Coupling Mechanistically the Convective Motions and Cloud Macrophysics in a Climate Model (Final Technical Report for CM4 Project)
Global climate models fail to adequately represent shallow cumulus conditions. The activities at the University of Texas at Austin focus on deploying advanced statistical approaches to identify linkages between numerical models and observations using the E3SM-Single Column Model (SCM) and different ARM campaigns focused on shallow cumulus conditions at SGP. The current version of the SCM uses CLUBB to represent shallow cumulus. The parameterization represents a significant evolution from older generation parameterizations insofar as it contains a number of prognostic equations that keep track of the turbulent nature of the environment that are carried forward in time. The parameters associated with this scheme address the rate at which different prognostic quantities that determine vertical turbulent fluxes of heat and moisture decay with time. The large number of parameters gives the CLUBB scheme a lot of flexibility. The expectation of its developers is that it should represent any shallowly convective environment. The concern among developers and other theorists was not whether it could represent any one environment, but whether a single judicious choice of parameters would allow it to predict the turbulent characteristics of a range of environments. Through several exhaustive studies that made use of Bayesian statistical calibration, tens of thousands of SCM experiments, and ensembles of observations of shallow cumulus at SGP that were also modeled using Large Eddy Simulations (LES), we have only achieved partial success in using CLUBB within SCM to capture important aspects of what has been observed and modeled with LES at SGP. Even as we worked to improve observational tests and make a more scientifically focused attempt at modifying subsets of CLUBB parameters, model performance continues to be lacking in some important respects. In one calibration, we were able to achieve a near perfect match to observed properties of liquid water path, cloud radiative effects, and cloud fraction but with clouds that were trapped within a shallow layer and without the highly turbulent fluxes and vertical extent observed with ARM data and modeled with LES (Figure 1). The conclusion we are reaching is that shallow cumulus conditions are much more challenging to represent than was previously thought. This result is also prompting us to consider some aspects of the experiment design that may be limiting the performance of SCM in this case. The work has garnered the attention of Vincent Larson (CLUBB developer at Univ. Wisconsin – Milwaukee) and model developers Steven Klein and Yunyan Zhang (LLNL) with whom this work and will continue.