NASA NTRSDate not supplied
When allocating redundant effectors to virtual control commands, linear (generalized inverse) allocators have historically been used on aircraft and spacecraft. While simple to implement, generalized inverses are unable to realize a significant portion of the attainable moments. To address this drawback, the control allocation problem can also be formulated as a linear programming or quadratic programming problem and solved using convex optimization based solvers. These approaches have been shown to access a larger set of attainable moments, however, little work has been done to understand the performance of convex optimization-based control allocation in the presence of parametric model uncertainty. This paper seeks to compare the performance of several control allocation approaches, including two forms of generalized inverse allocators, the pseudo inverse and minimum-variance, and the linear programming and quadratic programming approach in the presence of parametric model uncertainty. The performance of these four allocators were tested on an aircraft model in the presence of realistic parametric model uncertainty and the convex optimization approaches were shown to outperform the generalized inverses.