiFePO 4 cell. The enhanced performance of these cells enabled by the Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 solid electrolyte is stable upon repeated charge/discharge cycling.

Zhou, Qiongyu↗

NASA NTRS2022

The Promise of Alloy Anodes for Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries are anext-generation technology that could featureimproved safety and energy density, but reliably integrating high-capacity electrode materials to enable high energy while retaining stablelong-termcycling remains a challenge. Anode materials that alloy with lithium, such as silicon, tin, and aluminum,offer high capacity that canyield high-energy battery cells. The use of alloy anodes in solid-state batteries potentially offers major mechanistic benefits compared to other anode contendersand battery systems, such as lithium metal in solid-state architectures or alloys in liquid-electrolyte batteries. This perspective discusseskey advantagesof alloy anode materials for solid-state batteries, including the avoidance of the short circuiting observed with lithium metal and the chemo-mechanical stabilization of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). We further discuss open research questions and challenges in engineering alloy-anode-based solid-state batteries, with the goal of advancing our understanding and control of alloy anode materialswithin solid-state architectures toward commercial application.

John A Lewis↗

DOE OSTI2022

Review of Multifunctional Separators: Stabilizing the Cathode and the Anode for Alkali (Li, Na, and K) Metal–Sulfur and Selenium Batteries

Alkali metal batteries based on lithium, sodium, and potassium anodes and sulfur-based cathodes are regarded as key for next-generation energy storage due to their high theoretical energy and potential cost effectiveness. However, metal–sulfur batteries remain challenged by several factors, including polysulfides’ (PSs) dissolution, sluggish sulfur redox kinetics at the cathode, and metallic dendrite growth at the anode. Functional separators and interlayers are an innovative approach to remedying these drawbacks. Here we critically review the state-of-the-art in separators/interlayers for cathode and anode protection, covering the Li–S and the emerging Na–S and K–S systems. The approaches for improving electrochemical performance may be categorized as one or a combination of the following: Immobilization of polysulfides (cathode); catalyzing sulfur redox kinetics (cathode); introduction of protective layers to serve as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) (anode); and combined improvement in electrolyte wetting and homogenization of ion flux (anode and cathode). It is demonstrated that while the advances in Li–S are relatively mature, less progress has been made with Na–S and K–S due to the more challenging redox chemistry at the cathode and increased electrochemical instability at the anode. Throughout these sections there is a complementary discussion of functional separators for emerging alkali metal systems based on metal–selenium and the metal–selenium sulfide. The focus then shifts to interlayers and artificial SEI/cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) layers employed to stabilize solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) in metal–sulfur solid-state batteries (SSBs). The discussion of SSEs focuses on inorganic electrolytes based on Li- and Na-based oxides and sulfides but also touches on some hybrid systems with an inorganic matrix and a minority polymer phase. The review then moves to practical considerations for functional separators, including scaleup issues and Li–S technoeconomics. The review concludes with an outlook section, where we discuss emerging mechanics, spectroscopy, and advanced electron microscopy (e.g. cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB))-based approaches for analysis of functional separator structure–battery electrochemical performance interrelations. Finally, throughout the review we identify the outstanding open scientific and technological questions while providing recommendations for future research topics.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2020

Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with a Block Copolymer Electrolyte Analyzed by X-ray Microtomography

Most of the work on Lithium-sulfur (LiS) batteries use liquid electrolytes that have limited stability when coupled with Li metal anodes. We have studied LiS batteries with a solid block copolymer electrolyte which exhibits improved stability against Li anodes. Additionally, the electrolyte comprises a polystyrene-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (SEO) copolymer doped with a Li salt. Hollow carbon nanospheres impregnated with sulfur were used to build a composite cathode. Two types of sulfur-impregnated functionalized carbon nanospheres were used: One with carboxylic acid groups and the other with short lithium poly(4-styrenesulfonyl(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) (PSTFSI-Li) chains. Cells with Li S dissolved in the SEO based electrolyte served as the baseline. After cycling, the reason for capacity fade was determined by imaging the batteries using synchrotron hard X-ray microtomography. It is generally assumed that LiS cells fail due to dissolution of polysulfide into the liquid electrolyte, i.e., the main problems related to the cathode. In our all-solid cells, failure was primarily due to delamination of the Li foil from the polymer electrolyte layer. Delamination is also observed at the sulfur cathode. It is likely that the large changes in volume of the active materials during cycling induce delamination in all-solid LiS cells. 2 8

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2024

A Review on Solid State Batteries: Life Cycle Perspectives

This report briefly reviews the characteristics of solid-state batteries (SSBs) and the life-cycle analysis (LCA) studies that have been completed for SSBs. Compared with conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), SSBs offer improved safety and potentially higher energy density — both enabled by replacing liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes and using lithium metal anodes. Several challenges impede the commercialization of SSBs, primarily related to the stability of the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes. Several options are under consideration for SSB electrolyte and cathode chemistries. As a result, the production processes for these components and the corresponding battery packs are still under development and can differ significantly from those used for conventional LIB pack production. A robust comparison of SSBs with LIBs through LCA is important to analyze the environmental benefits and challenges associated with this alternative battery system. While the literature provides only a few LCA studies focused on SSBs, with significant uncertainty in their life-cycle inventories (LCIs), those studies collectively suggest that solid electrolyte manufacturing is the major environmental hotspot, followed by cathode and anode production.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Stabilizing the Interphase in Cobalt–Free, Ultrahigh–Nickel Cathodes for Lithium–Ion Batteries

High-nickel layered oxide cathodes, such as LiNi 1-x-y Mn x Co y O 2 (NMC) and LiNi 1-x-y Co x Al y O 2 (NCA), are at the forefront for implementation in high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. The presence of cobalt in both cathode chemistries, however, largely deters their application due to fiscal and humanitarian issues affiliated with cobalt sourcing. Increasing the Ni content drives down the Co content, but introduces additional structural and electrochemical problems attributed to high-Ni cathodes. Herein a dually modified cobalt-free ultrahigh-nickel cathode 0.02B-LiNi 0.99 Mg 0.01 O 2 (NBM) is presented with 1 mol% Mg and 2 mol% B that exhibits a high initial 1C discharge capacity of 210 mA h g –1 with a 20% capacity retention improvement over 500 cycles when benchmarked against LiNiO 2 (LNO) in pouch full cell configurations with graphite anode. Postmortem analyses reveal the enhanced performance stems from reduced active lithium inventory loss and localized surface reactivity in the NBM cathode. Here, the stabilized cathode-electrolyte interphase subsequently reduces transition-metal dissolution and ensuing chemical crossover to the graphite anode, which prevents further catalyzed parasitic reactions that harmfully passivate the anode surface. Altogether, this study aims to highlight the importance of electrode characterization and analysis from an interphasial viewpoint and to push the ongoing research to stabilize cobalt-free ultrahigh-Ni cathodes for industrial feasibility.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2021

Practical Considerations for Testing Polymer Electrolytes for High-Energy Solid-State Batteries

Polymer electrolytes are an important class of materials in enabling solid-state batteries, which have the potential to exceed 400 Wh/kg energy density. Despite significant advancements in their lithium-ion transport and mechanical properties over the last two decades, the integration and testing of these novel electrolyte materials into functioning cells with the electrode loadings and dimensions required to meet the cell-level energy density goals have been limited. Here, through multiple representative examples, we demonstrate the need of testing in close to practical cell conditions for a faster and more reliable evaluation of polymeric electrolytes. In particular, the need for testing with thin lithium anodes and practical cycling capacities is demonstrated for evaluation of their lithium-metal interfacial stability and dendritic resistance, respectively, and a testing protocol is suggested. The guidelines presented here will also apply to testing of other solid electrolytes for solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Synergistic effects of chlorine substitution in sulfide electrolyte solid state batteries

All-solid-state battery is considered as one of the most promising competitors to Li ion batteries. Two widely known performance metrics for solid electrolytes, among others, are ionic conductivity and stability. In this study, it is found that both can be improved by the synergistic effects of chlorine substitution in sulfide-based solid electrolytes. Particularly, instabilities arising from both bulk decompositions and interfacial reactions to electrodes can be better inhibited in the chlorine substituted sulfide solid electrolytes through the increased susceptibility to the mechanical constriction induced enhancement of voltage stability. As a result, the stability window of some chlorine-rich Li-argyrodites can be systematically higher than some other chlorine-deficient or chlorine-free electrolytes, especially under the implementation of the mechanical constriction battery assembly and test conditions. Thus, a solid-state battery system of 4 V to 5 V-class cathodes paired with lithium metal anode is demonstrated using these chlorine-rich Li-argyrodites without additional coatings. Furthermore, since Cl composition modulates the stability and instability of Li-argyrodite at low voltages, it allows us to design a multilayer configuration with a hierarchy of Li metal stabilities to demonstrate the stable cycling at relatively high current densities for solid-state batteries. It is found that a moderate Cl composition in the electrolyte is the best to inhibit Li dendrite penetration as the central electrolyte layer, emphasizing a slightly increased “instability” as the hidden performance metric of relevance here, in addition to the two well-known metrics of stability and ionic conductivity. The understanding of the chlorine substitution effect in sulfide electrolytes provides an important design principle for all-solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Voltage Mining for (De)lithiation-Stabilized Cathodes and a Machine Learning Model for Li-Ion Cathode Voltage

Advances in lithium-metal anodes have inspired interest in discovery of Li-free cathodes, most of which are natively found in their charged state. This is in contrast to today's commercial lithium-ion battery cathodes, which are more stable in their discharged state. In this study, we combine calculated cathode voltage information from both categories of cathode materials, covering 5577 and 2423 total unique structure pairs, respectively. The resulting voltage distributions with respect to the redox pairs and anion types for both classes of compounds emphasize design principles for high-voltage cathodes, which favor later Period 4 transition metals in their higher oxidation states and more electronegative anions like fluorine or polyanion groups. Generally, cathodes that are found in their charged, delithiated state are shown to exhibit voltages lower than those that are most stable in their lithiated state, in agreement with thermodynamic expectations. Deviations from this trend are found to originate from different anion distributions between redox pairs. In addition, a machine learning model for voltage prediction based on chemical formulas is trained and shows state-of-the-art performance when compared to two established composition-based ML models for material properties predictions, Roost and CrabNet.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2020

High-Power Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by High-Concentration Acetonitrile-Based Electrolytes with Vinylene Carbonate Additive

To enable next-generation high power, high-energy-density lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs), an electrolyte possessing both high Li Coulombic efficiency (CE) at high-rate and good anodic stability on cathodes is critical. Acetonitrile (AN) is a well-known organic solvent for high anodic stability and high ionic conductivity, yet its application in LMBs is limited due to its poor compatibility with Li metal anode even at high salt concentration conditions. Here, we developed a highly concentrated AN-based electrolyte with vinylene carbonate (VC) additive to suppress Li+ depletion at high current densities. Addition of VC in the AN-based electrolyte leads to the formation of a polycarbonate-based solid electrolyte interphase which minimizes Li corrosion and leads to very high Li CE of up to 99.1% at a current density of 0.2 mA cm-2. Using such an electrolyte, fast charging of Li||NMC333 cells has been realized at a high current density of 3.6 mA cm-2, and stable cycling of Li||NMC622 cells with a high cathode loading of 4 mAh cm-2 has also been demonstrated.

Peng, Zhe↗

DOE OSTI2021

Computation-guided discovery of coating materials to stabilize the interface between lithium garnet solid electrolyte and high-energy cathodes for all-solid-state lithium batteries

All-solid-state batteries with a lithium metal anode, enabled by lithium garnet solid electrolytes such as Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO), are a promising next-generation energy-storage technology. The further development of all-solid-state battery requires the integration of high-energy cathodes such as LiNi 1-x-y Mn x Co y O 2 (NMC) with the garnet solid electrolyte with stable and low-resistance interfaces, which requires a coating layer to stabilize the interface during high-temperature sintering and electrochemical cycling. In order to guide the future development of interfacial coatings, we perform high-throughput thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles computation to investigate the stability of LLZO garnet and high-energy NMC cathodes with a wide range of materials chemistries. Here our study reveals the factors governing the materials stability with LLZO garnet and NMC cathodes, and identifies the mechanisms of good coating layers stable with LLZO and NMC. In addition to classifying known coating layers, our study provides detailed guiding charts and multiple new materials systems as promising coatings for stabilizing LLZO—NMC interfaces to enable high-energy-density garnet-based all-solid-state batteries. Our demonstrated computation scheme and high-throughput analyses are generally applicable to investigate and screen coating materials for stabilizing interfaces in energy-related applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗