Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “sectionalizing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Meteorite Sample Section Repair at NASA Johnson Space Center

Introduction: Meteorite thin and thick sections are routinely shipped from NASA Johnson Space Center to fulfill sample allocation requests from principle investigators around the world. Sections are also re-turned to JSC when researchers are finished studying them since, in most cases, they can be reused for other studies. The sections are very fragile unfortunately, and sometimes return to us needing repairs. The fol-lowing should give you an idea of how we repair sections here in the very lab where they were created. NOTE: Please do not attempt to repair ANSMET meteorite sections that are in your possession. We will perform the repairs for you at NASA JSC if you send the section back to us. Section Delamination: The majority of the meteorite sections that we produce here are secured to the glass slide using a high quality, two-part epoxy. Occasionally, we are asked to use superglue if the researcher wishes to dismount the section from the slide. Both epoxy and superglue are excellent adhesives, but they both tend to embrittle with time which results in delamination from the slide. Exposure to vacuum can also degrade the adhesion between the sample section and the glass slide. Repeated handling of the slide edges can accelerate delamination and, as a preventive measure, the outer 1-2 mm of epoxy is trimmed from newly created sections at JSC. If conductive tapes (copper, carbon, etc.) are used on the section during analysis, great care must be taken in removing the tape so that the epoxy is not pulled up with it. If in doubt, the tape can be left on the section when it is returned to JSC. Before we perform any repairs to sample sections, carbon, gold, or other coatings are removed. We accomplish this using a slurry of 0.05 micron alumina and 190 proof ethyl alcohol applied to a felt polishing pad fitted to a rotating lap wheel. Coatings are re-moved in this manner from all sections that are re-turned to JSC. The extent of the delamination determines how we proceed with the section repair. If the meteorite sample area of the section is not disturbed, then we carefully remove the delaminated epoxy. This is done using a binocular microscope with a 6X zoom, cut-proof gloves, and a very sharp, single edged razor blade. We cut the delaminated epoxy with the blade angled away from the sample area and using very light pressure. The trimmed section is then cleaned in an ultrasonic bath of 200 proof ethyl alcohol for no more than 10 seconds and carefully dried using a lint-free clean room wipe. The section is then placed into a lab oven at 110o F in preparation for epoxy. We mix the resin and hardener components of the low viscosity epoxy and very small amounts are applied to the cut edges of the section using a needle probe and the binocular microscope. Warming the epoxy helps secure the existing section by filling any voids between the glass slide and the section. After the new epoxy cures, we give the section a light polish on a lap wheel fitted with cotton polishing paper that is charged with 1 micron diamond paste. If the section has delaminated to the point of sample area being lifted from the glass, then it may be irreparable. We employ the above technique along with clamping the section in a Teflon pad arrangement in order to flatten the sample while the epoxy cures. Otherwise, the sample will tend to curl. This works to some degree, but once the sample area curls, it seldom re-turns to the original flatness without cracking or bending. Canada Balsam and Crystalbond: We repair damaged sections that had originally been prepared using Canada Balsam or Crystalbond adhesives through the gradual application of heat. We take great care with these samples since these bonding materials tend to get brittle with age. The section is heated in gradual steps (40-50o F per hour) to the melting point of the adhesive. We repair the sample while the adhesive is fluid and then the section is cooled in the same gradual manner in which it was heated. Slide Cracks and Breaks: Accidents happen. Especially with something as small and fragile as a thin/thick section. We all know someone who has driven a microscope objective into a section. As bad as the damage may look, the section can be repaired in most instances. NOTE: Please do not try to tape or glue section pieces back together prior to returning the dam-aged section. This practice usually renders the section irreparable. If the glass slide is cracked but the section is still in one piece, we repair it by infilling the crack with the low viscosity epoxy mentioned earlier. If the slide is in pieces, we can reassemble it with epoxy on a new backer slide. This is a tricky task as the pieces need to be in the correct plane with respect to each other, especially if the sample area is split among several pieces.

Meteorite↗
NASA NTRS2018

A Summary of Results from Two Full-Scale Fokker F28 Fuselage Section Drop Tests

During 2017, two vertical drop tests were conducted on two partial sections removed from a Fokker F28 MK4000 aircraft as a part of a joint NASA / Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) effort to investigate the crashworthiness characteristics of Transport Category Aircraft, as defined by 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25. The first test was a pure vertical drop test of a relatively uniform forward section, which included an underfloor area for luggage. The second test was a canted drop test onto a sloped surface of a portion of the fuselage representing the wingbox stiffened structure. In both tests, accelerometers were installed on the floor, seat track, luggage, and overhead bin to measure responses in the two airframe sections. In addition, ten Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, a.k.a. crash test dummies) were included in each test to measure the potential of onboard occupant injury. Self-contained data recorders, logging accelerations and rotational rates, were also used on the seat tracks and lower structure for evaluation as potential crash recording devices in future tests. Finally, the starboard side of each section was painted with a stochastic black and white speckle pattern for use in full field photogrammetric imaging techniques. The results collected show notable differences in the Forward and Wingbox Section responses. The Forward Section floor accelerations showed a relatively uniform response of approximately 7 g throughout the impact event. This section exhibited large amounts of subfloor crushing, floor stiffener failures and seat deformation upon impact. These results are contrasted by the Wingbox Section accelerations, which showed large differences when comparing accelerations recorded from either the rear or the front portion of the section reaching peaks of 39 g in some locations. Additionally, the Wingbox Section test induced a forward motion caused from the rotation at impact. With the exception of the lower cavity, there was minimal deformation in the Wingbox Section, and ATD responses were consistently higher than those for the Forward Section. A complete set of results are presented for the airframe, seat, ATD, overhead bin, and subfloor regions for each section. The ATD results are compared to current injury criteria, and determinations will be made on the likelihood of injury. Additional results for cargo-hold stored luggage are presented in an attempt to provide a component-level characterization for better understanding of under-floor loading. Finally, a discussion of the relevance of the results for a proposed airframe level crashworthiness guideline are presented.

Littell, Justin D.↗
NASA NTRS1946

Theoretical and Experimental Data for a Number of NACA 6A-Series Airfoil Sections

The NACA 6A-series airfoil sections were designed to eliminate the trailing-edge cusp which is characteristic of the NACA 6-series sections. Theoretical data are presented for NACA 6A-series basic thickness forms having the position of minimum pressure at 30-, 40-, and 50-percent chord and with thickness ratios varying from 6 percent to 15 percent. Also presented are data for a mean line designed to maintain straight sides on the cambered sections. The experimental results of a two dimensional wind tunnel investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of five NACA 64A-series airfoil sections and two NACA 63A-series airfoil sections are presented. An analysis of these results, which were obtained at Reynolds numbers of 3 x 10(exp 6), 6 x 10(exp 6), and 9 x 10(exp 6), indicates that the section minimum drag and maximum lift characteristics of comparable NACA 6-series and 6A-series airfoil sections are essentially the same. The quarter-chord pitching-moment coefficients and angles of zero lift of NACA 6A-series airfoil sections are slightly more negative than those of corresponding NACA 6-series airfoil sections. The position of the aerodynamic center and the lift-curve slope of smooth NACA 6-series sections. The addition of standard leading-edge roughness causes the lift-curve slope of the newer sections to decrease with increasing airfoil thickness ratio.

Loftin, Laurence K., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2014

A Novel Hybrid Ultramicrotomy/FIB-SEM Technique: Preparation of Serial Electron-Transparent Thin Sections of a Hayabusa Grain

The Japanese space agency's (JAXA) Hayabusa mission returned the first particulate samples (typically <100micron) from the surface of an asteroid (25143 Itokawa). These precious samples provide important insights into early Solar System processes, but their sizes pose tremendous challenges to coordinated analysis using a variety of nano- and micro-beam techniques. The ability to glean maximal information from individual particles has become increasingly important and depends critically on sample preparation. We developed a hybrid technique combining traditional ultramicrotomy with focused ion beam (FIB) techniques, allowing for more thorough in situ investigations of grain surfaces and interiors. Using this method, we increase the number of FIB-prepared sections that can be recovered from a particle with dimensions on the order of tens of microns. These sections can be subsequently analyzed using a variety of analytical techniques. Particle RA-QD02-0211 is a approx. 40×40×20 micron particle from Itokawa containing olivine and Fe sulfides. It was embedded in low viscosity epoxy and partly sectioned to a depth of approx 10 micron; sections are placed on Cu grids with thin amorphous films for transmission electron microscope (TEM) analyses. With the sample surface partly exposed, the epoxy bullet is trimmed to a height of approx. 5mm to accommodate the allowable dimensions for FIB work (FEI Quanta 600 3D dual beam FIB-SEM). Using a diamond trim knife, the epoxy surrounding the grain is removed on 3 sides (to within a few microns of the grain); the depth of material removed extends well below the bottom of the particle. The sample is attached to an SEM pin mount, the epoxy coated with conductive paint, and the entire assembly coated with approx. 40nm of carbon to eliminate sample charging during FIB work. A protective carbon cap is placed according to the plan for the 15 FIB sections. The central 'spine' of the cap runs perpendicular to the front of the sample, and the 'ribs' protruding from either side run parallel. Each rib indicates the location of a planned FIB section, and the spine contains the final two planned sections. We use a cap with a 4 micron-wide spine and 2micron-wide ribs that have ≳3.5 micron of space between them (narrower cuts result in too much re-deposition of material inside the trenches). Using a 30kV, 3nA ion-beam we expose the front surface of the grain and commence milling trenches between sections. Rather than using the typical C-cut to prepare the sample for lift-out, an L-cut is used instead, leaving the sample connected by an interior tab. tab. Sections are lifted out, attached to TEM grids and thinned to electron transparency. TEM analyses show that our hybrid technique preserves both interior and edge features, including surface modifications from exposure to the space environment, such as damaged rims that form in response to solar wind implantation effects and adhering grains. In addition, the FIB sections provide larger areas that are free of fractures and chatter effects in comparison to the microtome thin sections, thus enabling more accurate measurements of solar flare particle track densities that are used to determine the surface exposure age of the particles.

Berger, Eve L.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Finite Element Simulations of Two Vertical Drop Tests of F-28 Fuselage Sections

In March 2017, a vertical drop test of a forward fuselage section of a Fokker F-28 MK4000 aircraft was conducted as part of a joint NASA/FAA project to investigate the performance of transport aircraft under realistic crash conditions. In June 2017, a vertical drop test was conducted of a wing-box fuselage section of the same aircraft. Both sections were configured with two rows of aircraft seats, in a triple-double configuration. A total of ten Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) were secured in seats using standard lap belt restraints. The forward fuselage section was also configured with luggage in the cargo hold. Both sections were outfitted with two hat racks, each with added ballast mass. The drop tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research facility located at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. The measured impact velocity for the forward fuselage section was 346.8-in/s onto soil. The wing-box section was dropped with a downward facing pitch angle onto a sloping soil surface in order to create an induced forward acceleration in the airframe. The vertical impact velocity of the wing-box section was 349.2-in/s. A second objective of this project was to assess the capabilities of finite element simulations to predict the test responses. Finite element models of both fuselage sections were developed for execution in LS-DYNA(Registered Trademark), a commercial explicit nonlinear transient dynamic code. The models contained accurate representations of the airframe structure, the hat racks and hat rack masses, the floor and seat tracks, the luggage in the cargo hold for the forward section, and the detailed under-floor structure in the wing-box section. Initially, concentrated masses were used to represent the inertial properties of the seats, restraints, and ATD occupants. However, later simulations were performed that included finite element representations of the seats, restraints, and ATD occupants. These models were developed to more accurately replicate the seat loading of the floor and to enable prediction of occupant impact responses. Models were executed to generate analytical predictions of airframe responses, which were compared with test data to validate the model. Comparisons of predicted and experimental structural deformation and failures were made. Finally, predicted and experimental soil deformation and crater depths were also compared for both drop test configurations.

Jackson, Karen E.↗