NASA NTRS1999
Work was conducted over a ten-year period to address the central issue of damage in primary load-bearing aircraft composite structure, specifically fuselage structure. This included the three facets of damage resistance, damage tolerance, and damage arrest. Experimental, analytical, and numerical work was conducted in order to identify and better understand the mechanisms that control the structural behavior of fuselage structures in their response to the three aspects of damage. Furthermore, work was done to develop straightforward design methodologies that can be employed by structural designers in preliminary design stages to make intelligent choices concerning the material, layup, and structural configurations so that a more efficient structure with structural integrity can be designed and built. Considerable progress was made towards achieving these goals via this work. In regard to damage tolerance considerations, the following were identified as important effects: composite layup and associated orthotropy/structural anisotropy, specifics of initial local damage mechanisms, role of longitudinal versus hoop stress, and large deformation and associated geometric nonlinearity. Means were established to account for effects of radius and for the nonlinear response. In particular, nondimensional parameters were identified to characterize the importance of nonlinearity in the response of pressurized cylinders. This led to the establishment of a iso-nonlinear-error plot for reference in structural design. Finally, in the case of damage tolerance, the general approach of the original methodology to predict the failure pressure involving extending basic plate failure data by accounting for the local stress intensification was accomplished for the general case by accounting for the mechanisms noted by utilizing the capability of the STAGS finite element code and numerically calculating the local stress intensification for the particular configuration to be considered. For the issue of damage arrest, placement of and configuration of stiffeners (including stiffener curvature), and magnitude and orientation of principal strains due to local bending were found to be key considerations. Means were established to account for stiffener effectiveness quantitatively based on radius, slit size, stiffener curvature' and relative bending stifffiesses involved. Geometric nonlinearity was also found to play an - 24 - important role here. Furthermore, it was determined that damage propagation is controlled by different mechanisms (hoop stress versus flapping stress and the associated factors involved in each) depending upon the direction of damage propagation. This latter item results in an inability to scale these phenomena in one test due to the different factors involved. Finally, the importance of shell curvature and associated instability in response to transverse loading including impact were found to be important considerations in damage resistance. A technique, involving asymmetric meshing of a finite element mesh, was developed to predict this behavior and showed excellent correlation with experimental results. Further details of these ten years of work are presented herein with references made to the fourteen documents produced during this work where full details can be found. Implications of this work are discussed and recommendations made. Although it is clear that there is more work to be done to fully understand composite fuselage technology and specifically the overall issue of damage in primary load-bearing composite structures, important understanding and capability has been extended via this work.