SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This presentation summarizes in-house testing performed at NASA’s Glenn Research Center on silicon anode cells for a new electric aircraft battery design funded by the Transformational Tools & Technologies (TTT) task of the Transformative Aeronautics Concept Program.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To release information to United States Navy, Naval Research Laboratory. Information to be released includes drawings of universal cell test fixtures developed at Idaho National Laboratory.
The li-ion pouch design cells exhibit similar behavior under off-nominal conditions as those in metal cans that do not have the internal safety devices. Safety should be well characterized before batteries are designed. Some of the li-ion pouch cell designs studied in this program reacted most violently to overcharge conditions at the medium rates but were tolerant to overcharge at very low rates. Some pouch cell designs have higher tolerance to vacuum exposures than some others. A comparison of the pouch material itself does not show a correlation between this tolerance and the number of layers or composition of the pouch indicating that this is a property of the electrode stack design inside the pouch. Reduced pressure (8 to 10 psi) test environments show that the extent of capacity degradation under reduced pressure environments is much less than that observed under vacuum conditions. Lithium-ion Pouch format cells are not necessarily true polymer cells.
Lithium-Sulfur batteries (LSB) have emerged as one of the strong contenders for high energy density rechargeable batteries in the Li-ion battery domain. The LSB system is considered as the most promising to achieve the next milestone in energy density of 500 Wh/kg. However, the LSB system is plagued with problems of polysulfide formation which are soluble in the organic electrolyte leading to loss in capacity and eventual cell failure. The problem is further compounded by dendrite formation on the Li anode during electrochemical cycling leading to puncturing of the separator causing eventual short-circuiting of the cell and consequent heat generation resulting in major safety hazards of flammability of the organic liquid electrolyte and impending explosion. This chapter describes various approaches developed to combat both cathode and anode issues. These involve synthesis and characterization of complex framework materials (CFMs) for confining the polysulfides and sulfur in the LSB cathodes. The CFMs include a CFM host and a coating applied to the CFM host, which includes one or more form of an electronic conductor, a lithium-ion conductor and a functional electrocatalyst for electrocatalytically converting the soluble polysulfides to Li 2 S. Further, sulfur is infiltrated into the CFM host creating a sulfur-carbon linkage serving as effective anchors for trapping the ensuing polysulfides. The systems have been tested in coin cells and pouch cells with metallic Li anodes under lean electrolyte conditions of 3-4 μl/mg of electrolyte (E) to sulfur (S) ratios showing promise and feasibility. New emergent dendrite-free alloys have also been identified to test against pure Li and CFM cathodes in coin cell and pouch cell configurations under lean electrolyte conditions. Results of these studies are described and discussed with thoughts on future directions.
Li metal anode is a promising candidate for next-generation energy storage systems and is widely explored in Li-ion and solid-state batteries. Despite its potential, Li metal anodes face instabilities during long-term cycling, especially when paired with NMC or sulfur-based cathodes, where Li is cycled at high capacities of 6-8 mAh/cm2, equivalent to a thickness of 30-40 µm. During such extensive utilization, degradation mechanisms such as excessive solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), dendrites, and dead Li emerge, and ultimately lead to sudden failure and reduced cycle life. The origin of the degradation mechanisms stem from surface heterogeneities introduced during Li foil manufacturing and storage [1, 2]. As cycling progresses, the local heterogeneities propagate, resulting in uneven Li utilization and degradation-prone regions across the electrode [3], which consequently induce performance variations at the cell level. This heterogeneity propagation is particularly pronounced in large-format pouch cells in practical applications, where the surface effects are magnified. Without a clear understanding of the multi-scale heterogeneities and the development of surface homogenization methods, the performance consistency will be compromised, hindering the commercialization of Li metal batteries. In this presentation, we investigate the evolution of surface heterogeneity propagation on commercially available Li foils. We discover that inhomogeneous Li utilization appears as early as the first half-cycle of formation, manifesting as localized clusters and pits. In pouch cell configurations, these features exhibit areal density variations across the electrode on a scale of millimeters. To improve Li utilization homogeneity, a scalable mechanical brushing method is introduced to remove the chemically heterogeneous surface passivation layer. Furtherore, the influence of utilization homogeneity on cell-to-cell consistency is evaluated using 32 Li-NMC811 pouch cells divided into as-received and brushed Li groups. On the brushed Li, clusters and pits are no longer observable, and the cells exhibit significantly improved consistency in discharge capacity trajectories and cycle lifetime. Overall, this study highlights the role of Li surface utilization homogeneity on long-term cycling performance. Our research provides a pathway for improving large-area electrode uniformity and establishing evaluation methods for cell-to-cell consistency, both are key steps toward the commercialization of Li metal batteries and beyond. [1] Otto, Svenja-K., et al. "In-depth characterization of lithium-metal surfaces with XPS and ToF-SIMS: toward better understanding of the passivation layer." Chemistry of Materials 33.3 (2021): 859-867. [2] Hatzell, Kelsey, et al. "Aligning lithium metal battery research and development across academia and industry." Joule (2024). [3] Kim, Sangwook, et al. "Calendar life of lithium metal batteries: Accelerated aging and failure analysis." Energy Storage Materials 65 (2024): 103147.
This project objective was to develop and demonstrate a lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery in a pouch-format cell capable of achieving an energy density ≥ 500 Wh/kg while achieving a 1,000 cycle life. The research focused on cell optimization and fabrication addressing different technical barriers and challenges including: 1) thin lithium anode optimization; 2) current collector and tab attachment design; 3) cathode porosity control; 4) electrolyte to sulfur ratio control; 5) cell design; and 6) cell fabrication. The project developed and demonstrated various technologies to address these technical barriers and challenges. The project demonstrated a thin lithium anode by vapor deposition, a collector design and validation of laser welding of tab attachment method, a cathode porosity control strategy by binder optimization, a calendaring process control and surface/interface treatment, and an electrolyte to sulfur ratio control with influence on cell energy density. The sulfur cathode was optimized by tuning the formulation, optimizing the calendaring process, and introducing a novel electrode fabrication process. To address the electrolyte performance issue, the electrolyte optimization was achieved with additive and formulation tuning and the introduction of a dual-phase electrolyte system. In addition to the demonstration of the optimized electrode with a novel fast-curing coating process and dual-phase electrolyte, a coating separator was further developed to address the polysulfide shuttling issue. The resulting new cell design with these optimized cell components was demonstrated in the 1 Ah pouch cell with medium sulfur loading and moderate porosity (~ 4.5 mAh cm-2, 65% porosity) and showed an energy density of > 400 Wh/kg (with E/S ratio of 2.8). The Li-SPAN cell configuration was also evaluated in combination with a new dual-phase electrolyte system. Initial coin cell performance demonstrated cycle stability of >300 cycles with an estimated energy density of 300 Wh/kg at the pouch format level. The corresponding 1 Ah pouch format SPAN cells with the new polymer electrolyte were developed which has shown a stable capacity at 800-900 mAh for ~40 cycles so far.
The criticality of cobalt (Co) has been motivating the quest for Co-free positive electrode materials for building lithium (Li)-ion batteries. However, the Co-free positive electrode materials usually suffer from relatively fast capacity decay when coupled with conventional LiPF 6 -organocarbonates electrolytes. To address this issue, a 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) based localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) was developed and evaluated in a Co-free Li-ion cell chemistry (Graphite||LiNi 0.96 Mg 0.02 Ti 0.02 O 2 ). Extraordinary capacity retentions were achieved with the LHCE in coin cells (95.3%), single layer pouch cells (79.4%) and high capacity loading double layer pouch cells (70.9 %) after being operated within the voltage range of 2.5-4.4 V for 500 charge/discharge cycles. The capacity retentions of counterpart cells using LiPF6 based conventional electrolyte only reached 61.1%, 57.2% and 59.8%, respectively. Mechanistic studies reveal that the superior electrode/electrolyte interphases formed by the LHCE and the intrinsic chemical stability of the LHCE account for the excellent electrochemical performance in the Co-free Li-ion cells.
Lithium-ion battery packs require thermal management to achieve optimum life and safety. This is becoming crucial for battery packs composed of high-energy-density cells. Pouch cells themselves achieve highest packaging efficiency but require additional structural support and thermal management when grouped into modules, especially under abusive conditions such as thermal runaway. Novel foam battery pads have demonstrated to cushion volume changes of pouch cells and are reengineered in this study to mitigate cell-to-cell thermal runaway propagation. The compressible pads are made of polyurethane foams incorporating flame-retardant additives or coatings, including intumescent and fire wall materials. Here their performances were evaluated by conducting nail penetration tests on modules composed of pouch cells at 100% state of charge (SOC), with the foams placed in between the cells. Experimental results show cascading thermal runaway was considerably delayed by polyurethane foams incorporating flame-retardant additives or coatings. Complete prevention of cascading failure was achieved with dense polyurethane foams with multilayered coatings of both fire wall and intumescent materials.
In this study, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are promising for automotive applications due to their high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh/kg). In addition, the natural abundance of sulfur could mitigate the global raw material supply chain challenge of commercial lithium-ion batteries that use critical elements, such as nickel and cobalt. However, due to persistent polysulfide shuttling and uncontrolled lithium dendrite growth, Li-S batteries using nonencapsulated sulfur cathodes and conventional ether-based electrolytes suffer from rapid cell degradation upon cycling. Despite significant improvements in recent decades, there is still a big gap between lab research and commercialization of the technology. To date, the reported cell energy densities and cycling life of practical Li-S pouch cells remain largely unsatisfactory. Traditional approaches to improving Li-S performance are primarily focused on confining polysulfides using electronically conductive hosts. However, these micro- and mesoporous hosts suffer from limited pore volume to accommodate high sulfur loading and the associated volume change during cycling. Moreover, they fail to balance adsorption-conversion of polysulfides during charge-discharge, leading to the formation of massive dead sulfur. Such hosts are themselves electrochemically inactive, which decreases the practical energy density. In contrast, a series of nontraditional approaches, paired with advances in multiscale mechanistic understanding, have recently demonstrated exciting performance outcomes not only in conventional coin cells but also in practical pouch cells. In this Account, we first introduce our novel cathode design strategies to overcome polysulfide shuttling and sluggish redox kinetics in thick S cathodes via selenium-sulfur chemistry and cathode host engineering. Next, we gain a mechanistic understanding of Li-S batteries in various types of electrolytes via a series of spectroscopic, nuclear magnetic resonance, and electrochemical methods. Meanwhile, a novel cathode solid electrolyte interphase encapsulation strategy via nonviscous highly fluorinated ether-based electrolyte is introduced. The established selection rule by investigating how solvating power retards the shuttle effect and induces robust cathode/solid-electrolyte interphase formation is also included. We then discuss how the synergistic interactions between rational cathode structures and electrolytes can be exploited to tailor the reaction pathways and kinetics of S cathodes under high mass loading and lean electrolyte conditions. In addition, a novel interlayer design to simultaneously overcome degradation processes (polysulfide shuttling and lithium dendrite formation) and accelerate redox reaction kinetics is presented. Finally, this Account concludes with an overview of the challenges and strategies to develop Li-S pouch cells with high practical energy density, long cycle life, and fast-charging capability.
Selection, testing and validation of electrolyte candidates for Li-ion cells are discussed, based on a 10-minute target for extreme fast charge (XFC). A combination of modeling and laboratory measurements create a timely and synergistic approach to identifying candidate electrolyte formulations. Multi-solvent systems provide a balanced set of properties, wherein lower molecular-weight solvents offer reduced viscosity, increased species diffusivity, and mitigation of concentration polarization at high charge rates. Carefully selected formulations can exhibit peak conductivity and usable conductivity range of two to three times that of the baseline EC-EMC (3:7, wt.) + LiPF 6 . Candidates are also chosen based on stability and longevity within the cell environment. Lab testing coincides with property predictions from the Advanced Electrolyte Model (AEM) and a macro-scale cell model. Furthermore, cell testing utilized coin and pouch cells having NMC532 or NMC811 cathodes with graphite electrodes. Results indicate combinations of low-molecular weight solvents are key for fast-charge electrolytes as they extend the useful conductivity range to both low and higher salt concentrations, and possess higher self-diffusivities compared to conventional solvents. This reduces impacts from concentration polarization. The choice of electrolyte also influences the tendency for lithium metal deposition at the anode, as showcased by experimental and modeling results herein.
High-energy Ni-rich NMC (LiNi x Mn y Co 1-x-y O 2 , x ≥ 0.6) is a very promising cathode material in Li-ion batteries but the gas generation during cycling is a significant safety concern and becomes the major roadblock of the large-scale commercialization of Ni-rich NMC cathode materials. Micron-sized single crystal Ni-rich NMC has a potential to address the common issues that polycrystals have. However, it is unknown if gassing issue will be mitigated or even eliminated by using single crystals, not mentioning a quantifiable understanding of gas generation from single crystals and polycrystals. This work takes LiNi 0.76 Mn 0.14 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC76) as a model material to study the mechanism of gas generation from single crystal and polycrystalline NMC by using both coin cells and pouch cells, which provides different conclusions on the generated gases, highlighting the importance of using relevant testing conditions for fundamental diagnostic study on battery materials. Further, the information from single crystal NMC also provides critical insights from material perspective to enhance the safety attributes of Ni-rich NMC cathodes.
The rapidly growing technological demand for lithium-ion batteries has prompted the development of novel cathode materials with high energy density, low cost, and improved safety. High voltage spinel, LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO), is one of the most promising candidates yet to be commercialized. The two primary obstacles for this material are the inferior electronic conductivity and fast capacity degradation in full cells due to the high operating voltage. By systematically addressing these limitations, we successfully develop a thick LNMO electrode with areal capacity loadings up to 3 mAh·cm –2 . The optimized thick electrode is paired with a commercial graphite anode at both the coin cell and pouch cell level, achieving a full cell capacity retention as high as 72% and 78%, respectively, after 300 cycles. We attribute this superior cycling stability to careful optimizations of cell components and testing conditions, with a specific focus improving electronic conductivity and high voltage compatibility. These results suggest precise control of materials quality, electrode architecture and electrolyte optimization can soon support the development of a cobalt-free battery system based on a thick LNMO cathode (>4 mAh·cm 2 ), which will eventually meet the needs of next-generation Li-ion batteries with reduced cost, improved safety, and assured sustainability.
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are attractive candidates for post-lithium-ion battery technologies because of their ultrahigh theoretical energy density and low cost of active cathode materials. However, the commercialization of LSBs remains extremely challenging primarily due to poor cycling performance and safety concerns, which are inherently caused by low conductivity of S 8 and Li 2 S, severe polysulfide shuttling, and high polarization by solid Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S deposition. Catalytic materials could facilitate the large-scale practical application of LSBs by overcoming all these challenges. In this review, we investigate the sulfur species evolution in LSBs and explore the roles of catalytic materials in charge/discharge processes, highlighting the catalysis of solid S 8 to liquid polysulfides and solid Li 2 S 2 to Li 2 S. Furthermore, we offer systematic strategies from atomic to macro levels, including defect engineering, morphology engineering and catalyst compositing, to enhance catalysis efficiency in terms of sulfur supercooling, fast charge transfer, thiosulfate generation, disulfide bond cleavage, tuneable Li 2 S growth and Li 2 S decomposition enhancement. Finally, the design and availability of the proposed catalytic materials will further advance LSB technology from coin cells and pouch cells to the subsequent commercialization scale.
To sustain the high-rate current required for fast charging electric vehicle batteries, electrodes must exhibit sufficiently high effective ionic diffusion. Additionally, to reduce battery manufacturing costs, wetting time must decrease. Both of these issues can be addressed by structuring the electrodes with mesoscale pore channels. However, their optimal spatial distribution, or patterns, is unknown. Herein, a genetic algorithm has been developed to identify these optimal patterns using a CPU-cheap proxy distance-based model to evaluate the impact of the added pore networks. Both coin-cell and pouch cell form factors have been considered for the wetting analysis, with their respective electrolyte infiltration mode. Regular hexagonal and mud-crack-like patterns, respectively, for fast charging and fast wetting were found to be optimal and have been compared with pre-determined, easier to manufacture, patterns. The model predicts that using cylindrical channels arranged in a regular hexagonal pattern is ∼6.25 times more efficient for fast charging as compared to grooved lines with both structuring strategies being restricted to a 5% electrode total volume loss. The model also shows that only a very limited electrode volume loss (1%–2%) is required to dramatically improve the wetting (5–20 times) compared to an unstructured electrode.
This report discuss aging mechanisms and cycling performance of Li batteries, and considers the influence of both the passive and active materials. To achieve this aim we developed in situ coin cell and pouch cell NMR probes as well as HR-MAS NMR protocols to study cells with as a little modification as possible.
All-solid-state lithium batteries are widely reputed as the next major step in energy storage technology on account their drastically improved safety over wet cells, as solid electrolytes lack the volatile compounds in wet electrolytes that make them combustible. This enhanced safety enables a far wider range of products and vehicles to go fully electric and aligns with future NASA missions that require high performing, reliable, and safe batteries. However, they currently face issues with implementation in consumer products due to the often-poor mechanical properties of the solid electrolyte and relative difficulty to manufacture. Typical solid-state electrolyte challenges were bypassed by incorporating a range of polymeric binders into a solid electrolyte suspension and cast onto a composite carbon-sulfide cathode to create a single bilayer film. The resulting films display superior flexibility and durability compared to solid-electrolyte films typically discussed in literature without compromising the thinness of the films. The bilayer film was then punched into 12.7 cm diameter discs and 4 cm by 5 cm sheets, pressed, and assembled into coin cells and pouch cells respectively.